Smoking Among Immigrant Groups in the United States: Prevalence, Education Gradients, and Male-to-Female Ratios.

INTRODUCTION: Immigrants in the United States are less likely to smoke than those born in the United States, but studies have not fully described the diversity of their smoking patterns. We investigate smoking by world region of birth and duration of residence in the United States, with a comprehensive approach covering current prevalence levels, education gradients, and male-to-female ratios. METHODS: The data originate from the National Health Interview Surveys, 2000-2015, and the sample of 365 404 includes both US-born and foreign-born respondents aged 25-70 years. World region of birth and duration of residence in the United States measure immigrant characteristics. Current cigarette smoking was analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Immigrant groups were protected from smoking and had weaker education gradients in smoking and larger male-to-female smoking ratios than the US-born population. However, large differences emerged among the immigrant groups for region of birth but less so for duration of residence in the United States. For example, immigrants from sub-Saharan Africa and the Indian subcontinent have low prevalence, weak education gradients, and high male-to-female ratios. Immigrants from Europe have the opposite pattern, and immigrants from Latin America fall between those two extremes. CONCLUSION: The stage of the cigarette epidemic in the region of birth helps explain the diverse group profiles. Duration of residence in the United States does less to account for the differences in smoking than region of birth. The findings illustrate the heterogeneity of immigrant populations originating from diverse regions across the world and limited convergence with the host population after immigration. IMPLICATIONS: The study identifies immigrant groups that, because of high smoking prevalence related to levels in the host country, should be targeted for cessation efforts. It also identifies immigrant groups with low prevalence for which anti-smoking programs should encourage maintenance of healthy habits. Many immigrant groups show strong education disparities in smoking, further suggesting that smokers with lower levels of education be targeted by public health programs.

Use of tobacco, alcohol and cannabis in late adolescence: roles of family living arrangement and socioeconomic group.

BACKGROUND: France has one of the highest levels in Europe for early use of legal and illegal psychoactive substances. We investigate in this country disparities in adolescent problematic substance use by family living arrangement and parental socioeconomic group. METHODS: The data used were from the 2017 nationally-representative ESCAPAD survey, conducted among 17-year-olds in metropolitan France (N = 39,115 with 97% response rate). Prevalence ratios (PR) were estimated using modified Poisson regression. RESULTS: Adolescents living in non-intact families (44%) reported daily smoking, binge drinking and regular cannabis use (respectively ≥3 episodes and ≥ 10 uses in the last 30 days) much more frequently than those living in intact families (for example, the PR estimates for father single parent families were respectively 1.69 (1.55-1.84), 1.29 (1.14-1.45) and 2.31 (1.95-2.74)). Socioeconomic differences across types of families did little to explain the differential use. Distinctive socioeconomic patterns were found: a classical gradient for smoking (PR = 1.34 (1.22-1.47) for the most disadvantaged group relative to the most privileged); an inverse association for binge drinking (PR = 0.72 (0.64-0.81) for the most disadvantaged relative to the most privileged), and no significant variation for cannabis use. CONCLUSION: Our findings shed light on the consistency of the excess use of adolescents from non-intact families and on the substance-specific nature of the association with parental socioeconomic group. Preventive approaches at the population level should be complemented by more targeted strategies.

Smoking among immigrant groups in metropolitan France: prevalence levels, male-to-female ratios and educational gradients.

BACKGROUND: Although the French population comprises large and diverse immigrant groups, there is little research on smoking disparities by geographical origin. The aim of this study is to investigate in this country smoking among immigrants born in either north Africa, sub-Saharan Africa or French overseas départements. METHODS: The data originate from the 2010 Health Barometer survey representative of metropolitan France. The subsample of 20,211 individuals aged 18-70 years (born either in metropolitan France or in the above-mentioned geographical regions) was analysed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Both immigrants from sub-Saharan Africa and immigrants from overseas départements were protected from smoking compared to the reference population, and the former had a distinctive strongly reversed educational gradient in both genders. Returned former settlers from the French colonies in North Africa (repatriates) had the highest smoking levels. Natives from the Maghreb (Maghrebins) showed considerable gender discordance, with men having both a higher prevalence (borderline significance) and a reversed gradient and women having lower prevalence than the reference population. CONCLUSION: Immigrants from regions of the world in stage 1 of the cigarette epidemic had relatively low smoking levels and those from regions in stage 2 had relatively high smoking levels. Some groups had a profile characteristic of late phases of the cigarette epidemic, and others, some of which long-standing residents, seemed to be positioned at its early stages. The situation for Maghrebins reflected the enduring influence of gendered norms post-migration. Based on their educational gradients, immigrants from overseas départements (particularly men) and Maghrebin women may be at risk of losing their particularly low prevalence. Immigrants from sub-Saharan Africa could retain it. In-depth analysis of smoking profiles of immigrants' groups is essential for a better targeting of smoking prevention and cessation programs.

