Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 9(7): 883-5, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25979248

RESUMO

The use of propofol for sedation during endoscopy has been increasing, particularly given its association with superior patient satisfaction. Propofol sedation may also allow for higher quality endoscopy exams, increased efficiency of endoscopy suites and most particularly, permit better patient compliance with colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. However, propofol is typically provided by anesthesia specialists via monitored anesthesia care, and is associated with significant economic burden. Given the increasing use of monitored anesthesia care, which adds significant costs to endoscopy, payers are likely to react with changes in payer policies. One alternative to monitored anesthesia care is non-anesthesiologist administered propofol, which due to safety concerns and a lack of reimbursement has not been widely adopted in the US.


Assuntos
Anestesiologia/economia , Anestésicos Intravenosos/economia , Colonoscopia/economia , Segurança do Paciente , Propofol/economia , Anestesiologia/métodos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efeitos adversos , Sedação Profunda/efeitos adversos , Sedação Profunda/economia , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Satisfação do Paciente , Propofol/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA