Comorbidity, age of onset and suicidality in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): An international collaboration.

OBJECTIVES: To collate data from multiple obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) treatment centers across seven countries and five continents, and to report findings in relation to OCD comorbidity, age of onset of OCD and comorbid disorders, and suicidality, in a large clinical and ethnically diverse sample, with the aim of investigating cultural variation and the utility of the psychiatric diagnostic classification of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders. METHODS: Researchers in the field of OCD were invited to contribute summary statistics on current and lifetime psychiatric comorbidity, age of onset of OCD and comorbid disorders and suicidality in their patients with OCD. RESULTS: Data from 3711 adult patients with primary OCD came from Brazil (n=955), India (n=802), Italy (n=750), South Africa (n=565), Japan (n=322), Australia (n=219), and Spain (n=98). The most common current comorbid disorders were major depressive disorder (28.4%; n=1055), obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (24.5%, n=478), generalized anxiety disorder (19.3%, n=716), specific phobia (19.2%, n=714) and social phobia (18.5%, n=686). Major depression was also the most commonly co-occurring lifetime diagnosis, with a rate of 50.5% (n=1874). OCD generally had an age of onset in late adolescence (mean=17.9years, SD=1.9). Social phobia, specific phobia and body dysmorphic disorder also had an early age of onset. Co-occurring major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and psychotic disorders tended to have a later age of onset than OCD. Suicidal ideation within the last month was reported by 6.4% (n=200) of patients with OCD and 9.0% (n=314) reported a lifetime history of suicide attempt. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cross-continental study, comorbidity in OCD was common. The high rates of comorbid major depression and anxiety disorders emphasize the need for clinicians to assess and monitor for these disorders. Earlier ages of onset of OCD, specific phobia and social phobia may indicate some relatedness between these disorders, but this requires further study. Although there do not appear to be significant cultural variations in rates or patterns of comorbidity and suicidality, further research using similar recruitment strategies and controlling for demographic and clinical variables may help to determine whether any sociocultural factors protect against suicidal ideation or psychiatric comorbidity in patients with OCD.

[Does experience influence perception of dyspnea?]. / Influye la experiencia en la percepción de disnea?

OBJECTIVE: The perception of somatic sensations like dyspnea can be influenced by such factors as an individual s personality, experiences, or ability to adapt to stimuli. Our aim was to determine whether the perception of acute bronchoconstriction is different for patients with asthma and patients who have never experienced an episode of airway obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We studied 2 groups of patients. The first consisted of 24 subjects with intermittent rhinitis and asthma (10 females and 14 males) with a mean (SD) age of 25 (7) years. All reported not feeling dyspnea at rest on a Borg scale. The second group consisted of 24 subjects who only had rhinitis but no lung disease (no episode of asthma) or dyspnea at rest (12 females and 12 males) with a mean age of 27 (6) years. There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to sex, smoking, economic or educational level, anxiety (determined by the trait portion of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), depression (Beck Depression Inventory), or spirometric parameters. All took a histamine bronchial provocation test in which the patient assessed dyspnea on a modified Borg scale after each histamine dose. The provocation dose needed to produce a 20% decrease (PD20) in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) was calculated. We also recorded dyspnea perception score when FEV1 fell 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%. RESULTS: No dyspnea was perceived at PS20 by 12.5% of the asthmatics and by 45% of nonasthmatics (P< .0001). The mean PS20 was 2.4 (2.1) (range, 0-7) in the first group and 0.37 (0.48) (range, 0-3) in the second (P< .0001). More asthma patients than nonasthmatics perceived dyspnea at all degrees of bronchial obstruction. PD20 was different in the 2 groups (1.6 [2] vs 6.03 [5] for the first and second groups, respectively; P< .003), but there was no significant relation between PD20 and PS20 (Spearman s correlation coefficient, 0.19; P= .221). CONCLUSION: Our findings support the hypothesis that appropriate perception of dyspnea is grounded in prior experience and learning.

[Evolution over time in over perceivers of dyspnea in asthma]. / Evolución temporal de la percepción exagerada de disnea en los pacientes con asma.

OBJECTIVE: In previous studies we identified a subgroup of patients whose perception of breathlessness was exaggerated during acute bronchoconstriction and who were termed "over perceivers" or "hyperperceivers". In this study we aimed to determine whether such over perception is sporadic or stable over time. We also examined whether there is an association between over perception of dyspnea and hyperventilation syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 22 stable asthmatics (11 men, 11 women) who had been over perceivers of dyspnea in a study 9 years earlier. After a medical history was taken, a patient performed forced spirometry and a severity classification was made according to the criteria of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). A bronchial histamine challenge was then administered to measure dose-related perception of dyspnea on a Borg scale, according to a procedure that was similar to the one used 9 years earlier by the same investigator. The patients were also asked for a subjective assessment of the severity of their asthma (scale, 0-10) and to respond to items on the Nijmegen hyperventilation questionnaire and the trait form of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. RESULTS: The overall perception of severity of disease, level of anxiety, and perception of dyspnea at rest were lower after 9 years (P<.001). No change was observed in bronchial hyperresponsiveness (dose of inhaled histamine required to provoke a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1]-PD20) or objective parameters of severity (FEV1 and GINA classification). Fourteen asthmatics (64%) were still over perceivers and the other patients had changed: 6 were normal perceivers and 2 were "poor perceivers". Only subjective perception of disease severity improved for the patients who were still over perceivers; the other patients, on the other hand, showed improvements in subjective assessments, objective ones (except PD20), and anxiety. Finally, those who remained over perceivers had higher scores for anxiety (24 vs 15; P<.05) and hyperventilation (18 vs 13; P= not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Most over perceivers of dyspnea remain so over the years and this trait is related to anxiety. We have been unable to demonstrate an association with hyperventilation syndrome.

