Two-stage phase I dose-escalation study of intratumoral reovirus type 3 dearing and palliative radiotherapy in patients with advanced cancers.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and feasibility of combining intratumoral reovirus and radiotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and to assess viral biodistribution, reoviral replication in tumors, and antiviral immune responses. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with measurable disease amenable to palliative radiotherapy were enrolled. In the first stage, patients received radiotherapy (20 Gy in five fractions) plus two intratumoral injections of RT3D at doses between 1 x 10(8) and 1 x 10(10) TCID(50). In the second stage, the radiotherapy dose was increased (36 Gy in 12 fractions) and patients received two, four, or six doses of RT3D at 1 x 10(10) TCID(50). End points were safety, viral replication, immunogenicity, and antitumoral activity. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with various solid tumors were treated. Dose-limiting toxicity was not seen. The most common toxicities were grade 2 (or lower) pyrexia, influenza-like symptoms, vomiting, asymptomatic lymphopenia, and neutropenia. There was no exacerbation of the acute radiation reaction. Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) studies of blood, urine, stool, and sputum were negative for viral shedding. In the low-dose (20 Gy in five fractions) radiation group, two of seven evaluable patients had a partial response and five had stable disease. In the high-dose (36 Gy in 12 fractions) radiation group, five of seven evaluable patients had partial response and two stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of intratumoral RT3D and radiotherapy was well tolerated. The favorable toxicity profile and lack of vector shedding means that this combination should be evaluated in newly diagnosed patients receiving radiotherapy with curative intent.

Clinical grade OK432-activated dendritic cells: in vitro characterization and tracking during intralymphatic delivery.

Dendritic cells (DC) are under intense preclinical and early clinical evaluation for the immunotherapy of cancer. However, the optimal culture conditions and route of delivery for DC vaccination have not been established. Here we describe the first human application of DC matured with the bacterial agent OK432 (OK-DC), using a short-term serum-free culture protocol, which generates mature DC from CD14+ precursors after 5 days. These cells were prepared within the framework of a National Blood Service facility, demonstrating that DC represent a product which is potentially deliverable alongside current standardized cell therapies within the UK National Health Service. In vitro analysis confirmed that OK-DC were mature, secreted tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and interleukin-12, and stimulated both T cell and natural killer cell function. To explore effective delivery of OK-DC to lymph nodes, we performed an initial clinical tracking study of radioactively labeled, unpulsed OK-DC after intralymphatic injection into the dorsum of the foot. We showed that injected DC rapidly localized to ipsilateral pelvic lymph nodes, but did not disseminate to more distant nodes over a 48-hour period. There was no significant toxicity associated with OK-DC delivery. These results show that OK-DC are suitable for clinical use, and that intralymphatic delivery is feasible for localizing cells to sites where optimal priming of innate and adaptive antitumor immunity is likely to occur.

Randomized phase II study comparing thalidomide with medroxyprogesterone acetate in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate escalating doses of thalidomide compared with medroxyprogesterone in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), who had either progressed after first-line immunotherapy or who were not suitable for immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thalidomide was started at 100 mg/d orally (PO) and escalated by 100 mg/d every 2 weeks to the maximum dose of 400 mg/d. Medroxyprogesterone was given at a fixed dose of 300 mg PO daily. RESULTS: Sixty patients were entered (thalidomide:medroxyprogesterone = 29:31; median age, 59 [thalidomide], 60 [medroxyprogesterone]; No. of patients assessable for response, 22 [thalidomide], 26 [medroxyprogesterone]). In the thalidomide arm, there was no objective response seen. The best response was SD in three patients lasting 5+, 6+, and 12 months, respectively. All patients in the medroxyprogesterone arm progressed. There was no difference in overall survival between the two arms; median survival in the thalidomide arm was 8.2 months compared with 4.8 months in the medroxyprogesterone arm (P = .62). Hazard ratio was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.67 to 1.94). Median duration of treatment was 73 days (range, 14 to 364 days) in the thalidomide arm, and 84 days (range, 7 to 175 days) in the medroxyprogesterone arm. The high incidence of toxicity in the thalidomide arm, mainly somnolence, constipation, fatigue and paraesthesia, meant that only 30.8% of patients were able to tolerate the maximum dose of 400 mg/d of treatment. CONCLUSION: Thalidomide is not superior to medroxyprogesterone acetate in patients with metastatic RCC. Its risk/benefit ratio does not favor its use in this patient population.