Prevalence and Characterisation of Patients with Asthma According to Disease Severity in Portugal: Findings from the EPI-ASTHMA Pilot Study.

Objective: To assess the feasibility of the procedures of EPI-ASTHMA. EPI-ASTHMA is a population-based multicentre stepwise study about the prevalence and characterisation of patients with asthma based on disease severity in Portugal. Methods: A pilot study of EPI-ASTHMA was conducted with adults from three primary care centres. We followed a stepwise approach comprising 4 stages: stage 0-invitation phone call (n ~1316); stage 1-telephone interview (n ~658); stage 2-clinical assessment with physical examination, diagnostic tests, and patient-reported outcome measures, to confirm the diagnosis of those with possible asthma at stage 1 (n ~160); stage 3-characterization of a subgroup of asthma patients by collecting data through a telephone interview, patient file review and CARATm app (n ~40), after 3-months. The frequency of asthma was calculated in relation to the entire study population (stage 1) and the frequency of difficult-to-treat/severe asthma in relation to the number of asthma patients (stage 3). Results: From 1305 adults invited, 892 (68%) accepted to participate (stage 0) and 574 (64%; 53[42-67] y; 43% male) were interviewed (stage 1). From those, 148 (26%; 60[46-68] y; 43% male) were assessed at stage 2, and 46 (31%; 51[39-67] y; 44% male) were diagnosed with asthma. Half of these patients (n = 23) accepted to install the app. Stage 3 was completed by 41 (93%) patients, of whom 31 (83%) had asthma confirmed by their file review. A total of 8% of participants had asthma, of those 17% had difficult-to-treat and 5% severe asthma. Conclusion: Attained recruitment rates and the quality of the results confirmed the feasibility of the EPI-ASTHMA stepwise approach. This pilot study provided insight into the improvement of the procedures to be generalized across the country.

EPI-ASTHMA study protocol: a population-based multicentre stepwise study on the prevalence and characterisation of patients with asthma according to disease severity in Portugal.

INTRODUCTION: In Portugal as in other countries, data on the epidemiology of asthma are mainly grounded in questionnaire studies. Additionally, the detailed characterisation of asthma in terms of disease severity, control and phenotypes remain scarce. Studies assessing the prevalence of asthma and its subgroups using accurate methods are needed. This study aims to determine the prevalence of asthma, difficult-to-treat asthma and severe asthma, and to evaluate sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of those patients, in mainland Portugal. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A population-based nationwide study with a multicentre stepwise approach will be conducted between 2021 and 2023 in 38 primary care centres of the Portuguese National Health Service. The stepwise approach will comprise four stages: Stage 0-telephone call invitation to adult subjects (≥18 years) randomly selected (n~15 000); stage 1-telephone screening interview assessing the participants' respiratory symptoms (n~7500); stage 2-diagnostic visit, including physical examination, diagnostic tests (eg, spirometry, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide, blood eosinophil count) and patient-reported outcome measures for diagnostic confirmation of those identified with possible asthma at stage 1 (n~1800); stage 3-further evaluation of patients with asthma and of patients with difficult-to-treat asthma and severe asthma, after 3 months (n~460). At stage 3, data will be collected from a review of the patient's electronic health records, a follow-up telephone call and the CARATm (Caracteristicas Auto-reportadas de Asma em Tecnologias Móveis) app database. The prevalence of asthma, difficult-to-treat asthma and severe asthma will be determined as the percentage of patients with asthma confirmed from the overall population (stage 1). For the analysis of factors associated with asthma, difficult-to-treat asthma and severe asthma, logistic regression models will be explored. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approvals for the study were obtained from the ethics committee of the local health unit of Matosinhos, Porto (38/CES/JAS), Alto Minho (38/2021/CES) and the regional health administration of Lisbon-Vale do Tejo (035/CES/INV/2021). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05169619.

Managing asthma in primary healthcare.

Asthma brings considerable challenges for family doctors because of its variety of shapes, different levels of severity, a wide age range, and the fact that in the last decades clinicians are able to offer much better treatment options with a better level of disease control and a higher quality of life. The objectives of the current review article are to provide an up-to-date review by primary care respiratory leaders from different countries of the most significant challenges regarding asthma diagnosis and management, the importance of team work and the problems in recognizing and dealing with difficult-to-manage and severe asthma in primary care. The article provides a short review of the main challenges faced by family physicians and other primary health care professionals in supporting their patients in the management of asthma, such as asthma diagnosis, promoting access to spirometry, the importance of a multiprofessional team for the management of asthma, how to organize an asthma review, the promotion of patient autonomy and shared decision-making, improving the use of inhalers, the importance of the personalized asthma action plan, dealing with difficult-to-manage and severe asthma in primary care and choosing when, where and how to refer patients with severe asthma. The article also discusses the development of an integrated approach to asthma care in the community and the promotion of Asthma Right Care.

