Assessment of Instability in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Using a New Bone Scan Scoring System.

Background and Objectives: Unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures require surgical management as they can result in neurological deficits if left untreated. This study aimed to evaluate whether a new bone scan scoring system could accurately assess instability in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures who underwent bone scans and magnetic resonance imaging prior to surgery between January 2015 and August 2017 at Ulsan University Hospital were selected for inclusion. Instability was determined by clinical assessment and imaging, and the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity score was determined. Bone scans were visually evaluated using a new bone scan scoring system. Bone scan findings of vertebral body (BB) and posterior column (BP) were scored separately and were summed to produce BTS {BTS (total score) = BB (body score, 5 points) + BP (posterior score, 2 points)}. The diagnostic performance of the scoring system for identifying unstable then thoracolumbar burst fractures were assessed. Results: Of the 52 thoracolumbar burst fractures, 34 (65.4%) were unstable and 31 (59.6%) had a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity score ≥ 5. The diagnostic performance of using BTS ≥ 4 to identify unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures and those with a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity score ≥ 5 was as follows: sensitivity, 61.8% and 58.1%; specificity, 94.4% and 81.0%; positive predictive value, 95.5% and 81.8%; and negative predictive value, 56.7% and 56.7%, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed bone scan scoring system has a high specificity and positive predictive value for identifying thoracolumbar burst fractures that are unstable or have a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity score ≥ 5. This scoring system may help to inform decisions regarding surgical management.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between arthroscopic subchondral drilling and microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes of the two common bone marrow stimulation techniques such as subchondral drilling and microfracture for symptomatic osteochondral lesions of the talus and to evaluate prognostic factors affecting the outcomes. METHODS: Ninety patients (90 ankles) who underwent arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation for small- to mid-sized osteochondral lesions of the talus constituted the study cohort. The 90 ankles were divided into two groups: a drilling group (40 ankles) and a microfracture group (50 ankles). Each group was matched for age and gender, and both groups had characteristics similar to those obtained from pre-operative demographic data. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and the ankle activity score (AAS) were used to compare clinical outcomes, during a mean follow-up period of 43 months. RESULTS: The median AOFAS scores were 66.0 points (51-80) in drilling group and 66.5 points (45-81) in microfracture group pre-operatively, and these improved to 89.4 points (77-100) and 90.1 points (69-100) at the final follow-up, respectively. The median VAS scores improved at the final follow-up compared with the pre-operative condition. The median AAS for the drilling group improved from 4.5 (1-6) pre-operatively to 6.0 (1-8) at the final follow-up, while those for the microfracture group improved from 3.0 (2-8) to 6.0 (3-9). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the AOFAS scores, VAS, and AAS. CONCLUSIONS: The arthroscopic subchondral drilling and microfracture techniques that were used to stimulate bone marrow showed similar clinical outcomes. The results of this study suggest that both techniques are effective and reliable in treating small- to mid-sized osteochondral lesions of the talus, regardless of which of the two techniques is used. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Multicentric giant cell tumor in adolescents: three case reports.

The presentation of multicentric giant cell tumor in adolescents with an open physis is very rare. We report three cases of a multicentric giant cell tumor of the bone in adolescents, and a review of the literature is also presented.

A comparative study of meniscectomy and nonoperative treatment for degenerative horizontal tears of the medial meniscus.

BACKGROUND: It is still debated whether a degenerative horizontal tear of the medial meniscus should be treated with surgery. HYPOTHESIS: The clinical outcomes of arthroscopic meniscectomy will be better than those of nonoperative treatment for a degenerative horizontal tear of the medial meniscus. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A total of 102 patients with knee pain and a degenerative horizontal tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus on magnetic resonance imaging were included in this study between January 2007 and July 2009. The study included 81 female and 21 male patients with an average age of 53.8 years (range, 43-62 years). Fifty patients underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy (meniscectomy group), and 52 patients underwent nonoperative treatment with strengthening exercises (nonoperative group). Functional outcomes were compared using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, and patient subjective knee pain and satisfaction. Radiological evaluations were performed using the Kellgren-Lawrence classification to evaluate osteoarthritic changes. RESULTS: In terms of clinical outcomes, meniscectomy did not provide better functional improvement than nonoperative treatment. At the final follow-up, the average VAS scores were 1.8 (range, 1-5) in the meniscectomy group and 1.7 (range, 1-4) in the nonoperative group (P = .675). The average Lysholm knee scores at 2-year follow-up were 83.2 (range, 52-100) and 84.3 (range, 58-100) in the meniscectomy and nonoperative groups, respectively (P = .237). In addition, the average Tegner activity scale and subjective satisfaction scores were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Although most patients initially had intense knee pain with mechanical symptoms, both groups reported a relief in knee pain, improved knee function, and a high level of satisfaction with treatment (P < .05 for all values). Two patients in the meniscectomy group and 3 in the nonoperative group with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1 progressed to grade 2 at the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between arthroscopic meniscectomy and nonoperative management with strengthening exercises in terms of relief in knee pain, improved knee function, or increased satisfaction in patients after 2 years of follow-up.