Pathogen Detection in Infective Endocarditis Using Targeted Metagenomics on Whole Blood and Plasma: a Prospective Pilot Study.

Initial microbiologic diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) relies on blood cultures and Bartonella and Coxiella burnetii serology. Small case series and one prospective study have preliminarily reported application of metagenomic sequencing on blood or plasma for IE diagnosis. Here, results of a prospective pilot study evaluating targeted metagenomic sequencing (tMGS) for blood-based early pathogen detection and identification in IE are reported. Subjects diagnosed with possible or definite IE at a single institution were prospectively enrolled with informed consent from October 2020 to July 2021. Blood was drawn and separated into whole blood and plasma. Both specimen types were subjected to nucleic acid extraction and PCR targeting the V1-V3 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene, followed by next-generation sequencing on an Illumina MiSeqTM platform. 35 subjects, 28 (80%) with definite and 7 (20%) with possible IE were enrolled, including 6 (17%) with blood culture-negative endocarditis (BCNE). Overall, 20 whole blood (59%) and 16 plasma (47%) samples tested positive (P = 0.47). When results of whole blood and plasma testing were combined, a positive tMGS result was found in 23 subjects (66%). tMGS identified a potential pathogen in 5 of 6 culture-negative IE cases. Although further study is needed, the results of this pilot study suggest that blood-based tMGS may provide pathogen identification in subjects with IE, including in culture-negative cases.

Impact of an electronic smart order-set for diagnostic stewardship of Clostridiodes difficile infection (CDI) in a community healthcare system in South Florida.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate testing for Clostridiodes difficile infection (CDI) increases health care onset cases and contributes to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of patients in a community health care system. METHODS: An electronic smart order set for the testing of CDI was created and implemented to improve the appropriateness of testing. A retrospective review of patients who were tested for CDI, pre and post, was conducted to determine if inappropriate stool testing for CDI decreased post-implementation of the order set. RESULTS: 224 patients were tested for CDI during the study period with the post-implementation period having a higher proportion of patients who met appropriate testing criteria defined by presence of diarrhea (80.5% vs 61.3%; P = .002). The rate of inappropriate CDI stool testing decreased from 31.1% to 11.0% after implementation (P < .001). A higher proportion of CDI patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge (54.2% vs 33.0%; P = 0.001) during the post-implementation period. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant reduction in inappropriate CDI testing following the implementation of the order set. There was an observed increase in the proportion of patients who underwent recent gastrointestinal surgery which may have contributed to the increase in 30-day readmission rates during the post-implementation period.

Outcomes of COVID-19 With the Mayo Clinic Model of Care and Research.

OBJECTIVE: To report the Mayo Clinic experience with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related to patient outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with COVID-19 diagnosed between March 1, 2020, and July 31, 2020, at any of the Mayo Clinic sites. We abstracted pertinent comorbid conditions such as age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index variables, and treatments received. Factors associated with hospitalization and mortality were assessed in univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: A total of 7891 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection with research authorization on file received care across the Mayo Clinic sites during the study period. Of these, 7217 patients were adults 18 years or older who were analyzed further. A total of 897 (11.4%) patients required hospitalization, and 354 (4.9%) received care in the intensive care unit (ICU). All hospitalized patients were reviewed by a COVID-19 Treatment Review Panel, and 77.5% (695 of 897) of inpatients received a COVID-19-directed therapy. Overall mortality was 1.2% (94 of 7891), with 7.1% (64 of 897) mortality in hospitalized patients and 11.3% (40 of 354) in patients requiring ICU care. CONCLUSION: Mayo Clinic outcomes of patients with COVID-19 infection in the ICU, hospital, and community compare favorably with those reported nationally. This likely reflects the impact of interprofessional multidisciplinary team evaluation, effective leveraging of clinical trials and available treatments, deployment of remote monitoring tools, and maintenance of adequate operating capacity to not require surge adjustments. These best practices can help guide other health care systems with the continuing response to the COVID-19 pandemic.