Impact of Single Center Treatment on Ewing Sarcoma 10-Year Long Term Survival Rates.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Ewing sarcomas (ES) are the second most common solid malignant bone tumors in both, children and adolescents, and systemic chemotherapy protocols were established during the last 3 decades which proved to be a successful approach in addition to local treatment. The purpose of the present study is (i) to provide survival rates and prognostic factors for patients with ES which received treatment in a single center and (ii) to compare data with results of multicenter studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients (n = 38) were treated by the same surgeon whereas surgery was combined with radiotherapy in 55.3% of the patients (n = 21). Median age at diagnosis was 17.5 years (4.7-60) and the median follow-up time for all patients was 8.2 years (9.8 years for survivors, 3.2 years for non-survivors). RESULTS The survival rate for metastasis free sarcoma decreases from 90.5% to 50% for patients diagnosed with disseminated disease stage. Patients with a good response to chemotherapy survived in 83.3% of the cases. In addition, a higher OS was found for patients younger than 15 years (82.4%) when compared to patients older than 15 years (73.3%). In contrast, multicenter studies reported lower survival rates for metastasis free (~60%) and metastasis stages (< 40%). DISCUSSION The survival rates in the present single center study are higher than the rates reported from multi-center studies although same chemotherapy protocols were used and no substantially difference are apparent for patient population. CONCLUSIONS Based on the present data we re-emphasize that patients with Ewing sarcoma receive appropriate treatment in a large and qualified center particularly considering the survival rates. In addition, our data underline that a close collaboration between the oncological team and the experienced surgeon is crucial for patient's care. Key words: Ewing sarcoma, survival rate, single center, prognostic factors, chemotherapy, surgery, multi center, single center.

Phase Ib study of weekly mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor ridaforolimus (AP23573; MK-8669) with weekly paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: The additive cytotoxicity in vitro prompted a clinical study evaluating the non-prodrug rapamycin analogue ridaforolimus (AP23573; MK-8669; formerly deforolimus) administered i.v. combined with paclitaxel (PTX; Taxol). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with taxane-sensitive solid tumors were eligible. The main dose escalation foresaw 50% ridaforolimus increments from 25 mg with a fixed PTX dose of 80 mg/m(2), both given weekly 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle. Collateral levels with a lower dose of either drug were planned upon achievement of the maximum tolerated dose in the main escalation. Pharmacodynamic studies in plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and skin biopsies and pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction studies at cycles 1 and 2 were carried out. RESULTS: Two recommended doses were determined: 37.5 mg ridaforolimus/60 mg/m(2) PTX and 12.5 mg/80 mg/m(2). Most frequent toxic effects were mouth sores (79%), anemia (79%), fatigue (59%), neutropenia (55%) and dermatitis (48%). Two partial responses were observed in pharyngeal squamous cell and pancreatic carcinoma. Eight patients achieved stable disease > or =4 months. No drug interaction emerged from PK studies. Decrease of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein1 (4E-BP1) phosphorylation was shown in PBMCs. Similar inhibition of phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 and mitogen-activated protein kinase was present in reparative epidermis and vascular tissues, respectively. CONCLUSION: Potential antiangiogenic effects and encouraging antitumor activity justify further development of the combination.

Renal safety profiles of ibandronate 6 mg infused over 15 and 60 min: a randomized, open-label study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical data show that a single, 15-min i.v. infusion of ibandronate 6 mg does not significantly alter renal function. We evaluated the effect on renal function of repeated 15-min infusions of ibandronate 6 mg in women with breast cancer and bone metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to i.v. ibandronate 6 mg every 3-4 weeks for < or =6 months, infusion over 15 min (n = 102) or 60 min (n = 28). The primary end point was the percentage of patients with increased serum creatinine of > or =44.2 micromol/l. Blood chemistry was assessed at each visit. RESULTS: Two per cent [2/101; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-7.0] of patients in the 15-min infusion arm and no patients (0/26; 95% CI 0.0-13.2) in the 60-min infusion arm had increased serum creatinine that met the primary end point. There were no clinically relevant changes in serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, or N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase, alpha(1)-microglobulin, or microalbuminuria. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. No clinically relevant changes were observed in vital signs, hematology, blood chemistry, or urine analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Ibandronate 6 mg by 15-min infusion every 3-4 weeks appear to be consistent with those renal safety profiles of 60-min infusion.

Boys but not girls with T-lineage acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) are different from children with B-progenitor ALL. Population-based data results of initial prognostic factors and long-term event-free survival. Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: In a population-based data registry of children with ALL, initial prognostic factors were analyzed with regard to long-term event-free survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1976-1991 the Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group (SPOG) observed 610 children and adolescents who were diagnosed with ALL before the age of 15 years, and who were prospectively treated according to different study protocols. Immunophenotyping of B-progenitor- or T-lineage ALL was possible in 573 children. Leucocyte count, age, and sex were compared with regard to immunophenotype of lymphoid cells and to event-free survival on Kaplan Meier curves by statistical analyses including multivariate analysis and the Cox regression backward elimination test. RESULTS: Of the 573 patients who were immunophenotyped 86.4% had B-progenitor ALL and 13.6% T-lineage ALL. The differences between B-progenitor ALL and T-lineage ALL with respect to initial white blood cell count, age and gender were significant. A comparison of event-free survival in children with B-progenitor ALL versus T-lineage ALL revealed significant differences in boys (p < 0.001) but not in girls (p = 0.183). Statistical tests showed gender to be an independent risk factor. CONCLUSION: The long-term outcome following identical treatment of both genders was significantly better in girls with T-lineage ALL than in boys. Girls with T-lineage ALL, but not boys with T-lineage ALL, had a prognostic outcome similar to children with B-progenitor ALL.

Treatment of relapsing acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood. III. Experiences with 54 first bone marrow, nine isolated testicular, and eight isolated central nervous system relapses observed 1985-1989.

Of 54 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and first hematological recurrence observed between 1985 and 1989, 31 relapsed while still on treatment and 23 after cessation of therapy. Of the former, only one survived. Of the latter, 11 children survived after a minimum follow-up of 25 months. During the same period, a first isolated testicular relapse was observed in nine boys, of whom six survived, and an isolated CNS relapse in eight patients, of whom three survived. As a rule, survivors of a bone marrow or testicular relapse were doing well while those surviving a CNS relapse had considerable neuropsychological sequelae. These results, compared with those of two preceding studies, suggest that with intensification of front-line treatments, it becomes more difficult to rescue children who relapse, particularly those with a bone marrow relapse while on therapy.