[Prevalence of hyperventilation syndrome in patients treated for asthma in a pulmonology clinic]. / Prevalencia del síndrome de hiperventilación en pacientes tratados por asma en una consulta de neumología.

OBJECTIVE: Although the presence of hyperventilation syndrome can affect the symptoms of patients with asthma, there is very little information available regarding its frequency in Spain. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of hyperventilation syndrome in the asthmatic population treated as outpatients and establish its relationship with anxiety disorders. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We studied 157 consecutive asthmatic patients (61 men and 96 women; mean [SD] age, 45 [17] years; forced expiratory volume in the first second, 84% [21%] of the predicted value) treated in our outpatients clinic. The patients had stable disease with varying degrees of severity. After collecting demographic data and medical histories, we asked the patients to complete the Spanish versions of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index, the Asthma Symptom Checklist, and the Nijmegen questionnaire; in the latter test, a score of 23 or over was considered diagnostic for hyperventilation syndrome. Finally, patients were evaluated to determine whether they had suffered from panic disorder in the last 6 months (according to the criteria of the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders). RESULTS: Hyperventilation syndrome was present in 57 asthmatic patients (36%) and panic disorder in 4 patients (2%). The majority of patients with hyperventilation syndrome were women (78% vs 51%; P=.001) and were older (49 vs 42; P=.01); they displayed more basal dyspnea (1.26 vs 0.89 on the Medical Research Council scale; P=.01), greater sensitivity to anxiety (P=.001), and went to the emergency room more often for exacerbations (P=.002). Patients with hyperventilation syndrome scored significantly higher on all subscales of the Asthma Symptoms Checklist. Finally, the variables introduced in the regression analysis (stepwise) to explain the score on the Nijmegen questionnaire (r(2)=0.57) were basal dyspnea and sensitivity to anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one third of the asthmatic patients treated in a pulmonology clinic also present hyperventilation syndrome. This cannot be explained by comorbidity of asthma with panic disorder, and is only partly linked to the symptoms associated with hyperventilation that appear during an asthma attack.

[Agreement in asthmatics' perception of dyspnea during acute and chronic obstruction]. / Concordancia entre la percepción de disnea del asmático durante la obstrucción aguda y crónica.

OBJECTIVE: Three types of asthmatic patients can be identified during periods of clinical stability: "poor perceivers," "normal perceivers," and "over perceivers." When asthmatics undergo bronchial challenge in the laboratory, the same distinctions in type of perception can be observed. The aim of the present study was to determine the level of agreement between the 2 situations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 93 patients with persistent moderate asthma (36 men and 57 women; mean age 40 years) were studied. We asked them to assess their dyspnea on a modified Borg scale when stable and after each histamine dose in a bronchial provocation test. When a patient's Borg scale assessment in stable situation was below the 25th percentile, that patient was classified as a poor perceiver. Patients were considered over perceivers if their score in stable situation was in the 75th percentile. Others were labeled normal perceivers. Type of perception during acute bronchoconstriction was defined in function of the change in Borg assessment once forced expiratory volume in the first second had decreased 20%: poor perceivers were those whose change in Borg assessment was in the 25th percentile, over perceivers were in the 75th percentile, and normal perceivers in the middle percentiles. RESULTS: In stable situation, 23 patients were poor perceivers, 58 were normal perceivers, and 12 were over perceivers. During bronchoconstriction, there were 23 poor perceivers, 47 normal perceivers, and 23 over perceivers. Agreement was estimated by a kappa index of 0.0574 for poor perception, 0.1521 for over perception, and 0.3980 for normal perception. CONCLUSIONS: Asthmatics' perception of dyspnea during periods of stability and during acute bronchoconstriction are independent phenomena. It is therefore not possible to infer how a patient will perceive an asthmatic attack by evaluating only how he or she perceives breathlessness during stable periods.

[The quality of life in asthma: an evaluation of the AQLQ questionnaire for its use on a Spanish population. Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire]. / Calidad de vida en el asma: validación del cuestionario AQLQ para su utilización en población española.

The study of morbidity in asthma requires consideration not only of standard physiopathologic and function parameters, but also of the impact the disease has on the patient's life-style as he or she perceives it and evaluates it. The quantification of this factor, known as health-related quality of life (HRQL), is achieved by administering questionnaires specially designed for the purpose. We analyzed the reliability, content validity and construct validity (convergence and divergence) of one instrument, the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) designed by Marks and colleagues. This questionnaire covers 4 dimensions (breathlessness, mood, social limitation and worrying) and gives a total score. After a process of translation and back translation the AQLQ was administered to 102 adult asthmatics living in an urban center, all of whom had been stable for at least the preceding 4 weeks. The following data were recorded: age, sex, duration of disease, FEV1, medication, dyspnea, hospital visits, nighttime symptoms and severity of disease (from the patient's own point of view and according to the scale of the International Consensus Report [ICR]). The reliability study (internal consistency with Crombach's alpha coefficient and inter-item correlation analysis) gave satisfactory results in all cases (range of r = 0.39 to 0.78; alpha = 0.78 to 0.91). Content validity (factorial analysis of the main components, oblique and orthogonal rotations) was less satisfactory, although 4 factors were found; these factors adjusted relatively well to one of the proposed sub-scales and together explained 65.2% of the total variance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Asthma patients' perception of dyspnea during acute bronchoconstriction]. / Percepción de la disnea durante la broncoconstricción aguda en los pacientes con asma.

