Dissociable neural substrates of opioid and cocaine use identified via connectome-based modelling.

Opioid use disorder is a major public health crisis. While effective treatments are available, outcomes vary widely across individuals and relapse rates remain high. Understanding neural mechanisms of treatment response may facilitate the development of personalized and/or novel treatment approaches. Methadone-maintained, polysubstance-using individuals (n = 53) participated in fMRI scanning before and after substance-use treatment. Connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM)-a recently developed, whole-brain approach-was used to identify pretreatment connections associated with abstinence during the 3-month treatment. Follow-up analyses were conducted to determine the specificity of the identified opioid abstinence network across different brain states (cognitive vs. reward task vs. resting-state) and different substance use outcomes (opioid vs. cocaine abstinence). Posttreatment fMRI data were used to assess network changes over time and within-subject replication. To determine further clinical relevance, opioid abstinence network strength was compared with healthy subjects (n = 38). CPM identified an opioid abstinence network (p = 0.018), characterized by stronger within-network motor/sensory connectivity, and reduced connectivity between the motor/sensory network and medial frontal, default mode, and frontoparietal networks. This opioid abstinence network was anatomically distinct from a previously identified cocaine abstinence network. Relationships between abstinence and opioid and cocaine abstinence networks replicated across multiple brain states but did not generalize across substances. Network connectivity measured at posttreatment related to abstinence at 6-month follow-up (p < 0.009). Healthy comparison subjects displayed intermediate network strengths relative to treatment responders and nonresponders. These data indicate dissociable anatomical substrates of opioid vs. cocaine abstinence. Results may inform the development of novel opioid-specific treatment approaches to combat the opioid epidemic.

Computer-based training for cognitive behavioral therapy for Spanish-speaking substance users: adaptation and satisfaction.

There are few available culturally and linguistically adapted behavioral health interventions for substance use among Spanish-speaking adults. The authors describe the cultural adaptation of an innovative computer-based training for cognitive behavioral therapy program (CBT4CBT). Based in cognitive-behavioral skills training, CBT4CBT utilizes a telenovela to teach monolingual Spanish-speaking adults who have migrated to the United States to recognize triggers; avoid these situations; and cope more effectively with the consequences of substance use. Participants endorsed high levels of satisfaction with the program content and found the material to be easy to understand and relevant to their life experiences.

Religiosity and Spirituality in Latinx Individuals with Substance Use Disorders: Association with Treatment Outcomes in a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Although many studies have examined religiosity as a protective factor for substance use, few have considered its relationship to treatment outcomes among Latinx adults. Using data from 89 individuals participating in a randomized clinical trial evaluating a culturally adapted Spanish-language version of web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT4CBT-Spanish) for substance use, we evaluated the relationship between religiosity, as measured by the Religious Background and Behavior questionnaire, and treatment outcomes. Overall, there were few significant correlations between religiosity scores and treatment outcomes. Past-year religiosity was positively correlated with one measure of abstinence for those randomized to CBT4CBT-Spanish, but this did not persist during a six-month follow-up period. Findings suggest that religiosity may be associated with short-term abstinence outcomes among Latinx adults receiving a culturally adapted cognitive behavioral therapy treatment. However, additional research is needed with larger and more heterogenous Latinx populations.

Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions Targeting Alcohol or Other Drug Use and Co-Occurring Mental Health Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.

AIMS: This meta-analysis reviewed 15 clinical trials (18 study sites/arms), examining the efficacy of an integrated cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBI) delivered to individuals with an alcohol or other drug use disorder and a co-occurring mental health disorder (AOD/MHD). Outcomes were alcohol or other drug use and mental health symptoms at post-treatment through follow-up. METHODS: The inverse-variance weighted effect size was calculated for each study and pooled under random effects assumptions. RESULTS: Integrated CBI showed a small effect size for AOD (g = 0.188, P = 0.061; I2 = 86%, τ2 = 0.126, k = 18) and MHD (g = 0.169, P = 0.024; I2 = 58%, τ2 = 0.052, k = 18) outcomes, although only MHD outcomes were statistically significant. Analysis by subgroup suggested that effect magnitude varied by type of contrast condition (integrated CBI + usual care vs. usual care only; integrated CBI vs. a single-disorder intervention), follow-up time point (post-treatment vs. 3-6 months) and primary AOD/MHD diagnosis, although these sub-groups often contained significant residual heterogeneity. In a series of mixed effects, meta-regression models, demographic factors were non-significant predictors of between-study heterogeneity. For AOD outcomes, greater effects were observed in higher quality studies, but study quality was not related to effect size variability for MHD outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis shows a small and variable effect for integrated CBI with the most promising effect sizes observed for integrated CBI compared with a single disorder intervention (typically an AOD-only intervention) for follow-up outcomes, and for interventions targeting alcohol use and/or post-traumatic stress disorder. Given the clinical and methodological variability within the sample, results should be considered a preliminary, but important step forward in our understanding of treatment for co-occurring AOD/MHD.

Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Galantamine for Methadone-Maintained Individuals With Cocaine Use Disorder: Secondary Analysis of Effects on Illicit Opioid Use.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Concurrent use of cocaine and opioids is a persistent and challenging problem, particularly within methadone maintenance settings, and there are no approved pharmacotherapies for this population. Galantamine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, was found in a randomized clinical trial to reduce cocaine use among methadone-maintained individuals who were also cocaine dependent. Because of the potential of galantamine to reduce multiple drugs of abuse, it may also reduce opioid use. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 120 methadone-maintained individuals with concurrent cocaine dependence. Participants were randomized to galantamine or placebo in a 12-week trial with a 6-month follow-up (97% of intention to treat sample reached for final follow-up). RESULTS: There was a significant main effect for galantamine over placebo on percent of urine specimens that were negative for opioids, both within treatment (77% for galantamine vs 62% for placebo, F = 5.0, P = 0.027) and through a 6-month follow-up (81% vs 59%, respectively, F = 10.8, P = 0.001). This effect was seen regardless of whether participants used nonprescribed opioids during the baseline period. Galantamine effects were seen early in treatment, with participants in placebo submitting the first opioid-positive urine specimen significantly sooner than participants in galantamine (median day 15 vs 53, Wilcoxon = 5.7, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: If these results are supported in future trials, galantamine may hold promise across multiple drugs of abuse, including opioids. (Am J Addict 2019;28:238-245).

Randomized pilot trial of Web-based cognitive-behavioral therapy adapted for use in office-based buprenorphine maintenance.

Background: Despite the clear success of office-based buprenorphine treatment in increasing availability of effective treatment for opioid use disorder, constraints on its effectiveness include high attrition and limited high-quality behavioral care in many areas. Web-based interventions may be a novel strategy for providing evidence-based behavioral care to individuals receiving office-based buprenorphine maintenance. This report describes modification and initial pilot testing of Web-based training in cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT4CBT) specifically for use with individuals in office-based buprenorphine. Methods: Twelve-week randomized pilot trial evaluating effects of CBT4CBT-Buprenophine in retaining participants and reducing drug use with respect to standard office-based buprenorphine alone was carried out. Twenty individuals meeting DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition) criteria for current opioid use disorder were randomized to standard buprenorphine treatment or buprenorphine plus access to CBT4CBT-Buprenorphine. Results: There were promising findings regarding rates of urine toxicology screens negative for opioids (91% versus 64%; P = .05, effect size d = 0.88) and all drugs (82% versus 30%; P = .004, d = 1.2). Individuals randomized to CBT4CBT-Buprenorphine completed a mean of 82.6 (SD = 4.4) days of treatment (of a possible 84) compared with 68.6 (SD = 32.6) for those assigned to standard buprenorphine treatment. Conclusions: Although preliminary and limited by the small sample size, this trial suggests the feasibility and promise of validated, Web-based interventions, tailored for this specific patient population, for improving outcomes in office-based buprenorphine.

Culturally Adapted, Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Spanish-Speaking Individuals With Substance Use Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether adding Web-based cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) to standard outpatient psychiatric or addiction treatment improved substance use outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a randomized clinical trial in New Haven, Connecticut, between 2014 and 2017 comparing 8 weeks of standard outpatient treatment to the same treatment with access to a culturally adapted version of Web-based CBT with a 6-month follow-up. Participants were 92 treatment-seeking individuals with Spanish as their primary language and current substance use disorder, with few other restrictions. RESULTS: Treatment completion and data availability were high (98% of the randomized sample). For the primary outcome (change in frequency of primary substance used), there was a significant effect of treatment condition by time (t 1, 718 = -2.64; 95% confidence interval = -0.61, 0.09; P = .01), indicating significantly greater reductions for those assigned to Web CBT, which were durable through the 6-month follow-up. The knowledge test indicated significantly greater increases for those assigned to Web CBT. CONCLUSIONS: Adding a culturally adapted version of Web-based CBT to standard treatment improved substance use outcomes. Public Health Implications. This approach has high potential to address health disparities by providing an easily accessible, inexpensive form of evidence-based treatment to a range of Latinos with substance use disorders.

Change in DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorder Criteria Count and Severity Level as a Treatment Outcome Indicator: Results from a Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Most clinical trials evaluating treatments for alcohol use target individuals meeting diagnostic criteria for alcohol use disorder (AUD), but few address change in diagnostic status following treatment or as a potential outcome indicator. This study evaluated whether DSM-5 AUD total criteria count or severity category was sensitive to change over time and treatment effects. METHODS: Data were drawn from a randomized clinical trial that evaluated the efficacy of computer-based cognitive behavioral therapy program (CBT4CBT) for AUD. Sixty-eight individuals were randomized to 1 of the 3 weekly outpatient treatments for an 8-week period: (i) treatment as usual (TAU), (ii) TAU+CBT4CBT, and (iii) CBT4CBT+brief monitoring. Structured clinical interviews were used to determine current (past 30 days) AUD diagnosis at baseline, end-of-treatment, and 6 months following end-of-treatment. Change in the total number of DSM criteria endorsed, as well as severity categories (mild, moderate, severe), was evaluated across time and by treatment condition. RESULTS: Generalized Poisson's linear mixed models revealed a significant reduction in the number of DSM criteria from baseline to treatment end point [time effect χ2 (1) = 35.54, p < 0.01], but no significant interactions between time and treatment condition. Fewer total criteria endorsed, as well as achieving at least a 2-level reduction in AUD severity category at end-of-treatment, were associated with better outcomes during follow-up. Chi-square results indicated a greater proportion of individuals assigned to TAU+CBT4CBT had at least a 2-level reduction in severity category compared to TAU, at trend-level significance [χ2 (2, 54) = 5.13, p = 0.07], consistent with primary alcohol use outcomes in the main trial. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate change in DSM-5 AUD total criteria count, as well as severity category, in a randomized clinical trial. These findings offer support for their use as a potential clinically meaningful outcome indicator.

Gray-matter relationships to diagnostic and transdiagnostic features of drug and behavioral addictions.

Alterations in neural structure have been reported in both cocaine-use disorder and gambling disorder, separately, suggesting similarities across addiction diagnoses. Individual variation in neural structure has also been associated with impulsivity, a dimensional construct implicated in addictions. This study combines categorical (diagnosis-based) and dimensional (transdiagnostic) approaches to identify neural structural alterations linked to addiction subtypes and trait impulsivity, respectively, across individuals with gambling disorder (n = 35), individuals with cocaine-use disorder (n = 37) and healthy comparison individuals (n = 37). High-resolution T1-weighted data were analyzed using modulated voxel-based morphometry (VBM). Statistical analyses were conducted using whole-brain general-linear models, corrected for family-wise error (pFWE < .05). Categorical analyses indicated a main effect of diagnostic group on prefrontal (dorsal anterior cingulate and ventromedial prefrontal cortex) gray matter volumes (GMVs), involving decreased GMVs among cocaine-use disorder participants only. Dimensional analyses indicated a negative association between trait impulsivity and cortical (insula) and subcortical (amygdala and hippocampus) GMVs across all participants. Conjunction analysis indicated little anatomical overlap between regions identified as differentiating diagnostic groups and regions covarying with impulsivity. These data provide first evidence of neural structural differences between gambling disorder and an illicit substance-use disorder. They further indicate dissociable effects of diagnostic groupings and trait impulsivity on neural structure among individuals with behavioral and drug addictions. Study findings highlight the importance of considering both categorical and dimensional (e.g. Research Domain Criteria; RDoC) analysis approaches within the context of addictions research.

