Guideline-Concordant Surgical Care for Lobular Versus Ductal Inflammatory Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Quality of surgical care is understudied for lobular inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), which is less common, more chemotherapy-resistant, and more mammographically occult than ductal IBC. We compared guideline-concordant surgery (modified radical mastectomy [MRM] without immediate reconstruction following chemotherapy) for lobular versus ductal IBC. METHODS:  Female individuals with cT4dM0 lobular and ductal IBC were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2010-2019. Modified radical mastectomy receipt was identified via codes for "modified radical mastectomy" or "mastectomy" and "≥10 lymph nodes removed" (proxy for axillary lymph node dissection). Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and t-tests were used. RESULTS: A total of 1456 lobular and 10,445 ductal IBC patients were identified; 599 (41.1%) with lobular and 4859 (46.5%) with ductal IBC underwent MRMs (p = 0.001). Patients with lobular IBC included a higher proportion of individuals with cN0 disease (20.5% lobular vs. 13.7% ductal) and no lymph nodes examined at surgery (31.2% vs. 24.5%) but were less likely to be node-negative at surgery (12.7% vs. 17.1%, all p < 0.001). Among those who had lymph nodes removed at surgery, patients with lobular IBC also had fewer lymph nodes excised versus patients with ductal IBC (median [interquartile range], 7 (0-15) vs. 9 (0-17), p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lobular IBC patients were more likely to present with node-negative disease and less likely to be node-negative at surgery, despite having fewer, and more frequently no, lymph nodes examined versus ductal IBC patients. Future studies should investigate whether these treatment disparities are because of surgical approach, pathologic assessment, and/or data quality as captured in the NCDB.

Temporal Trends and Factors Associated with Receipt of Post-mastectomy Radiation After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with cT3 Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Given the potential impact of increasingly effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) recommendations, we examined temporal trends in post-NACT PMRT for cT3 breast cancer. METHODS: We identified women ≥ 18 years in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) diagnosed 2004-2019 with cT3N0-1M0 breast cancer treated with chemotherapy and mastectomy. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations between pathologic NACT response [complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or no response (NR); or disease progression (DP)] and PMRT and between PMRT and overall survival (OS), respectively. RESULTS: We identified 39,901 women (Asian/Pacific Islander 1731, Black 5875, Hispanic 3265, White 27,303). Among cN0 patients with CR, PMRT rates declined from 67% in 2004 to 35% in 2019 but remained unchanged for patients with DP. Relative to NR, CR [odds ratio (OR) 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.46] and PR (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.36-0.55) in cN0 patients were associated with lower odds of PMRT while DP (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.05-1.69) was associated with higher odds. Among cN1 patients, PMRT rates decreased from 90% to 73% for CR between 2005 and 2019 and increased from 76% to 82% for DP between 2004 and 2019. Relative to NR, CR (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.95) was associated with lower odds of PMRT while DP (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.58-2.37) was associated with higher odds. PMRT was associated with improved OS among cN1 patients (hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.88). CONCLUSION: CR was associated with decreased PMRT receipt over time, while temporal trends following PR and DP differed by cN status, suggesting that nodal involvement guided PMRT receipt more than in-breast disease.

The Landmark Series: Mastectomy Trials (Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing and Reconstruction Landmark Trials).

Despite advances in medical therapy, the foundation of breast cancer treatment is surgery. The landscape of operative intervention for breast cancer has shifted toward less invasive techniques, resulting in improved cosmesis and lower morbidity while maintaining oncologic integrity. In this article, we review the body of literature contributing to landmark advances in mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer.

