Renal Artery Stenosis in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Long-term Prognosis.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The objective was to determine the prevalence and clinical determinants of renal artery stenosis (RAS) in patients undergoing digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the assessment of peripheral artery disease (PAD), and to evaluate its prognostic significance. METHODS: All DSAs performed from January 2000 to January 2006 were retrospectively reviewed for assessment of PAD in patients naive for any prior revascularisation of lower-limb arteries. All DSA studies were read by two senior physicians blinded to outcome, and consensus was reached in cases of disagreement. RAS was defined as the presence of ≥50% stenosis in either renal artery. Patients' electronic medical files were systematically reviewed and follow-up was completed by contact with family physicians until January 2014. The primary outcome was composite, including death, peripheral revascularisation, or any limb amputation. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, and another composite, including death and non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke or coronary or carotid revascularisation. RESULTS: In total, 400 consecutive patients having a first DSA of lower extremities, two thirds of whom were for critical limb ischaemia, were studied. Thirteen patients were excluded owing to poor renal artery imaging. RAS was detected in 57 patients (14%). Only two factors were independently and significantly associated with RAS in multivariate analysis: diffuse PAD (involving both proximal and distal segments [odds ratio {OR} 3.50, 95% confidence interval {CI} 1.16-10.54; p = .026]) and decreased glomerular filtration rate (OR 0.55 per 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2, 95% CI 0.41-0.75; p < .001). During follow-up (mean ± SD 62 ± 47 months), 25% experienced limb amputation and 54% died. In multivariate analysis, no significant association was found between RAS and primary outcome (hazard ratio 0.80; 95% CI 0.57-1.10). No significant association was found with secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Incidental RAS is frequent (14%) among patients with PAD undergoing lower extremity imaging. No difference in outcome in patients with RAS versus those without RAS was seen. Larger studies are necessary to draw definite conclusions.

Anemia, an independent predictive factor for amputation and mortality in patients hospitalized for peripheral artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: Anemia is associated with poorer outcome in coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure (HF), but data on patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are scarce, especially regarding the local (limb) prognosis. It was hypothesized that anemia is associated with poorer prognosis in patients hospitalized for PAD, and this relationship would be proportional to the severity of the anemia. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. MATERIALS: The Cohorte des Patients Artéritiques (COPART) is a multicenter registry of patients hospitalized for PAD in three university hospitals in southwestern France. METHODS: Clinical and biological data were collected at entry. Patients were followed up to 1 year. Anemia was defined by Hb < 8.2 mmol/L in men and <7.6 mmol/L in women. The primary outcome was 1-year survival free from major amputation. The secondary outcome was 1-year major amputation. RESULTS: Data of 925 consecutive patients (70.7 ± 12.8 years, 29.2% females) were analyzed. Patients were hospitalized either for revascularization or medical therapy, with Rutherford categories 3 (25%), 4 (9.1%), 5 or 6 (55.1%) as well as acute limb ischemia (10.8%). Anemia was present in 471 patients (50.9%). These patients were significantly older, with higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, clinical CAD, HF, chronic kidney disease, and cancer, and with lower rates of smoking and dyslipidemia than their counterparts (p < .05 for all). In multivariate models, anemia was significantly and independently associated (p < 0.001) with death and amputation (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.15-1.80) with similar findings for secondary outcomes. A lower level of hemoglobin is associated with a higher risk of mortality and amputation (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.09-1.32). CONCLUSION: Anemia and its severity are independent predictors of mortality and limb loss in patients hospitalized for PAD.

[College of the French Vascular Medicine Teachers (CEMV) statement: Arterial Doppler waveforms analysis (simplified Saint-Bonnet classification)]. / Recommandations du Collège des enseignants de médecine vasculaire (CEMV) : analyse des flux artériels Doppler (classification de Saint-Bonnet simplifiée).

Lower extremity peripheral artery disease is a frequent disease. Arterial Doppler waveforms analysis is a key element in vascular medicine, especially to diagnose lower peripheral artery disease. Although Doppler waveforms are often used, descriptions are highly heterogeneous. This review presents the simplified Saint-Bonnet classification that is tought to vascular medicine residents in order to homogenize arterial flow description.

[Prevalence and prognosis of aspirin resistance in critical limb ischemia patients]. / Prévalence et valeur pronostique de la résistance à l'aspirine chez les patients en ischémie critique chronique des membres inférieurs.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence and the association between aspirin resistance in critical limb ischemia patients using the VerifyNow® bed-side platelet test, and occurrence of cardiovascular morbidity and/or death at one year. MATERIALS AND METHODS: National multicenter prospective observational study related to COPART II centers. From 2010 through 2014, 64 subjects hospitalized for critical limb ischemia and already treated by aspirin before the VerifyNow® test were included. A VerifyNow® test>550 ARU was defined as aspirin resistance. Critical limb ischemia was defined according to the TASC I criteria. The primary outcome was a composite including death, acute coronary syndrome, stroke and major amputation during the one-year follow-up period. RESULTS: In all, 9/64 patients were aspirin resistant, the status was confirmed in one case. The prevalence of aspirin resistance was 14.06%. There was no significant difference between aspirin resistant and aspirin non-resistant groups in terms of cardiovascular history and glycemia status. Neither was there significant difference between the two groups in terms of survival. CONCLUSION: Aspirin resistance was not predictive of poorer survival in critical limb ischemia patients. However, our population was limited. Considering that a clear definition of aspirin resistance and standardized diagnostic tests are lacking, complementary studies might be useful.