Positive and negative affect in cocaine use disorder treatment: Change across time and relevance to treatment outcome.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) for substance use disorder is empirically supported, and may be associated with change in affect over time. OBJECTIVES: Understanding the role of affect in cocaine use disorder could help to improve CBT outcomes. METHODS: This secondary analysis included 140 adults with cocaine use disorder, 57.9% female, drawn from two randomized controlled studies of web-based cognitive-behavior therapy who completed the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) before and during treatment. RESULTS: In mixed-effects regression models, baseline negative affect (NA) scores were not associated with self-reported cocaine use during treatment, but baseline PA scores were associated with less frequent cocaine use (ß = -0.04, p = .02). During treatment, NA scores reduced over time in CBT and treatment as usual (ß = -0.27, p < .01), although PA scores did not change. Higher weekly NA scores were associated with weekly cocaine use (ß = .02, SE = .01, t(746.15) = 2.37, p = .02), although weekly PANAS PA scores were not associated with weekly cocaine use. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Results indicated that individuals with higher baseline PA were more likely to abstain from cocaine use during treatment, even when controlling for baseline cocaine use frequency. Although baseline NA was not associated with cocaine use, NA during treatment was associated with greater cocaine use. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: PA at baseline and NA during treatment were associated with cocaine use. If findings are replicated, treatment developers may wish to include treatment interventions to boost early PA and reduce NA throughout treatment. (Am J Addict 2018;XX:1-8).

Momentary Associations Between Reported Craving and Valuing Health in Daily Smokers.

INTRODUCTION: Research suggests that a blunted response to nondrug rewards, especially under conditions associated with strong cigarette cravings, is associated with reduced abstinence motivation in daily smokers. One limitation of previous studies is that they have largely focused on monetary rewards as broad representative of nondrug rewards. It remains unclear whether craving dampens responses to more abstract nondrug rewards, such as personal values. Personal values often have a positive valence and are frequently assumed to remain stable across time and situations. However, there may be time-varying and contextual influences on smokers' appraisal of values in daily life. Characterizing fluctuations in value importance in relation to relapse precipitants (eg, craving) may inform interventions that leverage personal values as motivation for cessation. METHODS: Daily smokers (n = 18) completed ecological momentary assessment surveys measuring the importance of specific personal values and smoking-related variables during 8 days of monetarily reinforced cigarette abstinence. We hypothesized that value ratings would demonstrate adequate within-person heterogeneity for multilevel modeling and that within-person fluctuations in craving would be negatively related to valuing personal health. RESULTS: All values demonstrated adequate within-person variability for multilevel modeling. Within-person craving was negatively related to health valuation (p = .012) and a cross-level interaction (p > .0001) suggested this effect is stronger for individuals who report greater overall craving. CONCLUSIONS: Greater craving is associated with decreased importance of personal health in the moment, particularly for those with high average levels of craving. Timely interventions that bolster importance of health during moments of elevated craving can potentially improve cessation outcomes. IMPLICATIONS: This study builds on research highlighting the positive influence of personal values in motivating behavior change. Values are an often used, but poorly studied, construct that has considerable utility in smoking cessation. Valuing personal health is frequently reported as a primary motivator for a quit attempt. Inasmuch as personal health is a distal nondrug reward used to motivate smoking abstinence, naturalistic evaluation of health importance, and motivators for continued smoking (ie, craving) could inform the timing and content of smoking treatment. This study is among the first to evaluate momentary assessment of personal values and craving within daily life.

Comparable efficacy of behavioral and pharmacological treatments among African American and White cocaine users.

Multiple randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have evaluated a range of treatments for cocaine dependence, but few of these have focused specifically on the racial diversity observed among cocaine-dependent patients. The present analyses evaluated racial variation in cocaine use and addiction-related psychosocial outcomes at baseline and follow-up among 388 African American and White adults participating in 1 of 5 RCTs evaluating a range of pharmacological and behavioral treatments for cocaine use disorders. General linear modeling (GLM) indicated significant racial variation in cocaine and psychosocial indicators at baseline. At baseline, there were significant racial differences in the number of days paid for work in the 30 days prior to the study, age, days of cocaine use in the past month, age of first cocaine use, psychosocial problems (i.e., employment, cocaine, legal, and family), public assistance status, and prevalence of lifetime anxiety disorders. There were no significant main or interaction effects of race and study on treatment outcomes at posttreatment. These findings suggest that despite significant racial differences at baseline, the pharmacological and behavioral treatments resulted in fairly comparable outcomes across racial groups in these 5 RCTs.

