Comparison of Thrombelastography (TEG) in Patients with Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage and Cerebral Infarction.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to analyze the changing role of thrombelastography (TEG) by detecting the indexes of TEG in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage and cerebral infarction, combined with pathogenesis, and to find objective laboratory indexes for the diagnosis and treatment of cerebrovascular diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from 150 patients were collected, including 69 cases identified as the cerebral infarction group and 81 cases identified as the cerebral hemorrhage group. In addition, 50 healthy adults were selected as a control group. The cerebral hemorrhage group was divided into 3 subgroups according to the amount of bleeding: small hemorrhage group, moderate hemorrhage group, and large hemorrhage group. The diagnosis for each participant was mainly based on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). TEG indexes [R value (coagulation reaction time), K value (coagulation time), Angle (reflecting the formation rate of blood clot and the function of fibrinogen), MA (maximum thrombus amplitude), CI (coagulation index)] were measured by TEG YZ5000 instrument. RESULTS The cerebral infarction group had lower R and K values and higher Angle and CI (P<0.05). The cerebral hemorrhage group had higher K value; the Angle and MA were lower in the moderate hemorrhage group and in the large hemorrhage groups (P<0.05). In the cerebral hemorrhage group, Angle and MA were negatively correlated with the amount of cerebral hemorrhage (r=-0.475, -0.394 respectively, P<0.05), and the K value was positively correlated with the amount of cerebral hemorrhage (r=0.337, P<0.05), while the R value had no significant correlation with the amount of cerebral hemorrhage (r=0.251, P>0.05). R and K values in the cerebral infarction group were significantly lower, while Angle, MA, and CI were significantly higher in the cerebral hemorrhage group. CONCLUSIONS K value, Angle, and MA may be of value in the assessment of the amount of cerebral hemorrhage.

Nomogram prediction model for the risk of intracranial hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Background: Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) might worsen the clinical outcomes, and a reliable predictive system is needed to identify the risk of hemorrhagic transformation after IVT. Methods: Retrospective collection of patients with acute cerebral infarction treated with intravenous thrombolysis in our hospital from 2018 to 2022. 197 patients were included in the research study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen the factors in the predictive nomogram. The performance of nomogram was assessed on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: A total of 197 patients were recruited, of whom 24 (12.1%) developed HT. In multivariate logistic regression model National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (OR, 1.362; 95% CI, 1.161-1.652; p = 0.001), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) (OR, 1.012; 95% CI, 1.004-1.020; p = 0.003), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (OR, 3.430; 95% CI, 2.082-6.262; p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (OR, 1.039; 95% CI, 1.009-1.075; p = 0.016) were the independent predictors of HT which were used to generate nomogram. The nomogram showed good discrimination due to AUC-ROC values. Calibration plot showed good calibration. DCA showed that nomogram is clinically useful. Conclusion: Nomogram consisting of NIHSS, NT-pro BNP, NLR, SBP scores predict the risk of HT in AIS patients treated with IVT.

Efficacy and safety of combined stent retriever and contact aspiration vs. stent retriever alone on revascularization in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: Whether the efficacy of combined stent retriever and contact aspiration (S + A) is superior to stent retriever (S) alone for revascularisation in patients with large vessel occlusive stroke remains uncertain. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of combined stent retriever and contact aspiration for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with large vessel occlusion by comparing it with stent retriever alone. Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library databases for randomised controlled trials and observational studies (case-control and cohort studies) published before 1 October 2023 comparing the efficacy of combined stent retriever and contact aspiration versus tent retriever alone in patients with large vessel occlusive stroke. The end point of the primary efficacy observed in this meta-analysis study was the rate of first pass nearly complete or complete recanalisation (mTICI 2c-3). Secondary effectiveness nodes were: rate of first pass successful recanalisation (mTICI 2b-3), rate of near-complete or complete recanalisation of the postoperative vessel, rate of successful recanalisation of the postoperative vessel, and MRS 0-2 within 90 days. Safety endpoints were interoperative embolism, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, and mortality within 90 days. Results: A total of 16 studies were included in the literature for this meta-analysis, with a total of 7,320 patients (S + C group: 3,406, S group: 3,914). A comprehensive analysis of the included literature showed that combined stent retriever and contact aspiration had a higher rate of near-complete or complete recanalisation of the postoperative vessel [OR = 1.53, 95% CI (1.24, 1.88), p < 0.0001] and rate of successful recanalisation of the postoperative vessel compared to stent retriever alone [OR = 1.83, 95% CI (1.55, 2.17), p < 0.00001]; there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the rate of first pass nearly complete or complete recanalisation [OR = 1.00, 95% CI (0.83, 1.19), p = 0.96], rate of first pass successful recanalisation [OR = 1.02, 95% CI (0.85, 1.24), p = 0.81], interoperative embolism [OR = 0.93, 95% CI (0.72, 1.20), p = 0.56], symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage [OR = 1.14, 95% CI (0.87, 1.48), p = 0.33], MRS 0-2 within 90 days [OR = 0.89, 95% CI (0.76, 1.04), p = 0.14] and mortality within 90 days [OR = 1.11, 95% CI (0.94, 1.31), p = 0.22]. Conclusion: Combined stent retriever and contact aspiration has a higher rate of postprocedural revascularisation (mTICI 2c-3/mTICI 2b-3) compared with stent retriever alone in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke. In addition, it was not superior to stenting alone in terms of the rate of first pass recanalisation (mTICI 2c-3/mTICI 2b-3), interoperative embolisation, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, good functional prognosis within 90 days and mortality within 90 days.

