The tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor LX1031 shows clinical benefit in patients with nonconstipating irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT]) has an important role in gastrointestinal function. LX1031 is an oral, locally acting, small molecule inhibitor of tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH). Local inhibition of TPH in the gastrointestinal tract might reduce mucosal production of serotonin (5-HT) and be used to treat patients with nonconstipating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). METHODS: We evaluated 2 dose levels of LX1031 (250 mg or 1000 mg, given 4 times/day) in a 28-day, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 155 patients with nonconstipating IBS. 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), a biomarker of pharmacodynamic activity, was measured in urine samples at baseline (24 hours after LX1031 administration), and at weeks 4 and 6 (n = 76). RESULTS: Each dose of LX1031 was safe and well-tolerated. The primary efficacy end point, relief of IBS pain and discomfort, improved significantly in patients given 1000 mg LX1031 (25.5%), compared with those given placebo, at week 1 (P = .018); with nonsignificant improvements at weeks 2, 3, and 4 (17.9%, 16.3%, and 11.6%, respectively). Symptom improvement correlated with a dose-dependent reduction in 5-HIAA, a marker for TPH inhibition, from baseline until week 4. This suggests the efficacy of LX1031 is related to the extent of inhibition of 5-HT biosynthesis. Stool consistency significantly improved, compared with the group given placebo, at weeks 1 and 4 (P < .01) and at week 2 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In a phase 2 study, LX1031 was well tolerated, relieving symptoms and increasing stool consistency in patients with nonconstipating IBS. Symptom relief was associated with reduced levels of 5-HIAA in urine samples. This marker might be used to identify patients with nonconstipating IBS who respond to inhibitors of 5-HT synthesis.

Upper gastrointestinal tract safety of daily oral risedronate in patients taking NSAIDs: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency of upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract adverse events associated with risedronate during two (2-year) randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Male and female patients aged 40 to 80 years with mild to moderate medial-compartment knee osteoarthritis were enrolled. Data were pooled and analyzed for risedronate at 5 mg and at 15 mg once daily and compared with placebo. The results of the once-weekly dosages (35 or 50 mg) were assessed separately. RESULTS: A total of 2483 patients were randomized: 622 to placebo, 628 to risedronate at 5 mg/d, 609 to risedronate at 15 mg/d, 310 to risedronate at 35 mg once weekly, and 314 to risedronate at 50 mg once weekly. During the study, 77% of patients were regular nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and/or analgesic users (defined as those who took medication 23 days per week), and 68% were regular NSAID users. The number of upper GI tract adverse events was similar between treatment groups, with no dose-related response: 161 for placebo, 176 for rlsedronate at 5 mg/d, and 150 for risedronate at 15 mg/d. The time to the first upper GI tract adverse event was similar between treatment groups. There was no difference in the frequency of upper GI tract adverse events In risedronate-treated patients compared with patients who were regular users of NSAIDs or NSAIDs and/or analgesics. Findings were similar for those in the once-weekly risedronate groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that risedronate regimens at 5 mg/d or 15 mg/d as well as once weekly at 35 mg or 50 mg are not associated with an increased frequency of upper GI tract adverse events, even in patients who have an increased risk for such events.

A proposed statistical framework for the management of subgroup analyses for large clinical trials.

Planned and unplanned subgroup analyses of large clinical trials are frequently performed and the results are sometimes difficult to interpret. The source of a nominal significant finding may come from a true signal, variation of the clinical trial outcome or the observed data structure. Quantitative assessment is critical to the interpretation of the totality of the clinical data. In this article we provide a general framework to manage subgroup analyses and to interpret the findings through a set of supplement analyses to planned main (primary and secondary) analyses, as an alternative to the commonly used multiple comparison framework. The proposed approach collectively and coherently utilizes several quantitative methods and enhances the credibility and interpretability of subgroup analyses. A case study is used to illustrate the application of the proposed method.

Monthly dosing with risedronate 50 mg on three consecutive days a month compared with daily dosing with risedronate 5 mg: a 6-month pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Risedronate 5 mg daily significantly reduces the incidence of vertebral and non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. We compared the efficacy and tolerability of risedronate 50 mg administered on 3 consecutive days per month, with and without a loading dose, with those of risedronate 5 mg daily in a randomized, double-blind study. METHODS: Subjects were postmenopausal women 65-80 years old with low bone mineral density (BMD) (T-score < or = -2). Subjects received risedronate 5 mg daily for 6 months (n = 48), risedronate 150 mg (50-mg doses on 3 consecutive days) monthly for 6 months (n = 50), or a loading dose of risedronate 15 mg daily for 1 month followed by 150 mg (50-mg doses on 3 consecutive days) monthly for 5 months (n = 52). RESULTS: Within 1 week, statistically significant reductions in urine N-telopeptide, the primary efficacy measure, were observed in all three groups. After 6 months, the least squares (LS) mean differences (95% confidence intervals [CI]) from the change in the 5 mg daily group (-39.88) were -3.54% (-15.71; 8.64) for the 150 mg monthly and -2.02% (-14.13;10.10) for the loading dose + 150 mg monthly groups. Mean percent changes in serum alpha-C-telopeptide, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and BMD, secondary efficacy measures, after 6 months were also similar for the three groups. The LS mean differences (95% CI) from the mean percent change in BMD in the 5 mg daily group (3.22%) were 0.20 (-1.15; 1.55) for the 150 mg monthly and -0.58 (-1.93; 0.76) for the loading dose + 150 mg monthly groups. The safety profile of the monthly regimens was similar to that of the 5 mg daily regimen and consistent with product labeling. CONCLUSIONS: A monthly regimen of risedronate 50 mg on 3 consecutive days per month was similar to risedronate 5 mg daily with respect to its effect in suppressing bone turnover and increasing BMD and its safety profile in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. This study was not powered to be a confirmatory trial for non-inferiority; therefore, additional study is needed.

Development of musculoskeletal toxicity without clear benefit after administration of PG-116800, a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, to patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group, dose-response study of the efficacy and safety of the oral administration of PG-116800, a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor, in patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis. The primary efficacy endpoints included the progression of joint space narrowing in the osteoarthritic knee, as measured by microfocal radiography with fluoroscopic positioning, and the reduction of symptoms (pain and stiffness) and/or the improvement of function, as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC). Four hundred and one patients were randomly assigned to either placebo (n = 80) or one of fourdoses of PG-116800: 25 mg (n = 81), 50 mg (n = 80), 100 mg (n = 80), or 200 mg (n = 80) taken twice daily for 12 months. During the study, the 200-mg dose was discontinued based on an increased frequency of musculoskeletal adverse effects. After 1 year of treatment, no statistically significant difference was observed between placebo and PG-116800 with regard to mean changes in minimum joint space width of the knee or to WOMAC scores. The most frequent adverse effect was arthralgia (35%). Twenty-three percent of evaluable patients had at least a 30% decrease from baseline of at least onerange-of-motion measurement of either shoulder at a follow-up visit. The percentage of patients with reduction in range of motion was significantly greater in the twohighest dose groups relative to placebo. Thirteen percent of patients, half of whom were in the 200-mg group, reported hand adverse events (oedema, palmar fibrosis, Dupuytren contracture, or persistent tendon thickness or nodules). The threemost frequent shoulder adverse events were reversible arthralgia, stiffness, and myalgia, which mostly affected the twohighest dose groups. The unfavorable risk-benefit balance of the MMP inhibitor PG-116800 in patients with knee osteoarthritis precludes further development of the compound for this indication. This study adds to the weight of evidence suggesting that side effect profiles of MMP inhibitors in general make them unsuitable for use in osteoarthritis.

Risk factors associated with the loss of cartilage volume on weight-bearing areas in knee osteoarthritis patients assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: a longitudinal study.

The objective of this study was to identify, on a symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) cohort, the risk factors associated with the progression of the disease. More specifically, we investigated the correlation between knee cartilage volume loss from subregions over the span of 24 months by means of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) with demographic, clinical, radiological, and MRI structural changes. A cohort of 107 patients with knee OA selected from a large trial evaluating the effect of a bisphosphonate underwent x-rays and MRI of the knee at baseline and 24 months. Joint space width (JSW) and joint space narrowing (JSN) and cartilage volume loss over time in subregions of the tibial plateaus and femoral condyles were quantitated. Structural changes in the subchondral bone (hypersignal) and in the menisci (tear and extrusion) were also evaluated. The greatest cartilage volume loss was found in the medial compartment, and risk factors included female gender, JSW, meniscal lesions, and bone changes at baseline. Subregion analysis revealed that the greatest cartilage volume loss at 24 months was found in the central area of the medial tibial plateau (15%; p < 0.0001) and of the medial femoral condyle (12%; p < 0.0001). These findings were associated with the presence at baseline of meniscal extrusion, particularly severe meniscal extrusion, medial and severe meniscal tear, bone hypersignal, high body mass index (BMI), smaller JSW, increases in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and patient global scores over time, and greater JSN. Parameters predicting medial central femoral condyle cartilage volume loss at 24 months were lateral meniscal tear, SF-36 and BMI at baseline, and JSN. At the medial central tibial plateau, the parameters were severe meniscal extrusion, severe lateral meniscal tear, and bone hypersignal in the lateral compartment at baseline, and WOMAC pain change. Meniscal damage and bone changes are the features most closely associated with the greatest subregional cartilage volume loss. Interestingly, for the first time, JSN was strongly associated with cartilage loss in the central areas of plateaus and condyles. This study also further confirms the correlation between cartilage volume loss and JSN and symptomatic changes at 24 months.

Long term evaluation of disease progression through the quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis patients: correlation with clinical symptoms and radiographic changes.

The objective of this study was to further explore the cartilage volume changes in knee osteoarthritis (OA) over time using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI). These were correlated with demographic, clinical, and radiological data to better identify the disease risk features. We selected 107 patients from a large trial (n = 1,232) evaluating the effect of a bisphosphonate on OA knees. The MRI acquisitions of the knee were done at baseline, 12, and 24 months. Cartilage volume from the global, medial, and lateral compartments was quantified. The changes were contrasted with clinical data and other MRI anatomical features. Knee OA cartilage volume losses were statistically significant compared to baseline values: -3.7 +/- 3.0% for global cartilage and -5.5 +/- 4.3% for the medial compartment at 12 months, and -5.7 +/- 4.4% and -8.3 +/- 6.5%, respectively, at 24 months. Three different populations were identified according to cartilage volume loss: fast (n = 11; -13.2%), intermediate (n = 48; -7.2%), and slow (n = 48; -2.3%) progressors. The predictors of fast progressors were the presence of severe meniscal extrusion (p = 0.001), severe medial tear (p = 0.005), medial and/or lateral bone edema (p = 0.03), high body mass index (p < 0.05, fast versus slow), weight (p < 0.05, fast versus slow) and age (p < 0.05 fast versus slow). The loss of cartilage volume was also slightly associated with less knee pain. No association was found with other Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, joint space width, or urine biomarker levels. Meniscal damage and bone edema are closely associated with more cartilage volume loss. These data confirm the significant advantage of qMRI for reliably measuring knee structural changes at as early as 12 months, and for identifying risk factors associated with OA progression.

Risedronate decreases biochemical markers of cartilage degradation but does not decrease symptoms or slow radiographic progression in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: results of the two-year multinational knee osteoarthritis structural arthritis study.

OBJECTIVE: Bisphosphonates have slowed the progression of osteoarthritis (OA) in animal models and have decreased pain in states of high bone turnover. The Knee OA Structural Arthritis (KOSTAR) study, which is the largest study to date investigating a potential structure-modifying OA drug, tested the efficacy of risedronate in providing symptom relief and slowing disease progression in patients with knee OA. METHODS: The study group comprised 2,483 patients with medial compartment knee OA and 2-4 mm of joint space width (JSW), as determined using fluoroscopically positioned, semiflexed-view radiography. Patients were enrolled in 2 parallel 2-year studies in North America and the European Union. These studies evaluated the efficacy of risedronate at dosages of 5 mg/day, 15 mg/day, 35 mg/week (in Europe), and 50 mg/week (in North America) compared with placebo in reducing signs and symptoms, as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index and patient global assessment (PGA) scores, and in slowing radiographic progression. RESULTS: A reduction of approximately 20% in signs and symptoms, as measured by WOMAC subscales and PGA scores, was observed in all groups, with no treatment effect of risedronate demonstrated. Risedronate did not significantly reduce radiographic progression as measured by decreased JSW or using a dichotomous definition of progression (joint space loss of >or=0.6 mm). Thirteen percent of patients receiving placebo demonstrated significant disease progression over 2 years. A dose-dependent reduction in the level of C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type II collagen, a cartilage degradation marker associated with progressive OA, was seen in patients who received risedronate. No increase in the number of adverse events was demonstrated for risedronate compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Although risedronate (compared with placebo) did not improve signs or symptoms of OA, nor did it alter progression of OA, a reduction in the level of a marker of cartilage degradation was observed. A sustained clinically relevant improvement in signs and symptoms was observed in all treatment and placebo groups.

Effect of risedronate on joint structure and symptoms of knee osteoarthritis: results of the BRISK randomized, controlled trial [ISRCTN01928173].

To determine the efficacy and safety of risedronate in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA), the British study of risedronate in structure and symptoms of knee OA (BRISK), a 1-year prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, enrolled patients (40-80 years of age) with mild to moderate OA of the medial compartment of the knee. The primary aims were to detect differences in symptoms and function. Patients were randomized to once-daily risedronate (5 mg or 15 mg) or placebo. Radiographs were taken at baseline and 1 year for assessment of joint-space width using a standardized radiographic method with fluoroscopic positioning of the joint. Pain, function, and stiffness were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA index. The patient global assessment and use of walking aids were measured and bone and cartilage markers were assessed. The intention-to-treat population consisted of 284 patients. Those receiving risedronate at 15 mg showed improvement of the WOMAC index, particularly of physical function, significant improvement of the patient global assessment (P < 0.001), and decreased use of walking aids relative to patients receiving the placebo (P = 0.009). A trend towards attenuation of joint-space narrowing was observed in the group receiving 15 mg risedronate. Eight percent (n = 7) of patients receiving placebo and 4% (n = 4) of patients receiving 5 mg risedronate exhibited detectable progression of disease (joint-space width >or= 25% or >or= 0.75 mm) versus 1% (n = 1) of patients receiving 15 mg risedronate (P = 0.067). Risedronate (15 mg) significantly reduced markers of cartilage degradation and bone resorption. Both doses of risedronate were well tolerated. In this study, clear trends towards improvement were observed in both joint structure and symptoms in patients with primary knee OA treated with risedronate.

X-ray technologists' reproducibility from automated measurements of the medial tibiofemoral joint space width in knee osteoarthritis for a multicenter, multinational clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reproducibility of x-ray technologists, 26 in North America (NA), 24 in Europe (EU), in reliably repositioning patient's osteoarthritic (OA) knees, from computerized measurements of minimum joint space width (JSW) and reproducibility in joint repositioning, during their training for the clinical trial. METHODS: Technologists from 12 NA and 12 EU clinical radiology units received identical training, at one site on each continent, in performing the fluoroscopically assisted semiflexed knee examination and in quality control criteria (QCC) for film acceptance. Subjects recruited were 129 in NA and 70 in EU, with both knees radiographed for some subjects. Each technologist radiographed 5 OA knees and repeated the process on the same knees 2 to 7 days later. Minimum medial JSW was measured at a single center on digitized images with computer software that corrected for radiographic magnification. Technologists' reproducibility in joint repositioning and JSW measurement was determined from the difference between test and retest. RESULTS: In all, only 3/50 technologists failed qualification criteria with a repeat-film JSW difference > 0.50 mm. The mean, standard deviation (SD) of the difference in JSW between test/retest for 146 NA film-pairs of -0.020 (0.16) mm was not statistically different from that in 120 EU film-pairs: -0.001 (0.18) mm. In NA and EU 45% of examinations achieved high quality, i.e., JSW difference between repeat films < 0.1 mm, and 92% achieved excellent to good quality with a difference between repeat films < 0.3 mm. NA and EU technologists' reproducibility was unaffected by subject's sex, age, and degree of JSW loss. Reproducibility in joint reposition for all technologists was excellent. CONCLUSION: Between-continent precision of JSW measurements from all accepted pairs of semiflexed views was excellent to very good and similar to the high technical quality achieved in the authors' original report. The value of training incorporating both test/retest radiographs and film QCC is essential for the high technical quality required for multinational clinical trials.

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of knee osteoarthritis progression over two years and correlation with clinical symptoms and radiologic changes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the change in osteoarthritic (OA) knee cartilage volume over a two-year period with the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to correlate the MRI changes with radiologic changes. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with symptomatic knee OA underwent MRI of the knee at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Loss of cartilage volumes were computed and contrasted with changes in clinical variables for OA and with standardized semiflexed knee radiographs at baseline at 1 and 2 years. RESULTS: Progression of cartilage loss at all followup points was statistically significant (P < 0.0001), with a mean +/- SD of 3.8 +/- 5.1% for global cartilage loss and 4.3 +/- 6.5% for medial compartment cartilage loss at 6 months, 3.6 +/- 5.1% and 4.2 +/- 7.5% at 12 months, and 6.1 +/- 7.2% and 7.6 +/- 8.6% at 24 months. Discriminant function analysis identified 2 groups of patients, those who progressed slowly (<2% of global cartilage loss; n = 21) and those who progressed rapidly (>15% of global cartilage loss; n = 11) over the 2 years of study. At baseline, there was a greater proportion of women (P = 0.001), a lower range of motion (P = 0.01), a greater circumference and higher level of pain (P = 0.05) and stiffness in the study knee, and a higher body mass index in the fast progressor group compared with the slow progressor group. No statistical correlation between loss of cartilage volume and radiographic changes was seen. CONCLUSION: Quantitative MRI can measure the progression of knee OA precisely and can help to identify patients with rapidly progressing disease. These findings indicate that MRI could be helpful in assessing the effects of treatment with structure-modifying agents in OA.