Transoral Fixation of Bicortical Screws Is Safe and Feasible for Lower Jaw Osteotomies.

PURPOSE: Transoral placement of bicortical screws is a rigid fixation method in orthognathic surgery that is used less often than transbuccal placement. The aim of this study was to examine the postoperative outcome of transoral bicortical screw insertion during orthognathic surgery and to compare it with the more common transbuccal fixation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Clinical files of orthognathic surgery patients operated on from January 2010 through December 2012 were reviewed. Screw insertion approach (transoral vs transbuccal) was examined as a predictive variable for postoperative complications (hardware removal and infection). Type of surgery, fibrin sealant, preoperative third molar removal, and patient age and gender were analyzed as potential risk factors. Descriptive and bivariate statistics and regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 606 patients whose cases were reviewed, 509 patients (185 men; mean age, 26.3 ± 11.1 yr) met the inclusion criteria. Most presented with a Class II malocclusion (84.5%). A transbuccal approach was used in 27.5% of cases, leading to a screw-related infection of 6.3%. Patients treated with a transoral technique (72.5%) had fewer infections (3.5%), but this was not statistically relevant. Screw removal was indicated in 3.3% of patients. Screw placement using the transoral and transbuccal approaches was performed in 3.0 and 4.2% of patients, respectively. Infection and screw removal rates did not differ significantly between fixation techniques (P = .16 and P = .49, respectively). CONCLUSION: The present findings showed an overall low rate of screw removal and infection secondary to bicortical screw insertion during orthognathic surgery. The postoperative outcome was similar for the transoral and transbuccal approaches.

Peri-implant bone changes following tooth extraction, immediate placement and loading of implants in the edentulous maxilla.

The aim of this study was to clinically and radiographically evaluate peri-implant bone level changes after rehabilitation of a fully edentulous maxilla by placement of six implants in either fresh extraction sites or healed edentulous ridges up till 18 months after implant placement. Twenty patients with a terminal dentition in the maxillae (11 men, 9 women) received a total of 120 OsseoSpeed implants; 118 implants could be loaded immediately of which 59 were placed in extraction sockets and 59 were placed in healed sites. Within 24 h after surgery, all patients received a chairside-assembled, fibre-reinforced temporary fixed prosthetic reconstruction in occlusion. Six months post-surgery, final screw-retained CoCr (15) or Ti (5) computer numerical control-milled and acrylic-veneered frameworks were placed directly at implant level without interposing abutments. Intraoral radiographs were taken 6 and 18 months after implant placement. Implant survival rate was 100%. Mean marginal bone level was located on average -0.35 mm below the reference point (standard deviation 0.29, range -1.20 to +0.02 mm) 18 months after loading. Whether implants were placed in healed bone sites or fresh extraction sockets did not significantly affect the bone level changes. Furthermore, the use of either CoCr or Ti at the implant level did not significantly affect marginal bone loss. Within the limits of this prospective clinical trial, results seem to indicate that immediate placement and occlusal loading of five to six implants in the edentulous maxilla can be carried out successfully. Whether or not those implants are placed in fresh extraction sockets does not seem to alter the outcome. The present data show a successful 1-year outcome of a treatment protocol involving tooth extraction immediately combined with implant placement and loading.

A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.

The aim of this study was to present a new approach to acquire a three-dimensional virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning without the use of plaster dental models and without deformation of the facial soft-tissue mask. A "triple" cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan procedure with triple voxel-based rigid registration was evaluated and validated on 10 orthognathic patients. First, the patient was scanned vertically with a wax bite wafer in place (CBCT scan No1). Second, a limited dose scan of the patient with a Triple Tray AlgiNot impression in place was carried out (CBCT scan No2). Finally, a high-resolution scan of the Triple Tray AlgiNot impression was done (CBCT scan No3). Sequential and semiautomatic triple voxel-based rigid registration (RNo1-RNo3) was performed to augment the patient's skull model with accurate occlusal and intercuspidation data (Maxilim, version 2.1.1., Medicim NV, Mechelen, Belgium). All registrations were based on the Maximisation of Mutual Information registration algorithm. Because the accuracy and stability of the voxel-based registration (RNo1) between the Triple Tray AlgiNot impression scan and the limited low-dose patient scan were not known, this particular registration step needed to be validated. The accuracy of registration was measured on a synthetic skull and showed to be highly accurate. A volume overlap of 98.1% was found for registered impression scan No1. The mean distance between registered impression scan No1 and registered impression scan No2 was 0.08 +/- 0.03 mm (range, 0.04-0.11 mm). As far as the stability of registration was concerned, successful registration with a stable optimal position was obtained with a maximum variability of less than 0.1 mm. The results of this study showed that semiautomatic sequential triple voxel-based rigid registration of the triple CBCT scans augmented the 3-D virtual skull model with detailed occlusal and intercuspidation data in a highly accurate and robust way. The method is therefore appropriate and valid for 3-D virtual orthognathic surgery planning in the clinical routine.

A prospective study on infectious complications in orthognathic surgery.

