Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 31(11): 3122-3130, 2021 10 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34629257

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Obesity defined by body mass index (BMI) is independently associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Abdominal obesity, defined by waist circumference, is a predictor of cardiovascular events. Recently, relative fat mass (RFM) was proposed as a marker of cardiovascular risk. We assessed the role of three different measures of obesity to predict unprovoked VTE in a longitudinal study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Moli-sani is a prospective cohort study carried out in the general population of the Molise region, Italy. A total of 23,538 individuals (48% men, age 55.4 years) enrolled between 2005 and 2010 were eligible. Patients on anticoagulant treatment were excluded. BMI ≥30 kg/m2 defined obesity, waist circumference >102 cm for men or 88 cm for women defined abdominal obesity, tertiles of RFM were compared. The long-term incidence of first unprovoked VTE during follow-up was assessed. Overall, 29.6% individuals were obese and 44.2% had abdominal obesity. A total of 66 first unprovoked VTE events were diagnosed during a median follow-up of 8.2 years. After multivariable Cox regression analysis, the risk of unprovoked VTE was significantly higher in obese participants (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.16-3.07) than in participants with BMI <30; in subjects with abdominal obesity than with normal waist circumference (HR 2.19, 1.26-3.81); and in subjects with third vs first RFM tertile index (HR 2.46, 1.15-5.28). The areas under the curves for the models including the three obesity indexes were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Three indexes of obesity based on BMI, waist circumference or RFM similarly predict first occurrence of unprovoked VTE.


Assuntos
Adiposidade , Índice de Massa Corporal , Obesidade Abdominal/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Circunferência da Cintura , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Itália/epidemiologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Abdominal/diagnóstico , Obesidade Abdominal/fisiopatologia , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico
2.
Expert Rev Hematol ; 16(2): 121-129, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36820873

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Liver cirrhosis is accompanied by several hemostatic alterations, which contribute to the current theory of "rebalanced hemostasis." Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a frequent complication of liver cirrhosis (17-26% of the cirrhotic patients), and liver cirrhosis is a common risk factor for SVT (24-28% of SVT cases). AREAS COVERED: This narrative review aims to describe the current state of the art on the anticoagulant treatment of cirrhotic SVT, with a particular focus on the possible role of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and recent guidelines on this topic. EXPERT OPINION: Early anticoagulant therapy is recommended in cirrhotic patients with acute SVT, to obtain vessel recanalization and decrease the rates of portal hypertension-related complications. Gastroesophageal varices do not represent a contraindication to anticoagulation, if adequate prophylaxis of variceal bleeding is established, and varices band ligation can be safely performed without the need to stop the anticoagulant treatment. The conventional treatment of cirrhotic SVT consisted of low molecular weight heparin, as initial treatment of choice, eventually followed by vitamin K antagonists, but the DOACs can be considered as a reasonable alternative in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis.


Assuntos
Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas , Varizes , Trombose Venosa , Humanos , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/etiologia , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/complicações , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevenção & controle , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Trombose Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Trombose Venosa/etiologia , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Cirrose Hepática/tratamento farmacológico , Varizes/complicações , Varizes/tratamento farmacológico
3.
Minerva Med ; 112(6): 713-725, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33832217

RESUMO

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is the most frequent among the splanchnic vein thrombosis, accounting for 90% of cases. More than half of PVT are provoked by liver cirrhosis, solid cancer or myeloproliferative neoplasms. The remaining cases are non-malignant non-cirrhotic PVT and include either unprovoked events or thrombosis secondary to other less common risk factors (e.g. abdominal surgery, intrabdominal inflammations/infections, or hormonal stimuli). Anticoagulant therapy in patients with acute symptomatic PVT should be started early after diagnosis, if no active bleeding, to obtain greater vessel recanalization and reduce the occurrence of portal-hypertension related complications. Gastroesophageal varices do not represent a contraindication to anticoagulant treatment, as long as adequate measures have been undertaken for the prophylaxis of gastroesophageal bleeding. Different treatment options (unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin, vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) can be considered. In this narrative review we will discuss the treatment of PVT in the three most common scenarios (cirrhosis-associated, cancer-associated and non-malignant non-cirrhotic PVT). We will also discuss the role of the DOACs and summarize recent guidelines on this topic.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Veia Porta , Trombose Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA