Soluble Nogo-Receptor-Fc decoy (AXER-204) in patients with chronic cervical spinal cord injury in the USA: a first-in-human and randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes neural disconnection and persistent neurological deficits, so axon sprouting and plasticity might promote recovery. Soluble Nogo-Receptor-Fc decoy (AXER-204) blocks inhibitors of axon growth and promotes recovery of motor function after SCI in animals. This first-in-human and randomised trial sought to determine primarily the safety and pharmacokinetics of AXER-204 in individuals with chronic SCI, and secondarily its effect on recovery. METHODS: We conducted a two-part study in adults (aged 18-65 years) with chronic (>1 year) cervical traumatic SCI at six rehabilitation centres in the USA. In part 1, AXER-204 was delivered open label as single intrathecal doses of 3 mg, 30 mg, 90 mg, or 200 mg, with primary outcomes of safety and pharmacokinetics. Part 2 was a randomised, parallel, double-blind comparison of six intrathecal doses of 200 mg AXER-204 over 104 days versus placebo. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) by investigators using a central electronic system, stratified in blocks of four by American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade and receipt of AXER-204 in part 1. All investigators and patients were masked to treatment allocation until at least day 169. The part 2 primary objectives were safety and pharmacokinetics, with a key secondary objective to assess change in International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI) Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS) at day 169 for all enrolled participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03989440, and is completed. FINDINGS: We treated 24 participants in part 1 (six per dose; 18 men, six women), and 27 participants in part 2 (13 placebo, 14 AXER-204; 23 men, four women), between June 20, 2019, and June 21, 2022. There were no deaths and no discontinuations from the study due to an adverse event in part 1 and 2. In part 2, treatment-related adverse events were of similar incidence in AXER-204 and placebo groups (ten [71%] vs nine [69%]). Headache was the most common treatment-related adverse event (five [21%] in part 1, 11 [41%] in part 2). In part 1, AXER-204 reached mean maximal CSF concentration 1 day after dosing with 200 mg of 412 000 ng/mL (SD 129 000), exceeding those concentrations that were efficacious in animal studies. In part 2, mean changes from baseline to day 169 in ISNCSCI UEMS were 1·5 (SD 3·3) for AXER-204 and 0·9 (2·3) for placebo (mean difference 0·54, 95% CI -1·48 to 2·55; p=0·59). INTERPRETATION: This study delivers the first, to our knowledge, clinical trial of a rationally designed pharmacological treatment intended to promote neural repair in chronic SCI. AXER-204 appeared safe and reached target CSF concentrations; exploratory biomarker results were consistent with target engagement and synaptic stabilisation. Post-hoc subgroup analyses suggest that future trials could investigate efficacy in patients with moderately severe SCI without prior AXER-204 exposure. FUNDING: Wings for Life Foundation, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institute on Drug Abuse, and ReNetX Bio.

A randomized, double-blind, study of rofecoxib in patients with mild cognitive impairment.

Inflammatory mechanisms have been implicated in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and might be mediated via the COX-2 enzyme. Previous studies with the selective COX-2 inhibitors, rofecoxib and celecoxib, have shown that they do not alter the progression of AD. We conducted a double-blind study to investigate whether rofecoxib could delay a diagnosis of AD in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a group with an expected annual AD diagnosis rate of 10-15%. MCI patients > or =65 years were randomized to rofecoxib 25 mg (N=725) or placebo (N=732) daily for up to 4 years. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with a clinical diagnosis of AD. The estimated annual AD diagnosis rate was lower than the anticipated 10-15%: 6.4% in the rofecoxib group vs 4.5% in the placebo group (rofecoxib : placebo hazard ratio=1.46 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.94), p=0.011). Analyses of secondary end points, including measures of cognition (eg the cognitive subscale of the AD Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog)) and global function (eg the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)), did not demonstrate differences between treatment groups. There was also no consistent evidence that rofecoxib differed from placebo in post hoc analyses comparing ADAS-Cog and CDR-sum of boxes scores in overlapping subgroups of patients who had Mini Mental State Exam scores of 24-26 in the present MCI study and in a previous AD treatment study with a similar design. The results from this MCI study did not support the hypothesis that rofecoxib would delay a diagnosis of AD. In conjunction with the lack of effects observed in previous AD studies, the findings suggest that inhibition of COX-2 is not a useful therapeutic approach in AD.

