Anatomical study of the relationship between the lumbar intervertebral disc, nerves, and psoas major.

Cadaveric study; To describe the characteristics of the nerve and its relationship with the lumbar intervertebral disc and psoas major muscle. Nerve injury is an understudied complication of extreme lateral interbody fusion. A detailed description of the nerve anatomy would be helpful for surgeons to minimize the risk of this complication. The lumbar plexus and lumbar sympathetic nerve of 10 embalmed male cadavers were dissected, and the distribution, number, and spatial orientation of the nerves on the L1/2 to L4/5 intervertebral discs were examined. Metal wires were applied along nerve paths through the psoas major muscle. The position of the nerves was examined on CT. In zone III at L1/2 and L4/5, no nerves were found. In zone II and zone III at L2/3, no lumbar plexus was found, and only the ramus communicans passed through. At the L1-L5 level, the density of nerves in the posterior half of the psoas major muscle was greater than that in the anterior half. The lumbar plexus was found in all of zone IV. The genitofemoral nerve emerges superficially and anteriorly from the medial border of the psoas major at the L3-4 level, but at the L1/2 level, the sympathetic trunk is located in zone II. The remaining disc-level sympathetic trunks appear in zone I. No nerves were found in zone III of the L1/2 or L4/5 disc. In zones II and III of L2/3, the lumbar plexus appears safe. The genitofemoral nerve travels through zones II and III of L3/4. The distribution density of nerves in the posterior half of the psoas major muscle was greater than that in the anterior half of that muscle at the L1-L5 level.

A comparative study of the anatomy and MRI images of the lumbar foraminal ligaments at the L1-L5 levels.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of MRI images to reveal foraminal ligaments at levels L1-L5 by comparing the results with those of anatomical studies. METHODS: Eighty lumbar foramina were studied. First, the best MRI scanning parameters were selected, and the transverse and sagittal axes of each lumbar foramina were scanned to identify and record the ligament-like structures in each lumbar foramen. Then, the cadaveric specimens were anatomically studied, and all ligament structures in the lumbar foramina were retained. The number, morphology and distribution of ligaments under anatomical and MRI scanning were observed. Histological staining of the dissected ligament structures was performed to confirm that they were ligamentous tissues. Finally, the accuracy of ligament recognition in MRI images was statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 233 foraminal ligaments were identified in 80 lumbar intervertebral foramina through cadaveric anatomy. The radiating ligaments (176, 75.5%) were found to be attached from the nerve root to the surrounding osseous structures, while the transforaminal ligaments (57, 24.5%) traversed the intervertebral foramina without any connection to the nerve roots. A total of 42 transforaminal ligament signals and 100 radiating ligament signals were detected in the MRI images of the 80 intervertebral foramina. CONCLUSION: The MRI can identify the lumbar foraminal ligament, and the recognition rate of the transforaminal ligament is higher than that of the radiating ligament. This study provides a new method for the clinical diagnosis of the relationship between the lumbar foraminal ligament and radicular pain.

Anatomical Observation and Clinical Significance of the Medial Branch of the Lumbar Dorsal Rami.

STUDY DESIGN: Anatomical study. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elaborate on the anatomical characteristics of the medial branch of the lumbar dorsal rami and to discuss its possible clinical significance. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Radiofrequency ablation targeting the medial branch of the lumbar dorsal rami has been increasingly used in the clinical management of facetogenic low back pain (FLBP). Nonetheless, attention is also being given to complications such as atrophy of the lumbar soft tissues and muscles. Therefore, a more detailed understanding of the innervation pattern on the facet joint may improve the precision of nerve ablation therapy for FLBP. METHODS: An anatomical study of eight human specimens was carried out. The anatomic characteristics of the medial branch were observed and recorded. RESULTS: The medial branch originates from the lumbar dorsal rami, running close to the root of the posterolateral side of the superior articular process of the inferior cone. When passed through the mamillo-accessory ligament, it turns direction to the medial and caudal side, running in the multifidus muscle. In our study, each medial branch sent out two to five branches along the way. All the medial branches in L1-L4 gave off one to two small branches when crossing the facet joint and innervated the joint of the lower segment. Nineteen medial branches (23.75%) gave off recurrent branches to innervate the joint at the upper segment. CONCLUSION: The anatomical features of the medial branch remain similar in each lumbar segment. There are two types of joint branches, including the articular fibers that emanate from the medial branch as it runs along the medial border of the facet joint and the recurrent branch from the medial branch that innervates the upper facet joint. Moreover, an anastomotic branch was found in the medial branches between different segments.