Over-expression of long noncoding RNA HOTAIRM1 promotes cell proliferation and invasion in human glioblastoma by up-regulating SP1 via sponging miR-137.

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive malignant brain tumor in adults. Long noncoding RNA HOTAIRM1 (HOX antisense intergenic RNA myeloid 1) has been reported to participate in the progression of various cancers. However, the role of HOTAIRM1 in glioblastoma and its underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. The relative expression levels of HOTAIRM1, miR-137 and specificity protein 1 were detected by quantitative real-time PCR or western blot. The effects of HOTAIRM1 on cell proliferation and invasion were evaluated by Cell Counting Kit-8 assay and Transwell assay, respectively. The interactions among HOTAIRM1, miR-137 and specificity protein 1 were predicted by online softwares and confirmed by luciferase reporter assay and RNA immunoprecipitation assay. The levels of HOTAIRM1 and specificity protein 1 were significantly increased while miR-137 was significantly decreased in glioblastoma tissues and cells. Knockdown of HOTAIRM1 suppressed proliferation and invasion in glioblastoma cells. Moreover, miR-137 was bound to HOTAIRM1, and specificity protein 1 was identified as a target of miR-137. The protein level of specificity protein 1 was repressed by silencing the expression of HOTAIRM1, whereas the effect was restored by inhibiting the expression of miR-137. Downregulation of HOTAIRM1 expression suppressed the proliferation and invasion of glioblastoma cells by down-regulating specificity protein 1 expression via sponging miR-137, indicating a promising strategy for glioblastoma treatment.

A Cumulative Score Based on Preoperative Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Fibrinogen in Predicting Overall Survival of Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a retrospective analysis to explore the prognostic effect of the cumulative score based on neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and fibrinogen in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS: The clinical data of patients with GBM from January 2014 to December 2017 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. X-tile software was used to identify the optimal cutoff points of NLR and fibrinogen in predicting prognosis of GBM. Fibrinogen-NLR (F-NLR) score was calculated as following: fibrinogen >3.4 g/dL and NLR >4.1 was identified as F-NLR score of 2, only 1 abnormal index was defined as F-NLR score of 1, and no abnormal indices were classified as F-NLR score of 0. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients with primary GBM were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 116 patients were men and 71 were women, and the mean age was 55 ± 13.55 years. The cutoffs of lymphocyte, NLR, fibrinogen, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) identified by X-tile were 1.8 × 109/L, 4.1 × 109/L, 3.4 mg/dL, and 228.6. There were 87 patients with F-NLR score of 0, 50 patients with F-NLR score of 1, and 50 patients with F-NLR score of 2. In the univariate survival analysis, age, lymphocyte count, fibrinogen, NLR, PLR, F-NLR score of 2, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were significant predictors of overall survival (OS) in patients with GBM (all P < 0.05). After excluding related parameters, F-NLR score of 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.103; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.401-3.155; P < 0.001) and chemotherapy (HR, 0.650; 95% CI, 0.432-0.977; P = 0.038) were predictive factors of OS for patients with GBM. When stratified by extent of resection, age, and adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, F-NLR score maintained the prognostic value in patients with GBM (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: F-NLR score of 2 was a risk predictor of prognosis for patients with GBM.