Esophageal squamous papilloma: Literature review and case-control retrospective study with histopathological exam of human papillomavirus.

Background and Aim: Esophageal squamous papilloma (ESP) is a benign growth in the esophagus with unknown malignant potential. The mechanism underlying ESP formation is unknown, but human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has been proposed as a potential etiology. We sought to investigate the clinical characteristic of ESP in our population, review the current literature, and highlight the role of HPV. Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study conducted at two referral centers. We selected the ESP population by free-text search in the pathology department database and selected controls randomly from the general endoscopy population. Immunostains were used to evaluate ESP tissue for HPV. Results: Between January 2016 and December 2021, we identified 66 patients with ESP, with a prevalence of 0.72%. ESP patients were younger, with a median age of 52 years (P = 0.021), and more likely African American (34.4 vs 7.5%, P < 0.001) compared to controls. On endoscopy images, the growth was predominantly solitary (92.5%) in the middle of the esophagus (39.4%), with sizes ranging from 0.2 to 2.3 cm. A total of 62 patients had available tissue for HPV immune staining, and none tested positive for HPV. Eighteen patients had a follow-up endoscopy with an average of 504.5 days follow-up period. One patient developed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma during follow-up. Conclusions: We observed a higher prevalence of ESP compared to previous studies. The formation of ESP is multifactorial and partially explained by HPV infection in selected populations. The malignant potential of ESP is low but not negligible.

Healthcare Simulation: A Key to the Future of Medical Education - A Review.

Aim: Simulation originates from its application in the military and aviation. It is implemented at various levels of healthcare education and certification today. However, its use remains unevenly distributed across the globe due to misconception regarding its cost and complexity and to lack of evidence for its consistency and validity. Implementation may also be hindered by an array of factors unique to the locale and its norms. Resource-poor settings may benefit from diverting external funds for short-term simulation projects towards collaboration with local experts and local material sourcing to reduce the overall cost and achieve long-term benefits. The recent shift of focus towards patient safety and calls for reduction in training duration have burdened educators with providing adequate quantity and quality of clinical exposure to students and residents in a short time. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has severely hindered clinical education to curb the spread of illness. Simulation may be beneficial in these circumstances and improve learner confidence. We undertook a literature search on MEDLINE using MeSH terms to obtain relevant information on simulation-based medical education and how to best apply it. Integration of simulation into curricula is an essential step of its implementation. With allocations for deliberate practice and mastery learning under supervision of qualified facilitators, this technology is becoming essential in medical education. Purpose: To review the adaptation, spectrum of use, importance, and resource challenges of simulation in medical education and how best to implement it according to learning theories and best practice guides. Conclusion: Simulation offers students and residents with adequate opportunities to practice their clinical skills in a risk-free environment. Unprecedented global catastrophes provide opportunities to explore simulation as a viable training tool. Future research should focus on sustainability of simulation-based medical education in LMICs.

Pediatric Appendicitis Score for Identifying Acute Appendicitis in Children Presenting With Acute Abdominal Pain to the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) in predicting appendicitis in children presenting with acute abdominal pain to the Emergency Department (ED) of a private hospital in Pakistan. METHODS: This validation study was through retrospective chart review of children between 4-18 years of age with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis, presenting to the pediatric ED. Diagnostic accuracy was determined using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: 104 children (76% boys) with mean (SD) age of 10.9 (3.5) years met the eligibility criteria. 91% (n=95) patients had moderate to high PAS (score ³4), and 95% (n=99) had biopsy-proven appendicitis. The likelihood ratio calculated for low, equivocal and high-risk PAS was 0.10, 2.17 and 2.53, respectively. An equivocal PAS (score 4-6) showed a sensitivity of 96.8%, specificity of 80%, positive predictive value of 98.9% and AUC of 0.84 for predicting acute appendicitis. CONCLUSION: PAS showed good diagnostic accuracy in predicting acute appendicitis in children presenting to the ED.