Randomized phase 2 trial of NP001-a novel immune regulator: Safety and early efficacy in ALS.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of NP001, a novel immune regulator of inflammatory monocytes/macrophages, for slowing progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: This was a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of NP001 in 136 patients with ALS of <3 years' duration and forced vital capacity ≥70%. Participants received NP001 2 mg/kg, NP001 1 mg/kg, or placebo for 6 months. Safety, tolerability, and inflammatory biomarkers were assessed throughout the study. Preliminary efficacy was evaluated using the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) slope and change from baseline, with and without matched historical placebo controls, after 6 months of treatment. A post hoc analysis of the percentage of patients ("responders") whose ALSFRS-R did not change from baseline was also conducted. RESULTS: NP001 was generally safe and well-tolerated, except for infusion site pain and dizziness. No significant slowing of decline in the primary or secondary measures was observed. However, slowing of progression was observed in the high-dose group in patients with greater inflammation (wide range C-reactive protein). Moreover, NP001 may have dose dependently halted symptom progression in a subset of patients. More than 2 times as many patients on high-dose NP001 (25%) did not progress during 6 months of treatment compared with those on placebo (11%). Most "responders" had an elevated biomarker of inflammation, interleukin-18, and were positive for lipopolysaccharide at baseline, which decreased after treatment with NP001. CONCLUSION: The arresting of progression of ALS symptoms by NP001 in a subset of patients with marked neuroinflammation, as observed here, will represent a novel therapeutic approach for patients with ALS, if confirmed. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with ALS, NP001 is safe and did not significantly slow progression of the disease (difference in slope of the ALSFRS-R/month 0.12 favoring NP001, p = 0.55). The study lacks the precision to exclude an important effect of NP001.

NP001 regulation of macrophage activation markers in ALS: a phase I clinical and biomarker study.

This is a phase I, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose safety and tolerability study of NP001 in patients with ALS. NP001 is a novel regulator of inflammatory macrophages and monocytes. As ALS progression is thought to be related to neuroinflammation, an additional objective of the study was to assess the effects of NP001 administration on monocyte activation markers. Thirty-two ALS patients were enrolled and received either placebo (eight) or one of four (six at each dose) ascending single i.v. doses (0.2, 0.8, 1.6 and 3.2 mg/kg NP001). Patients were monitored for safety, and blood monocyte immune activation markers CD16 and HLA-DR were assessed pre- and 24 h post-dosing. Changes from baseline were calculated. Results showed that NP001 was generally safe and well tolerated. Importantly, a single dose of NP001 caused a dose-dependent reduction in expression of monocyte CD16, a marker of monocyte activation/inflammation. Additionally, monocyte HLA-DR expression was also decreased in those patients with elevated values at baseline. In conclusion, these data indicate that NP001 has an acute effect on inflammatory monocytes in ALS patient blood. The potential for modulation of inflammation in the context of ALS disease progression will require further study with long-term follow-up.

Telephone screening for amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of telephone screening for identifying subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) for enrollment in a clinical trial and to identify which elements of the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) best predicted the in-clinic determination of aMCI. METHODS: Subjects aged >/=65 years with memory complaints responded to an advertisement for a clinical trial by calling a central telephone recruiting agency. To determine eligibility, subjects went through a stepwise selection procedure involving a review of major protocol inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by administration of the Category Fluency Test (CFT) and then the TICS-m. Subjects meeting entry criteria, who obtained a score of /=24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination and a score of