Engagement With Stop Smoking Services After Referral or Signposting: A Mixed Methods Study.

INTRODUCTION: Screening for smoking when people interact with healthcare services and referral of those who smoke to stop smoking services (SSSs) is a key component of efforts to tackle tobacco use. However, little is known about what happens after someone is referred or signposted to SSSs. METHODS: As part of the Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department (NCT04854616), those randomised to intervention (n= 505) were referred to local SSSs (along with receiving brief advice and an e-cigarette starter kit) and those randomised to control (n= 502) were given contact details for the same services (signposted). SSS engagement data was collected: 1) directly from participants and 2) from SSS, additional qualitative data came from 33 participant interviews. RESULTS: Engagement with SSSs was very low. 3.2% (n=16) of those in the intervention group and 2.4% (n=12) in the control group reported attending a one-to-one support session. From SSS data, engagement was also low with 8.9% (n=43) of those referred engaging and 3.1% (n=15) going on to quit with SSS support. The majority of the 24 intervention participants interviewed did not recall being contacted by an SSS. CONCLUSION: Referral or signposting to stop smoking services within an Emergency Department based trial resulted in very low levels of engagement. Barriers to engagement identified included participants not being contacted by SSSs and the support offered not meeting their needs. IMPLICATIONS: Referral or signposting of those who smoke to Stop smoking services from the Emergency Department resulted in low rates of engagement in this large multi-centre randomised controlled trial. In order to better support those who smoke it may be more effective for smoking cessation advice to be offered 'in the moment' within clinical settings, and follow-up to be proactively offered rather than relying on people being motivated to contact the services themselves or engaging when contacted.

Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department (COSTED): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Supporting people to quit smoking is one of the most powerful interventions to improve health. The Emergency Department (ED) represents a potentially valuable opportunity to deliver a smoking cessation intervention if it is sufficiently resourced. The objective of this trial was to determine whether an opportunistic ED-based smoking cessation intervention can help people to quit smoking. METHODS: In this multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled superiority trial conducted between January and August 2022, adults who smoked daily and attended one of six UK EDs were randomised to intervention (brief advice, e-cigarette starter kit and referral to stop smoking services) or control (written information on stop smoking services). The primary outcome was biochemically validated abstinence at 6 months. RESULTS: An intention-to-treat analysis included 972 of 1443 people screened for inclusion (484 in the intervention group, 488 in the control group). Of 975 participants randomised, 3 were subsequently excluded, 17 withdrew and 287 were lost to follow-up. The 6-month biochemically-verified abstinence rate was 7.2% in the intervention group and 4.1% in the control group (relative risk 1.76; 95% CI 1.03 to 3.01; p=0.038). Self-reported 7-day abstinence at 6 months was 23.3% in the intervention group and 12.9% in the control group (relative risk 1.80; 95% CI 1.36 to 2.38; p<0.001). No serious adverse events related to taking part in the trial were reported. CONCLUSIONS: An opportunistic smoking cessation intervention comprising brief advice, an e-cigarette starter kit and referral to stop smoking services is effective for sustained smoking abstinence with few reported adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04854616.

A comparative study of key quality performance indicators in anesthesia and surgery in operation theatre at a tertiary care hospital in Rishikesh.

Background and Aims: A Key Performance Indicator (KPI) is a critical metric measuring organizational success or specific activities, reflecting the periodic achievement of operational goals aligned with strategic objectives. Material and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of key quality performance indicators, (CQI-NABH) concerning anesthesia and surgical services was conducted at a tertiary care hospital after taking institutional ethical clearance (AIIMS/IEC/21/150). It was as per COP 13, COP 14, and COP 15 standards of NABH 4th edition published in 2015. The study was conducted at the department of anesthesiology at a tertiary care hospital, and data were retrospectively analyzed from 01 October 2019, till November 2020. All patients undergoing elective or emergency surgical procedures under monitored anesthesia care and regional or general anesthesia during the study period were considered.The primary objective was to analyze Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) in perioperative services, with secondary goals including gap identification, suggesting corrective actions, and examining quality indicators during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Results: Out of 8574 patients operated during the study, 6705 were in the four months before the pandemic, and 1869 were operated during the COVID-19 scenario. In the pre-COVID era, many of the cases were performed on an elective basis (71.23%), and emergencies constituted 16.9% of the total number of cases. In the COVID era, most of the cases were emergencies (45.4%) and semi-emergencies (40.25%), and elective cases were only 14.05% of the total cases performed. The percentage of modification of anaesthesia plans ranged from 0-3.34%. Adverse anaesthesia events were observed in 0-2.1%, primarily related to cardiovascular, respiratory, and airway issues. No anaesthesia-related mortality was reported. Prophylactic antibiotic administration within one hour of surgery ranged from 88-100%. Conclusions: Monitoring and evaluating healthcare performance, specifically through KPIs, is vital for optimizing care and resource utilization. These indicators provide an overview of hospital service efficiency, aiding in key areas such as patient treatment, satisfaction, healthcare quality improvement, cost reduction, and optimal resource utilization. Addressing identified issues ensures effective and sustainable quality improvement in anaesthesia services, emphasizing ongoing monitoring as a foundation for hospital quality assurance.

Evaluation of risk factors for postoperative neurologic intensive care admission after brain tumor craniotomy: A single-center longitudinal study.

Background and Aims: Perioperative variable parameters can be significant risk factors for postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission after elective craniotomy for intracranial neoplasm, as assessed by various scoring systems such as Cranio Score. This observational study evaluates the relationship between these factors and early postoperative neurological complications necessitating ICU admission. Material and Methods: In total, 119 patients, aged 18 years and above, of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades I-III, scheduled for elective craniotomy and tumor excision were included. The primary objective was to evaluate the relationship between perioperative risk factors and the incidence of early postoperative complications as a means of validation of the Cranio Score. The secondary outcomes studied were 30-day postoperative morbidity/mortality and the association with patient-related risk factors. Results: Forty-five of 119 patients (37.82%) required postoperative ICU care with the mean duration of ICU stay being 1.92 ± 4.91 days. Tumor location (frontal/infratemporal region), preoperative deglutition disorder, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than 15, motor deficit, cerebellar deficit, midline shift >3 mm, mass effect, tumor size, use of blood products, lateral position, inotropic support, elevated systolic/mean arterial pressures, and duration of anesthesia/surgery were associated with a higher incidence of ICU care. Maximum (P = 0.035, AOR = 1.130) and minimum systolic arterial pressures (P = 0.022, Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 0.861) were the only independent risk factors. Cranio Score was found to be an accurate predictor of complications at a cut-off point of >10.52%. The preoperative motor deficit was the only independent risk factor associated with 30-day morbidity (AOR = 4.66). Conclusion: Perioperative hemodynamic effects are an independent predictor of postoperative ICU requirement. Further Cranio Score is shown to be a good scoring system for postoperative complications.

A computational model of current control mechanism for long-term potentiation (LTP) in human episodic memory based on gene-gene interaction.

The establishment of long-term potentiation (LTP) is a prime process for the formation of episodic memory. During the establishment of LTP, activations of various components are required in the signaling cascade of the LTP pathway. Past efforts to determine the activation of components relied extensively on the cellular or molecular level. In this paper, we have proposed a computational model based on gene-level cascading and interaction in LTP signaling for the establishment and control of current signals for achieving the desired level of activation in the formation of episodic memory. This paper also introduces a model for a generalized signaling pathway in episodic memory. A back-propagation feedback mechanism is used for updating the interaction levels in the signaling cascade starting from the last stage and ending at the start stage of the signaling cascade. Simulation of the proposed model has been performed for the LTP signaling pathway in the context of human episodic memory. We found through simulation that the qualifying genes correction factors of all stages are updated to their maximum limit. The article explains the signaling pathway for episodic memory and proves its effectiveness through simulation results.

