Prophylactic Antibiotic Duration and Infectious Complications in Pancreatoduodenectomy Patients With Biliary Stents: Opportunity for De-escalation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare infectious complications in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) patients with biliary stents treated with short, medium, or long durations of prophylactic antibiotics. BACKGROUND: Pre-existing biliary stents have historically been associated with higher infection risk after PD. Patients are administered prophylactic antibiotics, but the optimal duration remains unknown. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective cohort study included consecutive PD patients from October 2016 to April 2022. Antibiotics were continued past the operative dose per surgeon discretion. Infection rates were compared by short (≤24 h), medium (>24 but ≤96 h), and long (>96 h) duration antibiotics. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to evaluate associations with a primary composite outcome of wound infection, organ-space infection, sepsis, or cholangitis. RESULTS: Among 542 PD patients, 310 patients (57%) had biliary stents. The composite outcome occurred in 28% (34/122) short, 25% (27/108) medium, and 29% (23/80) long-duration ( P =0.824) antibiotic patients. There were no differences in other infection rates or mortality. On multivariable analysis, antibiotic duration was not associated with infection rate. Only postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio 33.1, P <0.001) and male sex (odds ratio 1.9, P =0.028) were associated with the composite outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Among 310 PD patients with biliary stents, long-duration prophylactic antibiotics were associated with similar composite infection rates to short and medium durations but were used almost twice as often in high-risk patients. These findings may represent an opportunity to de-escalate antibiotic coverage and promote risk-stratified antibiotic stewardship in stented patients by aligning antibiotic duration with risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathways.

Local Therapy Improves Survival for Early Recurrence After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Early recurrence following hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is associated with worse survival; yet, impact of further local therapy is unclear. We sought to evaluate whether local therapy benefits patients with early recurrence following hepatectomy for CLM. METHODS: Clinicopathologic and survival outcomes of patients managed with hepatectomy for CLM (1/2001-12/2020) were queried from a prospectively maintained database. Timing of recurrence was stratified as early (recurrence-free survival [RFS] < 6 months), intermediate (RFS 6-12 months), and later (RFS > 12 months). Local therapy was defined as ablation, resection, or radiation. RESULTS: Of 671 patients, 541 (81%) recurred with 189 (28%) early, 180 (27%) intermediate, and 172 (26%) later recurrences. Local therapy for recurrence resulted in improved survival, regardless of recurrence timing (early 78 vs. 32 months, intermediate 72 vs. 39 months, later 132 vs. 65 months, all p < 0.001). Following recurrence, treatment with local therapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.24), liver and extrahepatic recurrence (HR = 1.81), RAS + TP53 co-mutation (HR = 1.52), and SMAD4 mutation (HR = 1.92) were independently associated with overall survival (all p ≤ 0.002). Among patients with recurrence treated by local therapy, patients older than 65 years (HR 1.79), liver and extrahepatic recurrence (HR 2.05), primary site or other recurrence (HR 1.90), RAS-TP53 co-mutation (HR 1.63), and SMAD4 mutation (HR 2.06) had shorter post-local therapy survival (all p ≤ 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: While most patients recur after hepatectomy for CLM, local therapy may result in long-term survival despite early recurrence. Somatic mutational profiling may help to guide the multidisciplinary consideration of local therapy after recurrence.

Classification of Post-Pancreatectomy Readmissions and Opportunities for Targeted Mitigation Strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Within a learning health system paradigm, this study sought to evaluate reasons for readmission to identify opportunities for improvement. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Post-pancreatectomy readmission rates have remained constant despite improved index hospitalization metrics. METHODS: We performed a single-institution case-control study of consecutive pancreatectomy patients (October 2016 - April 2022). Complications were prospectively graded in biweekly faculty and advanced practice provider meetings. We analyzed risk factors during index hospitalization and categorized indications for 90-day readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 835 patients, median age 65 years and 51% (427/835) males, underwent 64% (534/835) pancreatoduodenectomies, 34% (280/835) distal pancreatectomies, and 3% (21/835) other resections. 24% (204/835) of patients were readmitted. Primary indication for readmission was technical in 51% (105/204), infectious in 17% (35/204), and medical/metabolic in 31% (64/204) of patients. Procedures were required in 77% (81/105) and 60% (21/35) of technical and infectious readmissions, respectively, while 66% (42/64) of medical/metabolic readmissions were managed non-invasively. During the index hospitalization, benign pathology (OR 1.8, P=0.049), biochemical pancreatic leak (OR 2.3, P=0.001), bile/gastric/chyle leak (OR 6.4, P=0.001), organ-space infection (OR 3.4, P=0.007), undrained fluid on imaging (OR 2.4, P=0.045), and increasing white blood cell count (OR 1.7, P=0.045) were independently associated with odds of readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Most readmissions following pancreatectomy were technical in origin. Patients with complications during index hospitalization, increasing white blood cell count, or undrained fluid before discharge were at highest risk for readmission. Pre-discharge risk-stratification of readmission risk factors and augmentation of in-clinic resources may be strategies to reduce readmission rates.

