Dermatome-Induced Lacerations: An Unspoken Problem in Burn Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Dermatome-induced lacerations are a known complication; however, there is a paucity of literature discussing the incidence and predisposing factors. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors to develop a preventive algorithm. METHODS: An 18-question survey was sent to all US and Canadian burn unit directors. Surgeons were queried about type and location of their practices, average annual caseload of skin graft harvesting, and number of dermatome-induced lacerations. The survey also asked about donor site location, harvesting technique and equipment, laceration severity, and causative factors. An algorithm was developed based on the results. RESULTS: Fifty-six responses (42% response rate) were received from the burn unit directors. They reported an estimated 133 lacerations over the past 5 y. The overall incidence of dermatome-induced lacerations was approximately 0.1% per year (1.3 per 1000 cases). The most commonly attributed causes were excessive pressure (25.0%) and patient factors (18.4%). Most lacerations occurred when using air dermatomes (73.0%) with a 4-inch guard (63.5%), 0.010- to 0.015-inch thickness (78.4%), and 30°-45° angulation (47.3%); the most common brand was Zimmer (71.6%). The dermatome was typically set up by a scrub tech or nurse (48.6%), whereas the skin harvesting was performed by residents (39.2%) or attendings (35.1%). Lacerations typically extended to subcutaneous tissue (70.3%), with no neurovascular injury (86.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that dermatome-induced lacerations are rare events and that certain factors predispose patients to injury. An algorithm was developed to provide guidance on risk factor identification and the set up and use of dermatomes.

Risk factors for hypothermia in EMS-treated burn patients.

OBJECTIVE: Hypothermia has been associated with increased mortality in burn patients. We sought to characterize the body temperature of burn patients transported directly to a burn center by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel and identify the factors independently associated with hypothermia. METHODS: We utilized prospective data collected by a statewide trauma registry to carry out a nested case-control study of burn patients transported by EMS directly to an accredited burn center between 2000 and 2011. Temperature at hospital admission ≤36.5°C was defined as hypothermia. We utilized registry data abstracted from prehospital care reports and hospital records in building a multivariable regression model to identify the factors associated with hypothermia. RESULTS: Forty-two percent of the sample was hypothermic. Burns of 20-39% total body surface area (TBSA) (OR 1.44; 1.17-1.79) and ≥40% TBSA (OR 2.39; 1.57-3.64) were associated with hypothermia. Hypothermia was also associated with age > 60 (OR 1.50; 1.30-1.74), polytrauma (OR 1.58; 1.19-2.09), prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale <8 (OR 2.01; 1.46-2.78), and extrication (OR 1.49; 1.30-1.71). Hypothermia was also more common in the winter months (OR 1.54; 1.33-1.79) and less prevalent in patients weighing over 90 kg (OR 0.63; 0.46-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of burn patients demonstrate hypothermia at hospital arrival. Risk factors for hypothermia are readily identifiable by prehospital providers. Maintenance of normothermia should be stressed during prehospital care.

Challenges in the Management of Large Burns.

Large burns provoke profound pathophysiological changes. Survival rates of patients with large burns have improved significantly with the advancement of critical care and adaptation of early excision protocols. Nevertheless, care of large burn wounds remains challenging secondary to limited donor sites, prolonged time to wound closure, and immunosuppression. The development of skin substitutes and new grafting techniques decreased time to wound closure. Individually, these methods have limited success, but a combination of them may yield more successful outcomes. Early identification of patients with likely poor prognosis should prompt goals of care discussion and involvement of a palliative care team when possible.

Impact of Microsurgical Reconstruction Timing on the Risk of Free Flap Loss in Acute Burns: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Free tissue transfer is usually considered as a last resort in severe burn cases, when skin substitutes and local flaps are not viable options. Prior studies have demonstrated a free flap loss rate ranging from 0% to 44%. The aim of this study is to identify the ideal timing to perform free flap reconstruction in acute burn-related injuries to minimize free flap loss. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were queried. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO database (CRD42023404478). Three time intervals from day of injury were identified: (1) 0-4 days, (2) 5-21 days, and (3) 22 days-6 weeks. The primary outcome was total free flap loss. Results: A total of 17 articles met inclusion criteria. The analysis included 275 free flaps performed in 260 patients (88% men, 12% women) affected by acute burn injuries. The pooled prevalence of free flap failure in the three time intervals (0-4 days, 5-21 days, and 22 days-6 weeks) were 7.32% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.38%-20.37%], 16.55% (95% CI: 11.35%-23.51%), and 6.74% (95% CI: 3.06%-14.20%), respectively. Conclusions: Free flap reconstruction carries a high risk of failure in patients with acute burn. However, timing of the reconstruction appears to influence surgical outcomes. Free flap reconstruction performed between 5 and 21 days from burn injury had a trend toward higher flap loss rates and should be discouraged.

Management of Acute Hand Burns: A Survey of American Burn Association-Verified Burn Centers.

Hand burns have a significant impact on the long-term function of burn patients. Recently, new protocols and technologies, such as dermal substitutes, have been introduced for the treatment of hand burns. This cross-sectional study investigates the preferred current management of acute hand burns and the role of dermal substitutes in treatment. A 10-question survey related to acute hand burns management was sent to 64 directors of American Burn Association (ABA)-verified burn centers. A total of 51.6% (n=33) directors of ABA-verified burn centers responded to the survey. For the treatment of superficial partial-thickness hand burns, 90.9% preferred a non-operative approach. Conversely, most respondents chose a single-stage excision and skin graft for deep partial-thickness hand burns (75.8%) and full-thickness hand burns (51.5%). However, for full-thickness hand burns, some surgeons prefer a two-stage reconstruction involving excision and placement of a skin substitute (27.3%) or allograft (9.1%), followed by a skin graft. Only 6.1% would utilize a three-stage reconstruction involving excision and allograft, excision and skin substitute, followed by skin grafting. Among surgeons who used skin substitutes (n=26), Integra (42.3%) and Novosorb Biodegradable Temporising Matrix (BTM) (23.1%) were preferred. The top reasons for choosing one specific dermal substitute were surgeon's preference (n=20; 76.9%) and cost (n=9; 34.6%). While a conservative non-operative approach is preferred for superficial partial-thickness hand burns, excision and skin grafting as a one-stage procedure remains the most common strategy for deep partial-thickness and full-thickness hand burns.

Free Flap Failure and Complications in Acute Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Severe acute burn injuries represent a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. Free flap reconstruction might be required in cases of significant critical structure exposure and soft tissue deficits, when local options are unavailable. This study aimed to determine the free flap complication rate in acute burn patients. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (CRD42023404478). The following databases were accessed: Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was the free flap failure rate. Results: The study identified 31 articles for inclusion. A total of 427 patients (83.3% men, 16.7% women) accounting for 454 free flaps were included. The mean patient age was 36.21 [95% confidence interval (CI), 31.25-41.16]. Total free flap loss rate was 9.91% [95% CI, 7.48%-13.02%], and partial flap loss was 4.76% [95% CI, 2.66%-8.39%]. The rate of venous thrombosis was 6.41% [95% CI, 3.90%-10.36%] and arterial thrombosis was 5.08% [95% CI, 3.09%-8.26%]. Acute return to the operating room occurred in 20.63% [16.33%-25.71%] of cases. Stratified by body region, free flaps in the lower extremity had a failure rate of 8.33% [95% CI, 4.39%-15.24%], whereas in the upper extremity, the failure rate was 6.74% [95% CI, 3.95%-11.25%]. Conclusion: This study highlights the high risk of free flap complications and failure in acute burn patients.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities Among Burn Surgery Leadership.

The underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minority groups has been well-documented in general and plastic surgery but not in burn surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate current minority group disparities among burn surgery leadership. A cross-sectional analysis was performed. Burn surgeons included directors of American Burn Association-verified burn centers in the United States, past and current presidents of the American Burn Association, and editorial board members of five major burn journals (Journal of Burn Care & Research, Burns, Burns & Trauma, Annals of Burns & Fire Disasters, and the International Journal of Burns and Trauma). Surgeons were compared based on factors including age, gender, training, academic rank, and Hirsch index (h-index). Among 71 burn center directors, 50 societal presidents, and 197 journal editors, minority groups represented 18.3, 2.0, and 34.5%, respectively. Among burn center directors, the group classified collectively as nonwhite was significantly younger (49 vs 56; P < .01), graduated more recently (2003 vs 1996; P < .01), and had a lower h-index (9.5 vs 17.4; P < .05). There were no significant differences in gender, type of residency training, advanced degrees obtained, fellowships, academic rank, and academic leadership positions between white and nonwhite groups. When compared with the 2018 U.S. National Census, burn unit directors had a 5.1% decrease in nonwhite representation. Disparities in representation of ethnic and racial minorities exist in burn surgery despite having similar qualifying factors.

Gender Disparities Among Burn Surgery Leadership.