Adolescent Hazardous Drinking and Socioeconomic Status in France: Insights Into the Alcohol Harm Paradox.

PURPOSE: The "alcohol harm paradox" has been evidenced among adults, but it is still largely unexplored among adolescents. We examined in a sample of French adolescents the relation between family socioeconomic status (SES), family living arrangement and parental substance use on 1 hand, and heavy episodic drinking (HED), lifetime alcohol-induced emergency room visits (A-ERV), and number of alcoholic drinks and solitary drinking during the last episode on the other hand. METHODS: A cross-sectional nationwide survey in March 2017 involved 13,314 French adolescents aged 17-18.5 years. They completed a pen and paper questionnaire about their own and their parents' alcohol and tobacco consumption. We used risk ratios (RRs) from modified Poisson regressions to assess the relationships. RESULTS: Adolescents from the lowest SES had reduced likelihood of reporting 1-2 or 3-5 episodes of heavy drinking compared to those from the highest SES (RR = 0.58, 95% confidence interval = [0.50; 0.66] and 0.35 [0.27; 0.45]), but no difference for six or more episodes (RR = 0.81 [0.59; 1.12]). A-ERV was more frequent among lowest SES adolescents (RR = 1.86 [1.05; 3.30]), possibly due to drinking larger quantities of alcohol and to more frequent solitary drinking in their last episode (p < .001). SES, parental substance use, and family living arrangement were independently associated with HED. DISCUSSION: Our findings reveal an "alcohol harm paradox" in late adolescence in France. Lower SES adolescents exhibit reduced HED but were more likely to consume large quantities alone and experience A-ERV. This emphasizes the significance of considering social determinants in alcohol-related research and interventions.

Can revenue collection for public funding in health care be progressive? An assessment of 29 Countries.

Most research on health care equity focuses on accessing services, with less attention given to how revenue is collected to pay for a country's health care bill. This article examines the progressivity of revenue collection among publicly funded sources: income taxes, social insurance (often in the form of payroll) taxes, and consumption taxes (e.g., value-added taxes). We develop methodology to derive a qualitative index that rates each of 29 high-income countries as to its progressivity or regressivity for each of the three sources of revenue. A variety of data sources are employed, some from secondary data sources and other from country representatives of the Health Systems and Policy Monitor of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. We found that countries with more progressive income tax systems used more income-based tax brackets and had larger differences in marginal tax rates between the brackets. The more progressive social insurance revenue collection systems did not have an upper income cap and exempted poorer persons or reduced their contributions. The only pattern regarding consumption taxes was that countries that exhibited the fewest overall income inequalities tended to have least regressive consumption tax policies. The article also provides several examples from the sample of countries on ways to make public revenue financing of health care more progressive.

Roles of parental smoking and family structure for the explanation of socio-economic inequalities in adolescent smoking.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Among European countries, France is particularly concerned by adolescent tobacco smoking, especially in disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds (SES). We measured the respective contributions of parental smoking and family living arrangement to social disparities in smoking during adolescence. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of survey data. SETTING: A cross-sectional nation-wide exhaustive 12-day survey in March 2017 of French youth aged 17-18.5 years participating in the national mandatory civic information day. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 13 314 adolescents answering a pen-and-paper questionnaire about their own tobacco consumption and the smoking of their parents. MEASUREMENTS: Risk ratios (RRs) were computed using modified Poisson regressions, and population-attributable fraction (PAF) was used as a measure of the explanatory roles of the different factors as mediators of SES. FINDINGS: Adolescents living within very privileged and privileged SES were significantly less likely to report daily tobacco smoking (20.4 and 22.7%, respectively) than those within modest and disadvantaged ones (26.0 and 28.6%, respectively). Parental smoking and family living arrangement independently explained the smoking inequalities among adolescents. After adjusting for schooling factors, the risks associated with parental smoking ranged between RR = 1.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.50-1.79] when the father only smoked and RR = 2.17 (95% CI = 1.99-2.36) when both parents smoked, compared with non-smoking parents; the risk associated with living in a non-intact family was 1.35 (95% CI = 1.26-1.43) and that of living outside the parental home was 1.20 (95% CI = 1.10-1.30). Apprentices and adolescents out of school had higher risks than those at school (RR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.68-1.98) and RR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.92-2.29). The contribution of parental smoking to adolescent smoking (PAF = 32%) was greater than that of SES (PAF = 9%), family living arrangement (PAF = 17%) or schooling factors (14%). The share of SES decreased from 18 to 9% when considering these mediating factors. CONCLUSION: In France, parental smoking appears to be the factor that most influences adolescent smoking, followed by family living arrangement; the role of family socio-economic status is small in comparison.

