Seeking sufficient and appropriate care during the first year after spinal cord injury: a qualitative study.

STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal qualitative study, based on a constructivist grounded theory and transformative approach. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated experiences of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) while navigating rehabilitation, resources for recovery, and community reintegration during the first year after injury. SETTING: An acute inpatient rehabilitation facility in the Midwest United States. METHODS: In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 individuals with newly-acquired SCI. Interviews were conducted approximately every other month for one year, beginning at acute inpatient rehabilitation. Data were analyzed and interpreted using a constructivist grounded theory approach and transformative paradigm, which examines power and social structures within and across institutions and gives voice to people at risk for marginalization. RESULTS: Participants experienced variable post-injury trajectories, with an average of four transitions within and across healthcare institutions in the first three months. Half of the cohort was discharged to a skilled nursing facility (SNF). Emergent themes included discharge (un)readiness; length of stay uncertainty and insurance impacts; challenges choosing a SNF including time-sensitive decisions; and early cessation of therapy in the SNF. Participants experienced resource navigation challenges such as communication/information access barriers and contending with many concerns at once. CONCLUSIONS: The experiences of this cohort reveal significant challenges to attaining sufficient and appropriate rehabilitation. Acute inpatient rehabilitation is a critical aspect of recovery, but does not ensure sufficient intervention for maximization of functional skills and community reintegration. Innovative rehabilitation models need to be developed for positive impacts on successful transition to independent living in the community.

Definitions of recovery and reintegration across the first year: A qualitative study of perspectives of persons with spinal cord injury and caregivers.

STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal, qualitative cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To understand how people with newly acquired spinal cord injury (PWS) and their support person (SP) define recovery and successful community reintegration (CR) across the first 12 months post-injury (mpi) and their satisfaction with the rate of recovery and reintegration experienced. SETTING: Academic and Veterans hospitals in Midwest USA. METHODS: In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted in two cohorts of PWS and SP during the initial inpatient rehabilitation stay, at 6 mpi, and at 12 mpi. Recordings were transcribed; four authors independently undertook line-by-line coding. The team discussed codes to reach consensus and synthesize into broader themes within the International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health and Transformative frameworks. RESULTS: Data are reported on 23 PWS and 21 SP. PWS and SP are similar in defining recovery as gaining motor function and achieving independence. However, SP more frequently define recovery in terms of maintaining positivity and emotional recovery. At 12 mpi both groups shift to define recovery according to progress. Social roles, being active, and employment are persistent themes of how PWS and SP define successful CR. However, SP also frequently define successful CR as reestablishing identity and emotional adjustment. Veterans with SCI less frequently defined successful CR as employment. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to reveal how PWS and SP define recovery and reintegration during the first 12 mpi. Given decreasing lengths of stay, this information can be used to tailor rehabilitation strategies during the critical first year of injury to optimize recovery.

Grasp and Release Test for Tetraplegic Hand Assessment: an update of the Grasp and Release Test.

The Grasp and Release Test (GRT) was originally developed to measure effectiveness of an implanted neuroprosthesis in people with tetraplegia. Its ease of use and lack of floor and ceiling effects culminated in recommendations for inclusion in a battery of tests to measure outcome following upper limb reconstructive surgery. However, the length of time taken to administer the GRT in a clinical setting, lack of instructions of accepted grasp patterns in the upper limb reconstructive surgery population and scoring procedures lead to differences in reporting outcomes using this measure. In order to ensure clinical utility for the upper limb reconstructive surgery population, revisions of the original test instructions have been made and are reported in this article. Further testing of the psychometric properties of the new measure are currently underway.

Safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in upper extremity rehabilitation after tetraplegia: protocol of a multicenter randomized, clinical trial.

STUDY DESIGN: A multisite, randomized, controlled, double-blinded phase I/II clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of pairing noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with rehabilitation to promote paretic upper extremity recovery and functional independence in persons living with chronic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Four-site trial conducted across Cleveland Clinic, Louis Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center of Cleveland and MetroHealth Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Institute of Ohio, and Kessler Foundation of New Jersey. METHODS: Forty-four adults (age ≥18 years) with tetraplegia following cervical SCI that occurred ≥1-year ago will participate. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive anodal tDCS or sham tDCS given in combination with upper extremity rehabilitation for 15 sessions each over 3-5 weeks. Assessments will be made twice at baseline separated by at least a 3-week interval, once at end-of-intervention, and once at 3-month follow-up. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome measure is upper extremity motor impairment assessed using the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) scale. Functional abilities will be assessed using Capabilities of Upper Extremity-Test (CUE-T), while functional independence and participation restrictions will be evaluated using the self-care domain of Spinal Cord Independent Measure (SCIM), and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment-associated change in corticospinal excitability and output will also be studied using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and safety (reports of adverse events) and feasibility (attrition, adherence etc.) will also be evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrials.gov identifier NCT03892746. This clinical trial is being performed at four sites within the United States: Cleveland Clinic (lead site), Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) and MetroHealth Rehabilitation Institute in Ohio, and Kessler Foundation in New Jersey. The U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity, 820 Chandler Street, Fort Detrick MD 21702-5014 is the awarding and administering acquisition office.

Considerations and recommendations for selection and utilization of upper extremity clinical outcome assessments in human spinal cord injury trials.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a focused review article. OBJECTIVES: This review presents important features of clinical outcomes assessments (COAs) in human spinal cord injury research. Considerations for COAs by trial phase and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health are presented as well as strengths and recommendations for upper extremity COAs for research. Clinical trial tools and designs to address recruitment challenges are identified. METHODS: The methods include a summary of topics discussed during a two-day workshop, conceptual discussion of upper extremity COAs and additional focused literature review. RESULTS: COAs must be appropriate to trial phase and particularly in mid-late-phase trials, should reflect recovery vs. compensation, as well as being clinically meaningful. The impact and extent of upper vs. lower motoneuron disease should be considered, as this may affect how an individual may respond to a given therapeutic. For trials with broad inclusion criteria, the content of COAs should cover all severities and levels of SCI. Specific measures to assess upper extremity function as well as more comprehensive COAs are under development. In addition to appropriate use of COAs, methods to increase recruitment, such as adaptive trial designs and prognostic modeling to prospectively stratify heterogeneous populations into appropriate cohorts should be considered. CONCLUSIONS: With an increasing number of clinical trials focusing on improving upper extremity function, it is essential to consider a range of factors when choosing a COA. SPONSORS: Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, Spinal Cord Outcomes Partnership Endeavor.

Upper Extremity Assessment in Tetraplegia: The Importance of Differentiating Between Upper and Lower Motor Neuron Paralysis.

Scientific advances are increasing the options for improved upper limb function in people with cervical level spinal cord injury (SCI). Some of these interventions rely on identifying an aspect of paralysis that is not uniformly assessed in SCI: the integrity of the lower motor neuron (LMN). SCI can damage both the upper motor neuron and LMN causing muscle paralysis. Differentiation between these causes of paralysis is not typically believed to be important during SCI rehabilitation because, regardless of the cause, the muscles are no longer under voluntary control by the patient. Emerging treatments designed to restore upper extremity function (eg, rescue microsurgical nerve transfers, motor learning-based interventions, functional electrical stimulation) all require knowledge of LMN status. The LMN is easily evaluated using surface electrical stimulation and does not add significant time to the standard clinical assessment of SCI. This noninvasive evaluation yields information that contributes to the development of a lifetime upper extremity care plan for maximizing function and quality of life. Given the relative simplicity of this assessment and the far-reaching implications for treatment and function, we propose that this assessment should be adopted as standard practice for acute cervical SCI.