Pharmacological and electronic cigarette interventions for smoking cessation in adults: component network meta-analyses.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking is the leading preventable cause of death and disease worldwide. Stopping smoking can reduce this harm and many people would like to stop. There are a number of medicines licenced to help people quit globally, and e-cigarettes are used for this purpose in many countries. Typically treatments work by reducing cravings to smoke, thus aiding initial abstinence and preventing relapse. More information on comparative effects of these treatments is needed to inform treatment decisions and policies. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the comparative benefits, harms and tolerability of different smoking cessation pharmacotherapies and e-cigarettes, when used to help people stop smoking tobacco. SEARCH METHODS: We identified studies from recent updates of Cochrane Reviews investigating our interventions of interest. We updated the searches for each review using the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group (TAG) specialised register to 29 April 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-RCTs and factorial RCTs, which measured smoking cessation at six months or longer, recruited adults who smoked combustible cigarettes at enrolment (excluding pregnant people) and randomised them to approved pharmacotherapies and technologies used for smoking cessation worldwide (varenicline, cytisine, nortriptyline, bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and e-cigarettes) versus no pharmacological intervention, placebo (control) or another approved pharmacotherapy. Studies providing co-interventions (e.g. behavioural support) were eligible if the co-intervention was provided equally to study arms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We followed standard Cochrane methods for screening, data extraction and risk of bias (RoB) assessment (using the RoB 1 tool). Primary outcome measures were smoking cessation at six months or longer, and the number of people reporting serious adverse events (SAEs). We also measured withdrawals due to treatment. We used Bayesian component network meta-analyses (cNMA) to examine intervention type, delivery mode, dose, duration, timing in relation to quit day and tapering of nicotine dose, using odds ratios (OR) and 95% credibility intervals (CrIs). We calculated an effect estimate for combination NRT using an additive model. We evaluated the influence of population and study characteristics, provision of behavioural support and control arm rates using meta-regression. We evaluated certainty using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: Of our 332 eligible RCTs, 319 (835 study arms, 157,179 participants) provided sufficient data to be included in our cNMA. Of these, we judged 51 to be at low risk of bias overall, 104 at high risk and 164 at unclear risk, and 118 reported pharmaceutical or e-cigarette/tobacco industry funding. Removing studies at high risk of bias did not change our interpretation of the results. Benefits We found high-certainty evidence that nicotine e-cigarettes (OR 2.37, 95% CrI 1.73 to 3.24; 16 RCTs, 3828 participants), varenicline (OR 2.33, 95% CrI 2.02 to 2.68; 67 RCTs, 16,430 participants) and cytisine (OR 2.21, 95% CrI 1.66 to 2.97; 7 RCTs, 3848 participants) were associated with higher quit rates than control. In absolute terms, this might lead to an additional eight (95% CrI 4 to 13), eight (95% CrI 6 to 10) and seven additional quitters per 100 (95% CrI 4 to 12), respectively. These interventions appeared to be more effective than the other interventions apart from combination NRT (patch and a fast-acting form of NRT), which had a lower point estimate (calculated additive effect) but overlapping 95% CrIs (OR 1.93, 95% CrI 1.61 to 2.34). There was also high-certainty evidence that nicotine patch alone (OR 1.37, 95% CrI 1.20 to 1.56; 105 RCTs, 37,319 participants), fast-acting NRT alone (OR 1.41, 95% CrI 1.29 to 1.55; 120 RCTs, 31,756 participants) and bupropion (OR 1.43, 95% CrI 1.26 to 1.62; 71 RCTs, 14,759 participants) were more effective than control, resulting in two (95% CrI 1 to 3), three (95% CrI 2 to 3) and three (95% CrI 2 to 4) additional quitters per 100 respectively. Nortriptyline is probably associated with higher quit rates than control (OR 1.35, 95% CrI 1.02 to 1.81; 10 RCTs, 1290 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), resulting in two (CrI 0 to 5) additional quitters per 100. Non-nicotine/placebo e-cigarettes (OR 1.16, 95% CrI 0.74 to 1.80; 8 RCTs, 1094 participants; low-certainty evidence), equating to one additional quitter (95% CrI -2 to 5), had point estimates favouring the intervention over control, but CrIs encompassed the potential for no difference and harm. There was low-certainty evidence that tapering the dose of NRT prior to stopping treatment may improve effectiveness; however, 95% CrIs also incorporated the null (OR 1.14, 95% CrI 1.00 to 1.29; 111 RCTs, 33,156 participants). This might lead to an additional one quitter per 100 (95% CrI 0 to 2). Harms There were insufficient data to include nortriptyline and non-nicotine EC in the final SAE model. Overall rates of SAEs for the remaining treatments were low (average 3%). Low-certainty evidence did not show a clear difference in the number of people reporting SAEs for nicotine e-cigarettes, varenicline, cytisine or NRT when compared to no pharmacotherapy/e-cigarettes or placebo. Bupropion may slightly increase rates of SAEs, although the CrI also incorporated no difference (moderate certainty). In absolute terms bupropion may cause one more person in 100 to experience an SAE (95% CrI 0 to 2). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The most effective interventions were nicotine e-cigarettes, varenicline and cytisine (all high certainty), as well as combination NRT (additive effect, certainty not rated). There was also high-certainty evidence for the effectiveness of nicotine patch, fast-acting NRT and bupropion. Less certain evidence of benefit was present for nortriptyline (moderate certainty), non-nicotine e-cigarettes and tapering of nicotine dose (both low certainty). There was moderate-certainty evidence that bupropion may slightly increase the frequency of SAEs, although there was also the possibility of no increased risk. There was no clear evidence that any other tested interventions increased SAEs. Overall, SAE data were sparse with very low numbers of SAEs, and so further evidence may change our interpretation and certainty. Future studies should report SAEs to strengthen certainty in this outcome. More head-to-head comparisons of the most effective interventions are needed, as are tests of combinations of these. Future work should unify data from behavioural and pharmacological interventions to inform approaches to combined support for smoking cessation.

