Promising clinical outcomes of nano-curcumin treatment as an adjunct therapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Different immunomodulation strategies have been used to manage COVID-19 due to the complex immune-inflammatory processes involved in the pathogenesis of this infection. Curcumin with its powerful anti-inflammatory and antiviral properties could serve as a possible COVID-19 therapy. In this study, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was performed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of nano-curcumin oral soft gels as a complementary therapy in moderate-severe COVID-19 patients. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) plus sofosbuvir was routinely administered to all 42 COVID-19 patients, who were randomly assigned to receive 140 mg of nano-curcumin or placebo for 14 days. CT scans of the chest were taken, and blood tests were run for all patients at time points of 0, 7, and 14 days. Our results indicated that C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels significantly decreased from baseline in the nano-curcumin-treated group on day 7. Furthermore, blood levels of D-dimer, CRP, serum ferritin, ESR, and inflammatory cytokines including IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 decreased more significantly in the nano-curcumin-treated group after 14 days. Additionally, the nano-curcumin group showed significant improvements in chest CT scores, oxygen saturation levels, and hospitalization duration. Based on our data, oral administration of nano-curcumin may be regarded as a promising adjunct treatment for COVID-19 patients due to its ability to speed up chest clearance and recovery.

Evaluation of noscapine-licorice combination effects on cough relieving in COVID-19 outpatients: A randomized controlled trial.

Background: As February 2023, SARS-CoV-2 is still infecting people and children worldwide. Cough and dyspnea are annoying symptoms almost present in a large proportion of COVID-19 outpatients, and the duration of these symptoms might be long enough to affect the patients' quality of life. Studies have shown positive effects for noscapine plus licorice in the previous COVID-19 trials. This study aimed to assess the effects of the combination of noscapine and licorice-for relieving cough in outpatients with COVID-19. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 124 patients at the Dr. Masih Daneshvari Hospital. Participants over 18 years of age with confirmed COVID-19 and cough were allowed to enter the study if the onset of symptoms was less than 5 days. The primary outcome was to assess the response to treatment over 5 days using the visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes included the assessment of cough severity after 5 days using Cough Symptom Score, as well as the cough-related quality of life and dyspnea relieving. Patients in the noscapine plus licorice group received Noscough® syrup 20 mL every 6 h for 5 days. The control group received diphenhydramine elixir 7 mL every 8 h. Results: By day five, 53 (85.48%) patients in the Noscough® group and 49 (79.03%) patients in the diphenhydramine group had response to treatment. This difference was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.34). The presence of dyspnea was significantly lower in the Noscough® group versus diphenhydramine at day five (1.61% in the Noscough® group vs. 12.9% in the diphenhydramine group; p-value = 0.03). The cough-related quality of life and severity also significantly favored Noscough® syrup (p-values <0.001). Conclusion: Noscapine plus licorice syrup was slightly superior to diphenhydramine in relieving cough symptoms and dyspnea in the COVID-19 outpatients. The severity of cough and cough-related quality of life were also significantly better in the noscapine plus licorice syrup. Noscapine plus licorice may be a valuable treatment in relieving cough in COVID-19 outpatients.

Study of the Effects of Melatonin on Sleep Disorders in Pulmonary Sarcoidosis Patients.

Background: The symptoms of pulmonary sarcoidosis may lead to fatigue, excessive daytime sleepiness, poor sleep quality, and a decrease in quality of life in these patients. Objectives: This study was designed to evaluate the effects of oral melatonin on sleep disorders of patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis. Methods: A randomized, single-blinded clinical trial was conducted on patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis. Eligible patients were randomly allocated into melatonin and control groups. Patients in the melatonin group were given 3 mg melatonin one hour before bedtime for three months. Sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, fatigue status, and quality of life were assessed applying General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS), and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), respectively, as well as the 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) scores at the baseline and three months after treatment. Results: There was a significant change in the GSDS (P < 0.001), PSQI (P < 0.001), ESS (P = 0.002), and FAS (P < 0.001) scores, which were decreased, compared to those of the control group. After intervention¸ global physical health and global mental health raw scores were improved comparing to the control group (P = 0.006, P = 0.02, respectively). The 12-item Short Form Survey evaluation showed that there was a significant difference between the melatonin (3.38 ± 4.61) and control (0.55 ± 7.25) groups in PCS-12 score after three months of therapy (P = 0.02). Conclusions: Our findings showed that supplemental melatonin could significantly improve sleep problems, quality of life, and excessive daytime sleepiness in sarcoidosis patients.