Implanted neuroprosthesis for restoring arm and hand function in people with high level tetraplegia.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and apply an implanted neuroprosthesis to restore arm and hand function to individuals with high level tetraplegia. DESIGN: Case study. SETTING: Clinical research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with spinal cord injuries (N=2) at or above the C4 motor level. INTERVENTIONS: The individuals were each implanted with 2 stimulators (24 stimulation channels and 4 myoelectric recording channels total). Stimulating electrodes were placed in the shoulder and arm, being, to our knowledge, the first long-term application of spiral nerve cuff electrodes to activate a human limb. Myoelectric recording electrodes were placed in the head and neck areas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful installation and operation of the neuroprosthesis and electrode performance, range of motion, grasp strength, joint moments, and performance in activities of daily living. RESULTS: The neuroprosthesis system was successfully implanted in both individuals. Spiral nerve cuff electrodes were placed around upper extremity nerves and activated the intended muscles. In both individuals, the neuroprosthesis has functioned properly for at least 2.5 years postimplant. Hand, wrist, forearm, elbow, and shoulder movements were achieved. A mobile arm support was needed to support the mass of the arm during functional activities. One individual was able to perform several activities of daily living with some limitations as a result of spasticity. The second individual was able to partially complete 2 activities of daily living. CONCLUSIONS: Functional electrical stimulation is a feasible intervention for restoring arm and hand functions to individuals with high tetraplegia. Forces and movements were generated at the hand, wrist, elbow, and shoulder that allowed the performance of activities of daily living, with some limitations requiring the use of a mobile arm support to assist the stimulated shoulder forces.

Rehabilitation Professionals' Perspectives on Human Rights, Disability, and Science: A Qualitative Study.

Objective: To investigate the attitudes and knowledge of rehabilitation professionals concerning human rights within the context of disability, science, and technology access. Design: A qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews. Setting: A large, urban, academically-affiliated rehabilitation research center. Participants: We conducted semi-structured interviews with rehabilitation professionals who specialize in spinal cord injury (SCI) care, including 6 physicians, 3 physical therapists, 2 occupational therapists, 2 nurses, 1 rehabilitation engineer, and 1 rehabilitation psychologist (N=15). Participants were purposively recruited through e-mail letters to members of the American Spinal Injury Association. Efforts were made to recruit a diverse cohort of rehabilitation professionals based on profession, sex, age, and race. Interviews were conducted in person during the 2018 annual meeting or by phone after the meeting. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded to identify emerging themes within and across participants' content. Results: Primary findings show that most respondents were unaware of disability-relevant human rights doctrine. None was aware of the right to science as articulated in Article 15 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. Only 2 respondents had previously considered injustices experienced by their clients as human rights violations, yet nearly all were intrigued by framing access difficulties within the right to science paradigm. Overall, participants reported they would find value in implementing human rights in their work. Conclusions: Rehabilitation professionals are receptive to a human rights framework. Further research is needed to identify actionable steps for implementing principles of human rights to increase access to technology by individuals with SCI.

Clinical Outcomes of "Paralyzed" Nerve Transfer for Treating Spinal Cord Injury: A Proof of Concept in a Human Model.

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is an option to restore function in individuals after high cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) who have limited available options for tendon or nerve transfer. To be considered for FES implantation, patients must possess upper motor neuron (UMN) type denervation in potential recipient muscles, which can be confirmed by response to surface electrical stimulation during clinical evaluation. Lower motor neuron (LMN) denervated muscles will not respond to electrical stimulation and, therefore, are unavailable for use in an FES system. Previous animal studies have demonstrated that a "paralyzed" nerve transfer of a UMN-denervated motor branch to an LMN-denervated motor branch can restore electrical excitability in the recipient. In this study, we report the indications, surgical technique, and successful outcome (restoration of M3 elbow flexion) after the first "paralyzed" nerve transfer in a human patient.

Reliability of the International Spinal Cord Injury Physical Therapy-Occupational Therapy Basic Data Set.

In interventional clinical trials for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), the influence of experimental biological, pharmacological, or device-related interventions must be differentiated from that of physical and occupational therapy interventions, as rehabilitation influences motor-related outcomes. The International Spinal Cord Injury (ISCI) Physical Therapy-Occupational Therapy Basic Data Set (PT-OT BDS) was developed with the intent to track the content and time of rehabilitation interventions that are delivered concurrently with experimental interventions. We assessed the reliability of the PT-OT BDS based on agreement between users. Following an online training session, physical therapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) from 10 SCI clinical centers across 7 countries participated. At each center, pairs of therapists (a treating therapist and an observing therapist; PT/PT, OT/OT, or PT/OT) used the PT-OT BDS to record the content and time of therapy sessions for 20 patients. Data were analyzed to determine agreement between therapist pairs regarding the content of the therapy session. The influence of therapist characteristics (professional discipline [PT/OT], years of experience working with individuals with SCI), patient characteristics (level [tetraplegia/paraplegia] and severity [complete/incomplete] of injury), setting (inpatient/outpatient), and whether the center was U.S.- versus non-U.S.-based were also analyzed. There was high agreement for five of seven categories and medium agreement for the remaining two categories. For six of the seven intervention categories, there were no significant differences between the treating and the observing therapists in the percentage of instances that a specific category was selected. Characteristics of the therapists, characteristics of the patient, therapy setting, and global location of the center had no meaningful influence on level of agreement between therapist pairs. The BDS is reliable for use across settings, countries, and with patients of various impairment levels. The study also helped identify additional areas where refinement of the syllabus would be of value.

Corticospinal inhibition investigated in relation to upper extremity motor function in cervical spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: Corticospinal inhibitory mechanisms are relevant to functional recovery but remain poorly understood after spinal cord injury (SCI). Post-injury characteristics of contralateral silent period (CSP), a measure of corticospinal inhibition evaluated using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is inconsistent in literature. We envisioned that investigating CSP across muscles with varying degrees of weakness may be a reasonable approach to resolve inconsistencies and elucidate the relevance of corticospinal inhibition for upper extremity function following SCI. METHODS: We studied 27 adults with chronic C1-C8 SCI (age 48.8 ± 16.1 years, 3 females) and 16 able-bodied participants (age 33.2 ± 11.8 years, 9 females). CSP characteristics were assessed across biceps (muscle power = 3-5) and triceps (muscle power = 1-3) representing stronger and weaker muscles, respectively. We assessed functional abilities using the Capabilities of the Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T). RESULTS: Participants with chronic SCI had prolonged CSPs for biceps but delayed and diminished CSPs for triceps compared to able-bodied participants. Early-onset CSPs for biceps and longer, deeper CSPs for triceps correlated with better CUE-T scores. CONCLUSIONS: Corticospinal inhibition is pronounced for stronger biceps but diminished for weaker triceps muscle in SCI indicating innervation relative to the level of injury matters in the study of CSP. SIGNIFICANCE: Nevertheless, corticospinal inhibition or CSP holds relevance for upper extremity function following SCI.

Preoperative evaluation of nerve transfer recipients after spinal cord injury using stimulated manual muscle testing.

Nerve transfer after spinal cord injury has become increasingly popular. Accurate preoperative identification of lower motor neuron involvement in potential recipient nerves is critical. Electrodiagnostic testing has been shown to correlate with intraoperative findings; however, it is time-consuming, costly and may not be readily available. Stimulated manual muscle testing is an alternative diagnostic approach. It is inexpensive and easily done by the surgeon or therapist in the office; however, correlation with intraoperative stimulation has not been reported. A retrospective review was conducted for patients who underwent nerve transfer for tetraplegia with recorded preoperative stimulated manual muscle testing and intraoperative stimulation results. Nine patients including 37 nerve transfers were included. Of the 37 nerve transfers, 36 were accurately graded preoperatively by stimulated manual muscle testing. Stimulated manual muscle testing had a sensitivity of 89%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 97%. This study supports stimulated manual muscle testing for preoperative distinction between upper versus lower motor neuron injuries.Level of evidence: IV.

Can the electrically stimulated manual muscle test differentiate upper from lower motor neuron injury in persons with acute SCI?

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the motor response on the stimulated manual muscle test (SMMT) in muscles with a grade 0 motor score on the manual muscle test (MMT) can differentiate lower motor neuron (LMN) from upper motor neuron (UMN) injury based on the presence of spontaneous activity (SA) with needle EMG. DESIGN: Prospective Study. PARTICIPANTS/METHODS: Twenty-one subjects with acute traumatic cervical SCI. METHODS: An upper extremity International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) evaluation was completed on all subjects. A needle EMG and an electrically stimulated manual muscle test (SMMT) were completed on all key upper extremity muscles with a MMT motor score of zero. RESULTS: The MMT, SMMT and Needle EMG were done on 77 muscles. The SMMT motor score was 0 on 10 muscles and >1 on 67 muscles. The needle EMG identified spontaneous activity (SA) in 55/77 muscles. Seventy percent (7/10) of the muscles with MMT and SMMT motor score of zero demonstrated SA on EMG. Seventy-two percent (48/67) of the muscles with MMT motor score = 0 and SMMT motor score ≥1 demonstrated SA on EMG. CONCLUSION: In our study, 70% of the muscles with a SMMT motor response of zero and 72% of the muscles with a SMMT motor response greater than or equal to one demonstrated SA on EMG. The use of the SMMT as a clinical measure to differentiate LMN from UMN integrity may be limited when applied.

