Varicocele, conventional laparoscopic ligation versus occluding balloon embolization.

INTRODUCTION: Varicocele is a relatively complex pathology that affects the pampiniform plexus of veins in the spermatic cord. Modern treatment involves both urological/surgical and interventional procedures. Our objective is to compare outcomes of conventional laparoscopic ligation (LL) and occluding balloon embolization (OBE) a percutaneous interventional procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated retrospectively a total of 98 patients, divided in two cohorts; arm A with 48 and arm B with 50 patients. Arm A patients underwent LL, while arm B ones were treated in interventional radiology suite, via OBE method. No comorbidities were reported, especially scrotal ones. Hence, all patients have been asked to respect 3 and 6 months' follow-up, clinical examination and ultrasonography were performed. Age range of the entire sample: 15-45 years old, with average of 28 years. The study involved two European centers. We performed a comparative analysis (Fisher's test) of intra-operative time, hospitalization and patient's postoperative recovery time. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Outcomes have been in line with the recent literature ones, allowing the occluding balloon embolization a small advantage for quicker operative average time, hospitalization needed and full recovery to normal activities for the patient. Main limitation was the unfeasibility of cost-effectiveness analysis due to national differences, limited sample and lack of complete semen analysis pre- and postoperative. CONCLUSION: Both OBE and LL are safe and effective procedures in the treatment of varicocele, conceding OBE a slight advantage in terms of hospital stay and full recovery to normal activity of patients.

Inflammation: predictive factor for negative evolution of prostate diseases.

The most frequent prostate diseases depending on age are prostatitis in young men, benign prostate hypertrophy in men over 50 years old, and prostate cancer (PCa) in elderly patients. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the role of inflammation in the progression of prostate diseases. We used clinical and paraclinical techniques for the positive diagnosis [serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determination, we performed transrectal ultrasound to asses the prostate volume and prostate biopsy or transurethral resection of the prostate, where it was imposed]. The prostate tissue specimens were analyzed histopathologically and immunohistochemically. Our results show that PCa patients with higher inflammation rates had a higher Gleason score in both the castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) group and the castration-sensitive group. We have noticed that patients with high inflammation grade also had a much higher International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). In conclusion, we can say that in our study, inflammation played an important role in the evolution of benign and malignant prostate diseases; its presence has influenced directly the severity of symptoms, and the aggressiveness of the diseases.