Outcomes of biological therapy in patients with severe asthma with chronic rhinosinusitis in Saudi Arabia: patients with nasal polyps versus those without nasal polyps.

BACKGROUND: This study's purposes were to evaluate the impact of biological therapies on outcomes in patients with severe asthma (SA) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and to compare these effects among those with NP (CRSwNP) versus those without NP (CRSsNP) in the "real-world" setting in Saudi Arabian patients. METHODS: From March to September 2022, a retrospective observational cohort study was undertaken at the severe asthma clinics of the Armed Forces Hospital-Southern Region (AFHSR) and King Khalid University Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia, to delineate the effects of dupilumab therapy. Outcomes were assessed, including clinical outcomes, FEV1, and laboratory findings before and one year after dupilumab. Post-therapy effects were compared between CRSwNP and CRSsNP. RESULTS: Fifty subjects were enrolled, with a mean age of 46.56. There were 27 (54%) females and 23(46%) males. Significant improvements in clinical parameters (frequency of asthma exacerbations and hospitalizations, the use of OCs, anosmia, SNOTT-22, and the ACT), FEV1, and laboratory ones (serum IgE and eosinophilic count) were observed 6 and 12 months after using dupilumab (p < 0.001), respectively. However, after 12 months of dupilumab therapy, there were no significant differences between those with and without NP with regards to clinical (anosmia, ACT, and OCs use), laboratory (eosinophilic count, serum IgE level) parameters, and FEV1%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CRS experienced significant improvements in clinical, FEV1, and laboratory outcomes after dupilumab therapy. However, these improvements were not maintained when comparing CRSwNP with CRSsNP. There were no significant differences between those with and without NP regarding ACT and OCs use or laboratory (eosinophilic count, serum IgE level) parameters. Further prospective multicenter studies are warranted.

Diagnosis of Small Intestinal Diaphragms and Strictures Induced by Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Through Intraoperative Enteroscopy: A Case Study From Saudi Arabia.

The small intestinal diaphragms are a rare condition characterized by focal or diffuse luminal narrowing in the small intestine. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been associated with the development of small intestinal diaphragms, particularly in long-term and high-dose users. In the current report, a Saudi adult female complained of abnormal bowel motions, which caused severe abdominal pain. She had long-term treatment with NSAID. Systemic and physical examination was unremarkable, apart from poorly localized, nonspecific tenderness to abdominal palpation. Two endoscopic investigations (upper and lower endoscopy) were performed to identify any abnormalities in the digestive system; also, a biopsy was taken for histopathological analysis. In addition, another capsule endoscopy was done to investigate any abnormal bowel motion. The findings of two endoscopic investigations and histopathological analysis of duodenum biopsies revealed different features of small intestinal diaphragms and stricture. The biopsies showed mild chronic inflammation. The esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy showed multiple strictures and ulcerations in the small bowel. Also, a diffused mucosal erythema of the stomach and a remarkable scar on the third part of the duodenum were detected. That might be due to the excessive use of NSAIDs. The investigations revealed multiple small bowel diaphragmatic stenosis and strictures in the proximal and distal small bowel. These are distinct signs of NSAID-induced small bowel diaphragms and strictures.

Impact of biological therapies on laboratory outcomes and FEV1 in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma with chronic rhinosinusitis: a real-life study from Saudi Arabia.