Surgical restoration of arm and hand function in people with tetraplegia.

Improved hand and arm function is the most sought after function for people living with a cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Surgical techniques have been established to increase upper extremity function for tetraplegics, focusing on restoring elbow extension, wrist movement, and hand opening and closing. Additionally, more innovative treatments that have been developed (implanted neuroprostheses and nerve transfers) provide more options for improving function and quality of life. One of the most important steps in the process of restoring upper extremity function in people with tetraplegia is identifying appropriate candidates - typically those with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor level C5 or greater. Secondary complications of SCI can pose barriers to restoring function, particularly upper extremity spasticity. A novel approach to managing spasticity through high-frequency alternating currents designed to block unwanted spasticity is being researched at the Cleveland FES Center and may improve the impact of reconstructive surgery for these individuals. The impact of these surgeries is best measured within the framework of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Function, Disability and Health. Outcome measures should be chosen to reflect changes within the domains of body functions and structures, activity, and participation. There is a need to strengthen the evidence in the area of reconstructive procedures for people with tetraplegia. Research continues to advance, providing more options for improved function in this population than ever before. The contribution of well-designed outcome studies to this evidence base will ultimately help to address the complications surrounding access to the procedures.

An ADL measure for spinal cord injury.

Occupational therapists do not have a comprehensive, objective method for measuring how persons with tetraplegia perform activities of daily living (ADL) in their homes and communities, because SCI ADL performance is usually determined in rehabilitation. The ADL Habits Survey (ADLHS) is designed specifically to address this knowledge gap by surveying performance on relevant and meaningful activities in homes and communities. After a comprehensive task analysis and pilot development, 30 activities were selected that emphasize a broad range of hand and wrist, reaching, and grasping movements in compound activities. A sample of 49 persons with cervical spinal cord injuries responded to items. The sample was predominantly male, median age was 41 years, and ASIA motor classification levels ranged from C2 through C8/T1 with majority concentration in C4, C5, or C6 (68%). Each participant report was rated by an occupational therapist using a seven category rating scale, and the item by participant response matrix (30 X 49) was analyzed with a Rasch model for rating scales. Results showed excellent participant separation (>4) and very high reliability (>.95), and both item and participant fit values were adequate (STANDARDIZED INFIT less than absolute value of 3). With only two exceptions, all participants fit the Rasch rating scale model, and only one item "Light housekeeping" presented significant fit issues. Principal Components Analysis an analysis of item residuals did not reveal serious threats to unidimensionality. A between group fit comparison of participants with more versus less movement found invariant item calibrations, and ANOVA of participant measures found statistically significant differences across ASIA motor classification levels. These ADLHS results offer occupational therapists a new method for measuring ADL that is potentially more sensitive to functional changes in tetraplegia than most instruments in common use. Accommodation of step disorder with a three category rating scale did not diminish measurement properties.

A Rare Case of Spontaneous Arachnoid Cyst Rupture Presenting as Right Hemiplegia and Expressive Aphasia in a Pediatric Patient.

This study examines an 11-year-old boy with a known history of a large previously asymptomatic arachnoid cyst (AC) presenting with acute onset of right facial droop, hemiplegia, and expressive aphasia. Shortly after arrival to the emergency department, the patient exhibited complete resolution of right-sided hemiplegia but developed headache and had persistent word-finding difficulties. Prior to symptom onset while in class at school, there was an absence of reported jerking movements, headache, photophobia, fever, or trauma. At the time of neurology consultation, the physical exam showed mildly delayed cognitive processing but was otherwise unremarkable. The patient underwent MRI scanning of the brain, which revealed left convexity subdural hematohygroma and perirolandic cortex edema resulting from ruptured left frontoparietal AC. He was evaluated by neurosurgery and managed expectantly. He recovered uneventfully and was discharged two days after presentation remaining asymptomatic on subsequent outpatient visits. The family express concerns regarding increased anxiety and mild memory loss since hospitalization.