Prospective Study of Perioperative Circulating Tumor DNA Dynamics in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of perioperative ctDNA dynamics on outcomes after hepatectomy for CLM. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Prognostication is imprecise for patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, and ctDNA is a promising biomarker. However, clinical implications of perioperative ctDNA dynamics are not well established. METHODS: Patients underwent curative-intent hepatectomy after preoperative chemotherapy for CLM (2013-2017) with paired prehepatectomy/postoperative ctDNA analyses via plasma-only assay. Positivity was determined using a proprietary variant classifier. Primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Median follow-up was 55 months. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included. ctDNA was detected before and after surgery (ctDNA+/+) in 14 (29%), before but not after surgery (ctDNA+/-) in 19 (40%), and not at all (ctDNA-/-) in 11 (23%). Adverse tissue somatic mutations were detected in TP53 (n = 26; 54%), RAS (n = 23; 48%), SMAD4 (n = 5; 10%), FBXW7 (n = 3; 6%), and BRAF (n = 2; 4%). ctDNA+/+ was associated with worse RFS (median: ctDNA+/+, 6.0 months; ctDNA+/-, not reached; ctDNA-/-, 33.0 months; P = 0.001). Compared to ctDNA+/+, ctDNA+/- was associated with improved RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.24 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.58)] and overall survival [HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.08-0.74)]. Adverse somatic mutations were not associated with survival. After adjustment for prehepatectomy chemotherapy, synchronous disease, and ≥2 CLM, ctDNA+/- and ctDNA-/- were independently associated with improved RFS compared to ctDNA+/+ (ctDNA+/-: HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.53; ctDNA-/-: HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative ctDNA dynamics are associated with survival, identify patients with high recurrence risk, and may be used to guide treatment decisions and surveillance after hepatectomy for patients with CLM.

Impact of cumulative operative time on postoperative complication risk in simultaneous resections of colorectal liver metastases and primary tumors.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) and primary colorectal cancers (CRC) is nuanced without firm rules for selection. This study aimed to identify factors associated with morbidity after simultaneous resection. METHODS: Using a prospective database, patients undergoing simultaneous CLM-CRC resection from 1/1/2017-7/1/2020 were analyzed. Regression modeling estimated impact of colorectal resection type, Kawaguchi-Gayet (KG) hepatectomy complexity, and perioperative factors on 90-day complications. RESULTS: Overall, 120 patients underwent simultaneous CLM-CRC resection. Grade≥2 complications occurred in 38.3% (n = 46); these patients experienced longer length of stay (median LOS 7.5 vs. 4, p < 0.001) and increased readmission (39% vs. 1.4%, p < 0.001) compared to patients with zero or Grade 1 complications. Median OR time was 298 min. Patients within highest operative time quartile (>506 min) had higher grade≥2 complications (57%vs. 23%, p = 0.04) and greater than 4-fold increased odds of grade≥2 morbidity (OR 4.3, 95% CI (Confidence Interval) 1.41-13.1, p = 0.01). After adjusting for Pringle time, KG complexity and colorectal resection type, increasing operative time was associated with grade≥2 complications, especially for resections in highest quartile of operative time (OR 7.28, 95% CI 1.73-30.6, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing simultaneous CLM-CRC resection, prolonged operative time is independently associated with grade≥2 complications. Awareness of cumulative operative time may inform intraoperative decision-making by surgical teams.

