Is perineal hypermobility an independent predictor of obstructive defecation?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Symptoms of obstructed defecation (OD) and anatomical abnormalities of the posterior compartment are prevalent in urogynecological patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether perineal hypermobility is an independent predictor of OD, as is the case for rectocele, enterocele and rectal intussusception. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 2447 women attending a tertiary urodynamic center between September 2011 and December 2016. The assessment included a structured interview, urodynamic testing, a clinical examination and 4D transperineal ultrasound. After exclusion of previous pelvic floor surgery and defined anatomical abnormalities of the anorectum, 796 patients were left for analysis. Perineal hypermobility was defined as rectal descent ≥ 15 mm below the symphysis pubis, determined in stored ultrasound volume datasets offline, using proprietary software, blinded to all other data. Any association between perineal hypermobility and symptoms of obstructed defecation was tested for by chi-square (X2) test. RESULTS: For the 796 patients analyzed, median age was 52 (range, 16-88) years with a mean BMI of 27 (range, 15-64) kg/m2. Average vaginal parity was two (range, 0-8). Reported OD symptoms in this group included sensation of incomplete emptying in 335 (42%), straining at stool in 300 (37%) and digitation in 83 (10%). At least one of those symptoms was reported by 424 (53%) women; 153 showed perineal hypermobility. There was no significant association between perineal hypermobility and OD symptoms on univariate testing. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of an independent association between perineal hypermobility and obstructed defecation.

Factors predicting success after microsurgical vasovasostomy.

PURPOSE: To identify factors predicting success and analyze critically the status of microsurgical double-layer vasovasostomy using predictive models. METHODS: A cohort of 263 patients treated at our institution for vasectomy reversal between 1986 and 2010 was included in our study, and the literature was reviewed. Inclusion criteria were previous bilateral vasectomy and presence of at least two postoperative semen analyses; patients reporting pregnancy without a postoperative semen analysis were excluded. A double-layer, microscope-assisted, tension-free anastomosis vasovasostomy was performed approximating mucosa to mucosa and muscle to muscle with a 10-0 non-absorbable suture. A multivariate logistic regression backward stepwise model was used to predict combined success, and a predictive model was calculated with remaining variables. RESULTS: Mean age was of 41.6 years (SD 7.1); mean duration of obstruction 7.2 years (SD 6.7). On multivariate analysis, uni- or bilateral granuloma and Silber grade of I-III were variable identified predicting higher probability to success (OR 3.105; 95% CI 1.108-8.702; p = 0.031 and OR 4.795; 95% CI 2.117-10.860; p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, some factors predicting success after vasovasostomy surgery are known but others remain unknown; our predictive model may easily predict patency and success after this surgery and offers a concrete assistance in counseling patients.