Randomized Trial of Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol Use Disorders: Efficacy as a Virtual Stand-Alone and Treatment Add-On Compared with Standard Outpatient Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an evidence-based treatment for alcohol use disorders (AUDs), yet is rarely implemented with high fidelity in clinical practice. Computer-based delivery of CBT offers the potential to address dissemination challenges, but to date there have been no evaluations of a web-based CBT program for alcohol use within a clinical sample. METHODS: This study randomized treatment-seeking individuals with a current AUD to 1 of 3 treatments at a community outpatient facility: (i) standard treatment as usual (TAU); (ii) TAU plus on-site access to a computerized CBT targeting alcohol use (TAU + CBT4CBT); or (iii) CBT4CBT plus brief weekly clinical monitoring (CBT4CBT + monitoring). Participant alcohol use was assessed weekly during an 8-week treatment period, as well as 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-eight individuals (65% male; 54% African American) were randomized (TAU = 22; TAU + CBT4CBT = 22; CBT4CBT + monitoring = 24). There were significantly higher rates of treatment completion among participants assigned to 1 of the CBT4CBT conditions compared to TAU (Wald = 6.86, p < 0.01). Significant reductions in alcohol use were found across all conditions within treatment, with participants assigned to TAU + CBT4CBT demonstrating greater increases in percentage of days abstinent (PDA) compared to TAU, t(536.4) = 2.68, p < 0.01, d = 0.71, 95% CI (0.60, 3.91), for the full sample. Preliminary findings suggest the estimated costs of all self-reported AUD-related services utilized by participants were considerably lower for those assigned to CBT4CBT conditions compared to TAU, both within treatment and during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrated the safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of web-based CBT4CBT targeting alcohol use. CBT4CBT was superior to TAU at increasing PDA when delivered as an add-on, and it was not significantly different from TAU or TAU + CBT4CBT when delivered with clinical monitoring only.

Emotion regulation strategies in individuals with cocaine use disorder maintained on methadone.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cognitive reappraisal (CR) and emotional suppression (ES), two emotion regulation strategies, are disrupted in other substance use disorders but have not been studied in cocaine dependence. METHODS: Methadone-maintained individuals with cocaine dependence (N = 72) completed assessment of CR, ES, cocaine use, and psychiatric symptoms. RESULTS: CR scores were associated with lower depression scores (r = -.29, p = .01), but not with cocaine abstinence during 8 weeks of treatment (r = .12, p = .29). CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: CR appeared relevant to cocaine-dependent individuals' depression, but was not associated with abstinence or treatment outcome. (Am J Addict 2016;25:529-532).

Psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in a heterogeneous sample of substance users.

BACKGROUND: The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is a widely used measure of affect. A comprehensive psychometric evaluation among substance users, however, has not been published. OBJECTIVE: To examine the psychometric properties of the PANAS in a sample of outpatient treatment substance users. METHODS: We used pooled data from four randomized clinical trials (N = 416; 34% female, 48% African American). RESULTS: A confirmatory factor analysis indicated adequate support for a two-factor correlated model comprised of Positive Affect and Negative Affect with correlated item errors (Comparative Fit Index = 0.93, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.07, χ(2) = 478.93, df = 156). Cronbach's α indicated excellent internal consistency for both factors (0.90 and 0.91, respectively). The PANAS factors had good convergence and discriminability (Composite Reliability > 0.7; Maximum Shared Variance < Average Variance Extracted). A comparison from baseline to Week 1 indicated acceptable test-retest reliability (Positive Affect = 0.80, Negative Affect = 0.76). Concurrent and discriminant validity were demonstrated with correlations with the Brief Symptom Inventory and Addiction Severity Index. The PANAS scores were also significantly correlated with treatment outcomes (e.g. Positive Affect was associated with the maximum days of consecutive abstinence from primary substance of abuse, r = 0.16, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the psychometric properties of the PANAS are retained in substance using populations. Although several studies have focused on the role of Negative Affect, our findings suggest that Positive Affect may also be an important factor in substance use treatment outcomes.

Patient Pre-Treatment Expectations Do Not Predict Cocaine Use Outcomes: Data From Four Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: There are very few data regarding the extent to which patients' initial expectations regarding treatment are associated with substance use treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine how patients' treatment expectations were associated with treatment outcomes. METHODS: This study explored patient pre-treatment expectations and substance use treatment outcomes for 387 individuals participating in treatment for cocaine use within the United States (68.2% male, mean age 36 years old, 54.8% Caucasian). RESULTS: Participants' expectations regarding abstinence were not strongly associated with post-treatment or follow-up cocaine use outcome measures. There was a significant association between the expected timeframe of receiving a positive treatment effect (i.e., outcome efficiency expectations) and days of cocaine use at the 1-month follow-up point (F = 3.45, p =.009). Post-hoc comparisons revealed that participants that expected positive effects of treatment within 0-1 week reported fewer days of cocaine use than those that expected results in 1-2 months. Also, those that expected positive effects of treatment in 1-2 months reported more cocaine use than those who expected positive results within two weeks to one month. Further, there was a significant effect of outcome efficiency expectations on a proxy measure of achieving a good treatment outcome at the three-month follow-up point (F = 11.13, p =.025). CONCLUSIONS/IMPORTANCE: Results suggest that treatment outcomes are not associated with patients' treatment outcome expectations, but that some outcomes are associated with treatment outcome efficiency expectations.

