Stress echocardiography for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction detection in patients with non-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study.

AIM: To assess whether the simultaneous performance of exercise stress echocardiography and cardio-pulmonary testing (ESE-CPET) may facilitate the timely diagnosis of subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in patients with non-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), preserved left ventricular systolic function, and exertional dyspnea or exercise intolerance. METHODS: This cross-sectional study, conducted between May 2017 and April 2018, involved 104 non-severe COPD patients with exertional dyspnea and preserved ejection fraction who underwent echocardiography before CPET and 1-2 minutes after peak exercise. Based on the peak E/e' ratio, patients were divided into the group with stress-induced LVDD - E/e'>15 and the group without stress-induced LVDD. We assessed the association between LVDD and the following CPET variables: minute ventilation, peak oxygen uptake (VO2), ventilatory efficiency, heart rate reserve, and blood pressure. RESULTS: During ESE-CPET, stress-induced LVDD occurred in 67/104 patients (64%). These patients had lower work load, peak VO2, O2 pulse, and minute ventilation (VE), and higher VE/VCO2 slope than patients without stress-induced LVDD (35.18±10.4 vs 37.01±11.11, P<0.05). None of the CPET variables correlated with E/e'. CONCLUSION: Combined ESE-CPET may distinguish masked LVDD in patients with non-severe COPD with exertional dyspnea and preserved left ventricular systolic function. None of the CPET variables was a predictor for subclinical LVDD.

Positive Stress Electrocardiography in Patients With Non-obstructive Coronary Disease.

Introduction The episodes of myocardial ischemia in patients with non-obstructive coronary disease are extremely variable in provoking factors and presentation. Purpose We investigated the significance of coronary blood flow velocity and epicardial diameter as correlates of a positive electrocardiographic exercise stress test (ExECG) in hospitalized patients with unstable angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease. Methods The study was a single-center cohort retrospective. ExECG was performed and analyzed in a group of 79 patients with non-obstructive coronary disease (coronary stenoses < 50%). Thirty-one percent of the patients (n=25) were diagnosed with slow coronary flow phenomenon, SCFP; 40.5% (n=32) - patients with hypertensive disease, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and slow epicardial flow; 27.8% (n=22) with hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy and normal coronary flow. The patients were hospitalized in University Hospital "Alexandrovska," Sofia in the period 2006-2008. Results The frequency of positive ExECG is increased as a trend was associated with smaller epicardial diameters and pronounced delay in epicardial coronary flow. In the subgroup with SCFP, the risk for a positive ExECG test was determined by slower coronary flow (36.5±7.7 frames vs. 30.3±4.4 frames, p=0.044) and borderline significant by epicardial lumen diameters (3.3±0.8 mm vs. 4.1±1.0 mm, p=0.051) and greater myocardial mass (92.8±12.6 g/m2 vs. 82.9±8.6 g/m2, p=0.054). In cases of left ventricular hypertrophy, which included both patients with the normal and slow epicardial flow, there were no statistically significant correlates of an abnormal exercise stress ECG test. Conclusions In patients with non-obstructive coronary atherosclerosis and predominantly slow epicardial coronary flow, the provoking of ischemia at an electrocardiographic exercise stress test is associated with the lower epicardial flow velocity at rest and with the smaller epicardial diameter. In SCFP, the risk for an abnormal stress test is determined by slower coronary flow, smaller epicardial lumen diameter, and greater myocardial mass. The presence and size of the plaque burden are not associated with a greater risk of a positive ExECG in these patients.

Left Ventricular Diastolic Function: Comparison of Slow Coronary Flow Phenomenon and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in the Absence of Obstructive Coronary Disease.

Background An interplay of myocardial structural abnormalities and coronary arterial dysfunction underlies the worsening left ventricular compliance. The conventionally used angina drugs have demonstrated a beneficial effect on both angina and coronary flow in cases with microvascular dysfunction and non-obstructive coronary disease. Despite that, vasoactive therapy only partially affects diastolic function in this patient population. Purpose This retrospective study was planned to evaluate the association of myocardial mass, delayed epicardial coronary flow, and vasoactive drugs with parameters of diastolic function in two cohorts with preserved left ventricular function and non-obstructive coronary disease in patients with slow coronary flow phenomenon (SCFP) and patients with the hypertensive disease and left ventricular hypertrophy. Material and methods The epicardial coronary flow was evaluated in 48 patients with unstable angina in the absence of coronary stenosis >50%, by applying the methods of corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infraction frame count (cTFC). The abnormalities in the left ventricular function were assessed by echocardiography using PW-Doppler of the diastolic mitral inflow and tissue Doppler imaging. Twenty-one (43.8%) patients were diagnosed with SCFP, and twelve patients (25%) had slow epicardial coronary flow, hypertensive disease, and ventricular hypertrophy (SFLVH). The remaining 15 (31.3%) were patients with ventricular hypertrophy, hypertension, and non-delayed epicardial coronary flow (NFLVH). Results The patients with SFLVH showed reduced peak early diastolic lateral mitral annular velocity (e'L) when compared to SCFP (7.1±1.9cm/s vs 8.6±2.1 cm/s, p=0.045) and NFLVH (7.1±1.9 cm/s vs 8.7±1.8 cm/s, p=0.018). A borderline significant difference was observed for the peak early diastolic septal mitral annular velocity (e'S) between the patients with SFLVH and SCFP ( 7.0±1.3 cm/s vs 8.3±2.1 cm/s, p=0.057). The ratio of mitral diastolic inflow velocity to early diastolic velocity of the mitral annulus (E/e') in the SFLVH group was a tendency higher than E/e' of the patients with SCFP (9.8±3.1 vs. 8.2±2.1, p=0.084) and NFLVH (9.8±3.1 vs. 7.8±1.5, p=0.051) .In the group with left ventricular hypertrophy, E/e' >10 was more frequently observed in patients with a marked delay in the epicardial flow (33.1 ± 13.1 frames vs. 25.4 ± 11.8 frames, p=0.011) and higher left ventricular mass (146.9 ± 17.7 g/m2 vs. 126.1 ± 121.5 g/m2, p=0.027). Conclusions Patients with microvascular angina represent a diverse population. The echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular relaxation (e') and end-diastolic pressure (E/e') are abnormally altered in the population with left ventricular hypertrophy compared to SCFP. The delayed epicardial flow further impairs diastolic function in hypertensive patients with hypertrophy and non-obstructive coronary disease.

