Acute ischemia of the upper and lower limbs: Tailoring the treatment to the underlying etiology.

Acute limb ischemia (ALI) can be a devastating clinical emergency with potentially limb- or life-threatening consequences. It is defined as a quickly developing or sudden decrease in limb perfusion producing new or worsening symptoms and signs, often threatening limb viability. ALI is commonly related to an acute arterial occlusion. Rarely, extensive venous occlusion can lead to upper and lower extremities ischemia (ie, phlegmasia). The incidence of acute peripheral arterial occlusion causing ALI is approximately 1.5 cases per 10,000 people per year. The clinical presentation depends on the etiology and whether the patient has underlying peripheral artery disease. Except for traumas, the most common etiologies are embolic or thrombotic events. Peripheral embolism, likely related to embolic heart disease, is the most common cause of acute upper extremity ischemia. However, an acute thrombotic event may occur in native arteries, at the site of a pre-existing atherosclerotic plaque, or as a failure of previous vascular interventions. The presence of an aneurysm may predispose to ALI for both embolic and thrombotic mechanisms. Immediate diagnosis, accurate assessment of limb viability, and prompt intervention, when needed, play important roles in salvaging the affected limb and preventing major amputation. Severity of symptoms is usually dependent on the amount of surrounding arterial collateralization, which may often reflect a pre-existing chronic vascular disease. For this reason, early recognition of the underlying etiology is crucial for choice of best management and definitely for treatment success. Any error in the initial evaluation may negatively affect the functional prognosis of the limb and endanger the patient's life. The aim of this article was to discuss diagnosis, etiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of patients with acute ischemia of the upper and lower limbs.

Acute pediatric encephalitis: etiology, course, and outcome of a 12-year single-center immunocompetent cohort.

BACKGROUND: Encephalitis is an uncommon but severe disorder due to an inflammation of the brain parenchyma, usually diagnosed on clinical, laboratory, electroencephalographic, and neuroradiological features. New causes of encephalitis have been reported in recent years, so diagnostic criteria have changed over time. We report on a single-center experience of a pediatric Hospital, the hub of its region, over 12 years (2008-2021), with the evaluation of all children managed for acute encephalitis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical, laboratory, neuroradiological, and EEG data from the acute phase and outcome of all immunocompetent patients diagnosed with acute encephalitis. According to the newly proposed criteria for pediatric autoimmune encephalitis, we divided patients into infectious, definite autoimmune, probable autoimmune, and possible autoimmune, and performed a comparison between the different groups. RESULTS: 48 patients (26 females, mean age 4.4 years), 19 with infections, and 29 with autoimmune encephalitis, were included. Herpes simplex virus 1 encephalitis was the most frequently identified etiology followed by anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Movement disorders at onset and a longer hospital stay were observed more frequently in autoimmune compared to infectious encephalitis (p p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Among the autoimmune group, children who started immunomodulatory treatment earlier (within 7 days from onset) had more frequent complete functional recovery (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Herpes virus and anti-NMDAR encephalitis are the most frequent etiologies within our cohort. Clinical onset and course are extremely variable. Since early immunomodulatory treatment was associated with a better functional outcome, our data confirm that a timely diagnostic classification in definite, probable, or possible autoimmune encephalitis can help the clinician in a successful therapeutic approach.