PREVALENCE OF SARS-CoV-2 RNA AND ANTIBODY DETECTION, AND VACCINATION STATUS IN PATIENTS WITH OCULAR VASCULAR OCCLUSION.

PURPOSE: To analyze the annual prevalence of ocular vascular occlusion in relation to COVID-19 infection and vaccination status in a prospective study. METHODS: All patients were examined for an active severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection by RNA detection and for a previous infection by virus-specific antibody detection, and their vaccination status was documented. Data from pandemic year 2020 and previous years, before COVID-19 (2019, 2018, 2017), were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: In 2021, a total of 103 patients with the first diagnosis of ocular vascular occlusion were treated. Most frequent subdiagnoses were central retinal vein occlusion (20.4%), nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (18.4%), central retinal artery occlusion (13.6%), and branch retinal artery occlusion (12.6%). Thereof, only three patients (2.9%) presented with virus-specific severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibodies, and none was PCR positive. Patients with preceded severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination (59.2%) presented with comparable characteristics as unvaccinated patients with vascular occlusion regarding age, gender distribution, systemic risk factors, duration of symptoms, visual acuity, and the present subdiagnoses ( P > 0.05). The total number of cases in 2021 (103 cases) was comparable with the pandemic year 2020, at which no vaccination was available (114 cases), and to earlier years 2017, 2018, and 2019 without COVID-19 pandemic (100, 120, and 119 cases). Furthermore, we did not reveal any differences between pandemic and reference years regarding patients' characteristics ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study did not reveal an increased annual prevalence of ocular vascular occlusions during COVID-19 pandemic years 2020 and 2021. Patients with previous COVID-19 vaccination did not present differences regarding the risk profile nor symptoms, compared with unvaccinated individuals.

Anatomical and functional results after vitrectomy with conventional ILM peeling versus inverted ILM flap technique in large full-thickness macular holes.

BACKGROUND: Aim of the study was to compare success rate and functional outcome following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with conventional internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling versus ILM flap technique for full-thickness idiopathic macular holes (FTMH). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of consecutive eyes with FTMH having undergone vitrectomy with sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) endotamponade 25% at the University Medical Center Rostock, Germany (2009-2020). Eyes were divided according to applied surgical technique (ILM peeling [group P] versus ILM flap [group F]). Inclusion criteria were macular hole base diameters (MH-BD) ≥ 400 µm plus axial length ≤ 26.0 mm. Each group was divided into two subgroups based on macular hole minimum linear diameter (MH-MLD): ≤ 400 µm and > 400 µm. Exclusion criteria were FTMH with MH-BD < 400 µm, trauma, myopia with axial length > 26.0 mm or macular schisis. Demographic, functional, and anatomical data were obtained pre- and postoperatively. Preoperative MH-BD and MH-MLD were measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT; Spectralis®, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). Main outcome parameter were: primary closure rate, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and re-surgery rate. RESULTS: Overall 117 eyes of 117 patients with FTMH could be included, thereof 52 eyes underwent conventional ILM peeling (group P) and 65 additional ILM flap (group F) technique. Macular hole closure was achieved in 31 eyes (59.6%) in group P and in 59 eyes (90.8%) in group F (p < 0.001). Secondary PPV was required in 21 eyes (40.4%) in group P and in 6 eyes (9.2%) in group F. Postoperative BCVA at first follow-up in eyes with surgical closure showed no significant difference for both groups (MH-MLD ≤ 400 µm: p = 0.740); MH-MLD > 400 µm: p = 0.241). CONCLUSION: Anatomical results and surgical closure rate following ILM flap technique seems to be superior to conventional ILM peeling for treatment of FTMH.