Clinical Course of Breast Cancer Patients with Local-Regional Progression During Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is standard for locally advanced breast cancer and is now frequently considered for those with early-stage and node-positive disease. We aimed to evaluate the treatment course and outcomes in patients with disease progression during NST. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with unilateral stage I-III breast cancer between 2005 and 2015 with documented local-regional progression while receiving NST, by clinical examination and/or imaging after two or more cycles of chemotherapy, were identified from a prospective database, stratified by receipt of surgery and outcomes analyzed. RESULTS: Of 6362 patients treated with NST during the study period, 124 (1.9%) developed disease progression. At a median live follow-up of 71 months, 23.4% were alive without disease and 70.2% had died from breast cancer. Median overall survival (OS) time for patients with progression was 26 months and median distant disease-free survival (DFS) was 14 months. Triple-negative breast cancer was associated with a higher likelihood of death (p < 0.001) and development of distant metastasis (p = 0.002). Among patients who had surgery (104, 89.3%), 40 (38.5%) developed local-regional recurrence, 67 (64.4%) developed distant metastasis, and 69 (66.3%) died from breast cancer. Median OS and median distant DFS in this subgroup was 31 and 16 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of local-regional and distant failure were seen following disease progression while receiving NST. This suggests aggressive tumor biology and the need to study novel systemic therapies. Poor survival outcomes despite surgical management highlight the importance of careful patient selection when considering operative intervention after progression while receiving NST.

Axillary ultrasound in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: which features are predictive of disease?

BACKGROUND: Axillary ultrasound is used in the evaluation of breast cancer patients to identify subclinical node-positive disease. The study aim was to identify whether certain radiologic characteristics correlate with cytology and final pathology. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed ultrasound images of 110 women with clinically node-negative breast cancer and suspicious axillary ultrasound to identify specific anatomic characteristics previously shown to be more commonly associated with metastatic involvement. Results were compared with cytology and final pathology. We used descriptive statistics for data summary. RESULTS: Of the 110 patients, cytology was positive in 71 (68%) and final pathology was positive in 80 (73%). The most common indication for biopsy was lymph node cortex characterized by thickening or eccentric contour (N = 40). Loss of the fatty hilum was described in 17 patients, and 9 patients had lymph nodes with both abnormal cortical and hilar features. Of 43 patients with "suspicious" disease without specific criteria, the most common indication for biopsy was disparity in size of one or more lymph nodes compared with others. Maximum cortical thickness was greater in patients with positive cytology compared with those with negative cytology (7.6 versus 6.2 mm; P = 0.047). Ultrasound characteristics such as lymph node size, cortical morphology, contour, and hilar fat were not individually predictive of final cytology and pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary ultrasound is a valuable tool that accurately predicted malignant axillary disease in 73% of patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer. Elaboration of standard criteria for nodal evaluation will improve usefulness of this imaging modality in preoperative staging of the axilla.

Addressing Inequalities in Breast Cancer Care Delivery.

Breast cancer treatment, timeliness of care, and clinical outcomes are inferior for patients of Black race and Hispanic ethnicity, and the origin of these inequities is multifactorial. Owing to aggregate reporting of data in the United States for patients of Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander ancestry, disparities within and across these groups are difficult to appreciate. In large part due to low prevalence, male breast cancer remains understudied, and treatment algorithms are primarily extrapolated from research conducted in female patients.

Identifying and Addressing Barriers to Screening Mammography in a Medically Underserved Community.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Breast cancer mortality is 40% higher for Black women compared to White women. This study seeks to assess knowledge of breast cancer screening recommendations and identify barriers to risk assessment and mammographic screening among a medically underserved, low-income, predominantly Black community in West Philadelphia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a free mobile mammography screening event, women were offered surveys to assess perceptions of and barriers to breast cancer risk assessment and screening. Among those who subsequently underwent mobile screening, health insurance and time to additional diagnostic imaging and biopsy, when relevant, were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: 233 women completed surveys (mean age 54 ± 13 years). Ninety-three percent of respondents identified as Black. The most frequently cited barrier to screening mammography was cost and/or lack of insurance coverage (30%). Women under 50 reported more barriers to screening compared to older women. Among those recalled from screening and recommended to undergo biopsy, there was a trend toward longer delays between screening and biopsy among those without a PCP (median 45 days, IQR 25-53) compared to those with a PCP (median 24 days, IQR 16-29) (p = 0.072). CONCLUSION: In a study of a medically underserved community of primarily Black patients, barriers to breast cancer risk assessment, screening, and diagnosis were identified by self-report and by documented care delays. While free mobile mammography initiatives that bring medical professionals into communities can help mitigate barriers to screening, strategies for navigation and coordination of follow-up are critical to promote timely diagnostic resolution for all patients.

Together We Go Farther: Improving Access to Cancer Screening Through a Multidisciplinary, One-Stop-Shop Approach.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Despite significant scientific advances in cancer treatment in recent decades, Black Americans still face marked inequities in cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Redressing these persistent inequities will require innovative strategies for community engagement. Radiologists, as experts in cancer screening and diagnosis for multiple malignancies, including breast, lung, and colon, are ideally suited to lead and implement community-based strategies to address local cancer disparities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Through an established academic-community partnership in West Philadelphia built over the course of multiple prior community healthcare events, the authors piloted a novel radiology-led multidisciplinary approach to improve access to cancer screening for the predominantly Black, medically-underserved residents. Using a "one-stop-shop" framework to provide a comprehensive suite of screening and ancillary services in the heart of the community, the authors sought to remove as many impediments to screening as possible. RESULTS: Approximately 350 participants attended the health fair, and a total of 232 screening tests or assessments were completed. Data from this event suggest that this inclusive approach, as well as the use of a health fair "passport" to incentivize engagement, can successfully improve access to screening and follow-up in an underserved community. CONCLUSION: This "one-stop-shop" community approach can be replicated by radiology-led teams in other settings as a high-value, scalable opportunity to reduce disparities in access to cancer screening.

Impact of Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act on Receipt of Surgery for Breast Cancer.

To determine whether Medicaid expansion under the 2010 Affordable Care Act affected rates of breast cancer surgery. Background: Data regarding the impact of Medicaid expansion on access to surgical treatment of breast cancer are limited. Methods: Patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2017 and residing in a state that expanded Medicaid in January 2014 or in a state that opted out of expansion were included. A quasi-experimental, difference-in-differences (DID) approach was used to assess rate of omission of surgical treatment. Results: Of 624,237 patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, 24,728 (4%) patients did not undergo surgical treatment. Overall, no significant differences in rates of omission of surgery over time were seen based on Medicaid expansion status. Significant findings were noted based on patient residential location. In rural areas, Medicaid expansion was associated with lower rates of omission of surgery (adjusted DID -2.47%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.01% to -0.94%; P = 0.002). In urban area, rates of omission of surgery increased over time for both groups, but the relative increase was lower in expansion states (adjusted DID -0.72%, 95% CI -1.25% to -0.20%; P = 0.007). In metro areas, changes in rates of surgery over time were comparable across expansion and non-expansion states (adjusted DID -0.08%, 95% CI -0.32% to 0.16%; P = 0.512). Conclusions: Medicaid expansion had no measurable effect on the receipt of surgery for breast cancer in the overall cohort. Medicaid expansion was associated with higher rates of surgery in rural areas, representing the minority of the population.

Comparative effectiveness of upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation in clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer: A decision analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the effectiveness of upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy for overall survival in patients with clinical T2N0 (cT2N0) esophageal cancer. We also assessed the influence of the diagnostic uncertainty of endoscopic ultrasound on the expected benefit of chemoradiation. METHODS: We created a decision analysis model representing 2 treatment strategies for cT2N0 esophageal cancer: upfront esophagectomy that may be followed by adjuvant therapy for upstaged patients and induction chemoradiation for all patients with cT2N0 esophageal cancer followed by esophagectomy. Parameter values within the model were obtained from published data, and median survival for pathologic subgroups was derived from the National Cancer Database. In sensitivity analyses, staging uncertainty of endoscopic ultrasound was introduced by varying the probability of pathologic upstaging. RESULTS: The baseline model showed comparable median survival for both strategies: 48.3 months for upfront esophagectomy versus 45.9 months for induction chemoradiation and surgery. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated induction chemoradiation was beneficial, with probability of upstaging > 48.1%, which is within the published range of 32% to 65% probability of pathologic upstaging after cT2N0 diagnosis. The presence of any of 3 key variables (size larger than 3 cm, high grade, or lymphovascular invasion) was associated with > 48.1% risk of upstaging, thus conferring a survival advantage to induction chemoradiation. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal treatment strategy for cT2N0 esophageal cancer depends on the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound staging. High-risk features that confer increased probability of upstaging can inform clinical decision making to recommend induction chemoradiation for select cT2N0 patients.

Cost Analysis of a Surgical Consensus Guideline in Breast-Conserving Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The Society of Surgical Oncology and American Society of Radiation Oncology consensus statement was the first professional guideline in breast oncology to declare "no ink on tumor" as a negative margin in patients with stages I/II breast cancer undergoing breast-conservation therapy. We sought to analyze the financial impact of this guideline at our institution using a historic cohort. STUDY DESIGN: We identified women undergoing re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer from 2010 through 2013 using a prospectively maintained institutional database. Clinical and billing data were extracted from the medical record and from administrative resources using CPT codes. Descriptive statistics were used in data analysis. RESULTS: Of 254 women in the study population, 238 (93.7%) had stage I/II disease and 182 (71.7%) had invasive disease with ductal carcinoma in situ. A subcohort of 83 patients (32.7%) who underwent breast-conservation therapy for stage I/II disease without neoadjuvant chemotherapy had negative margins after the index procedure, per the Society of Surgical Oncology and American Society of Radiation Oncology guideline. The majority had invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 70 [84.3%]) and had invasive disease (n = 45 [54.2%]), and/or ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 49 [59.0%]) within 1 mm of the specimen margin. Seventy-nine patients underwent 1 re-excision and 4 patients underwent 2 re-excisions, accounting for 81 hours of operative time. Considering facility fees and primary surgeon billing alone, the overall estimated cost reduction would have been $195,919, or $2,360 per affected patient, under the guideline recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the Society of Surgical Oncology and American Society of Radiation Oncology consensus guideline holds great potential to optimize resource use. Application of the guideline to a retrospective cohort at our institution would have decreased the overall re-excision rate by 5.6% and reduced costs by nearly $200,000. Additional analysis of patient outcomes and margin assessment methods is needed to define the long-term impact on surgical practice.

National Survey of Burnout among US General Surgery Residents.

BACKGROUND: Burnout is a complex syndrome of emotional distress that can disproportionately affect individuals who work in health care professions. STUDY DESIGN: For a national survey of burnout in US general surgery residents, we asked all ACGME-accredited general surgery program directors to email their general surgery residents an invitation to complete an anonymous, online survey. Burnout was assessed with the Maslach Burnout Inventory; total scores for Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalization (DP), and Personal Accomplishment (PA) subscales were calculated. Burnout was defined as having a score in the highest tertile for EE or DP or lowest tertile for PA. Chi-square tests and one-way ANOVA were used to test associations between burnout tertiles for each subscale and various resident and training-program characteristics as appropriate. RESULTS: From April to December 2014, six hundred and sixty-five residents actively engaged in clinical training had data for analysis; 69% met the criterion for burnout on at least one subscale. Higher burnout on each subscale was reported by residents planning private practice careers compared with academic careers. A greater proportion of women than men reported burnout on EE and PA. Higher burnout on EE and DP was associated with greater work hours per week. Having a structured mentoring program was associated with lower burnout on each subscale. CONCLUSIONS: The high rates of burnout among general surgery residents are concerning, given the potential impact of burnout on the quality of patient care. Efforts to identify at-risk populations and to design targeted interventions to mitigate burnout in surgical trainees are warranted.