Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BJU Int ; 102(11): 1531-8, 2008 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19035858

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of degarelix, a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (blocker), vs leuprolide for achieving and maintaining testosterone suppression in a 1-year phase III trial involving patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 610 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (any stage; median age 72 years; median testosterone 3.93 ng/mL, median prostate-specific antigen, PSA, level 19.0 ng/mL) were randomized and received study treatment. Androgen-deprivation therapy was indicated (neoadjuvant hormonal treatment was excluded) according to the investigator's assessment. Three dosing regimens were evaluated: a starting dose of 240 mg of degarelix subcutaneous (s.c.) for 1 month, followed by s.c. maintenance doses of 80 mg or 160 mg monthly, or intramuscular (i.m.) leuprolide doses of 7.5 mg monthly. Therapy was maintained for the 12-month study. Both the intent-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol populations were analysed. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of the trial was suppression of testosterone to

Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inibidores , Oligopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Leuprolida/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oligopeptídeos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/metabolismo , Testosterona/metabolismo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Bone Miner Res ; 20(11): 1905-11, 2005 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16234962

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: We compared combination treatment with teriparatide plus raloxifene with teriparatide alone in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis in a 6-month double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that measured biochemical markers of bone turnover and BMD. Markers of bone formation and spine BMD increased similarly with teriparatide alone and combination therapy. However, combination therapy induced a significantly smaller increase in bone resorption versus teriparatide alone and significantly increased total hip BMD versus baseline. INTRODUCTION: The effects of combining two approved treatments for osteoporosis with different modes of action were examined by comparing teriparatide [rhPTH(1-34)] monotherapy with combination teriparatide and raloxifene therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 6-month randomized, double-blind trial comparing teriparatide plus raloxifene (n = 69) versus teriparatide plus placebo (n = 68) was conducted in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. RESULTS: Bone formation (N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen [PINP]) increased similarly in both treatment groups. However, the increase in bone resorption (serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen [CTx]) in the combination group was significantly smaller than in the teriparatide-alone group (p = 0.015). Lumbar spine BMD significantly increased 5.19 +/- 0.67% from baseline in the teriparatide-alone group. In the combination group, lumbar spine (6.19 +/- 0.65%), femoral neck (2.23 +/- 0.64%), and total hip (2.31 +/- 0.56%) BMD significantly increased from baseline to study endpoint, and the increase in total hip BMD was significantly greater than in the teriparatide-alone group (p = 0.04). In the teriparatide-alone group, mean serum calcium levels increased from baseline to endpoint (0.30 +/- 0.06 mg/dl, p < 0.001), whereas mean serum phosphate remained unchanged. In the combination group, mean serum calcium was unchanged, and mean serum phosphate decreased (-0.20 +/- 0.06 mg/dl, p < 0.001) from baseline to endpoint. Changes in serum calcium (p < 0.001) and phosphate (p < 0.004) were significantly different between treatment groups. The safety profile of combination therapy was similar to teriparatide alone. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy increased bone formation to a similar degree as teriparatide alone. However, the increase in bone resorption was significantly less and total hip BMD significantly increased for combination therapy compared with teriparatide alone. Combination treatment with raloxifene may thus enhance the bone forming effects of teriparatide. Further studies over longer treatment duration that include fracture endpoints are necessary to fully ascertain the clinical significance of combination raloxifene plus teriparatide therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis.


Assuntos
Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Cloridrato de Raloxifeno/uso terapêutico , Teriparatida/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Cálcio/sangue , Cálcio/urina , Colágeno/sangue , Colágeno Tipo I , Creatina/urina , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Testes de Função Renal , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/sangue , Peptídeos/sangue , Fósforo/sangue , Fósforo/urina , Pró-Colágeno/sangue , Cloridrato de Raloxifeno/efeitos adversos , Cloridrato de Raloxifeno/farmacologia , Teriparatida/efeitos adversos , Teriparatida/farmacologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ácido Úrico/sangue , Ácido Úrico/urina , Vômito/induzido quimicamente
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA