Estimation of myocardial work from pressure-strain loops analysis: an experimental evaluation.

Purpose: The area of left ventricular (LV) pressure-strain loop (PSL) is used as an index of regional myocardial work. The purpose of the present work is to compare the main segmental PSL markers and the derived global work indices, when they are calculated using an estimated pressure signal or an observed pressure signal. Methods and results: In nine patients implanted with a bi-ventricular pace-maker (CRT), LV pressure was invasively measured in five conditions: CRT-off, LV-pacing, right ventricular-pacing and two different CRT-pacing. For each condition, systolic blood pressure was measured by brachial artery cuff-pressure and transthoracic echocardiography loops were recorded simultaneously. The error and relative root mean square error (rRMSE) between measured and estimated pressure were calculated for each patient and each configuration. Correlation coefficient (R2) and Bland-Altman (BA) analysis were performed for PSL area and work indices. A total of 43 different haemodynamic conditions were compared (774 segmental PSL). The global rRMSE between estimated and measured LV-pressure was 12.3 mmHg. The estimated and measured segmental LV-PSL were strongly correlated, with an R2 of 0.98. BA analysis shows that the mean bias for the estimation of segmental LV-PSL area is 86.0 mmHg.%. A significant bias effect with linearly increasing error with pressure values is observed. R2 ≥ 0.88 and a mean bias in BA analysis ≤41.4 mmHg.% was observed for the estimation of global myocardial work indices. Conclusion: The non-invasive estimation for LV pressure-strain loop area and the global myocardial work indices obtained from LV-PSL strongly correlates with invasive measurements.

Long-term reverse remodeling by cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing: A feasibility study of noninvasive hemodynamics-guided device programming.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing (MultiPoint Pacing [MPP]) improves acute hemodynamics and chronic outcomes in comparison to conventional biventricular pacing (BiV), though MPP programming questions persist. OBJECTIVES: In this multicenter feasibility study, we evaluated the feasibility of using noninvasive systolic blood pressure (SBP) to guide MPP programming and assessed the chronic 6-month echocardiographic CRT response. METHODS: Patients implanted with MPP-enabled CRT-defibrillator devices underwent noninvasive hemodynamic assessment (finger arterial pressure) during a pacing protocol that included atrial-only pacing and various BiV and MPP configurations. Each configuration was repeated 4 times, alternating with a reference pacing configuration, to calculate the SBP difference relative to reference (ΔSBP). CRT configurations with the greatest ΔSBP were programmed. An independent core laboratory analyzed baseline and 6-month echocardiograms, with CRT response defined as a 6-month reduction in LV end-systolic volume ≥ 15%. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (71% male; LV ejection fraction 30.3% ± 7.5%; QRS duration 161 ± 19 ms; 26% had ischemic cardiomyopathy) were enrolled in 4 European centers. Relative to atrial-only pacing, the best BiV and best MPP configurations produced significant SBP elevations of 3.1 ± 4.2 (P < .01) and 4.1 ± 4.1 mm Hg (P < .01), respectively (BiV vs MPP; P < .01). Greater SBP elevations were associated with the best MPP compared with the best BiV configurations in 29 of 37 patients completing the pacing protocol (78%). Of MPP-programmed patients completing the 6-month follow-up visit, 23 of 27 (85%) were classified as CRT responders (6-month reduction in LV end-systolic volume 37.0% ± 13.6%). CONCLUSION: Acute noninvasive hemodynamics after CRT device implantation predominantly favored MPP over BiV programming. MPP programming guided by noninvasive hemodynamics resulted in positive LV structural remodeling.

Physiological approach to monitor patients in congestive heart failure: application of a new implantable device-based system to monitor daily life activity and ventilation.

AIMS: We examine an expert system designed to permanently monitor patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) using data of a dual-sensor pacemaker and to allow warning of significant changes in physiological indices. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 67 implanted patients divided into two groups: a control group without history of CHF (n = 19) who had received DDDR pacemakers (DDD group) and a test group (n = 48) who had received cardiac resynchronization therapy systems (CRT group) for severe CHF (NYHA III or IV, LVEF <40%). The embedded monitoring system measures minute ventilation (MV) and activity (ACT) at rest and at exercise. All devices collect data, and all adverse medical events were recorded. Data are stored daily for up to 3 months. The mean ACT was similar for both groups. Mean rest and exercise MV were significantly higher in CRT group. On 195 periods of 1-month follow-up in the CRT group, 31 events were suspected, 22 were true positive, 9 were false-positive, and 3 clinical adverse events were not predicted (sensitivity: 88%, specificity: 94.7%, positive predictive value: 71%, negative predictive value: 98.2%) CONCLUSION: A new diagnostic expert system that holds promise for the long-term ambulatory monitoring of CHF was developed.

Clinical testing of a new pacemaker function to monitor ventricular capture.

Automatic beat-by-beat capture functions are designed to minimize the pacing energy delivered, while maintaining the highest safety by delivering an immediate back-up stimulus in case of loss of capture. The objective of this study was to estimate the lowering of ventricular pacing amplitude allowed by such a function, compared to amplitudes usually set manually in routine practice. An automatic ventricular pacing threshold test is launched every 6 hours to measure the automatic capture threshold (AT). From AT the function calculates: (1) the"capture amplitude"(V(c)) = AT + 0.5 V at a minimum output of 1 V and (2) the"safety amplitude" (V(s)) = twice AT at a minimum output of 2.5 V. The function preferentially uses V(c) and verifies capture after each paced beat. In case of loss of capture, a back-up spike is delivered and V(s) is implemented until the next threshold measurement. We estimated the ventricular amplitude delivered by the pacemaker from data stored in the pacemaker memory. We compared these values with the pacing amplitude typically programmed manually (MPA) by physicians at twice AT and a minimum of 2.5 V. Data from 57 recipients of Talent 3 DR pacemakers were analyzed. Complete data sets were available in 25 patients at 1 day, 28 at 1 month, and 39 between 1 day and 1 month. No loss of capture or ventricular pause was observed on 53 ambulatory electrocardiograms (ECG); and pulse amplitude automatically delivered by the device was significantly lower than the MPA at each of the three time points analyzed. This new beat-by-beat capture function allows a significant lowering of the pacing amplitude compared to manual settings, while preserving a 100% safety.