Heterotopic Digital Replantation in Mutilating Hand Injuries: An Algorithmic Approach Based on 53 Cases and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the mutilated hand is one of the most difficult challenges for hand microsurgeons. When multiple digits are amputated, orthotopic digital replantation of the available remnants may not adequately restore the hand function. In such cases, heterotopic digital replantation may provide a more functional reconstruction. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2018, 53 patients with mutilating hand injuries were treated with heterotopic digital replantation at our institution. A retrospective chart review was conducted to determine the details of the injury, indications for heterotopic digital replantation, and functional outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 173 digits were amputated from 53 patients (one patient suffered from bilateral hand injuries, so totally 54 hands). Sixty-eight digits underwent heterotopic digital replantation, 30 digits had orthotopic digital replantation, and 75 stumps were terminalized. The survival rate of digits treated by heterotopic digital replantation and orthotopic digital replantation was 83.8% (57/68) and 86.7% (26/30), respectively (p = 1). Tripod grip was achieved in 83.3% (45/54) of patients following replantation and optional secondary reconstructive surgeries. CONCLUSION: Heterotopic digital replantation is a practical and reliable method for achieving optimal hand function following mutilating hand injuries. The basic principles are to restore a functional thumb in the first instance, followed by at least two adjacent fingers against which the thumb can oppose. This method is particularly indicated when orthotopic digital replantation of the available amputated parts would yield a suboptimal result.

Measuring recovery after open lower limb fractures: combined objective functional tests and global perceived recovery outperform narrower metrics and a standard generic patient reported outcome measure.

BACKGROUND: Open lower limb fractures are serious injuries requiring combined ortho-plastic surgery and have significantly worse outcomes than similar closed fractures. There is little objective published data to determine which functional outcome measures best reflect progress or completeness of physical recovery. Our hypothesis was that objective measures combining strength, mobility and balance would better reflect recovery than isolated parameters (e.g. range of motion ROM) and would compare well to patients' perceived recovery. METHODS: Adult open lower limb fracture patients were reviewed 6 and 12 weeks, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injury. The mechanism, injury pattern, age, gender and treatment were recorded. Isolated parameter objective functional outcome measures (OFOMs) (ROM and MRC strength grade) were compared to combined OFOMs (timed up and go, comfortable gait speed and fast gait speed, Edgren Side Step Test (TUAG, CGS, FGS, ESST) and Single Leg balance. Patient reported outcomes were recorded (Global Perceived Effect (GPE) score and Disability Rating Index (DRI)). Statistical analysis used non-parametric tests (e.g. Spearman correlation) compared each with time since injury. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (54 male) with a median age of 45(20-75) years. Of the 19 isolated OFOMs, only knee flexion and ankle plantar flexion ROM and strength improved with time (Spearman correlation p = 0.042, 0.008, 0.032, 0.036 respectively). TUAG, ESST, CGS, FGS and GPE scores showed significant improvement (Spearman correlation p < 0.001). Patients' estimation of recovery paralleled these measures (Spearman correlation p < 0.001) with all but 2 patients achieving the minimum clinical important difference in DRI by 12 months compared to baseline. However, the GPE score had a higher proportion of improving responses than DRI at each time-point. DISCUSSION: Functional recovery is a key determinant in patients returning to work, providing for themselves and their family or resuming independent living for older patients. This study has demonstrated time-related improvements in combined OFOMs measuring mobility, strength, agility and balance paralleling patients' perception of recovery in the 12 months after open lower limb fractures. Over the same time-frame, the simple GPE score compared favourably with the DRI. Such parameters could become part of a defined core outcomes set. Focussing rehabilitation towards these combined OFOMs may help hasten recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: South West Wales REC 06/WMW02/10).

Malignant melanoma in the hand: current evidence and recommendations.

Malignant melanoma is the leading cause of death from skin cancer. In spite of significant advances in the management of melanoma with the advent of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and adjuvant oncological therapies, the death rate continues to increase worldwide. Melanoma in the hand poses additional diagnostic and management challenges. Consequently, these tend to present at a later stage and are associated with a poorer prognosis. It is imperative that hand surgeons treat any pigmented hand lesion with suspicion to ensure rapid diagnosis and treatment. This article outlines the presentation of melanoma, and how to investigate suspicious pigmented lesions of the hand and digits. It guides hand surgeons in their approach to melanoma of the hand, outlining the multidisciplinary team approach as well as current standard surgical and reconstructive options to optimize outcomes.

The contribution of breast and abdominal pannus weight to body mass index: implications for rationing of reduction mammaplasty and abdominoplasty.

The body mass index (BMI) is an arbitrary criterion used by third party fundholders in some countries for rationing the public funding of reduction mammaplasty and abdominoplasty surgery. Many patients have commented that the weight of their excess breast tissue or abdominal pannus contributes to an overestimation of their body mass index. This study seeks to establish the truth of this by ascertaining whether the difference between pre- and postoperative body mass indices of patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty or abdominoplasty is significant. Case notes of 30 sequential reduction mammaplasty patients and 16 abdominoplasty patients were analyzed to ascertain their preoperative weight, height, calculated BMI, and the mass of the breast reduction or abdominal resection specimen as measured in theater. This information was used to retrospectively calculate the difference the weight of the specimen would have made to their BMI. Overall, the difference between pre- and postoperative BMI is not statistically significant (reduction mammaplasty P = 0.22; abdominoplasty P = 0.62, 2-tailed t test). However, the largest contribution breast reduction and abdominoplasty resection specimens made to the BMI in our series was 1 and 2.4, respectively. We suggest that it may be appropriate to consider a minority of patients for surgery if their BMI is within 1.0 (for breast reduction) or 2 (for abdominoplasty) of any set target BMI, and highlight the specific patient subpopulations to which this is most applicable. An estimate of resection weight preoperatively may allow a "corrected" BMI to be used for determining eligibility for surgery.

Hand reanimation.

Brachial plexus disruption, major traumatic amputations, and Volkmann's contracture are all devastating injuries that present difficult reconstructive challenges. Advances in our understanding of nerve injury, regeneration, and refinement of microsurgical techniques have given rise to a number of therapeutic avenues over the last 4 decades. Hand reanimation aims to provide strength, stability, and mobility to a sensate hand. How this is achieved depends on a thorough understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, which in turn dictates what surgical modalities are suitable. Common to all reanimation procedures is the need to ensure full passive range of motion of the target joints prior to definitive surgery. Hand therapy is essential to prevent deleterious sequelae of injury, and to maximize rehabilitation following surgical reconstruction. Options for reanimation include nerve repair, nerve grafting, nerve transfer, tendon transfer, and free functioning muscle transfer.