Changes in lung cancer staging and emergency presentations during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aim: This study retrospectively analyses the impact of the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic on route of presentation and staging in lung cancer compared to the 2 years before and after implementation of the Leicester Optimal Lung Cancer Pathway (LOLCP) in Leicester, United Kingdom. Method: Electronic databases and hospital records were used to identify all patients diagnosed with lung cancer in 2018 (pre-LOLCP), 2019 (post-LOLCP), and March 2020-2021 (post-COVID-19 lockdown). Information regarding patient characteristics, performance status, stage, and route of diagnosis was documented and analysed. Emergency presentation was defined as diagnosis of new lung cancer being made after unscheduled attendance to urgent or emergency care facility. Results: Following implementation of the LOLCP pathway, there was a significant decrease in emergency presentations from 26.8 to 19.6% (p = 0.002) with a stage shift from 33.9% early stage disease to 40.3%. These improved outcomes were annulled during the COVID-19 pandemic, with emergency presentations increasing to 38.9% (p < 0.001) and a reduction in early-stage lung cancer diagnoses to 31.5%. There was a 61% decline in 2 week wait referrals but no significant decline in the LOLCP direct-to-CT referrals. Conclusion: We have demonstrated a significant increase in late-stage lung cancer diagnoses and emergency presentations during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The causes for these changes are likely to be multifactorial. The long-term effect on lung cancer mortality remains to be seen and is an important focus of future study.

Comparison between patient state index, bispectral index, and clinical parameters for propofol induction in Indian patients: A prospective study.

Background and Aims: Patient state index (PSI) and bispectral index (BIS) are depth of anesthesia monitors utilized for the dosage of propofol usage for induction. We compare PSI, BIS, and Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAA/S) for propofol dose usage for induction. Material and Methods: Seventy-four ASA I and II patients, aged 18-65 years scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included and divided into groups to titrate the drug dosage of propofol needed for induction of anesthesia, monitored by PSI (Group A), BIS (Group B), or clinical OAA/S (Group C). The drug dosage needed for induction was based on a PSI value of 25 ± 2, BIS value of 48 ± 2, and OAA/S value of ≤2 as the endpoint of induction in respective groups. Intraoperative hemodynamic variables and any complications were compared. Results: The mean doses of propofol needed for induction were 2.23 mg/kg (Group A), 2.05 mg/kg (Group B), and 2.11 mg/kg (Group C). A significantly decreased dose was needed to achieve the desired end in Group B compared to Group A (P = 0.01). The hemodynamic variables such as heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure among the three groups were comparable. Conclusion: The clinical method of titrating the dose of propofol for induction and anesthetic depth by the loss of verbal response is comparable to both BIS and PSI monitoring.