The aim of this study was to analyze variations in the perception of acute bronchial obstruction among asthmatics in our practice and to try to define the variables that influence inter-individual differences. We studied 153 asthmatics in stable condition, using a Borg scale to measure dyspnea perceived during a histamine bronchial challenge test. To study individual perception we analyzed both absolute magnitude of perception of dyspnea on the Borg scale when forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) fell 20% (perception score 20-PS20) and the mathematical difference between PS20 and baseline dyspnea (change in Borg, CB). The results were as follows. 1) The factors that affected PS20 according to multiple linear regression were anxiety, baseline dyspnea and the provocative concentration required to produce a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20). 2) Within each level of asthma severity, there were differences in dyspnea perception when FEV1 fell 20% (analysis of variance of repeated measures), such that patients with mild asthma and no bronchial obstruction perceived more change in dyspnea. 3) CB during the bronchial challenge test distinguished four ways of perceiving dyspnea: 15% were dysperceivers, 13% were hypoperceivers, 48% were normoperceivers and 24% were hyperperceivers. 4) Hypoperceivers and dysperceivers were at greater risk of severe exacerbation whereas hyperperceivers requested unnecessary medical consultations. 5) Subjects with poorer quality of life were usually dysperceivers; hyperperceivers were the second most common type among those with poorer quality of life. In conclusion, a large percentage of asthmatics do not appropriately perceive acute bronchial obstruction, and the simplest way to evaluate their perception is to calculate the change in dyspnea (on a Borg scale) during the bronchial challenge test. The manner of perceiving dyspnea can not be predicted beforehand, yet it has a significant impact on the use of medical resources and patient quality of life, among other aspects.

[Perception of improvement in asthma patients]. / Percepción de mejoría en los pacientes con asma.

The objective of this study was to investigate the ability of patients with stable asthma to recognize improvement in bronchial obstruction with treatment. We enrolled 75 stable asthmatics (44 women and 31 men, mean age 43 17 years) who reported baseline dyspnea on a modified Borg scale. Acute bronchodilation of 15% was provoked in the laboratory, after which the patients were asked if there was a change in dyspnea. Our results were as follows. 1) Overall, 19 asthmatics (25%) failed to perceive improvement in dyspnea with bronchodilation. 2) The mean change in dyspnea was 1.17 1.11, although the change was greater in patients with more severe asthma (0.60 0.5 for mild asthmatics, 1.05 1.07 for moderate asthmatics and 1.93 1.4 for severe asthmatics; p < 0.0001). 3) Perception of improvement was significantly related to level of the patient's emotional balance (anxiety-depression), quality of life, education, socioeconomic level, age, age of onset, severity, baseline dyspnea and obstruction, thoracic pressure and number of visits to the doctor in the preceding year. 4) The variables entered into the stepwise regression model were baseline dyspnea, depression, thoracic pressure and age. 5) Generally, young asthmatics whose disease appeared at a younger age and who also had less ventilatory obstruction and greater quality of life, showed a tendency to underestimate the beneficial effect of bronchodilator treatment. Moreover, when asthma was severe, non-perceptive individuals had significantly more admissions to intensive care units due to asthma exacerbation.In conclusion, 25% of our asthmatics are unable to recognize whether their bronchia dilate as a result of treatment, meaning that they would delay the start of rescue medication during an exacerbation. Such patients should be identified in order to establish therapeutic guidelines in function of objective home criteria (peak-flow monitoring).

Schizophrenia and automatic processing: an exploratory study.

This study deals with the schizophrenic deficit as one of automatic processing. To test the idea, a special experimental task was designed on which 21 schizophrenics, 21 depressives, and 21 normal subjects had to complete a series of simple geometric figures. When the subjects had thoroughly learned this activity, another information source, a brief story, was introduced, and the subjects had to pay attention to the story while they did the task. Two dependent variables were considered, execution time and performance. There were no differences among the three groups in the first experimental condition; but in the second condition, when the distractor was introduced, schizophrenics needed more time to do the task and their performance was noticeably worse than those of both normals and depressives. This outcome is explained in terms of a failure in the internal mechanisms which regulate the automatic, parallel, and unconscious processing.

Self-consciousness Scale: a study of Spanish housewives.

The purpose of this study was to examine the applicability with 93 Spanish housewives of the translated Self-consciousness Scale. We present reliability measures and normative data, and we also include data for two clinical samples (31 depressive and 31 asthmatic women patients).

Bronchial asthma and personality dimensions: a multifaceted association.