Effects of statins on endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery is a method capable of detecting endothelium dysfunction. Statins are generally consent drugs for reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and are shown to improve the systemic endothelial function. HYPOTHESIS: The aim of our study was to assess the endothelial function using FMD of the brachial artery in patients with different degrees of coronary artery stenosis with respect to their treatment with statins. METHODS: We evaluated the FMD of 221 patients with coronary arteriography performed, of whom 99 (44.8%) were receiving statins and 122 (55.2%) were not receiving statins. RESULTS: We did not find a statistically significant difference in the FMD values between the patients with and without a statin treatment: 5.57 +/- 5.68 and 4.69 +/- 4.48, respectively, P = .581. In the subgroup of patients without angiographically visible coronary artery stenoses or with stenoses <20% (86 patients), patients undergoing statin treatment had a significantly better endothelial function compared to patients without such a treatment: FMD 9.24 +/- 6.87 and 6.50 +/- 4.51, respectively, P = .047. CONCLUSIONS: FMD could not distinguish between the patients who were treated with statin and those not treated with statins with the same demographic, clinical, and angiographic characteristics. The only exception was in the group of patients with a minor coronary disease. Statin treatment had a more pronounced effect in the earlier stages of coronary atherosclerosis.

Endothelial function in patients with and without diabetes mellitus with different degrees of coronary artery stenosis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate endothelial function using flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM) with different degrees of coronary artery stenosis. METHOD: We investigated 293 patients, 69 (23.6%) of whom had DM. FMD and coronary arteriography were performed. RESULTS: Patients with DM had a significantly lower FMD (mean +/- SD, 3.7 +/- 3.8%) compared with patients without DM (mean +/- SD, 5.2 +/- 5.3%) (p < 0.05). When the results were broken down by the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) (no significant coronary artery stenosis, 1-vessel disease, 2-vessel disease, and 3-vessel disease) the only statistically significant difference between diabetics and nondiabetics was found in patients without significant coronary stenosis (mean FMD +/- SD: 5.2 +/- 4.4% in diabetics, 7.6 +/- 5.4% in nondiabetics [p < 0.05]). CONCLUSION: In CAD patients, the presence of DM was associated with endothelial dysfunction. The difference in the FMD was clearly expressed between patients with and without DM in the subgroup without significant coronary stenosis, and was no longer present with advanced coronary atherosclerosis.

Evaluation of the SCHILLER BR-102 plus noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the International Protocol introduced by the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the SCHILLER BR-102 plus (Schiller AG, Baar, Switzerland) noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure recorder according to the International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults introduced by the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension. METHOD: One SCHILLER BR-102 plus blood pressure recorder was tested by a validation team, consisting of three persons: two observers (nurses) and a doctor, acting as supervisor and 'expert'. The European Society of Hypertension International Protocol comprises two phases. Fifteen participants were recruited for the first phase and, following a successful test, a further 18 persons (giving a total of 33) were recruited additionally. For phase 1, five of the 15 participants had systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in each of the ranges: low, medium and high. For phase 2, 11 of the 33 participants (including the first 15 participants) had systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in each of the ranges. The mercury standard for validation was preferred over the optional Sphygmocorder. Because the SCHILLER BR-102 plus has the oscillometric method as backup to the basic auscultatory measurement, both systems of measurement were subjected to individual validations. RESULTS: Results obtained show that the SCHILLER BR-102 plus noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure recorder meets all the requirements specified in the International Protocol for both oscillometric and auscultatory methods. CONCLUSION: On the basis of these results, the SCHILLER BR-102 plus can be recommended for ambulatory blood pressure measurement in clinical practice using both auscultatory and oscillometric modes.