Analysis of Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Open Versus Robotic Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive, robotic gastrectomy is associated with better short-term outcomes and quicker functional recovery. However, the degree to which the robotic approach influences postoperative pain and opioid use after gastrectomy is unknown. Our primary aim was to determine whether the robotic approach to gastrectomy reduces postoperative opioid use compared with the open approach. METHODS: Patients who underwent gastrectomy (November 2018 to September 2021) were identified retrospectively. Clinical characteristics, short-term surgical outcomes, oral morphine equivalent (OME) use, and pain scores were collected. Both groups were managed through an enhanced recovery program in the perioperative period. RESULTS: Of 81 patients, 50 underwent open and 31 underwent robotic gastrectomy. Compared with open gastrectomy patients, robotic gastrectomy patients had longer surgery time (360 vs. 288 min), less blood loss (50 vs. 138 mL), and shorter hospital stay (4 vs. 6 days) (all medians, P < 0.001). Robotic gastrectomy patients used lower OMEs on postoperative days 0-4 (all P < 0.05) and in total for days 0-4 (total mean dose 65.0 vs. 169.5 mg; P < 0.001) than did open gastrectomy patients. The robotic gastrectomy patients were prescribed a lower mean OME dose than the open gastrectomy patients (19.0 vs. 29.0 mg, respectively; P = 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that robotic approach was associated with lower opioid use (odds ratio 3.70; 95% CI 1.01-14.3; P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with open gastrectomy, robotic gastrectomy reduces opioid use in the early postoperative period and is associated with fewer OME discharge prescriptions and shorter hospital stay.

Opioid Discharge Prescriptions After Inpatient Surgery: Risks of Rebound Refills by Length of Stay.

INTRODUCTION: As inpatient stays become shorter, one concern with standardizing discharge opioid prescriptions is the potential risk of "rebound refills." We sought to compare opioid prescription refill rates and volumes for surgical patients discharged on postoperative day (POD) 2-3, 4-7, and 8+. METHODS: In a prospective quality improvement protocol, faculty volunteered to use either a 5x-multiplier (5x) or usual care (UC) for discharge prescriptions after inpatient (≥48 h stay) surgery from Sep-Dec 2019. The 5x-multiplier is 5-times the patient's last 24-h opioid use (by oral morphine equivalents, OME). Cohorts were compared by POD of discharge: POD 2-3 ("SHORT"), POD 4-7 ("INTERMEDIATE"), and POD 8+ ("LONG"). The primary endpoint was 30-d refill rates. Secondary endpoints included 30-d refill OME and inpatient opioid weaning/discharge metrics. RESULTS: From 22 faculty, 409 patients were included. When stratified by POD, 154 (37.7%) were discharged SHORT, 176 (43.0%) INTERMEDIATE, and 79 (19.3%) LONG. SHORT stay patients had a median last 24-h OME of 10 mg (versus 5 mg INTERMEDIATE, 5 mg LONG; P = 0.268), and a median discharge OME of 55 mg (versus 75 mg INTERMEDIATE, 100 mg LONG; P = 0.221). Patients with SHORT stays did not have higher refill rates (11.7% versus 18.2% INTERMEDIATE, 19.0% LONG; P = 0.193) or higher median refill OME (150 mg versus 300 mg INTERMEDAITE, 339 mg LONG; P = 0.154). CONCLUSIONS: Despite concerns of increased refills, patients discharged by POD 2-3 were not associated with "rebound refills." A patient-centered 5x-multiplier standardization of discharge opioid prescriptions is feasible in all inpatient surgery patients, even those discharged following a short inpatient stay.

