RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The inter-phase gap (IPG) offset effect is defined as the dB offset between the linear parts of electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) amplitude growth functions for two stimuli differing only in IPG. The method was recently suggested to represent neural health in cochlear implant (CI) users while being unaffected by CI electrode impedances. Hereby, a larger IPG offset effect should reflect better neural health. The aims of the present study were to (1) examine whether the IPG offset effect negatively correlates with the ECAP threshold and the preoperative pure-tone average (PTA) in CI recipients with residual acoustic hearing and (2) investigate the dependency of the IPG offset effect on hair cell survival and intracochlear electrode impedances. DESIGN: Seventeen adult study participants with residual acoustic hearing at 500 Hz undergoing CI surgery at the University Hospital of Zurich were prospectively enrolled. ECAP thresholds, IPG offset effects, electrocochleography (ECochG) responses to 500 Hz tone bursts, and monopolar electrical impedances were obtained at an apical, middle, and basal electrode set during and between 4 and 12 weeks after CI surgery. Pure-tone audiometry was conducted within 3 weeks before surgery and approximately 6 weeks after surgery. Linear mixed regression analyses and t tests were performed to assess relationships between (changes in) ECAP threshold, IPG offset, impedance, PTA, and ECochG amplitude. RESULTS: The IPG offset effect positively correlated with the ECAP threshold in intraoperative recordings (p < 0.001) and did not significantly correlate with the preoperative PTA (p = 0.999). The IPG offset showed a postoperative decrease for electrode sets that showed an ECochG amplitude drop. This IPG offset decrease was significantly larger than for electrode sets that showed no ECochG amplitude decrease, t(17) = 2.76, p = 0.014. Linear mixed regression analysis showed no systematic effect of electrode impedance changes on the IPG offset effect (p = 0.263) but suggested a participant-dependent effect of electrode impedance on IPG offset. CONCLUSIONS: The present study results did not reveal the expected relationships between the IPG offset effect and ECAP threshold values or between the IPG offset effect and preoperative acoustic hearing. Changes in electrode impedance did not exhibit a direct impact on the IPG offset effect, although this impact might be individualized among CI recipients. Overall, our findings suggest that the interpretation and application of the IPG offset effect in clinical settings should be approached with caution considering its complex relationships with other cochlear and neural health metrics.
RESUMO
Background: Cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion can change the mechanical state of the ear whereby wideband tympanometry absorbance (WBTA) may serve as a sensitive tool to monitor these mechanical changes of the peripheral auditory pathway after CI surgery. In WBTA, the amount of acoustic energy reflected by the tympanic membrane is assessed over a wide frequency range from 226 Hz to 8000 Hz. The objective of this study was to monitor changes in WBTA in CI recipients before and after surgery. Methods: Following otoscopy, WBTA measurements were conducted twice in both ears of 38 standard CI recipients before and in the range of 4 to 15 weeks after CI implantation. Changes from pre- to postoperative absorbance patterns were compared for the implanted as well as the contralateral control ear for six different frequencies (500 Hz, 750 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, 3000 Hz, 4000 Hz). Furthermore, the influence of the time point of the measurement, surgical access, electrode type, sex and side of the implantation were assessed for the implanted and the control ear in a linear mixed model. Results: A significant decrease in WBTA could be observed in the implanted ear when compared with the contralateral control ear for 750 Hz (p < 0.01) and 1000 Hz (p < 0.05). The typical two-peak pattern of WBTA measurements was seen in both ears preoperatively but changed to a one-peak pattern in the newly implanted ear. The linear mixed model showed that not only the cochlear implantation in general but also the insertion through the round window compared to the cochleostomy leads to a decreased absorbance at 750 and 1000 Hz. Conclusions: With WBTA, we were able to detect mechanical changes of the acoustical pathway after CI surgery. The implantation of a CI led to decreased absorbance in the lower frequencies and the two-peak pattern was shifted to a one-peak pattern. The result of the linear mixed model indicates that WBTA can detect mechanical changes due to cochlear implantation not only in the middle ear but also in the inner ear.