Cognitive Function as a Transdiagnostic Treatment Target in Stimulant Use Disorders.

Stimulant use disorder is an important public health problem, with an estimated 2.1 million current users in the United States alone. No pharmacological treatments are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for stimulant use disorder and behavioral treatments have variable efficacy and limited availability. Most individuals with stimulant use disorder have other comorbidities, most with overlapping symptoms and cognitive impairments. The goal of this article is to present a rationale for cognition as a treatment target in stimulant use disorder and to outline potential treatment approaches. Rates of lifetime comorbid psychiatric disorders among people with stimulant use disorders are estimated at 65% to 73%, with the most common being mood disorders (13% to 64%) and anxiety disorders (21% to 50%), as well as non-substance-induced psychotic disorders (<10%). There are several models of addictive behavior, but the dual process model particularly highlights the relevance of cognitive impairments and biases to the development and maintenance of addiction. This model explains addictive behavior as a balance between automatic processes and executive control, which in turn are related to individual (genetics, comorbid disorders, psychosocial factors) and other (craving, triggers, drug use) factors. Certain cognitive impairments, such as attentional bias and approach bias, are most relevant to automatic processes, while sustained attention, response inhibition, and working memory are primarily related to executive control. These cognitive impairments and biases are also common in disorders frequently comorbid with stimulant use disorder and predict poor treatment retention and clinical outcomes. As such, they may serve as feasible transdiagnostic treatment targets. There are promising pharmacological, cognitive, and behavioral approaches that aim to enhance cognitive function. Pharmacotherapies target cognitive impairments associated with executive control and include cholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., galantamine, rivastigmine) and monoamine transporter inhibitors (e.g., modafinil, methylphenidate). Cognitive behavioral therapy and cognitive rehabilitation also enhance executive control, while cognitive bias modification targets impairments associated with automatic processes. Cognitive enhancement to improve treatment outcomes is a novel and promising strategy, but its clinical value for the treatment of stimulant use disorder, with or without other psychiatric comorbidities, remains to be determined in future studies.

Anger and its Association with Substance Use Treatment Outcomes in a Sample of Adolescents.

Anger is a common affective experience, yet it is relatively understudied in the substance use treatment literature. This study explored anger as a predictor of treatment outcomes in a large sample of adolescents. Data were extracted from the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study for Adolescents (DATOS-A). An anger profile was created based on adolescents' pre-treatment responses to four items assessing history of temper outbursts and aggression. Individuals were classified as High Anger (n = 506) and Normal/Low Anger (n = 2,326) based on their pattern of responses to these items. High Anger at baseline was associated with several poor outcomes at the 12-month follow-up point, including a greater likelihood of experiencing delirium tremens, relapsing on drugs due to alcohol use, having difficulty controlling temper and behavior, and being arrested for attacks on persons.

Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Comorbid Cannabis Use and Anxiety Disorders.

Cannabis use disorders (CUDs) co-occur with anxiety disorders at high rates, presumably because some individuals with anxiety disorders may rely on cannabis to manage anxiety. Motivation enhancement therapy (MET) combined with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is an efficacious intervention for CUD, yet outcomes are worse for patients with elevated anxiety. The integration of MET-CBT with False Safety Behavior Elimination Treatment (FSET) may be useful with anxious CUD patients, as the use of cannabis to manage anxiety can be targeted as a false safety behavior. Here, we describe the integrated treatment and the successful use of it among two patients-one with CUD and comorbid social anxiety disorder (SAD) and one with CUD and comorbid SAD and generalized anxiety disorder. Data support the feasibility of this integrated treatment as a viable approach to the treatment of CUD and comorbid anxiety disorders. Future controlled trials are now warranted to further evaluate the intervention.