                                                                 Abstract Background: Few studies have addressed the effects of biological therapies on laboratory outcomes and changes in FEV1 in patients with severe asthma (SA) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). We aimed to study the effect of three biological therapies on laboratory outcomes and FEV1 in Saudi Arabian patients with SA and CRS. METHODS: From March to September 2022, a retrospective observational cohort study was undertaken at the severe asthma clinics of the Armed Forces Hospital-Southern Region (AFHSR) and King Khalid University Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia, to delineate the effects of 3 biological therapies (benralizumab, dupilumab, and omalizumab) in adults with SA and concomitant CRS in terms of FEV1 and laboratory parameters (serum IgE and eosinophilic counts). RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 46.68. There were 45 (56%) females and 35 (44%) males. There were significant improvements in FEV1 and laboratory parameters (serum IgE and eosinophilic counts) after 6 &12 months of biological therapies compared to pre-biological therapies (p<0.001, each). The response was different among different biological therapies. The improvements in FEV1, serum IgE, and eosinophilic counts were manifest with benralizumab and dupilumab but not with omalizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the first study from two large Saudi Arabian tertiary centers for patients with severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis agree with and support those of worldwide real-life ones. One-year follow-up of patients with SA and CRS showed the effectiveness of benralizumab and dupilumab, but not omalizumab, regarding FEV1, serum IgE, and eosinophilic counts. Further prospective multicenter studies are warranted.

Endoscopy of Low BMI Patients Compared to Normal BMI Patients: A Study From the Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia.

Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopies are essential for detecting and treating various digestive tract problems. While typically safe, these treatments can entail the risk of severe adverse events (SAEs), especially in individuals with a low body mass index (BMI). The current study aimed to evaluate whether post-endoscopy SAEs are more common in patients with low BMI and find risk factors for serious adverse outcomes in Saudi Arabian patients from Khamis Mushait, Aseer region, Saudi Arabia. The data of 398 adult patients with abdominal endoscopies between April and November 2023 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: low BMI (BMI ≤ 18.5) and control (18.5 ≤ BMI ≤ 30). They were matched for age, gender, comorbidities, endoscopy type, and other pertinent characteristics. Low-BMI patients (Group I, n = 108) were substantially younger and had lower levels of albumin and total protein than the control group (Group II, n = 209). Comorbidities varied between groups, with diabetes mellitus more prevalent in Group II and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) more commonplace in Group I. Treatment options also differed, with Group I receiving more biological treatments, steroids, and feeding tubes. Endoscopic procedures and indications were comparable among groups, with no significant variations in post-endoscopy complications. The endoscopy results varied from gastritis to colon malignancy, with no SAEs recorded in either group. Unlike earlier findings, this study found no higher incidence of SAEs in low-BMI individuals having abdominal endoscopy. This might be because of the restricted guidelines of different medical authorities, including clear informed consent that illustrates any risks, benefits, alternatives, sedation plan, and potential diagnostic or therapeutic interventions. Also, professional endoscopists and consultants who ensure adequate visualization of the GI mucosa, using mucosal cleansing and insufflation as necessary, should avoid any risk of abdominal hemorrhage. These findings highlight the significance of personalized risk assessment and pre-procedural optimization, including nutritional assistance, in this patient population. More prospective research with larger sample sizes is needed to validate these findings and create targeted techniques for improving outcomes in individuals with a low BMI having endoscopic operations.

Clinical Features and Predictors of Mortality in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Retrospective Study From Southern Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY: We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and mortality predictors in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Adult patients who were admitted to the Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, a large tertiary hospital in Southern Saudi Arabia, with the diagnosis of acute PE were retrospectively examined for the predictors of one-year mortality. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality was 15.6% among 212 patients. In univariate analysis, only age was significantly associated with increased early mortality, whereas age, obesity, presence of active malignancy, hypertension, use of thrombolytics, and Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) were significantly associated with increased late mortality. By use of binary logistic regression, the presence of obesity (HR 6.010, 95%CI 0.048-16.853, p=0.030), active malignancy (HR 3.040, 95%CI 1.147-8.059, p=0.025), and the use of thrombolytics (HR 8.074, 95%CI 2.719-23.977, p<0.001), were independently significant factors for late (overall) mortality, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among Saudi Arabian patients in the Southern Region, our data show that age is an independent factor for increased early and late mortality. The presence of obesity, active malignancy, and the use of thrombolytics, were independently significant factors for increased late (one-year) mortality. These factors should be taken into account for risk stratification and decisions on tailored management of patients with PE. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed.