Utilizing a registry for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction from a tertiary care hospital in Thailand: opportunities to improve the quality of care.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute coronary syndrome requires a reliable measurement of quality for ensuring evidence-based care. Clinical registries have been used to support quality improvement activities in some countries, but there are few data concerning their implementation in developing countries. In 2008, a multidisciplinary Siriraj ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) registry team was formed with the intention to improve the process of care. This report summarizes observational data collected within the first year to characterize the clinical profile, management and in-hospital outcomes of STEMI patients at the author's institute. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The present study is a prospective, observational study. From June 2008 through June 2009, data from all consecutive patients presenting within 24 hours of STEMI at Siriraj Hospital were collected. The patient's data on demographics, procedures, medications and in-hospital outcomes were collected. RESULTS: During the 1-year period, 112 patients with STEMI were enrolled. The mean age was 59.3 years old and 81.3% were males. There was a high prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and current smoking. Median time from symptom onset to presentation was 120 minutes. 98 patients (84.8% of the patients) received reperfusion therapy in the form of thrombolytic therapy (21.4%) or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, 63.40%). For thrombolytic therapy, the median door to needle time was 68 minutes. Rescue PCI was performed in 20.8% of the thrombolytic treated patients. For primary PCI, the median door to balloon time was 118 minutes. In-hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery was performed in 6% of the patients. In-hospital mortality rate was 9.8%. Re-infarction and stroke were rare events. CONCLUSION: Despite a high utilization rate of reperfusion therapy the time to reperfusion therapy exceeds the length of time recommended by current guidelines. The authors' findings provide important data for future benchmarking and represent a significant opportunity for quality improvement in STEMI-related care and outcomes.

Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention compared with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention (PCI) and thrombolytic therapy (TT) are alternative means of achieving reperfusion in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes between both reperfusion strategies. The authors sought to compare in-hospital outcomes after PCI or TT for patients with acute STEMI. MATERIAL AND METHOD: From August 2002 through June 2004, data from all patients who received reperfusion therapy for acute STEMI were collected prospectively. The decision regarding type of reperfusion strategy was at the attending cardiologist's discretion. The patient's data on demographics, procedures, medications, and in-hospital outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: From August 2002 through June 2004, 234 patients were admitted to the authors' institute with the diagnosis of acute STEMI. Of the 146 patients who received reperfusion therapy, 91 were treated with primary PCI and 55 received intravenous TT as the reperfusion modality. In the TT group, 51 (93%) patients received streptokinase and 11 (21.6%) underwent rescue angioplasty. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. Both patient groups had frequent presence of diabetes (PCI 44.2% vs. TT 39.6%, p = 0. 6). Cardiogenic shock on admission was present in 11% of the PCI patients and 7.3% of the TT patients (p = ns). In-hospital mortality was not significantly different in the two groups (PCI 14.3% vs. TT 10. 9%, p = 0.56). In the TT group, there was a trend toward a higher rate of major bleeding (PCI 6.6% vs. TT 16.4%, p = 0.06) and stroke (PCI 2.2% vs. TT 7.3%, p = 0.13) complications without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The present findings suggest that both PCI and TT are comparable alternative methods of reperfusion among STEMI patients in terms of in-hospital mortality. In certain subgroups that are at increased risk of bleeding or stroke, primary PCI may be the preferred treatment strategy.

Acute coronary syndrome in 1366 patients at Siriraj Hospital: clinical characteristics, management and in-hospital outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the baseline characteristics, management and in-hospital outcomes of all patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). MATERIAL AND METHOD: The present study is a prospective, observational study of all consecutive patients admitted with ACS. From August 1, 2002 through October 31, 2005, data from 1366 ACS patients were collected. RESULTS: The patients were classified according to the final discharge diagnosis as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI, 33.5%), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI, 47%) and unstable angina (UA, 19.5%). Approximately half of the patients were older than 65 years old. The STEMI patients were significantly younger and had a higher percentage of men than the NSTE-ACS patients. There was a very high prevalence of diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia in the patients. Only 60% of the STEMI patients received reperfusion therapy. Of these, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed more frequently (35%) than thrombolytic therapy (24%). There were substantial delays in time to treatment. Median door to needle and door to balloon time were 135 and 130 minutes respectively. Half of the NSTEMI and UA patients underwent coronary angiography and about one-third had PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting in the same hospital admission. In-hospital mortality rate was high: STEMI 19%, NSTEMI 16% and UA 4%. CONCLUSION: The present study provides invaluable information regarding the spectrum of ACS in our country. Overall in-hospital mortality was higher than that reported from international registries. The present findings represent a significant opportunity for quality improvement in the care of patients with ACS and the implementation of preventive strategies for patients with and at risk for coronary artery disease.