Association of Patient Controlled Analgesia and Total Inpatient Opioid Use After Pancreatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The initial settings on an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) pump can represent a significant source of postoperative opioid exposure. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of first day IV-PCA use on total inpatient opioid use after open pancreatectomy, before and after standardization of initial dosing. METHODS: Inpatient oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) were reviewed for pancreatectomy patients treated with IV-PCA at a single institution before and after (3/2016-8/2017 versus 3/2019-11/2020) implementation of a standardized initial IV-PCA dosing regimen (initial limit 0.1 mg hydromorphone, or 1 mg OME, every 10 min as needed). IV-PCA OME in the first 24 h and the total inpatient OME were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: Of 220 total patients, 132 were in the prestandardization (PRE) historical cohort. A first-24-h IV-PCA use was different (PRE median 95 mg versus poststandardization [POST] 15 mg, P < 0.001). The median total inpatient OME was different (P < 0.001) between PRE (525 mg, interquartile range [IQR] 239-951 mg) and POST patients (129 mg, IQR 65-204 mg) with 77% (median 373 mg) of total inpatient OMEs contributed by IV-PCA in the PRE and 56% (median 64 mg) in the POST cohorts. There were similar patient-reported pain scores between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Standardizing initial IV-PCA settings was associated with a reduced first-24-h opioid exposure, proportional and absolute total IV-PCA use, and total inpatient OMEs. Because of the contribution of an IV-PCA to the total inpatient opioid exposure, purposeful reduction or omission of an IV-PCA is critical to perioperative opioid reduction strategies.

Perioperative blood transfusions and survival in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients given multimodality therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The impact of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) on outcomes for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients given multimodality therapy (MMT) remains undefined. We sought to evaluate the association of PBT with survival after PDAC resection. METHODS: Pancreatectomy patients (July 2011-December 2017) who received MMT were abstracted from a prospective database. Overall survival (OS) was compared by PBT within 30 days, 24 h (24HR-BT), or 24 h until 30 days (Postop-BT). RESULTS: Most (76.6%) of 312 MMT patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy (NT). Eighty-nine patients (28.5%) received PBT; 58 (18.6%) 24HR-BT, and 31 (9.9%) Postop-BT. Compared with surgery-first, NT patients received more 24HR-BTs (22.2% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.003) and PBTs overall (32.6% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.004). Overall median OS was 45 months. The association of PBT with shorter median OS appeared limited to first 24-h transfusions (34 months 24HR-BT vs. 48 months Postop-BT vs. 53 months no-PBT, p = 0.009) and was dose-dependent, with a median OS of 52 months for 0 units 24HR-BT, 35 months for 1 unit, and 25 months for ≥2 units (p = 0.004). Independent predictors of OS included node-positivity (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.93, p < 0.001), perineural invasion (HR: 1.64, p = 0.050), postoperative pancreatic fistula (HR: 1.94, p = 0.018), and 24HR-BT (HR: 1.75, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Transfusions given within 24 h are associated with dose-dependent decreases in survival after pancreatectomy for PDAC.

Educating surgical oncology providers on perioperative opioid use: A departmental survey 1 year after the intervention.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A department-wide opioid reduction education program resulted in a 1-month change in perceptions of opioid needs and prescribing recommendations for surgical oncology patients. This study's aim was to re-evaluate if early trends were retained 1 year later. METHODS: Surgical Oncology attendings, fellows, and advanced practice providers at a Comprehensive Cancer Center were surveyed 1-year after an August 2018 opioid reduction education program, to compare departmental and individual opioid prescribing habits. RESULTS: The September 2019 response rate was 54/93 (58%), with 41 completing both the post-education and 1-year follow-up surveys. The departmental and matched cohort continued to recommend a lower quantity of discharge opioids for all five index operations (by >50%) and expected less postoperative days to zero opioid needs, when compared to pre-education perceptions. Providers continued to agree that discharge opioid prescriptions should be based on a patient's last 24 hours of inpatient opioid use. There was universal agreement that each respondent's opioid administration had decreased in the past year. CONCLUSIONS: The initial 1-month improvements in perioperative opioid prescribing perceptions were retained 1 year later by Surgical Oncology providers who recommended fewer discharge opioids, faster weaning to zero opioids, and standardized patient-specific discharge opioid volume calculations.