CSF Oculorrhea Presenting as "Tearing" following the Repair of Fronto-Ethmoidal Encephalocele.

INTRODUCTION: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) oculorrhea is extremely rare, and very few cases have been reported mostly following trauma. There is only 1 case in the published literature where oculorrhea occurred following the repair of fronto-nasal encephalocele. CASE DESCRIPTION: A six-year-old girl presented with gradually increasing fronto-ethmoidal encephalocele with secondary papulo-nodular changes. She underwent bi-frontal craniotomy with excision of encephalocele sac and herniated gliotic brain followed by dural closure using peri-cranial graft. One month later, she presented again with swelling over the operative site and "tearing" from both her eyes. She was diagnosed with CSF oculorrhea. After failing conservative management, lumbar drain was inserted and kept on continuous drainage. Oculorrhea stopped with lumbar drain but restarted with its removal. Therefore, theco-peritoneal shunt was placed, following which oculorrhea stopped. She is doing well at 5 months' follow-up. CONCLUSION: CSF oculorrhea must be considered by the pediatric neurosurgeons in any patient who presents with "tearing" following the repair of an anterior encephalocele.

Evaluation of lignocaine infusion on recovery profile, quality of recovery, and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multimodal analgesia entrains the use of drugs in perioperative period producing adequate pain relief without affecting the quality of recovery by decreasing drug-related adverse effects. Systemic lignocaine has effective analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-hyperalgesic properties and improves the quality of recovery after surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety women scheduled for elective transabdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia were randomized to receive infusion of lignocaine (1.5 mg/kg over 15 min followed by a 2 mg/kg/h infusion until the end of surgery) (Group 1) or normal saline (10 mL over 15 min followed by infusion 1 mL/kg/h till end of surgery) (Group 2). Standard anesthesia techniques were used in both the groups. The patients received inj. tramadol for postoperative analgesia. Perioperative hemodynamics, extubation variables, postoperative analgesic requirement, and quality of recovery score were evaluated. RESULTS: Hemodynamics were maintained in both the groups. Time for extubation was also similar. Demand for first postoperative analgesic was after 70.8 ± 70.4 min (Group 1) and 40.7 ± 30.0 min (Group 2) (P = 0.006). Total tramadol usage was 477.0 ± 133.2 mg (Group 1) and 560.0 ± 115.0 mg (Group 2) (P < 0.001). Return of bowel function was faster in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (37.1 ± 5 vs 41.8 ± 7.4 h, P < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) recovery score (QoR-40) was 184 (178-191) in Group 1 and 178 (171-180) in Group 2 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Perioperative use of intravenous infusion of lignocaine is associated with decreased analgesic requirement postoperatively, and improved quality of recovery score signifying greater patient satisfaction.

Comparison of block characteristics of spinal anesthesia following intravenous dexmedetomidine and clonidine.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Different routes of administration of α2 adrenergic receptor agonists have been found to prolong the duration of spinal block. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients, aged 18-60 years, of ASA physical status I or II posted for elective fixation of fractures of lower limb under spinal anesthesia were selected. Spinal anesthesia was administered with 2.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine mixed with 10 µg fentanyl. The patients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg/h for 15 min followed by infusion of 0.3 µg/kg/h (Group I), IV Clonidine 2 µg/kg/h for 15 min followed by infusion of 0.5 µg kg/h (Group II) or 15 ml of normal saline for 15 min followed by infusion at 50 ml/h (Group III). Motor and sensory blockade was evaluated using bromage score and pin prick method respectively. RESULTS: The median block height in all groups was T8. Time to achieve block height was fastest in Group I. Time of regression of sensory block to T12/L1 dermatome was 230.75 ± 21.25 min (Group I), 196.25 ± 20.27 min (Group II) and 163.88 ± 15.46 min (Group III) respectively. Regression of motor blocks to Bromage 0/1 was 274 ± 21.25 min, 234.25 ± 32.41 min and 130.12 ± 20.70 min in Groups I, II and III respectively. Bradycardia was seen in one patient in Group I and two patients in Group II. Hypotension was seen in five patients in Group I and seven patients in Group II. First requirement for postoperative analgesic was after 353.13 ± 39.60 min, 314.38 ± 30.64 min and 193.25 ± 17.74 min in Groups I, II and III respectively. CONCLUSION: IV α2 agonists are useful adjuvants for prolongation of the duration of spinal block. IV dexmedetomidine produces a better clinical profile compared to clonidine.