Gender disparities have been described in the plastic surgery and general surgery literature, but no data have been reported in burn surgery. The aim of this study is to determine gender disparities among burn surgery leadership. A cross-sectional study was performed. Burn surgeons included were directors of American Burn Association (ABA)-verified burn centers, past presidents of the ABA, and International Society for Burn Injuries (ISBI), and editors of the Journal of Burn Care & Research, Burns, Burns & Trauma, Annals of Burns & Fire Disasters, and the International Journal of Burns and Trauma. Training, age, H-index, and academic level and leadership position were compared among surgeons identified. Among the 69 ABA and ISBI past presidents, 203 burn journals' editorial board members, and 71 burn unit directors, females represented only 2.9%, 10.5%, and 17%, respectively. Among burn unit directors, females completed fellowship training more recently than males (female = 2006, male = 1999, P < .02), have lower H-indexes (female = 8.6, male = 17.3, P = .03), and are less represented as full professors (female = 8.3%, male = 42.4%, P = .026). There were no differences in age, residency, research fellowship, or number of fellowships. Gender disparities exist in burn surgery and are highlighted at the leadership level, even though female surgeons have a similar age, residency training, and other background factors. However, gender diversity in burn surgery may improve as females in junior faculty positions advance in their careers.

A Qualitative Survey Study of United States Burn Units: Pathways to a Career in Burn Surgery.

With current changes in training requirements, it is important to understand the venues in the United States for a general surgery (GS) and plastic surgery (PS) resident interested in pursuing a burn surgery career. The study aims to evaluate the pathways to a career in burn surgery and the current state of leadership. A cross-sectional study was conducted between August and September 2017. A 12-question survey was sent to all burn unit directors in the United States, asking about their background, who manages various aspects of burn care and the hiring requirements. Responses were received from 55 burn unit directors (47% response rate). Burn units are lead most commonly by physicians who received GS training (69%), but the majority either did not undergo fellowship training (31%) or completed a burn surgery fellowship (29%). While surgical care (GS = 51%, PS = 42%) and wound care (GS = 51%, PS = 42%) were predominantly managed by GS- or PS-trained burn teams, management of other aspects of burn care varied depending on the institution, demonstrating that a shift in burn care management. The desired hiring characteristics, including GS (67%) or PS residency (44%) and a burn surgery (55%), trauma surgery (15%), or critical care (44%) fellowship. Directors' training significantly influenced their preferences for hiring requirements. While leadership in burn surgery is dominated by GS-trained physicians, the surgical and wound care responsibilities are shared among PS and GS. Although one third of current directors did not undergo fellowship training, aspiring surgeons are advised to obtain a burn surgery and/or critical care fellowship.

Characterization of sex dimorphism following severe thermal injury.

Sex-based outcome differences have been previously studied after thermal injury, with a higher risk of mortality being demonstrated in women. This is opposite to what has been found after traumatic injury. Little is known about the mechanisms and time course of these sex outcome differences after burn injury. A secondary analysis was performed using data from a prospective observational study designed to characterize the genetic and inflammatory response after significant thermal injury (2003-2010). Clinical outcomes were compared across sex (female vs male), and the independent risks associated with sex were determined using logistic regression analysis after controlling for important confounders. Stratified analysis across age and burn severity was performed, whereas Cox hazard survival curves were constructed to determine the time course of any sex differences found. During the time period of the study, 548 patients met inclusion criteria for the cohort study. Men and women were found to be similar in age, TBSA%, inhalation injury, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health score. Regression analysis revealed that female sex was independently associated with over a 2-fold higher mortality after controlling for important confounders (odds ratio, 2.2; P = .049; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-4.8). The higher independent mortality risk for women was exaggerated and remained significant only in pediatric patients and demonstrated a dose-response relationship with increasing burn size (%TBSA). Survival analysis demonstrated early separation of female and male curves, and a greater independent risk of multiple organ failure was demonstrated in the pediatric cohort. The current results suggest that sex-based outcome differences may be different after thermal injury compared with traumatic injury and that the sex dimorphism may be exaggerated in patients with higher burn size and in those in the pediatric age group, with female sex being associated with poor outcome. These sex-based mortality differences occur early and may be a result of a higher risk of organ failure and early differences in the inflammatory response after burn injury. Further investigation is required to thoroughly characterize the mechanisms responsible for these divergent outcomes.

Admission temperature and survival in patients admitted to burn centers.

It is commonly believed that hypothermia occurring during burn resuscitation is associated with poor outcome, but there is little direct supporting evidence. The authors conducted an analysis of a statewide trauma registry to determine whether hypothermia (T ≤36.5°C) was associated with mortality when controlling for clinical confounders. They included all patients treated at an accredited burn center from 2000 to 2011 where the trauma registrar recorded the primary injury type as a burn. They excluded records with missing data and nonphysiologic temperature (<26°C or >42°C). The primary exposure of interest was hypothermia. The authors constructed a hierarchical, multivariable logistic regression model to examine the effect of hypothermia on survival, controlling for potentially confounding variables. Predictors of mortality are presented as odds ratio (95% confidence interval). Primary burn injury was coded 17,098 times during the study period. Of these, 3809 were not treated at a burn center and 1192 were excluded for missing data. Admission hypothermia was independently associated with mortality (1.91 [1.58-2.29]) when adjusting for age, sex, total second- and third-degree burn surface area (TBSA), comorbid conditions, injury severity score, direct transport vs referral, method of temperature measurement, year, and the hospital providing care. Increasing age, female sex, TBSA >40%, presence of multiple comorbid conditions, and increasing injury severity score were associated with mortality. Other variables in the model were not independently associated with outcome. There was a weak correlation between TBSA and admission temperature (r = .18). Hypothermia at hospital admission is independently associated with mortality in burn patients when controlling for clinical confounders. Future studies should address potential causes underlying this observation.

Radiographic assessment of ground-level falls in elderly patients: Is the "PAN-SCAN" overdoing it?

INTRODUCTION: Routine, whole-body computed tomography imaging (PAN-SCAN) has been shown to identify unexpected injuries and alter the management of patients presenting with blunt trauma. We sought to characterize the changes in practice over time and the utility of PAN-SCAN imaging in elderly patients who fall and require admission to a trauma center. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis by using data derived from a Pennsylvania state-wide trauma registry (2007-2010). All hemodynamically stable patients (>65 years) who had a ground-level fall and were admitted for >24 hours were selected. Patients who underwent a combination of all three scans within 2 hours of arrival were considered to have underwent PAN-SCAN imaging. Clinical outcomes were compared across PAN-SCAN patients relative to less diagnostic imaging. Regression analysis was used to determine whether PAN-SCAN imaging was an independent determinate of mortality and resource use. RESULTS: Over the period of study, 13,043 patients met inclusion criteria. The annual rate of PAN-SCAN imaging after ground-level falls increased over time. After we controlled for important confounders, PAN-SCAN imaging was not associated with mortality (odds ratio 0.97, P = .74, 95% confidence interval 0.80-1.18). Despite greater injury severity, PAN-SCAN imaging was independently associated with significantly lesser intensive care unit requirements, step-down days, and a lesser overall duration of stay. CONCLUSION: PAN-SCAN imaging has become more common over time in elderly patients having a ground-level fall. Although PAN-SCAN imaging during the initial trauma evaluation was not associated with an independent decrease in the risk of mortality, it was independently associated with lesser hospital resource use. These data suggest that whole-body computed tomography imaging may benefit trauma center resource use for patients with ground-level falls.

Evolving role of endovascular techniques for traumatic vascular injury: a changing landscape?

BACKGROUND: Endovascular management of blunt aortic injury has dramatically reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with this specific injury. There remains a paucity of evidence quantifying the beneficial effects associated with endovascular (ENDO) techniques for other vascular injury types and little information regarding the impact ENDO techniques have had on the management of traumatic vascular injuries over time. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from the National Trauma Data Bank over 2002 to 2006 and 2008 time periods (NTDB 7.2 and RDS 2008). Injured patients undergoing any arterial vascular repair procedure using ENDO or standard open techniques were determined using ICD-9-CM procedure codes. Abbreviated Injury codes were used to select patients who suffered subclavian, carotid, or thoracic aortic injury. Logistic regression was used to determine whether EARLY ENDO procedures (first 24 hours after injury) were independently associated with a lower risk of mortality. RESULTS: The percentage of ENDO procedures significantly increased over time irrespective of mechanism of injury. When aortic (thoracic), subclavian, and carotid arterial injuries were analyzed, a significant decrease in mortality over time was found. The percentage of ENDO procedures for all arterial injury subtypes significantly increased in the RECENT (2008) period. Seventy-five percentage of ENDO procedures occurred early (initial 24 hours) with 20% of those patients being hypotensive upon arrival (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg). For patients who had vascular procedures in the RECENT period, regression analysis revealed that early ENDO procedures were independently associated with a 35% reduction in mortality risk (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.8) after controlling for major confounders including mechanism of injury and presence of hypotension on arrival. CONCLUSION: ENDO procedures for arterial injury have increased over time while mortality for arterial injury subtypes has significantly decreased. Early ENDO procedures are common and are independently associated with a lower risk of mortality. These results suggest outcomes after vascular injury may benefit from ENDO expertise and that ENDO techniques should be incorporated into the early treatment algorithm of trauma patients with vascular injury, particularly those that require difficult operative exposure.