Educating Surgical Oncology Providers on Perioperative Opioid Use: Results of a Departmental Survey on Perceptions of Opioid Needs and Prescribing Habits.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing oncologic surgery are at risk for persistent postoperative opioid use. As a quality improvement initiative, this study sought to characterize provider perceptions regarding opioid-prescribing after oncologic procedures. METHODS: Surgical oncology attending physicians, clinical fellows, and advanced practice providers (APPs) at a high-volume cancer center were surveyed before and after educational sessions focusing on the opioid epidemic with review of departmental data. RESULTS: The pre-education response rates were 72 (70%) of 103: 22 (65%) of 34 attending physicians, 19 (90%) of 21 fellows, and 31 (65%) of 48 APPs. For five index operations (open abdominal resection, laparoscopic colectomy, wide local excision, thyroidectomy, port), the fellows answered that patients should stop receiving opioids sooner than recommended by the attending surgeons or APPs. For four of five procedures, the APPs recommended higher discharge opioid prescriptions than the attending surgeons or fellows. Almost half of the providers (n = 46, 45%) responded to both the pre- and post-education surveys. After the intervention, the providers recommended lower numbers of opioid pills and indicated that patients should be weaned from opioids sooner for all the procedures. Compared with pre-education, more providers agreed post-education that discharge opioid prescriptions should be based on a patient's last 24 h of inpatient opioid use (83 vs 91%; p = 0.006). The providers who did not attend a session showed no difference in perceptions or recommendations at the repeat assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Variation exists in perioperative opioid-prescribing among provider types, with those most involved in daily care and discharge processes generally recommending more opioids. After education, providers lowered discharge opioid recommendations and thought patients should stop receiving opioids sooner. The next steps include assessing for quantitative changes in opioid-prescribing and implementing standardized opioid prescription algorithms.

Utilizing risk-stratified pathways to personalize post-hepatectomy discharge planning: A contemporary analysis of 1,354 patients.

BACKGROUND: While risk-stratified post-hepatectomy pathways (RSPHPs) reduce length-of-stay, can they stratify hepatectomy patients by risk of early postoperative events. METHODS: 90-day outcomes from consecutive hepatectomies were analyzed (1/1/2017-12/31/2021). Pre/post-pathway analysis was performed for pathways: minimally invasive surgery ("MIS"); non-anatomic resection/left hepatectomy ("low-intermediate risk"); right/extended hepatectomy ("high-risk"); "Combination" operations. Time-to-event (TTE) analyses for readmission and interventional radiology procedures (IRPs) was performed. RESULTS: 1354 patients were included: MIS/n= â€‹119 (9 â€‹%); low-intermediate risk/n= â€‹443 (33 â€‹%); high-risk/n= â€‹328 (24 â€‹%); Combination/n= â€‹464 (34 â€‹%). There was no difference in readmission (pre: 13 â€‹% vs. post:11.5 â€‹%, p â€‹= â€‹0.398). There were fewer readmissions in post-pathway patients amongst MIS, low-intermediate risk, and Combination patients (all p â€‹> â€‹0.1). 114 (8.4 â€‹%) patients required IRPs. Time-to-readmission and time-to-IR-procedure plots demonstrated lower plateaus and flatter slopes for MIS/low-intermediate-risk pathways post-pathway implementation (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). CONCLUSION: RSPHPs can reliably stratify patients by risks of readmission or need for an IR procedure by predicting the most frequent period for these events.

Postoperative Global Period Cost Reduction Using 3 Successive Risk-Stratified Pancreatectomy Clinical Pathways.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that iterative revisions of our original 2016 risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathways would be associated with decreased 90-day perioperative costs. STUDY DESIGN: From a single-institution retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with 3 iterations: "version 1" (V1) (October 2016 to January 2019), V2 (February 2019 to October 2020), and V3 (November 2020 to February 2022), institutional data were aggregated using revenue codes and adjusted to constant 2022-dollar value. Grand total perioperative costs (primary endpoint) were the sum of pancreatectomy, inpatient care, readmission, and 90-day global outpatient care. Proprietary hospital-based costs were converted to ratios using the mean cost of all hospital operations as the denominator. RESULTS: Of 814 patients, pathway V1 included 363, V2 229, and V3 222 patients. Accordion Grade 3+ complications decreased with each iteration (V1: 28.4%, V2: 22.7%, and V3: 15.3%). Median length of stay decreased (V1: 6 days, interquartile range [IQR] 5 to 8; V2: 5 [IQR 4 to 6]; and V3: 5 [IQR 4 to 6]) without an increase in readmissions. Ninety-day global perioperative costs decreased by 32% (V1 cost ratio 12.6, V2 10.9, and V3 8.6). Reduction of the index hospitalization cost was associated with the greatest savings (-31%: 9.4, 8.3, and 6.5). Outpatient care costs decreased consistently (1.58, 1.41, and 1.04). When combining readmission and all outpatient costs, total "postdischarge" costs decreased (3.17, 2.59, and 2.13). Component costs of the index hospitalization that were associated with the greatest savings were room or board costs (-55%: 1.74, 1.14, and 0.79) and pharmacy costs (-61%: 2.20, 1.61, and 0.87; all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Three iterative risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathway refinements were associated with a 32% global period cost savings, driven by reduced index hospitalization costs. This successful learning health system model could be externally validated at other institutions performing abdominal cancer surgery.