What attributes do patients prefer in a family physician? A cross-sectional study in a northern region of Portugal.

OBJECTIVES: To determine which modifiable and non-modifiable attributes patients prefer in a family physician, as well as to analyse participants' characteristics associated with their choices. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Family healthcare units (FHU) in the city of Braga and Barcelos (Northern Portugal). PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 18 years or more, enrolled in the selected FHU. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The preferred attributes were assessed with a questionnaire delivered in the FHU. These attributes included gender, age and nationality and the importance of being Portuguese, of greeting with a handshake, of welcoming in the waiting area, of using an identification badge and of wearing a white coat. RESULTS: A total of 556 questionnaires were included in the analysis; 66% and 58% of the participants had no preference for the gender or age of the family physician, respectively. Using a multinomial logistic regression, male participants were 3.8 times more likely to have a preference for a male physician than having no preference, in comparison to female participants (OR 3.864, 95% CI 1.96 to 7.61). More than 69% of the participants considered greeting with a handshake, using an identification badge and wearing a white coat important or very important. There was a statistically significant association between being Portuguese and the major importance given to the use of an identification badge (ß=0.68, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.12). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that modifiable attributes of the family physician (greeting, presence of an identification badge and wearing a white coat) are important for patients. Potential changes in family physician attitude in consultation could ultimately affect patient-physician relationship.

Where does patient autonomy live, in times of crisis in Portugal? / Onde mora a autonomia do paciente em tempos de crise em Portugal?

Coronavirus disease 2019 made us question daily practices, such as the simple handshake. It also raised some ethical and legal issues. Are the ethical principles, that should guide the provision of individualized care, being fulfilled? Will we, as health professionals, be able to provide patients with instruments so that they can fully exercise their autonomy? The guarantee of necessary security solutions, to reduce the risk of contagion in the provision of care, safeguards the principle of non-maleficence. However, the risk of contagion is impossible to completely eliminate, and there is a residual risk associated with the use of physical facilities in healthcare services. But, shouldn't the decision to take that risk be the subject of the patient's free and informed will? The incorporation of telemedicine platforms is ideal for managing several challenges posed by COVID-19, such as the decrease in face-to-face health care assistance. Can the patient really decide how he prefers to be consulted, or are we imposing the consultation model? There have been profound changes in healthcare systems. However, one must remember that there are ethical principles of biomedicine, that should always prevail?

A pandemia de COVID-19 fez-nos questionar práticas diárias até então instituídas, como o simples aperto de mão. Levantou também outras questões, algumas de índole ético-legal. Estarão a ser cumpridos os princípios éticos que devem orientar a prestação de cuidados individualizados? Conseguiremos nós, profissionais de saúde, fornecer instrumentos aos doentes para que possam usufruir plenamente do seu direito de autonomia? A garantia de soluções de segurança necessárias, para diminuir o risco de contágio na prestação de cuidados, salvaguarda o princípio da não maleficiência. Todavia, o risco de contágio é impossível de eliminar na totalidade, existindo um residual associado à utilização das instalações físicas dos serviços de saúde. Mas, não deverá a decisão de assumir esse risco ser alvo do arbítrio livre, informado e esclarecido do doente? A diminuição da atividade assistencial presencial motivou a incorporação de outras ferramentas de comunicação como telefone, correio eletrónico e videochamada. Poderá o paciente realmente decidir sobre a forma como prefere ser consultado, ou estaremos nós a impor o modelo de consulta? Nos últimos meses ocorreram mudanças profundas na forma de trabalho em Saúde, que permanecerão. Não existirão, contudo, princípios éticos da biomedicina, que deverão sempre prevalecer?

A utilização da acupuntura no controlo da dor crónica em usuários com síndrome vertebral com irradiação / The use of acupuncture to control chronic pain in users with irradiated vertebral syndrome

Objetivos: a acupuntura é, cada vez mais, uma técnica utilizada, em usuários portadores de várias patologias, e, em especial, aquelas que são acompanhadas de dor crónica. Esta pesquisa teve como objetivo geral analisar o efeito da terapêutica não farmacológica de acupuntura e eletroacupuntura para o controle da dor crónica, em usuários com diagnóstico médico de síndrome vertebral com irradiação. Métodos: foi realizada uma pesquisa com dois momentos de avaliação ­ antes e após sessões de terapêutica não farmacológica de acupuntura e eletroacupuntura. Utilizou-se um questionário com variáveis de caracterização sociodemográfica e clínica, o Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)e Short Form 6 Dimensions (SF-6D). Resultados: participaram no estudo 43 usuários, tendo sido encontradas diferenças estaticamente significativas, do momento 1 para o momento 2 de avaliação, quer no domínio da severidade da dor (p<0,01), quer no domínio interferência da dor no funcionamento diário (p<0,01), assim como nas diferentes dimensões do SF-6D foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas. Conclusões: salienta-se que a terapêutica não farmacológica de acupuntura e eletroacupuntura em usuários com diagnóstico de síndrome vertebral com irradiação e dor crónica contribuiu para a diminuição da severidade da dor, da interferência da dor no funcionamento diário e melhoria da qualidade de vida relacionada com a saúde.

Aims: acupuncture is increasingly a technique used in users with various pathologies, and especially those who are accompanied by chronic pain. This research aimed to analyze the effect of non-pharmacological acupuncture and electroacupuncture therapy for the control of chronic pain in users with medical diagnosis of irradiation vertebral syndrome. Methods: a research was conducted with two evaluation moments: before and after non-pharmacological acupuncture and electroacupuncture therapy sessions. A questionnaire with variables of sociodemographic and clinical characterization, the Brief Pain Inventory and Short Form 6 Dimensions (SF-6D) was used. Results: forty-three users participated in the study, and statistically significant differences were found from moment 1 to moment 2 of evaluation, either in the pain severity domain (p<0.01) or in the pain interference domain in daily functioning (p <0.01), as well as in the different dimensions of SF-6D, statistically significant differences were found. Conclusions: non-pharmacological acupuncture and electroacupuncture therapy in users diagnosed with irradiation and chronic pain have contributed to decrease pain severity, pain interference in daily functioning and improvement of health-related quality of life.

Onde mora a autonomia do paciente em tempos de crise em Portugal? / Where does patient autonomy live, in times of crisis in Portugal?

Resumo A pandemia de COVID-19 fez-nos questionar práticas diárias até então instituídas, como o simples aperto de mão. Levantou também outras questões, algumas de índole ético-legal. Estarão a ser cumpridos os princípios éticos que devem orientar a prestação de cuidados individualizados? Conseguiremos nós, profissionais de saúde, fornecer instrumentos aos doentes para que possam usufruir plenamente do seu direito de autonomia? A garantia de soluções de segurança necessárias, para diminuir o risco de contágio na prestação de cuidados, salvaguarda o princípio da não maleficiência. Todavia, o risco de contágio é impossível de eliminar na totalidade, existindo um residual associado à utilização das instalações físicas dos serviços de saúde. Mas, não deverá a decisão de assumir esse risco ser alvo do arbítrio livre, informado e esclarecido do doente? A diminuição da atividade assistencial presencial motivou a incorporação de outras ferramentas de comunicação como telefone, correio eletrónico e videochamada. Poderá o paciente realmente decidir sobre a forma como prefere ser consultado, ou estaremos nós a impor o modelo de consulta? Nos últimos meses ocorreram mudanças profundas na forma de trabalho em Saúde, que permanecerão. Não existirão, contudo, princípios éticos da biomedicina, que deverão sempre prevalecer?

Abstract Coronavirus disease 2019 made us question daily practices, such as the simple handshake. It also raised some ethical and legal issues. Are the ethical principles, that should guide the provision of individualized care, being fulfilled? Will we, as health professionals, be able to provide patients with instruments so that they can fully exercise their autonomy? The guarantee of necessary security solutions, to reduce the risk of contagion in the provision of care, safeguards the principle of non-maleficence. However, the risk of contagion is impossible to completely eliminate, and there is a residual risk associated with the use of physical facilities in healthcare services. But, shouldn't the decision to take that risk be the subject of the patient's free and informed will? The incorporation of telemedicine platforms is ideal for managing several challenges posed by COVID-19, such as the decrease in face-to-face health care assistance. Can the patient really decide how he prefers to be consulted, or are we imposing the consultation model? There have been profound changes in healthcare systems. However, one must remember that there are ethical principles of biomedicine, that should always prevail?