Personality dimensions seem to play an important role in chronic diseases by maintaining or increasing the patient's physical complaints. This study examines in bronchial asthma: (a) the relationships among clinical data, baseline lung function, and personality traits; and (b) the patient's characteristics related to the physician's judgement about his or her asthma severity. Five questionnaires measuring anxiety, depression, self-consciousness, and subjective symptoms were completed by 51 asthmatic patients. Responses to questionnaires and clinical and demographic data were factor-analyzed. Factor analysis revealed that the physician's severity judgement is based on elderly age, high scores on depression, and longer duration of asthma.

Subjective symptomatology of asthma: validation of the asthma symptom checklist in an outpatient Spanish population.

The objective of this study was to validate the Asthma Symptom Checklist (ASC) so that it could be reliably used to assess the subjective symptomatology of asthma attacks in our context. Subjective symptomatology of asthma was examined in a group of 100 adult Spanish outpatients (57 women, 43 men; 17-69 years of age) with asthma. All of them completed the modified version of the ASC as well as questionnaires of depression, anxiety, and self-management of asthma (self-efficacy expectancies and health care utilization). Data about duration and severity of asthma, as well as dyspnea and %FEV1, were also recorded. The highest reliability Cronbach alpha indexes were for the panic-fear and fatigue scales. The oblique rotation of the ASC revealed five correlated factors (53% of the total variance explained): 1) panic-fear, 2) airways obstruction, 3) airways obstruction and panic-fear, 4) fatigue and irritability, 5) hyperventilation. The structure of factors was revalidated using orthogonal (varimax) rotation. Construct validity was examined by Person product-moment coefficient correlations, ANOVAs (asthma severity x ASC scores), and t-tests (sex by ASC scores). Panic-fear showed the best construct validity, as it was related to the severity of the asthma and the use of high-cost health care resources. There were no differences in ASC scores either on the basis of the asthma severity or on the sex of patients. The ASC factors represent stable components of subjective symptomatology of asthma attacks, especially with regard to the panic-fear and the hyperventilation subscales; however, the structure of the checklist as a whole was not identical to those reported in other studies. Correlations of the ASC with clinical variables related to asthma severity support the construct validity of the instrument and confirm its utility to evaluate the subjective symptomatology of asthma attacks in outpatients.

The Revised Asthma Problem Behavior Checklist: adaptation for use in Spanish asthmatic patients.

Behavioral problems associated with asthma management were examined in a group of 100 adult Spanish outpatients with asthma (57 women, 43 men; 17-69 years of age). All of them completed a Spanish version of the Revised Asthma Problem Behavior Checklist (RAPBC). Data about duration, severity, and self-management of asthma (self-efficacy expectancies and health care utilization), as well as dyspnea and FEV1, were also recorded. The highest-reliability Cronbach alpha indices were for the criteria related to emotions and behaviors that could precipitate asthma attacks. Concurrent criterion validity was examined first by Pearson correlations between the RAPBC scores and clinical data about asthma (duration, FEV1, and dyspnea), and second, by examining the differences in RAPBC scores (ANOVAs) among three severity groups of patients. Severe patients reported more behavioral problems associated with poor life-styles and self-management of their asthma and showed more psychological and physical negative consequences related to asthma. In conclusion, while the RAPBC could be considered a valid instrument to assess the behavioral problems associated with asthma in Spanish patients, and shows a good concurrent criterion validity, its reliability (internal consistency) with respect to life-style and self-management behaviors related to asthma should be improved, to ensure its utility as a screening instrument for behavior-related problems in asthmatic Spanish patients.

Assessment of the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a Spanish Asthma Quality of Life questionnaire.

A Spanish-language questionnaire designed for measuring the impact of asthma on quality of life in adults was developed. It was derived, by the application of a rigorous translation protocol, from a previously validated, English-language Asthma Quality of Life (AQL) questionnaire which had been developed in Australia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish AQL questionnaire using a cross-sectional and longitudinal design. Two hundred ninety-four clinically stable subjects with asthma (168 women, mean baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [FEV1] = 85% predicted), aged 17-70, attended for the initial baseline assessment. All subjects completed the AQL questionnaire and a full history and physical examination were performed. The clinical assessment of severity was based on the classification recommended by the Global Initiative on Asthma (GINA). One week after the initial assessment subjects completed the AQL questionnaire for a second time. Six months later, subjects were assessed clinically and completed all the assessment measures at baseline. Principal components analysis of the AQL questionnaire responses at the baseline visit revealed a structure that was almost identical to that seen in the original English-language questionnaire. The questionnaire was shown to be internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha 0.91 for total score and 0.80-0.86 for the four subscales) and repeatable (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.91 for the total scale and 0.78-0.92 for the subscales). The finding of expected strong correlations with the subject's global assessment of severity (p = 0.70) and dyspnea (p = 0.63), a weak inverse correlation with FEV1 (p = -0.17), and good discrimination among the four GINA severity categories (F3,291 = 37.16, p < 0.0001) supports the construct validity of the questionnaire. AQL scores increased with age (p = 0.31) and were higher in women (p < 0.005). The AQL was responsive to both improvement (mean change 1.02, p < 0.0001) and deterioration (mean change -1.13, p < 0.001) in the severity of asthma over a 6-month period. This disease-specific, Spanish-language AQL questionnaire was shown to have sound psychometric properties which make it suitable for use in cross-sectional or longitudinal studies where it is appropriate to assess the impact of asthma on the quality of life of individual patients.