A Primary Care Provider's Guide to Social Justice, the Right to Care, and the Barriers to Access After Spinal Cord Injury.

People living with spinal cord injury (SCI) face numerous barriers to primary care. This article identifies these barriers as social justice issues to emphasize their significance and the inequality of primary care received by people with SCI. Primary care providers have a responsibility to provide equal and accessible care to all patients and to remediate any obstacles to care. Understanding the well-documented barriers of competence, physical, policy and procedural, communication, and attitudes impacting primary care for people with SCI will bring much-needed awareness and opportunity for meaningful change. This article is a call to action for social justice within primary care and provides helpful recommendations for removing and addressing barriers. Better health care outcomes for people with SCI are possible if primary care physicians and providers become social justice advocates for their patients with SCI.

International Spinal Cord Injury Physical Therapy-Occupational Therapy Basic Data Set (Version 1.2).

STUDY DESIGN: Expert workgroup consensus, focused literature review, and vetting via feedback from international presentations and spinal cord professional membership groups. OBJECTIVES: Develop and refine a basic dataset to enable standardized documentation of physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) interventions delivered in a controlled clinical trial intended to improve voluntary motor function. SETTING: International Expert Working Group. METHODS: An international working group with expertise in spinal cord injury, PT, OT, and measurement developed a draft of the International Spinal Cord Injury (ISCI) Physical Therapy-Occupational Therapy (PT-OT) Basic Data Set (BDS). Emphasis was placed on efficiency and practicality of use. The BDS was iteratively refined based on applicable literature, and feedback collected from presentations at the 2017 and 2019 International Spinal Cord Society meetings. RESULTS: The ISCI PT-OT BDS contains seven broad categories of interventions: bed/seated mobility, standing activities, walking/stairs, gross motor upper extremity, fine motor upper extremity, strength training, and endurance training. The first five categories are classified as activity-directed and the last two as impairment-directed interventions. Time spent on interventions per category is recorded in 15-min intervals. CONCLUSIONS: The ISCI PT-OT BDS enables standardized documentation of PT-OT activity-directed or impairment-directed interventions. The ISCI PT-OT BDS is a documentation tool to facilitate evaluation of the influence of rehabilitation therapies on motor function in clinical trials of biologic or pharmacologic agents or rehabilitation technologies that are delivered in the clinical setting.

Risk-benefit value of upper extremity function by an implanted electrical stimulation device targeting chronic cervical spinal cord injury.

Study design: A cross-sectional stated-preference survey using direct-assessment questions. Objective: To determine the relative value placed on different outcomes to be used in a pivotal trial for the upper extremity configuration of the Networked Neuroprosthesis (NNP) as well as the tolerance of the expected adverse event profile. Setting: Academic medical center in the United States. Methods: Distribution of an online survey to adults living with tetraplegia; extent of agreement with each question/statement was obtaining using a 1-7 Likert scale. Results: There were 8 statements about potential benefits in arm/hand function; for all statements, more than 70% of participants rated the functions as "1-very important" to regain. There were variable degrees of concern related to risks that could occur during the 30-day post-surgical period and increasing degrees of concern related to risks that could occur in the first 5 years, potentially due to the device, based on the increasing degree of invasiveness of the intervention required to address the event. When analysing the results based on all degrees of interest, more than 64% of responders were interested in getting the NNP with a success rate threshold as low as 50% regardless of time post-injury. Chi-squared analyses revealed some associations between responses and sex, injury level, and injury duration; however, none of these were statistically significant upon post-hoc analysis. Conclusion: Data here indicate that people with tetraplegia are highly interested in a range of arm/hand functions and are tolerant of expected risks that may be associated with implanted neuroprosthetics. Sponsorship: The Institute for Functional Restoration funded this project through a sub-contract to K.D. Anderson from a larger Special Projects Award (grant number FP0020773) from the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation.

Neuromodulation for Functional Electrical Stimulation.

This article describes the application of neuromodulation in different ways to motor recovery, to replace lost function, or to improve function of organ systems for those who have experienced spinal cord injury or stroke. Multiple devices have been developed and are currently available for use whereas others are still in the experimental stage. Multiple uses of neuromodulation are described.