Outcomes of linear-stapled versus hand-sewn gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic Roux en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic Roux en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), the gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) may be performed using linear-stapled (LS) or completely hand-sewn (HS) techniques. No published study has compared operative and clinical outcomes following LS and HS LRYGB when performed by surgeons beyond the learning curve. This study examined outcomes of both techniques performed by two 'technique-specific' bariatric fellowship-trained surgeons. METHODS: Data on consecutive primary LRYGB undertaken in two university hospitals were prospectively collected over 28-months and included demographics, co-morbidities, postoperative morbidity, mortality, length of stay (LOS), reoperations, and excess weight loss (EWL). Data were presented as mean ± SD. RESULTS: There were 366 LRYGB studied (LS = 144 and HS = 222 patients) with 96 % 12-month follow-up. All procedures were completed laparoscopically with no anastomotic leak or mortality. The LS cohort had a lower body mass index (48.3 ± 5.0 vs 53.8 ± 7.1, P < 0.001), greater incidence of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.009) and sleep apnea (P = 0.007). The HS cohort had more patients in Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score classes B and C (P = 0.004 and P = 0.01), and shorter operating time (127 ± 30 vs 172 ± 30 min, P < 0.001). There were no differences in LOS, complications, or reoperations. The HS technique was associated with more GJA stenoses requiring endoscopic dilatation (7.7 vs 0 %, P < 0.001). At 12 months, EWL (%) was comparable between the two techniques (LS 71.0 ± 15.5 vs HS 66.5 ± 13.7, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: When performed by 'technique-specific' surgeons, both LS and HS GJA in LRYGB may be performed safely with no significant differences in morbidity, reoperations, or EWL.

The efficacy of pregabalin for prevention of catheter-related bladder discomfort: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the efficacy of preoperative pregabalin for prevention of catheter-related bladder discomfort. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, placebo controlled, double blinded study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients of either sex undergoing elective spine surgery and requiring urinary bladder catheterization were randomly assigned to two groups. The patients in Group P (pregabalin group) received 150 mg of pregabalin orally 1 h prior to induction of anesthesia with sips of water and the patients in Group C (control group) received placebo. Anesthesia technique was identical in both the groups. Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) was evaluated on a 4-point scale (1 = no discomfort, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe), on arrival (0 h) and again at 1, 2, and 6 h postoperatively. Patients were provided patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl for postoperative pain relief. RESULTS: The incidence of CRBD was significantly less in the pregabalin group compared with the control group at all time intervals (P < 0.05). The severity of CRBD was reduced in the pregabalin group compared with the control group at all time intervals except 6 h. The postoperative consumption of fentanyl was significantly less in group P, while the sedation score was significantly higher in the group P compared to group C. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with pregabalin 150 mg prevents CRBD and also decreases postoperative fentanyl consumption. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: (ref: CTRI/2013/11/004170).

Comparative evaluation of esmolol and dexmedetomidine for attenuation of sympathomimetic response to laryngoscopy and intubation in neurosurgical patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The present study compared the efficacy of esmolol and dexmedetomidine for attenuation of the sympathomimetic response to laryngoscopy and intubation in elective neurosurgical patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 90 patients aged 20-60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, either sex, scheduled for elective neurosurgical procedures were included in this study. Patients were randomly allocated to three equal groups of 30 each comprising of Control group (group C) 20 ml 0.9% saline intravenous (IV), group dexmedetomidine (group D) 1 µg/kg diluted with 0.9% saline to 20 ml IV and group esmolol (group E) 1.5 mg/kg diluted with 0.9% saline to 20 ml IV. All the drugs were infused over a period of 10 min and after 2 min induction of anesthesia done. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure were recorded baseline, after study drug administration, after induction and 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, and 15 min after orotracheal intubation. RESULTS: In group D, there was no statistically significant increase in HR and blood pressure after intubation at any time intervals, whereas in group E, there was a statistical significant increase in blood pressure after intubation at 1, 2, and 3 min only and HR up to 5 min. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg is more effective than esmolol for attenuating the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation in elective neurosurgical patients.