¿Influye la experiencia en la percepción de disnea? / Does Experience Influence Perception of Dyspnea?

Objetivo: En la percepción de las sensaciones somáticas, como la disnea, pueden influir factores tales como la propia personalidad del individuo, su experiencia previa o su capacidad de adaptación a los estímulos. El objetivo del presente estudio ha sido conocer si los pacientes con asma perciben una situación de broncoconstricción aguda de forma diferente de los pacientes que nunca han sufrido un episodio previo de obstrucción de la vía aérea. Pacientes y método: Estudiamos 2 grupos de pacientes. El primero estaba formado por 24 sujetos con rinitis y asma intermitente (10 mujeres y 14 varones, con una edad media ± desviación estándar de 25 ± 7 años), que no referían sentir disnea basal en la escala de Borg. El segundo lo formaron 24 pacientes con rinitis sola, sin enfermedad pulmonar (nunca habían sufrido un episodio de asma) ni disnea basal (12 mujeres y 12 varones, edad media de 27 ± 6 años). No había diferencias significativas entre los grupos en cuanto a edad, sexo, porcentaje de fumadores, nivel económico y educativo, ansiedad ­determinada por el State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, versión Rasgo (STAI-R)­, depresión (Beck) ni parámetros espirométricos. A todos ellos se les realizó una prueba de broncoprovocación con histamina midiendo la disnea experimentada tras cada dosis del fármaco en una escala modificada de Borg. Se calculó la PD20, es decir, la dosis de agente broncoconstrictor capaz de producir un descenso del 20% del valor inicial del volumen espiratorio forzado en el primer segundo (FEV1), así como la percepción de disnea con una caída del FEV1 del 5, el 10, el 15 y el 20% (PS5, PS10, PS15 y PS20, respectivamente). Resultados: No percibió disnea con el descenso del 20% en el FEV1 el 12,5% de los pacientes con asma, frente a un 45% de las personas no asmáticas (p < 0,0001). La media de la PS20 en el primer grupo fue de 2,4 ± 2,1 (rango: 0-7) y en el segundo de 0,37 ± 0,48 (rango: 0-3) (p < 0,0001). En todos los grados de obstrucción bronquial la disnea percibida por los pacientes con asma fue mayor. La PD20 fue diferente en ambos grupos (1,6 ± 2 frente a 6,03 ± 5; p < 0,003), pero no hubo relación significativa entre la PD20 y la PS20 (coeficiente de correlación de Spearman: 0,19, p = 0,221). Conclusión: Nuestros datos apoyan la hipótesis de que la adecuada percepción de la disnea se fundamenta en aspectos como la experiencia previa y el aprendizaje

Objective: The perception of somatic sensations like dyspnea can be influenced by such factors as an individual´s personality, experiences, or ability to adapt to stimuli. Our aim was to determine whether the perception of acute bronchoconstriction is different for patients with asthma and patients who have never experienced an episode of airway obstruction. Patients and method: We studied 2 groups of patients. The first consisted of 24 subjects with intermittent rhinitis and asthma (10 females and 14 males) with a mean (SD) age of 25 (7) years. All reported not feeling dyspnea at rest on a Borg scale. The second group consisted of 24 subjects who only had rhinitis but no lung disease (no episode of asthma) or dyspnea at rest (12 females and 12 males) with a mean age of 27 (6) years. There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to sex, smoking, economic or educational level, anxiety (determined by the trait portion of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), depression (Beck Depression Inventory), or spirometric parameters. All took a histamine bronchial provocation test in which the patient assessed dyspnea on a modified Borg scale after each histamine dose. The provocation dose needed to produce a 20% decrease (PD20) in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) was calculated. We also recorded dyspnea perception score when FEV1 fell 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%. Results: No dyspnea was perceived at PS20 by 12.5% of the asthmatics and by 45% of nonasthmatics (P<.0001). The mean PS20 was 2.4 (2.1) (range, 0-7) in the first group and 0.37 (0.48) (range, 0-3) in the second (P<.0001). More asthma patients than nonasthmatics perceived dyspnea at all degrees of bronchial obstruction. PD20 was different in the 2 groups (1.6 [2] vs 6.03 [5] for the first and second groups, respectively; P<.003), but there was no significant relation between PD20 and PS20 (Spearman´s correlation coefficient, 0.19; P=.221). Conclusion: Our findings support the hypothesis that appropriate perception of dyspnea is grounded in prior experience and learning

Evolución temporal de la percepción exagerada de disnea en los pacientes con asma / Evolution over time in over perceivers of dyspnea in asthma

