Incidence and associated risk factors for falls in adults with intellectual disability.

BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disability (ID) experience age-related changes earlier in life, and as such, falls among people with ID are of serious concern. Falls can cause injury and consequently reduce quality of life. Limited studies have investigated the incidence of falls among people with ID and the associated risk factors. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of falls and risk factors for falling in people with ID living in the community. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort (n = 78) of community-dwelling adults with ID. Characteristics measured at baseline included falls history, medication use, balance and mobility. Falls were reported for 6 months using monthly calendars and phone calls. Data were analysed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify risk factors associated with falling. RESULTS: Participants [median (interquartile range) age 49 (43-60) years, female n = 32 (41%)] experienced 296 falls, with 36 (46.2%) participants having one or more falls. The incidence of falls was 5.7 falls (injurious falls = 0.8) per person year (one outlier removed from analysis). A history of falls [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 6.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.90-21.34)] and being ambulant [adjusted OR: 4.50, 95% CI (1.15-17.67)] were associated with a significantly increased risk of falling. Falls were significantly less frequent among participants taking more than four medications [adjusted OR: 0.22, 95% CI (0.06-0.83)] and participants who were continent [adjusted OR: 0.25, 95% CI (0.07-0.91)]. CONCLUSIONS: People with ID fall at a younger age compared with the broader community. The associated falls risk factors also differ to older community-dwelling adults. Health professionals should prioritise assessment and management of falls risk in this population.

The impact of a vaccine mandate and the COVID-19 pandemic on influenza vaccination uptake in Western Australian health care students.

Annual influenza vaccination of health care students and workers helps protect themselves and patients from influenza, which has a high disease burden during seasonal peaks in Australia. Health care students are an important cohort whose early attitudes and habits towards influenza vaccination may influence future behaviours. We explored the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours towards influenza vaccination of health care students in two universities from 2018 to 2020 using convergent mixed methodology. We also assessed the impact of two external events - the introduction of mandatory influenza vaccination for select students in 2019, and the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. We found a significant increase in self-reported vaccination uptake between 2018 (73.5%) and 2020 (89.6%), with the mandate and COVID-19 pandemic being likely drivers of increased uptake. Vaccine mandates are effective but must be supported by easy accessibility, adequately addressing concerns around effectiveness and safety, and promotion of voluntary acceptance and trust.

Patient Evaluation of Emotional Comfort Experienced (PEECE): developing and testing a measurement instrument.

OBJECTIVES: The Patient Evaluation of Emotional Comfort Experienced (PEECE) is a 12-item questionnaire which measures the mental well-being state of emotional comfort in patients. The instrument was developed using previous qualitative work and published literature. DESIGN: Instrument development. SETTING: Acute Care Public Hospital, Western Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Sample of 374 patients. INTERVENTIONS: A multidisciplinary expert panel assessed the face and content validity of the instrument and following a pilot study, the psychometric properties of the instrument were explored. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis assessed the underlying dimensions of the PEECE instrument; Cronbach's α was used to determine the reliability; κ was used for test-retest reliability of the ordinal items. RESULTS: 2 factors were identified in the instrument and named 'positive emotions' and 'perceived meaning'. A greater proportion of male patients were found to report positive emotions compared with female patients. The instrument was found to be feasible, reliable and valid for use with inpatients and outpatients. CONCLUSIONS: PEECE was found to be a feasible instrument for use with inpatient and outpatients, being easily understood and completed. Further psychometric testing is recommended.

Australasian haematologist referral patterns to palliative care: lack of consensus on when and why.

BACKGROUND: Patients with haematological malignancies are not referred to palliative care services as frequently as those with solid cancers (non-haematological malignancies). AIMS: The present study surveyed haematologists in Australia and New Zealand. We aimed to record theoretical referral times, identify problems with referral to palliative care and clarify elements used to decide whether a patient was "terminally ill". METHODS: A questionnaire based on the case-histories of three patients (with acute leukaemia, lymphoma or multiple myeloma) was distributed at the Haematology Society of Australia and New Zealand Congress 2000, Perth, Australia. Each case was divided into stages by transitional points in the illness to include issues or prognostic variables that may stimulate referral to palliative care. Questions were asked about: (i) referral-triggers, (ii) problems previously experienced, (iii) definition of when the patient was "terminally ill", (iv) prognostication difficulties and (v) communication about prognosis. RESULTS: The response rate was 11%, which may represent up to 32% of Australian specialists. Eighty per cent had access to all types of palliative care services and refer for symptom control, regardless of illness stage. Twenty-nine per cent had experienced difficulties in referring. There was a variation as to exactly when referral would occur and when each case was considered "terminally ill". Reasons for early or later referral were explored. Prognostication difficulties were common. CONCLUSIONS: In theory there is a willingness to refer to palliative care, however this has yet to be translated to day-to-day practice. This may be due to prognostication difficulties, logistical factors and medical concerns. Models of referral are suggested for further study.