AIM: According to an earlier study in 2000, 4.7% of patients undergoing corrective facial orthopaedic surgery in this unit suffered a postoperative wound infection. In 1998, the Belgian Government recommended stricter rules for infection prophylaxis and a new antibiotic protocol similar to that proposed by Peterson (1990) was implemented in this unit. The new protocol was to be evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight hundred and ten consecutive patients were selected receiving orthognathic surgery (Le Fort I-type osteotomies, sagittal split osteotomies, segmental and chin osteotomies). Cefazolin 1g was administered intravenously on induction of general anaesthesia and repeated at 4h intervals for the duration of surgery. No antibiotics were administered postoperatively. The observation period was 6 weeks. When an infection occurred, appropriate culture specimens were obtained according to a standardized protocol. RESULTS: Fifty-one infections (6.8%) were diagnosed, 33 with purulent exudates occurring spontaneously or after incision and drainage. Ninety-two per cent of these infections occurred in the sagittal split area, 6% in the maxillary region and 2% in the chin region. Infections in the sagittal split area were further analysed. A reduction in infection rate from 6.6 to 2.6% was noted following a change in practice when fibrin glue was used in the wound instead of a drain in the sagittal split wound. Of the 30 aerobic cultures, 12 contained normal mucosal flora, of which 9 were Streptococcus species. In 11 of the 30 anaerobic cultures the identified species belonged to the Bacteroides group. This bacterium is resistant to cefazolin but sensitive to amoxicillin-clavulanate and for a high percentage also to clindamycin. All the other cultures were sterile. CONCLUSION: The infections occurring almost exclusively in the sagittal split osteotomy site can be partially explained by wound contamination upon removal of the drain. It is suggested that for prophylaxis cefazolin is replaced by amoxicillin-clavulanate.

Problems, obstacles and complications with transpalatal distraction in non-congenital deformities.

INTRODUCTION: The transpalatal distractor is a bone-borne device that eliminates negative orthodontic effects during and after maxillary expansion. It produces virtually parallel expansion in the coronal plane. Orthodontic appliances can be installed at an earlier date than when tooth-borne expanders are used. Our aim was to improve the technique by reviewing the difficulties encountered during applications in the past. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The files of 57 patients were analyzed for problems (difficulties requiring surgical intervention), obstacles (difficulties requiring surgical intervention but not interfering with the result), and complications (difficulties not resolved at the end of the treatment). RESULTS: Twenty-nine difficulties occurred. In 25 cases they were considered to be a 'problem'. Nine problems were surgery related and 16 problems were related to the distraction device itself (14 episodes of loosening of the module, two instances of loss of one osteosynthesis screw). 'Obstacles' occurred in three cases, i.e. loosening of an abutment plate. There was only one 'complication': unilateral infraorbital hyposensibility in a case of a high level corticotomy. CONCLUSION: The expansion goal was achieved in all patients. Loosening of the module proved to be the major cause of discomfort. The incidence of difficulties has lead to a change in the design of the hardware and in the surgical protocol.

Long-term clinical, microbiological, and radiographic outcomes of Brånemark™ implants installed in augmented maxillary bone for fixed full-arch rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to document the long-term outcome of Brånemark implants installed in augmented maxillary bone and to identify parameters that are associated with peri-implant bone level. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients of a periodontal practice who had been referred to a maxillofacial surgeon for iliac crest bone grafting in the atrophic maxilla were retrospectively recruited. Five months following grafting, they received 7-8 turned Brånemark implants. Following submerged healing of another 5 months, implants were uncovered and restorative procedures for fixed rehabilitation were initiated 2-3 months thereafter. The primary outcome variable was bone level defined as the distance from the implant-abutment interface to the first visible bone-to-implant contact. Secondary outcome variables included plaque index, bleeding index, probing depth, and levels of 40 species in subgingival plaque samples as identified by means of checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization. RESULTS: Nine out of 16 patients (eight females, one male; mean age 59) with 71 implants agreed to come in for evaluation after on average 9 years (SD 4; range 3-13) of function. One implant was deemed mobile at the time of inspection. Clinical conditions were acceptable with 11% of the implants showing pockets ≥ 5 mm. Periodontopathogens were encountered frequently and in high numbers. Clinical parameters and bacterial levels were highly patient dependent. The mean bone level was 2.30 mm (SD 1.53; range 0.00-6.95), with 23% of the implants demonstrating advanced resorption (bone level > 3 mm). Regression analysis showed a significant association of the patient (p < .001) and plaque index (p = .007) with bone level. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcome of Brånemark implants installed in iliac crest-augmented maxillary bone is acceptable; however, advanced peri-implant bone loss is rather common and indicative of graft resorption. This phenomenon is patient dependent and seems also associated with oral hygiene.

The use of a wax bite wafer and a double computed tomography scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model.

A detailed visualization of the interocclusal relationship is essential in a three-dimensional virtual planning setup for orthognathic and facial orthomorphic surgery. The purpose of this study was to introduce and evaluate the use of a wax bite wafer in combination with a double computed tomography (CT) scan procedure to augment the three-dimensional virtual model of the skull with a detailed dental surface. A total of 10 orthognathic patients were scanned after a standardized multislice CT scanning protocol with dose reduction with their wax bite wafer in place. Afterward, the impressions of the upper and lower arches and the wax bite wafer were scanned for each patient separately using a high-resolution standardized multislice CT scanning protocol. Accurate fitting of the virtual impressions on the wax bite wafer was done with surface matching using iterative closest points. Consecutively, automatic rigid point-based registration of the wax bite wafer on the patient scan was performed to implement the digital virtual dental arches into the patient's skull model (Maxilim, version 2.0; Medicim NV, St-Niklaas, Belgium). Probability error histograms showed errors of < or =0.16 mm (25% percentile), < or =0.31 mm (50% percentile), and < or =0.92 (90% percentile) for iterative closest point surface matching. The mean registration error for automatic point-based registration was 0.17 +/- 0.07 mm (range, 0.12-0.22 mm). The combination of the wax bite wafer with the double CT scan procedure allowed for the setup of an accurate three-dimensional virtual augmented model of the skull with detailed dental surface. However, from a clinical workload, data handling, and computational point of view, this method is too time-consuming to be introduced in the clinical routine.