Objetivo: En investigaciones previas para estudiar la percepción de disnea de los asmáticos durante la broncoconstricción aguda, encontramos un subgrupo de pacientes que presentaban una percepción exagerada (hiperperceptores). En el presente trabajo hemos querido comprobar si esta alteración perceptiva es un fenómeno esporádico o mantenido en el tiempo. Asimismo nos planteamos conocer si existe una asociación entre la hiperpercepción de la disnea y el síndrome de hiperventilación. Pacientes y métodos: Se incluyó en el estudio a 22 asmáticos estables que en un estudio realizado 9 años antes se habían mostrado hiperperceptores de disnea (11 varones y 11 mujeres). Tras una espirometría forzada y una entrevista clínica, se les clasificó en su categoría de gravedad de asma ­GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma)­. A continuación se les sometió a una prueba de provocación bronquial con histamina para medir la disnea percibida con cada dosis en una escala de Borg (procedimiento similar al empleado 9 años antes por el mismo investigador). Además se les pidió una valoración subjetiva de la gravedad de su asma (escala de 0-10) y que rellenaran el cuestionario Nijmegen de hiperventilación y el STAI-R (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) de ansiedad. Resultados: Globalmente, transcurridos 9 años, se han reducido (p < 0,001) la percepción de gravedad del asma, la ansiedad y la disnea basal. No se observaron cambios en el grado de hiperrespuesta bronquial (PD20: concentración de histamina capaz de provocar un descenso del volumen espiratorio forzado en el primer segundo del 20%) ni en parámetros objetivos de gravedad (volumen espiratorio forzado en el primer segundo y GINA). Catorce asmáticos seguían siendo hiperperceptores (64%) y en el resto había cambiado la percepción de la disnea: 6 normoperceptores y 2 hipoperceptores. En el grupo que seguía siendo hiperperceptor sólo mejoró significativamente la percepción subjetiva de gravedad; en cambio, en el grupo restante mejoraron la enfermedad subjetiva y objetivamente (excepto la PD20) y la ansiedad. Por último, los que continuaban siendo hiperperceptores puntuaron más alto en los cuestionarios de ansiedad (24 frente a 15; p < 0,05) e hiperventilación (18 frente a 13; p = no significativa). Conclusiones: La mayoría de hiperperceptores de disnea se mantienen así con el paso de los años, lo cual está relacionado con la ansiedad (no hemos podido demostrar su asociación con el síndrome de hiperventilación)

Objective: In previous studies we identified a subgroup of patients whose perception of breathlessness was exaggerated during acute bronchoconstriction and who were termed "over perceivers" or "hyperperceivers". In this study we aimed to determine whether such over perception is sporadic or stable over time. We also examined whether there is an association between over perception of dyspnea and hyperventilation syndrome. Patients and methods: The subjects were 22 stable asthmatics (11 men, 11 women) who had been over perceivers of dyspnea in a study 9 years earlier. After a medical history was taken, a patient performed forced spirometry and a severity classification was made according to the criteria of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). A bronchial histamine challenge was then administered to measure dose-related perception of dyspnea on a Borg scale, according to a procedure that was similar to the one used 9 years earlier by the same investigator. The patients were also asked for a subjective assessment of the severity of their asthma (scale, 0-10) and to respond to items on the Nijmegen hyperventilation questionnaire and the trait form of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Results: The overall perception of severity of disease, level of anxiety, and perception of dyspnea at rest were lower after 9 years (P<.001). No change was observed in bronchial hyperresponsiveness (dose of inhaled histamine required to provoke a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1]-PD20) or objective parameters of severity (FEV1 and GINA classification). Fourteen asthmatics (64%) were still over perceivers and the other patients had changed: 6 were normal perceivers and 2 were "poor perceivers". Only subjective perception of disease severity improved for the patients who were still over perceivers; the other patients, on the other hand, showed improvements in subjective assessments, objective ones (except PD20), and anxiety. Finally, those who remained over perceivers had higher scores for anxiety (24 vs 15; P<.05) and hyperventilation (18 vs 13; P= not significant). Conclusions: Most over perceivers of dyspnea remain so over the years and this trait is related to anxiety. We have been unable to demonstrate an association with hyperventilation syndrome

Prevalencia del síndrome de hiperventilación en pacientes tratados por asma en una consulta de neumología / Prevalence of hyperventilation syndrome in patients treated for asthma in a pulmonology clinic

Objetivo: Aunque la presencia del síndrome de hiperventilación (SH) puede influir en los síntomas de los pacientes con asma, existe escasa información acerca de su frecuencia en nuestro medio. Nuestro objetivo ha sido investigar la prevalencia de SH entre la población asmática controlada ambulatoriamente y establecer su relación con los trastornos de ansiedad. Pacientes y método: Con este propósito hemos estudiado a 157 asmáticos consecutivos (61 varones, 96 mujeres; edad media ± desviación estándar de 45 ± 17 años; volumen espiratorio forzado en el primer segundo: 84 ± 21%), controlados en nuestras consultas externas, en situación estable y con diferentes grados de gravedad. Tras recoger los datos demográficos y los relativos a su enfermedad, cumplimentaron las versiones españolas del Índice de Sensibilidad a la Ansiedad, el Listado de Síntomas durante un Ataque de Asma y el cuestionario Nijmegen; en este último, una puntuación de 23 o superior se consideró diagnóstica del SH. Finalmente, se valoró si habían presentado un trastorno de pánico en los 6 últimos meses (criterios de la cuarta edición del Manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales). Resultados: Presentaron SH 57 asmáticos (36%) y trastorno de pánico, 4 (2%). Los pacientes con SH eran mayoritariamente mujeres (un 78 frente a un 51%; p = 0,001) y tenían más edad (49 frente a 42; p = 0,01), más disnea basal (1,26 en la escala del Medical Research Council frente a 0,89; p = 0,01), más sensibilidad a la ansiedad (p = 0,001) y acudían más veces a urgencias por agudizaciones (p = 0,002). Los pacientes con SH puntuaron significativamente más alto en todas las subescalas del Listado de Síntomas durante un Ataque de Asma. Por último, las variables introducidas en el análisis de regresión (pasos sucesivos) para explicar la puntuación en el cuestionario Nijmegen (r² = 0,57) fueron: disnea basal y sensibilidad a la ansiedad. Conclusiones: Aproximadamente un tercio de los asmáticos controlados en una consulta de neumología presentan además SH. Esto no puede explicarse por la comorbilidad asma-trastorno de pánico y tiene que ver sólo en parte con los síntomas relacionados con la hiperventilación que aparece durante un ataque de asma