Intra-operative Tranexamic Acid Administration Significantly Decreases Incidence of Postoperative Bleeding Without Increasing Venous Thromboembolism Risk After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Retrospective Cohort Study of Over 400 Patients.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces surgical bleeding and is widely used in trauma, obstetrics and other specialties. This practice is less well-established in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) due to concerns surrounding venous thromboembolism (VTE); equally postoperative bleeding is a serious complication often requiring re-operation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared 30-day outcomes following primary LSG in patients receiving intra-operative TXA (March 2020-July 2022) to those who did not (March 2011-March 2020). The primary outcome was postoperative bleeding (Hb < 9 g/dL) requiring transfusion or re-operation. Secondary outcomes were incidence of VTE, serious postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo > grade 3) and death. Patients underwent standardised-protocol LSG without staple line re-enforcement under a single surgeon within the independent sector (private practice). TXA 1 g intravenous was administered immediately after a methylene blue leak test, prior to extubation. RESULTS: TXA group had 226 patients and non-TXA group had 192 patients. Mean age was 40.5 ± 10.3 and 39.1 ± 9.8 years, respectively. In the TXA group, no postoperative bleeds [versus 3 (1.6%) in non-TXA group, p = 0.0279] occurred. One staple line leak (0.4%) occurred in the TXA group compared to zero in the non-TXA group (p = ns). There was no VTE or death. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest cohort study of intra-operative TXA in primary LSG to date, which demonstrates significant decrease in postoperative bleeding without increasing VTE risk. The authors recommend administration of TXA immediately following leak test, or removal of bougie to maximise efficacy. Data of TXA in LSG is awaited from the randomised controlled PATAS trial.

A Review on Retinal Blood Vessel Enhancement and Segmentation Techniques for Color Fundus Photography.

The retinal image is a trusted modality in biomedical image-based diagnosis of many ophthalmologic and cardiovascular diseases. Periodic examination of the retina can help in spotting these abnormalities in the early stage. However, to deal with today's large population, computerized retinal image analysis is preferred over manual inspection. The precise extraction of the retinal vessel is the first and decisive step for clinical applications. Every year, many more articles are added to the literature that describe new algorithms for the problem at hand. The majority of the review article is restricted to a fairly small number of approaches, assessment indices, and databases. In this context, a comprehensive review of different vessel extraction methods is inevitable. It includes the development of a first-hand classification of these methods. A bibliometric analysis of these articles is also presented. The benefits and drawbacks of the most commonly used techniques are summarized. The primary challenges, as well as the scope of possible changes, are discussed. In order to make a fair comparison, numerous assessment indices are considered. The findings of this survey could provide a new path for researchers for further work in this domain.

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy - A prospective observational exploratory study.

Background and Aims: Acute kidney injury (AKI) can occur in post-laparotomy patients, with a variable incidence. This study aimed to determine the incidence of AKI in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy under general anaesthesia, the effect of preoperative variables on the development of AKI, and the association of post-operative AKI with patient outcomes. Methods: This prospective exploratory study in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy was followed up for 7 days to determine the incidence of post-operative AKI. We determined the patients developing different severity of AKI based on kidney disease improving global outcome staging. Fisher's exact test or Chi-squared test was used to study the association of demographic variables, and various periopertaive variables on the development of postoperative AKI. The association of AKI with the duration of hospital stay was estimated using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U Test, and Fisher's exact test was used to study the association between AKI and mortality. Results: No patient had AKI in the pre-operative period. On day 3, 18 patients; on day 5, 28 patients; and on day 7, 24 patients developed AKI. Overall, a maximum of 33 patients (out of 100) developed AKI at any time. Our study found that the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) IV and sepsis were independent risk factors for post-operative AKI. Our results also show a moderate-to-high independent association between AKI and duration of hospital stay and mortality (within 30 days). Conclusion: Incidence of post-operative AKI following emergency laparotomy was 33%. Higher preoperative ASA physical status and sepsis were significantly associated with postoperative AKI development.