Postoperative pain scores and opioid use after standard bupivacaine vs. liposomal bupivacaine regional blocks for abdominal cancer surgery: A propensity score matched study.

BACKGROUND: Fascial plane blocks (FPBs) are widely used for abdominal surgery with the assumption that liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is more effective than standard bupivacaine (SB). METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients administered FPBs with LB or SB â€‹+ â€‹admixtures (dexamethasone/dexmedetomidine) for open abdominal cancer surgery. Propensity score matching generated a 2:1 (LB:SB) matched cohort. Opioid use (mg oral morphine equivalents, OME) and severe pain (≥3 pain scores ≥7 in a 24-h period) were compared. RESULTS: Opioid use was >150 â€‹mg OME in 19.9 â€‹% (29/146) LB and 16.4 â€‹% (12/73) SB patients (p â€‹= â€‹0.586). Severe pain was experienced by 44 â€‹% (64/146) LB and 53 â€‹% (39/73) SB patients (p â€‹= â€‹0.198). On multivariable analysis, SB vs LB choice was not associated with high opioid volume >150 â€‹mg or severe pain. CONCLUSIONS: FPBs with standard bupivacaine were not associated with higher 72-h opioid use or more severe pain compared to liposomal bupivacaine.

Individual components of post-hepatectomy care pathways have differential impacts on length of stay.

BACKGROUND: The value of individual variable contributions to post-hepatectomy length of stay (LOS) are difficult to quantify within bundled care pathways. METHODS: Poisson regression and marginal effects models for prolonged post-hepatectomy LOS (>25% median) included Kawaguchi-Gayet (KG) complexity, perioperative variables, and pathways (minimally-invasive = MIS; low-intermediate-risk = KGI/II; high-risk = KGIII; combination). RESULTS: Median LOS was 2, 4, 5, and 5 days for MIS, KGI/II, KGIII and combination pathways (N = 978). Poisson regression identified age, intraoperative fluids, delayed diet tolerance, and combination cases as associated with increased LOS (p < 0.01). Marginal effects analysis demonstrated the following added probability of longer LOS: each year of age 0.03x, 250 mL intraoperative fluids 0.06x, each operative hour 0.2x, additional day before diet tolerance 0.4x, combination cases 0.7x. MIS was associated with 1.2x increased probability of shorter LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing intraoperative fluids, operative time, and postoperative diet, while favoring MIS approach when feasible, may maximize effects of post-hepatectomy care pathways to reduce LOS.

Short-Term and Textbook Surgical Outcomes During the Implementation of a Robotic Gastrectomy Program.

BACKGROUND: Whether gastric cancer patients derive greater benefit from robotic gastrectomy (RG), or open gastrectomy (OG) is unknown. We initiated a RG program in 2018, with prospective short-term outcome monitoring to ensure safety. We hypothesized that the RG program for gastric cancer can be safely implemented with equivalent safety and oncological textbook outcomes (TOs) to conventional open gastrectomy (OG). METHODS: The study included patients who underwent curative-intent OG or RG for gastric adenocarcinoma between January 2018 and December 2021. TO metrics were negative surgical margins, ≥ 15 lymph nodes examined, no severe (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) postoperative complications, no reinterventions within 90 days after surgery, no ICU admission, no prolonged length of stay (LOS; > 10 days), no 90-day postoperative mortality, and no readmission within 90 days after surgery. Overall TO was achieved when all these metrics were met. RESULTS: Of 161 patients, 120 underwent OG, and 41 underwent RG. The two groups' demographic and disease characteristics did not differ significantly. Compared with OG patients, RG patients had a longer median surgery time (348 vs. 282 min), smaller median blood loss volume (50 vs. 150 mL), lower mean prescribed opioid dose at discharge (12 vs. 45 mg), and shorter median LOS (4 vs. 7 days; all p < 0.001). The groups' postoperative complication rates (10% vs. 17%) did not differ significantly (p = 0.283). The overall TO rate of the RG group (73%) was higher than that of the OG group (60%), but the difference was not significant (p = 0.131). CONCLUSION: We were able to implement the RG program safely, without compromising safety or oncological outcomes.