Objective: Although the presence of hyperventilation syndrome can affect the symptoms of patients with asthma, there is very little information available regarding its frequency in Spain. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of hyperventilation syndrome in the asthmatic population treated as outpatients and establish its relationship with anxiety disorders. Patients and method: We studied 157 consecutive asthmatic patients (61 men and 96 women; mean [SD] age, 45 [17] years; forced expiratory volume in the first second, 84% [21%] of the predicted value) treated in our outpatients clinic. The patients had stable disease with varying degrees of severity. After collecting demographic data and medical histories, we asked the patients to complete the Spanish versions of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index, the Asthma Symptom Checklist, and the Nijmegen questionnaire; in the latter test, a score of 23 or over was considered diagnostic for hyperventilation syndrome. Finally, patients were evaluated to determine whether they had suffered from panic disorder in the last 6 months (according to the criteria of the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders). Results: Hyperventilation syndrome was present in 57 asthmatic patients (36%) and panic disorder in 4 patients (2%). The majority of patients with hyperventilation syndrome were women (78% vs 51%; P=.001) and were older (49 vs 42; P=.01); they displayed more basal dyspnea (1.26 vs 0.89 on the Medical Research Council scale; P=.01), greater sensitivity to anxiety (P=.001), and went to the emergency room more often for exacerbations (P=.002). Patients with hyperventilation syndrome scored significantly higher on all subscales of the Asthma Symptoms Checklist. Finally, the variables introduced in the regression analysis (stepwise) to explain the score on the Nijmegen questionnaire (r²=0.57) were basal dyspnea and sensitivity to anxiety. Conclusions: Approximately one third of the asthmatic patients treated in a pulmonology clinic also present hyperventilation syndrome. This cannot be explained by comorbidity of asthma with panic disorder, and is only partly linked to the symptoms associated with hyperventilation that appear during an asthma attack

Concordancia entre la percepción de disnea del asmático durante la obstrucción aguda y crónica / Agreement in asthmatics' perception of dyspnea during acute and chronic obstruction

Objetivo: Durante la estabilidad clínica se pueden distinguir 3 tipos de asmáticos: hipoperceptores, normoperceptores e hiperperceptores. Cuando a esos mismos pacientes se les provoca una broncoconstricción aguda, también existen hipo, normo e hiperperceptores de disnea. El objetivo del presente trabajo ha sido comprobar la concordancia entre ambas situaciones. Pacientes y métodos: Se ha estudiado a 93 pacientes con asma persistente moderada (36 varones y 57 mujeres; edad media de 40 años). Se les pidió que estimaran su disnea (escala modificada de Borg) en situación de estabilidad y después de cada dosis de histamina en una prueba de broncoprovocación. Cuando la puntuación de Borg en situación estable era menor del percentil 25, se consideró hipoperceptor; si era superior al percentil 75, hiperperceptor, y normoperceptor al grupo restante. En función del cambio de disnea al descender un 20% el volumen espiratorio forzado en el primer segundo se distinguieron los perceptores agudos: hipoperceptores (cambio en Borg inferior al percentil 25), hiperperceptores (cambio superior al percentil 75) y normoperceptores (cambio entre los percentiles 25 y 75). Resultados: En situación estable 23 pacientes fueron hipoperceptores, 58 normoperceptores y 12 hiperperceptores, mientras que durante la broncoconstricción hubo 23 hipoperceptores, 47 normoperceptores y 23 hiperperceptores. El análisis de concordancia mostró un índice kappa de 0,0574 para la hipopercepción, de 0,1521 para la hiperpercepción y de 0,3980 para la normopercepción. Conclusiones: Las percepciones de disnea de los asmáticos en situación estable y durante una broncoconstricción aguda son fenómenos independientes. Por ello, no es posible inferir cómo un paciente va a percibir una crisis de asma valorando únicamente cómo percibe su enfermedad durante la estabilidad clínica

Objective: Three types of asthmatic patients can be identified during periods of clinical stability: "poor perceivers," "normal perceivers," and "over perceivers." When asthmatics undergo bronchial challenge in the laboratory, the same distinctions in type of perception can be observed. The aim of the present study was to determine the level of agreement between the 2 situations. Patients and Methods: A total of 93 patients with persistent moderate asthma (36 men and 57 women; mean age 40 years) were studied. We asked them to assess their dyspnea on a modified Borg scale when stable and after each histamine dose in a bronchial provocation test. When a patient's Borg scale assessment in stable situation was below the 25th percentile, that patient was classified as a poor perceiver. Patients were considered over perceivers if their score in stable situation was in the 75th percentile. Others were labeled normal perceivers. Type of perception during acute bronchoconstriction was defined in function of the change in Borg assessment once forced expiratory volume in the first second had decreased 20%: poor perceivers were those whose change in Borg assessment was in the 25th percentile, over perceivers were in the 75th percentile, and normal perceivers in the middle percentiles. Results: In stable situation, 23 patients were poor perceivers, 58 were normal perceivers, and 12 were over perceivers. During bronchoconstriction, there were 23 poor perceivers, 47 normal perceivers, and 23 over perceivers. Agreement was estimated by a kappa index of 0.0574 for poor perception, 0.1521 for over perception, and 0.3980 for normal perception. Conclusions: Asthmatics' perception of dyspnea during periods of stability and during acute bronchoconstriction are independent phenomena. It is therefore not possible to infer how a patient will perceive an asthmatic attack by evaluating only how he or she perceives breathlessness during stable periods

Percepción de mejoría en los pacientes con asma / Perception of improvement in asthma patients

OBJETIVO: Investigar la capacidad de los pacientes con asma estable de reconocer la mejoría de su obstrucción bronquial con el tratamiento. MÉTODO: Seleccionamos a 75 asmáticos estables (44 mujeres y 31 varones, con una media de edad de 43 ñ 17 años), que referían sentir disnea basal en la escala modificada de Borg, y les provocamos en el laboratorio una broncodilatación aguda del 15 per cent; en esta situación los pacientes fueron interrogados acerca del cambio de disnea experimentado. RESULTADOS: 1. Globalmente, 19 asmáticos (25 per cent) no percibieron mejoría de su disnea con la broncodilatación. 2. La media del cambio en el nivel de disnea fue de 1,17 ñ 1,11; sin embargo, este cambio fue mayor en los pacientes con asma más grave: 0,60 ñ 0,5 en los asmáticos leves, 1,05 ñ 1,07 en los moderados y 1,93 ñ 1,4 en los graves (p < 0,0001). 3. La percepción de mejoría se correlacionó significativamente con el nivel de equilibrio emocional del paciente (ansiedaddepresión), la calidad de vida, la educación, el nivel económico, la edad, la edad de inicio de la enfermedad, la gravedad del asma, disnea y obstrucción basales, la opresión torácica y el número de consultas médicas realizadas en el año precedente. 4. Las variables introducidas en el modelo de regresión (pasos sucesivos) fueron: disnea basal, depresión, opresión torácica y edad. 5. En general, los asmáticos jóvenes cuya asma se inició a una edad más temprana y que, además, tienen menor obstrucción ventilatoria y mejor calidad de vida, presentan tendencia a infravalorar el efecto beneficioso del tratamiento broncodilatador. Además, cuando el asma es grave, estos individuos no perceptores de mejoría presentan significativamente más ingresos en cuidados intensivos por agudizaciones asmáticas. CONCLUSIÓN: El 25 per cent de nuestros asmáticos no es capaz de reconocer que sus bronquios se dilatan como resultado del tratamiento, motivo por el cual ante una agudización podrían retrasar el inicio de la medicación de rescate. Es aconsejable identificar a estos pacientes para establecer las pautas terapéuticas en función de criterios domiciliarios meramente objetivos (monitorización pico-flujo) (AU)

Percepción de la disnea durante la broncoconstricción aguda en los pacientes con asma / Asthma patients' perception of dyspnea during acute bronchoconstriction

El objetivo del estudio fue analizar las variaciones de la percepción de obstrucción bronquial aguda en los asmáticos de nuestra población e intentar definir las variables que condicionan dichas diferencias interindividuales. Se estudió a 153 asmáticos en situación estable, midiendo la disnea que percibían en una escala de Borg durante la realización de una prueba de provocación bronquial con histamina. Para el análisis de la percepción individual se valoraron tanto la PS20 (disnea en la escala de Borg al caer el FEV1 un 20 per cent) como la diferencia matemática entre la PS20 y la disnea basal ("cambio en Borg" [CB]). Según nuestros resultados: a) el conjunto de factores que determinan la PS20 (regresión lineal múltiple) ha sido la ansiedad, la disnea basal y la PC20; b) dentro de cada grupo de gravedad de asma existen diferencias en la disnea percibida cuando el FEV1 desciende un 20 per cent (análisis de la varianza de medidas repetidas), de modo que los pacientes con asma leve y sin obstrucción bronquial perciben más el cambio de disnea; c) el análisis del CB durante la prueba de provocación bronquial nos ha permitido distinguir 4 formas de percibir la disnea: un 15 per cent de los pacientes son disperceptores, un 13 per cent hipoperceptores, un 48 per cent normoperceptores y el 24 per cent hiperperceptores; d) los hipoperceptores y disperceptores tienen mayor riesgo de agudizaciones graves, mientras que los hiperperceptores generan innecesarias consultas médicas, y e) los grupos con una peor calidad de vida son los disperceptores, seguidos de los hiperperceptores. En conclusión, un elevado porcentaje de asmáticos no percibe de forma adecuada la obstrucción bronquial aguda, y el método sencillo de conocer cómo es dicha percepción consiste en calcular su cambio de disnea (en la escala de Borg) durante una prueba de provocación bronquial. La forma de percibir la disnea no puede inferirse de antemano y tiene repercusiones importantes, entre otras, en la utilización de recursos médicos y en la calidad de vida de los pacientes (AU)