Patient and provider determinants for receipt of three dimensions of respectful maternity care in Kigoma Region, Tanzania-April-July, 2016.

BACKGROUND: Lack of respectful maternity care (RMC) is increasingly recognized as a human rights issue and a key deterrent to women seeking facility-based deliveries. Ensuring facility-based RMC is essential for improving maternal and neonatal health, especially in sub-Saharan African countries where mortality and non-skilled delivery care remain high. Few studies have attempted to quantitatively identify patient and delivery factors associated with RMC, and none has modeled the influence of provider characteristics on RMC. This study aims to help fill these gaps through collection and analysis of interviews linked between clients and providers, allowing for description of both patient and provider characteristics and their association with receipt of RMC. METHODS: We conducted cross-sectional surveys across 61 facilities in Kigoma Region, Tanzania, from April to July 2016. Measures of RMC were developed using 21-items in a Principal Components Analysis (PCA). We conducted multilevel, mixed effects generalized linear regression analyses on matched data from 249 providers and 935 post-delivery clients. The outcomes of interest included three dimensions of RMC-Friendliness/Comfort/Attention; Information/Consent; and Non-abuse/Kindness-developed from the first three components of PCA. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Significant client-level determinants for perceived Friendliness/Comfort/Attention RMC included age (30-39 versus 15-19 years: Coefficient [Coef] 0.63; 40-49 versus 15-19 years: Coef 0.79) and self-reported complications (reported complications versus did not: Coef - 0.41). Significant provider-level determinants included perception of fair pay (Perceives fair pay versus unfair pay: Coef 0.46), cadre (Nurses/midwives versus Clinicians: Coef - 0.46), and number of deliveries in the last month (11-20 versus < 11 deliveries: Coef - 0.35). Significant client-level determinants for Information/Consent RMC included labor companionship (Companion versus none: Coef 0.37) and religiosity (Attends services at least weekly versus less often: Coef - 0.31). Significant provider-level determinants included perception of fair pay (Perceives fair pay versus unfair: Coef 0.37), weekly work hours (Coef 0.01), and age (30-39 versus 20-29 years: Coef - 0.34; 40-49 versus 20-29 years: Coef - 0.58). Significant provider-level determinants for Non-abuse/Kindness RMC included the predictors of age (age 50+ versus 20-29 years: Coef 0.34) and access to electronic mentoring (Access to two mentoring types versus none: Coef 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate the value of including both client and provider information in the analysis of RMC. Strategies that address provider-level determinants of RMC (such as equitable pay, work environment, access to mentoring platforms) may improve RMC and subsequently address uptake of facility delivery.

Increasing the availability and quality of caesarean section in Tanzania.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the results of increasing availability and quality of caesarean deliveries and anaesthesia in rural Tanzania. DESIGN: Before-after intervention study design. SETTINGS: Rural Tanzania. METHODS: Ten health centres located in rural areas were upgraded to provide comprehensive emergency obstetric care (CEmOC) and the four related district hospitals were supported. Upgrading entailed constructing and equipping maternity blocks, operation rooms and laboratories; installing solar systems, backup generators and water supply systems. Associate clinicians were trained in anaesthesia and in CEmOC. Mentoring and audit of reasons for caesarean section (CS) and maternal deaths were carried out. Measures of interest were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistical tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trends in CS rates, proportion of unjustified CS, use of spinal anaesthesia, and the risk of death from complications related to CS and anaesthesia. RESULTS: During the audit period (2012-2014), 5868 of 58 751 deliveries were by CS (10%). The proportion of CS considered to be unjustified decreased from 30 to 17% in health centres (P = 0.02) and from 37 to 20% in hospitals (P < 0.001). Practice of spinal anaesthesia for CS increased from 10% to 64% in hospitals (P < 0.001). Of 110 maternal deaths, 18 (16.4%) were associated with complications of CS, giving a risk of 3.1 per 1000 CS; three (2.7%) were judged to be anaesthetic-associated deaths with a risk of 0.5 per 1000 caesarean deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing availability and quality of CS by improving infrastructure, training and audit of reasons for CS is feasible, acceptable and required in low resource settings. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Increasing availability and quality of CS in rural Africa is feasible.