Differential Gains in Surgical Outcomes for High-Risk vs Low-Risk Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Successive Refinements of Risk-Stratified Care Pathways.

BACKGROUND: The use of risk-stratified pancreatectomy care pathways (RSPCPs) is associated with reduced length of stay (LOS). This study sought to evaluate the impact of successive pathway revisions with the hypothesis that high-risk patients require iterative pathway revisions to optimize outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A prospectively maintained database (October 2016 to December 2021) was evaluated for pancreaticoduodenectomy patients managed with RSPCPs preoperatively assigned based on postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) risk. Launched in October 2016 (version [V] 1), RSPCPs were optimized in February 2019 (V2) and November 2020 (V3). Targeted pathway components included earlier nasogastric tube removal, diet advancement, reduced intravenous fluids and opioids, institution-specific drain fluid amylase cutoffs for early day 3 removal, and patient education. Primary outcome was LOS. Secondary outcomes included major complication (Accordion grade 3+), POPF (International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery Grade B/C), and delayed gastric emptying (DGE). RESULTS: Of 481 patients, 234 were managed by V1 (83 high-risk), 141 by V2 (43 high-risk), and 106 by V3 (43 high-risk). Median LOS reduction was greatest in high-risk patients with a 7-day reduction (pre-RSPCP, 12 days; V1, 9 days; V2, 7 days; V3, 5 days), compared with low-risk patients (pre-pathway, 10 days; V1, 6 days; V2, 5 days; V3, 4 days). Complications decreased significantly among high-risk patients (V1, 45%; V2, 33%; V3, 19%; p < 0.001), approaching rates in low-risk patients (V1, 21%; V2, 20%; V3, 14%). POPF (V1, 33%; V2, 23%; V3, 16%; p < 0.001) and DGE (V1, 23%; V2, 22%; V3, 14%; p < 0.001) improved among high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Risk-stratified pancreatectomy care pathways are associated with reduced LOS, major complication, Grade B/C fistula, and DGE. The easiest gains in surgical outcomes are generated from the immediate improvement in the patients most likely to be fast-tracked, but high-risk patients benefit from successive application of the learning health system model.

Postoperative Opioid Use Is Associated with Increased Rates of Grade B/C Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is a major source of morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. This study examined the association between postoperative opioid use and CR-POPF in the context of opioid-sparing postoperative care. METHODS: A case-control study was performed on consecutive patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy between October 2016 and April 2022 at a single institution. Patients who developed CR-POPF were compared to controls. Multivariable regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with CR-POPF. RESULTS: A total of 281 patients underwent 187 open, 20 laparoscopic, and 74 robotic-assisted operations. The rate of CR-POPF was 21% (n = 58). CR-POPF rate declined from 32 to 8% over the study period (p < 0.001). Median oral morphine equivalents (OME) administered on POD 0-1 and 0-3 were 94 and 129 mg, respectively, in patients who did not develop a fistula versus 130 and 180 mg in those who did (both p ≤ 0.001). POD 0-3 OME (OR 1.11, p = 0.044) was independently associated with increased odds of CR-POPF, with each additional 50 mg (equivalent to 10 tramadol pills) increasing the relative risk by 11% and absolute risk by 2%. CONCLUSION: Early postoperative opioid use after distal pancreatectomy was associated with increased odds of CR-POPF. Decreasing perioperative opioid use through enhanced postoperative management is a low-cost and generalizable approach that may reduce rates of CR-POPF after distal pancreatectomy.