Anatomic zone division and clinical significance of the lumbar sinuvertebral nerves.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Discogenic low-back pain (DLBP) is one of the primary causes of low back pain (LBP) and is associated with internal disc disruptions and is mainly transmitted by the sinuvertebral nerve (SVN). The lack of a universal understanding of the anatomical characteristics of the SVN has compromised surgical treatment for DLPB. PURPOSE: This study aims to elaborate on the anatomical characteristics of the SVN and to discuss their possible clinical significance. STUDY DESIGN: The SVNs were dissected and immunostained in ten human lumbar specimens. METHODS: The SVNs at the segments from L1-L2 to L5-S1 in ten human cadavers were studied, and the number, origin, course, diameter, anastomotic branches, and branching points of the SVNs were documented. Three longitudinal and five transverse zones were defined in the dorsal coronal plane of the vertebral body and disc. The vertebrae were divided longitudinally as follows: the region between the medial edges of the bilateral pedicles is divided into three equal parts, the middle third is zone I and the lateral third on both sides are zones II; the areas lateral to the medial margin of the pedicle were zones III. The transverse zones were designated as follows: (a)superior margin of the vertebral body to superior margin of the pedicle; (b) between superior and inferior margins of the pedicle; (c) inferior margin of the pedicle to inferior margin of the vertebral body; (d) superior margin of the disc to the midline of the disc; and (e) midline of the disc to the inferior margin of the disc. The distribution characteristics of SVNs in various zones were recorded, and tissue sections were immunostained with anti-NF 200 and anti-PGP 9.5. RESULTS: The SVNs are divided into main trunks and deputy branches, with 109 main trunks and 451 deputy branches identified in the 100 lumbar intervertebral foramens (IVFs). The main trunks of the SVN originate from the spinal nerve and/or the communicating branch, but the deputy branch originating from both roots was not observed. All the main trunks and deputy branches of the SVNs originate from the posterolateral disc (III d and III e). The deputy branches of the SVN primarily innervate the posterolateral aspect of the intervertebral disc (III d 46.78%, III e 36.36%) and the subpedicular vertebral body (III c 16.85%). The main trunk of the SVNs passes primarily through the subpedicular vertebral body (III c 96.33%) and divides into ascending, transverse, and descending branches in the IVF: III c (23/101, 22.77%) or spinal canal: II c (73/101, 72.28%), II d (3/101, 2.97%), II b (2/101, 1.98%). The main trunk possesses extensive innervation, and except for the most medial discs (I d and I e), it almost dominates all other zones of the spinal canal. At the segments from L1-L2 to L5-S1, 39 ipsilateral anastomoses connecting the ascending branch to the main trunk or spinal nerve at the upper level were observed, with one contralateral anastomosis observed at L5. CONCLUSION: The zone distribution characteristics of SVNs are similar across all levels. Comparatively, the proportion of double-root origin and the number of insertion points of the SVNs increased at the lower level. The three types of anastomosis offer connections between SVNs at the same level and at different levels. The posteromedial disc is innervated by corresponding and subjacent main trunks, with the posterolateral disc mainly innervated by the deputy branch. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Detailed information and zone distribution characteristics of the lumbar SVNs can help improve clinicians' understanding of DLBP and improve the effectiveness of treatments targeting the SVNs.

Sinuvertebral nerve block treats discogenic low back pain: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Discogenic low back pain (DLBP) is considered the most common type of chronic low back pain (CLBP). Sinuvertebral nerve block (SVNB) is a rapid and precise intervention performed under local anesthesia to treat DLBP induced CLBP. Thus, in this study, we aimed to explore the clinical efficacy of SVNB for DLBP. Methods: We retrospectively included 32 DLBP patients from July 2020 and April 2021. Inclusion criteria: The patients had chronic pain, diagnosed as single-segment disc degeneration induced DLBP, and suffered from one-year ineffective conservative treatment. SVNB was performed and the patients were followed up at 3 and 7 days, and at 1 and 3 months after SVNB. The basic clinical characteristics, including age and gender, were collected. The measurements of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were assessed. Results: The average age was 49.31±14.37 years, and females vs. males was 20 (62.50%) vs. 12 (37.50%). The preoperative VAS and ODI score were 5.75±1.41 and 32.59±21.56, respectively. The VAS score was reduced to 2.50±1.46, 2.63±1.60, 3.53±2.17, and 3.78±2.18 at 3 and 7 days, and 1 and 3 months after SVNB, respectively (P<0.05). The improvement rates in the VAS score were 56.52%, 54.34%, 38.61%, and 34.26% at 3 and 7 days, and 1 and 3 months after SVNB, respectively. 18 patients (56.25%) experienced varying degrees of pain recurrence within 3 months. The ODI score was reduced by 17.28±13.06, 16.84±13.51, 19.63±17.12, and 21.44±19.03 points at 3, 7 days and 1, 3 months after SVNB, respectively (P<0.05). At 3 day and 3 month after SVNB, the ODI scores of 22 patients (68.75%) and 20 patients (62.50%) decreased to ≤20, respectively. The ODI improvement rates were 46.98%, 48.33%, 39.80%, and 34.24% at 3, 7 days and 1, 3 months after SVNB, respectively. Conclusions: We conducted a retrospective study of the clinical efficacy of SVNB for DLBP. As a rapid and cost-effective minimally invasive treatment, SVNB provided some assistance for the short-term pain relief and physical functional improvement of DLBP. SVNB could be a good choice for the treatment of DLBP.