Mediating role of education and lifestyles in the relationship between early-life conditions and health: evidence from the 1958 British cohort.

The paper focuses on the long-term effects of early-life conditions with comparison to lifestyles and educational attainment on health status in a cohort of British people born in 1958. Using the longitudinal follow-up data at age 23, 33, 42 and 46, we build a dynamic model to investigate the influence of each determinant on health and the mediating role of education and lifestyles in the relationship between early-life conditions and later health. Direct and indirect effects of early-life conditions on adult health are explored using auxiliary linear regressions of education and lifestyles and panel Probit specifications of self-assessed health with random effects addressing individual unexplained heterogeneity. Our study shows that early-life conditions are important parameters for adult health accounting for almost 20% of explained health inequality when mediating effects are identified. The contribution of lifestyles reduces from 32% down to 25% when indirect effects of early-life conditions and education are distinguished. Noticeably, the absence of father at the time of birth and experience of financial hardships represent the lead factors for direct effects on health. The absence of obesity at 16 influences health both directly and indirectly working through lifestyles.

Gender Patterns in Immigrants' Health Profiles in France: Tobacco, Alcohol, Obesity and Self-Reported Health.

Background: to date, little attention has been given to gender differences in the health of migrants relative to native-born. In this study, we examine the health profile of the largest immigrant groups in metropolitan France, considering several health indicators and with a special interest in the gendered patterns. Methods: The data originate from the 2017 Health Barometer survey representative of metropolitan France. A subsample of 19,857 individuals aged 18-70 years was analysed using modified Poisson regression, and risk ratio estimates (RR) were provided for the different migrant groups regarding alcohol use, current smoking, obesity and less-than-good self-reported health, adjusting for age and educational level. Results: None of the groups of male migrants differs from the native-born in terms of self-reported health, and they have healthier behaviours for alcohol (men from sub-Saharan Africa: 0.42 (0.29-0.61)) and from the Maghreb: 0.30 (0.1-0.54)) and smoking (men from sub-Saharan Africa: 0.64 (0.4-0.84)), with less frequent obesity (men from the Maghreb: 0.61 (0.3-0.95)). The latter, however, more frequently report current smoking (1.21 (1.0-1.46)). For women, less-than-good health is more frequently reported by the groups from sub-Saharan Africa (1.42 (1.1-1.75)) and from the Maghreb (1.55 (1.3-1.84)). Healthier behaviours were found for alcohol (women from overseas départements: 0.38 (0.1-0.85)) and from the Maghreb: (0.18 (0.0-0.57)) and current smoking (women from southern Europe: 0.68 (0.4-0.97), from sub-Saharan Africa: 0.23 (0.1-0.38) and from the Maghreb: 0.42 (0.2-0.61)). Conversely, some were more frequently obese (women from overseas départements: 1.79 (1.2-2.56) and from sub-Saharan Africa: 1.67 (1.2-2.23)). In the latter two groups from Africa, there is a larger relative male excess for tobacco than in the native-born (male-to-female ratios of respectively 2.87 (1.6-5.09) and 3.1 (2.0-4.65) vs 1.13 (1.0-1.20)) and there is a female excess for obesity (0.51 (0.2-0.89) and 0.41 (0.2-0.67)) in contrast with the native-born (1.07 (0.9-1.16)). The female disadvantage in terms of less-than-good self-reported health is more pronounced among migrants from the Maghreb than among the natives (0.56(0.4-0.46) vs. 0.86 (0.8-0.91)). Conclusion: Considering a set of four health indicators, we provide evidence for distinctive gender patterns among immigrants in France. Male immigrants have a healthy behavioural profile in comparison with the natives and no health disadvantage. Female immigrants have a more mixed profile, with a health disadvantage for the non-Western groups from Africa. The contribution to this discordance of socioeconomic factors and gender relations needs to be investigated.

Inequality of opportunities in health and death: an investigation from birth to middle age in Great Britain.

OBJECTIVE: We assess the existence of unfair inequalities in health and death using the normative framework of inequality of opportunities, from birth to middle age in Great Britain. METHODS: We use data from the 1958 National Child Development Study, which provides a unique opportunity to observe individual health from birth to the age of 54, including the occurrence of mortality. We measure health status combining self-assessed health and mortality. We compare and statistically test the differences between the cumulative distribution functions of health status at each age according to one childhood circumstance beyond people's control: the father's occupation. RESULTS: At all ages, individuals born to a 'professional', 'senior manager or technician' father report a better health status and have a lower mortality rate than individuals born to 'skilled', 'partly skilled' or 'unskilled' manual workers and individuals without a father at birth. The gap in the probability to report good health between individuals born into high social backgrounds compared with low, increases from 12 percentage points at age 23 to 26 at age 54. Health gaps are even more marked in health states at the bottom of the health distribution when mortality is combined with self-assessed health. CONCLUSIONS: There is increasing inequality of opportunities in health over the lifespan in Great Britain. The tag of social background intensifies as individuals get older. Finally, there is added analytical value to combining mortality with self-assessed health when measuring health inequalities.

Impact of early primary care follow-up after discharge on hospital readmissions.

Reducing repeated hospitalizations of patients with chronic conditions is a policy objective for improving system efficiency. We test the hypothesis that the risk of readmission is associated with the timing and intensity of primary care follow-up after discharge, focusing on patients hospitalized for heart failure in France. We propose a discrete-time model which takes into account that primary care treatments have a lagged and cumulative effect on readmission risk, and an instrumental variable approach, exploiting geographical differences in availability of generalists. We show that the early consultations with a GP after discharge can reduce the 28-day readmission risk by almost 50%, and that patients with higher ambulatory care utilization have smaller odds of readmission. Furthermore, geographical disparities in primary care affect indirectly the readmission risk. These results suggest that interventions which strengthen communication between hospitals and generalists are elemental for reducing readmissions and for developing effective strategies at the hospital level, it is also necessary to consider primary care resources that are available to patients.

Changes in Smoking Behavior over Family Transitions: Evidence for Anticipation and Adaptation Effects.

The study of changes in smoking behaviors over the life course is a promising line of research. This paper aims to analyze the temporal relation between family transitions (partnership formation, first childbirth, separation) and changes in smoking initiation and cessation. We propose a discrete-time logistic model to explore the timing of changes in terms of leads and lags effects up to three years around the event in order to measure both anticipation and adaptation mechanisms. Retrospective biographical data from the Santé et Itinéraires Professionnels (SIP) survey conducted in France in 2006 are used. Partnership formation was followed for both genders by a fall in smoking initiation and an immediate rise in smoking cessation. Childbirth was associated with increased smoking cessation immediately around childbirth, and additionally, females showed an anticipatory increase in smoking cessation up to two years before childbirth. Couple separation was accompanied by an anticipatory increase in smoking initiation for females up to two years prior to the separation, but this effect only occurred in males during separation. Our findings highlight opportunities for more targeted interventions over the life course to reduce smoking, and therefore have relevance for general practitioners and public policy elaboration.

Life Course Changes in Smoking by Gender and Education: A Cohort Comparison Across France and the United States.

Widening of educational disparities and a narrowing female advantage in mortality stem in good part from disparities in smoking. The changes in smoking and mortality disparities across cohorts and countries have been explained by an epidemic model of cigarette use but are also related to life course changes. To better describe and understand changing disparities over the life course, we compare age patterns of smoking in three cohorts and two nations (France and the United States) using smoking history measures from the 2010 French Health Barometer (N = 20,940) and the 2010 U.S. National Health Interview Survey Sample Adult File (N = 20,444). The results demonstrate statistically significant widening of gender and educational differences from adolescence to early and middle adulthood, thus accentuating the disparities already emerging during adolescence. In addition, the widening disparities over the life course have been changing across cohorts: Age differences in educational disparities have grown in recent cohorts (especially in France), while age differences in gender disparities have narrowed. The findings highlight the multiple sources of inequality in smoking and health in high-income nations.

Disadvantaged Social Groups and the Cigarette Epidemic: Limits of the Diffusion of Innovations Vision.

The original four-stage model of the cigarette epidemic has been extended with diffusion of innovations theory to reflect socio-economic differences in cigarette use. Recently, two revisions of the model have been proposed: (1) separate analysis of the epidemic stages for men and women, in order to improve generalization to developing countries, and; (2) addition of a fifth stage to the smoking epidemic, in order to account for the persistence of smoking in disadvantaged social groups. By developing a cohort perspective spanning a 35-year time period in France and the USA, we uncover distinctive features which challenge the currently held vision on the evolution of smoking inequalities within the framework of the cigarette epidemic. We argue that the reason for which the model may not be fit to the lower educated is that the imitation mechanism underlying the diffusion of innovations works well with regard to adoption of the habit, but is much less relevant with regard to its rejection. Based on those observations, we support the idea that the nature and timing of the epidemic differs enough to treat the stages separately for high and low education groups, and discuss policy implications.

Educational inequalities in smoking over the life cycle: an analysis by cohort and gender.

OBJECTIVES: The study investigates the life cycle patterns of educational inequalities in smoking according to gender over three successive generations. METHODS: Based on retrospective smoking histories collected by the nationwide French Health Barometer survey 2010, we explored educational inequalities in smoking at each age, using the relative index of inequality. RESULTS: Educational inequalities in smoking increase across cohorts for men and women, corresponding to a decline in smoking among the highly educated alongside progression among the lower educated. The analysis also shows a life cycle evolution: for all cohorts and for men and women, inequalities are considerable during adolescence, then start declining from 18 years until the age of peak prevalence (around 25), after which they remain stable throughout the life cycle, even tending to rise for the most recent cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis contributes to the description of the "smoking epidemic" and highlights adolescence and late adulthood as life cycle stages with greater inequalities.

Les soins et services de santé sont-ils financièrement accessibles ? De nouvelles bases factuelles sur la protection financière en France

Cette étude fait partie d’une série de rapports par pays qui présentent de nouvelles bases factuelles sur la protection financière – l’accessibilité financière aux soins et services de santé – au sein des systèmes de santé en Europe. Les restes à charge catastrophiques sont inférieurs en France par rapport à ceux enregistrés dans de nombreux pays de l’Union européenne (UE), mais les besoins de soins dentaires non satisfaits sont supérieurs à la moyenne de l’UE et ces deux constats sont associés à d’importantes inégalités liées au revenu. Les restes à charge catastrophiques affectent le quintile des ménages les plus pauvres et ils sont principalement dus aux restes à charge associés aux médicaments en ambulatoire, aux produits médicaux et aux soins externes. Il est très probable qu’ils soient le reflet d’un système de participations financières généralisées, importantes et complexes pour des soins et services de santé financés publiquement, notamment des dépassements d’honoraires élevés pour les matériels et produits médicaux et pour les soins et services ambulatoires. La couverture maladie complémentaire (ou complémentaire santé) qui rembourse une partie des dépenses de santé couvre près de 95 % de la population et améliore la protection financière de la plupart des individus grâce aux efforts continus du gouvernement visant à garantir un accès gratuit ou subventionné à cette couverture aux personnes aux revenus les plus modestes. Néanmoins, la complémentaire santé ne résout pas tous les problèmes d’accessibilité financière aux soins : les ménages aux revenus les plus modestes sont les plus susceptibles de ne pas détenir de complémentaire et celle-ci constitue une source de financement particulièrement régressive du système de santé. Elle implique par ailleurs un coût de transaction et des coûts financiers élevés pour les pouvoirs publics et les salariés. Depuis 2019, le gouvernement a pris des mesures visant à réduire les dépassements d’honoraires pour les produits médicaux. Pour aller plus loin, le gouvernement peut utiliser plus efficacement les ressources publiques en réduisant les participations financières et en permettant que le système de santé repose moins sur la couverture maladie complémentaire : par exemple, en exonérant les ménages à faibles revenus et les personnes atteintes d’une maladie chronique de toute participation financière, en introduisant un plafond sur toutes les participations financières, en limitant davantage les dépassements d’honoraires et en réduisant la régressivité du financement de la complémentaire santé.

Can people afford to pay for health care? New evidence on financial protection in France

This review is part of a series of country-based studies generating new evidence on financial protection – affordable access to health care – in health systems in Europe. Catastrophic health spending is lower in France than in many other European Union (EU) countries, but unmet need for dental care is above the EU average and both outcomes are marked by significant income inequality. Catastrophic health spending is heavily concentrated in the poorest fifth of households and mainly driven by out-of-pocket payments for outpatient medicines, medical products and outpatient care. This is likely to reflect widespread, heavy and complex user charges (co-payments) for publicly financed health care, including substantial balance billing for medical products and outpatient care. Complementary health insurance (CHI) covering user charges covers around 95% of the population and improves financial protection for most people due to sustained Government efforts to secure free or subsidized access to CHI for people with very low incomes. However, CHI does not fully address the problems caused by user charges: households with the lowest incomes are the least likely to have any form of CHI and CHI is a highly regressive way of financing the health system. It also involves significant transaction and financial costs for the Government and employers. Since 2019 the Government has taken steps to reduce balance billing for medical products. Building on this, the Government can use public resources more efficiently by reducing user charges and limiting the health system’s reliance on CHI – for example, exempting households with low incomes and people with chronic conditions from all co-payments; introducing an income-based cap on all co-payments; further limiting balance billing; and reducing the regressivity of CHI.