SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell therapy for severe COVID-19: a randomized phase 1/2 trial.

Despite advances, few therapeutics have shown efficacy in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In a different context, virus-specific T cells have proven safe and effective. We conducted a randomized (2:1), open-label, phase 1/2 trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of off-the-shelf, partially human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched, convalescent donor-derived severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific T cells (CoV-2-STs) in combination with standard of care (SoC) in patients with severe COVID-19 compared to SoC during Delta variant predominance. After a dose-escalated phase 1 safety study, 90 participants were randomized to receive CoV-2-ST+SoC (n = 60) or SoC only (n = 30). The co-primary objectives of the study were the composite of time to recovery and 30-d recovery rate and the in vivo expansion of CoV-2-STs in patients receiving CoV-2-ST+SoC over SoC. The key secondary objective was survival on day 60. CoV-2-ST+SoC treatment was safe and well tolerated. The study met the primary composite endpoint (CoV-2-ST+SoC versus SoC: recovery rate 65% versus 38%, P = 0.017; median recovery time 11 d versus not reached, P = 0.052, respectively; rate ratio for recovery 1.71 (95% confidence interval 1.03-2.83, P = 0.036)) and the co-primary objective of significant CoV-2-ST expansion compared to SοC (CoV-2-ST+SoC versus SoC, P = 0.047). Overall, in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19, adoptive immunotherapy with CoV-2-STs was feasible and safe. Larger trials are needed to strengthen the preliminary evidence of clinical benefit in severe COVID-19. EudraCT identifier: 2021-001022-22 .

Prospective De Novo Donor-Specific Antibody Monitoring in Renal Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) are associated with antibody-mediated rejection leading to kidney transplant failure. However, many transplant patients are stable with no signs of graft dysfunction at the time of dnDSA detection at screening test. METHODS: We prospectively studied 26 kidney transplant patients for 3 years, with dnDSA detected using the Luminex single-antigen bead assay in a routine test. Proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate were evaluated along with dnDSA monitoring at least annually. RESULTS: Graft loss associated with dnDSA occurred in 8 (31%) patients, 14 ± 11 months after the initial detection of dnDSA. These patients had more frequently multiple dnDSA (P = .004) and remarkable proteinuria, more than 1 g daily (P < .001). The remaining 18 patients were followed for 38 ± 15 months and considered stable as there was no deterioration regarding estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria. In 7 (39%) of these patients, dnDSA waned and were not detected anymore at follow-up. Antibodies against HLA class I had a significantly (P < .001) lower mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) (2603 ± 1098) compared with those against HLA class II (11,109 ± 6414). In regression analysis, they were predictive of dnDSA wane (P = .043; odds ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.94). Despite fluctuations during follow-up, there was no significant change in MFI for those who retained the dnDSA. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of dnDSA is transient in a significant proportion of stable renal transplant patients, especially in those with antibodies against HLA class I and a low MFI. Multiple dnDSA and severe proteinuria adversely affect renal graft survival.