COVID-19 Vaccine Allergy Safety Track (VAS-Track) pathway: real-world outcomes on vaccination rates and antibody protection.

BACKGROUND: Misdiagnosed vaccine-related "allergies" lead to unnecessary vaccine deferrals and incomplete vaccinations, leaving patients unprotected against COVID-19. To overcome limitations and queues for Allergist assessment, the "VAS-Track" pathway was developed to evaluate patients via a multi-disciplinary triage model including nurses, non-specialists, and Allergists. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effectiveness and safety of VAS-Track and evaluate its real-world impact in terms of vaccination rates and COVID-19 protection. METHODS: Patients referred to VAS-Track between September 2021 and March 2022 were recruited. Subgroup analysis was performed with prospective pre- and post-clinic antibody levels. RESULTS: Nurse-assisted screening identified 10,412 (76%) referrals as inappropriate. 369 patients were assessed by VAS-Track. Overall, 100% of patients were recommended to complete vaccination and 332 (90%) completed their primary series. No patients reported any significant allergic reactions following subsequent vaccination. Vaccination completion rates between patients seen by non-specialists and additional Allergist review were similar (90% vs. 89%, p = 0.617). Vaccination rates were higher among patients with prior history of immediate-type reactions (odds ratio: 2.43, p = 0.025). Subgroup analysis revealed that only 20% (56/284) of patients had seropositive COVID-19 neutralizing antibody levels (≥ 15 AU/mL) prior to VAS-Track, which increased to 92% after vaccine completion (pre-clinic antibody level 6.0 ± 13.5 AU/mL vs. post-clinic antibody level 778.8 ± 337.4 AU/mL, p > 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A multi-disciplinary allergy team was able to streamline our COVID-19 VAS services, enabling almost all patients to complete their primary series, significantly boosting antibody levels and real-world COVID-19 protection. We propose similar multidisciplinary models to be further utilized, especially in the settings with limited allergy services.

Associations between usual glycated haemoglobin and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A 10-year diabetes cohort study.

AIM: To investigate the assocation between glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study conducted in Hong Kong selected patients aged 45 to 84 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus and without CVD from primary care clinics during the period 2008 to 2010. Usual HbA1c measurement was calculated using a mixed-effects model to minimize regression dilution bias. The association between usual HbA1c and CVD risk was assessed by Cox regression, with adjustment for baseline covariates. Subgroup analyses by patient characteristics were also conducted. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 8.4 years (1.4 million person-years), 174 028 patients with 34 074 CVD events were observed. A curvilinear association was found between usual HbA1c and total CVD, stroke, heart failure and CVD mortality risk. No significant difference was found among patients with usual HbA1c <53 mmol/mol (7%). A positive linear association was found between usual HbA1c and the risks of outcomes when the usual HbA1c was 53 mmol/mol (7%) or above. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD risk per 1% increment in usual HbA1c >7% was 21% (HR 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.23) (HR for CVD per 1mmol/mol increment in usual HbA1c > 53 mmol/mol was 1.7% (HR 1.017, CI 1.015-1.019)). A similar pattern was identified in a patient subgroup analysis, but the effects of usual HbA1c in younger patients were more prominent than in older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Usual HbA1c increments for levels >53 mmol/mol (7.0%) were associated with elevated CVD risk, but no difference was found in the population with usual HbA1c <53 mmol/mol (7.0%), irrespective of patient characteristics. For CVD prevention, strict adherence to an HbA1c target of <53 mmol/mol (7%) should apply to younger patients.

Mortality-causing mechanisms and healthcare resource utilisation of treatment-resistant depression: A six-year population-based cohort study.

Background: Few studies investigated the mechanisms of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) leading to the worsened survival outcome, and economic evidence was mostly restricted to short follow-ups. We aimed to examine the association and potential mediators between TRD and all-cause mortality, and estimate a longer-term associated health resource utilisation pattern. Methods: This was a population-based cohort study using territory-wide electronic medical records in Hong Kong. Incident depression patients diagnosed in 2014 were followed up from the first diagnosis to death or December 2019 for TRD identification. We matched the TRD cohort 1:4 to the non-TRD cohort on propensity scores estimated by age, sex, history of physical disorders, and history of psychiatric conditions before depression diagnoses. Findings: 18% of incident patients developed TRD within six years of follow-up. Cox model showed that patients with TRD had 1⋅52-fold (95% CI: 1⋅14-2⋅02) greater risk of all-cause mortality, compared with non-TRD patients. Path analysis suggested that post-TRD psychiatric conditions significantly mediated 41⋅6% of mortality in patients with TRD (p=0.003). TRD was associated with 1⋅8-fold (95%CI: 1⋅63-2⋅00) higher healthcare costs compared to non-TRD patients over six years in negative binomial regression, with higher costs for both psychiatric and non-psychiatric services utilisation in all settings. Interpretation: Identifying patients with TRD and subsequent monitoring for post-TRD psychiatric diagnoses could be a way to reduce premature mortality. Multidisciplinary care involving both psychiatric and general medical professionals is also warranted to relieve the multifaceted impacts on healthcare resources and overall cost. Funding: Unconditional educational grant from Janssen.