Real-world treatment in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer : Treatment decisions in HER2+ mBC.

PURPOSE: The landscape of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treatment is changing due to the availability of new anti-HER2 drugs. The purpose of this study was to assess the current treatment patterns and sequences used in HER2+ mBC in the real-world setting. Secondary objectives were to describe the factors that influence the decision to prescribe a first and second-line antitumour treatment. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 3068 cases in Spain, Italy, the Netherlands and the UK. RESULTS: First and second-line treatments and regimens are consistent with the clinical guidelines, especially for recently initiated treatments. Age and performance status (PS) of patients impact treatment patterns: younger patients received more innovative treatments than elderly patients. In addition, while most patients received a first antitumor treatment, the rate of patients who continue to subsequent lines of therapy is low (55% transitioning from 1st to 2nd line; 58% from 2nd to 3rd line). Age and PS are key factors in the decision to prescribe further antitumor treatment. CONCLUSION: Fewer HER2+ mBC patients than expected receive a second and third line therapy. Guidelines should make specific recommendations for older patients or those with a poor PS.

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in advanced cutaneous melanoma patients in France.

BACKGROUND: Since 2011, the management of advanced melanoma has radically changed with the availability of new therapies (immunotherapy and BRAF-targeted therapy) and with BRAF testing. OBJECTIVES: Following the introduction of these new therapies, the objectives of this AMEL study were to describe treatment patterns and evaluate overall survival (OS) among unresectable stage III/IV melanoma patients, in a real-life setting in France. METHODS: The AMEL study is a multicentre retrospective record review study. Thirty-three physicians working in 33 unique treatment centres participated in the study. Two hundred and sixty-four patients diagnosed between 1 January 2012 and 31 October 2012 with unresectable stage III/IV melanoma were included in the study. RESULTS: 94.7% of the patients received a first-line antitumour drug treatment, 62.5% a second-line treatment while 26.9% received a third-line treatment with no significant differences between patients with a BRAF mutation (50.4%) and BRAF wild type (47.0%). First-line treatment differs according to the BRAF status: 74.8% of patients with a BRAF mutation received a BRAF inhibitor while 79.3% of the BRAF wild-type patients were treated with conventional chemotherapy. In second line and over, the treatment patterns were more heterogeneous, depending on the BRAF mutation, the treatment received previously, the speed of progression of the disease and the availability of immunotherapy at the time the treatment was initiated. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the BRAF mutation status, the median OS of patients was 16 months (95% CI = 14-18). Compared to a similar study conducted in 2007 (MELODY), a gain of 4 months is observed. The gain seems to be higher for patients with a BRAF mutation (18 months) than for those without a BRAF mutation (14 months). The OS of patients who sequentially received both a BRAF inhibitor and ipilimumab (28 months) highlights the benefit of this treatment sequence.

[Fulvestrant use in clinical practice in France: a pharmacoepidemiologic study]. / Etude pharmacoépidémiologique sur l'utilisation de fulvestrant en pratique clinique en France.

The objective of the study was to assess the prescription patterns of fulvestrant in clinical practice in France through a retrospective observational study. Primary endpoint was treatment duration. Data from patients who completed fulvestrant therapy between January and May 2007 were collected between May and June 2007 in 50 centers selected among a representative study sample of 110 centers. Two hundred seventeen patients were included. For 98-99% of patients, baseline characteristics were consistent with the approved indication in terms of postmenopausal status, estrogen-receptor positive tumors and treatment for advanced disease. Overall, 94% of patients had received previous endocrine therapy: tamoxifen in 60% and aromatase-inhibitor (AI) in 90%, including 35% exposed to AI as the unique prior endocrine therapy. Median duration of fulvestrant therapy was six months, and fulvestrant was the ultimate hormone therapy in 89% of evaluable patients. Fulvestrant is prescribed in the real practice in post-menopausal patients with ER-positive tumors, after prior hormone therapy and for advanced disease in the vast majority of patients, according to drug labeling. Due to the growing population receiving AI after or instead of tamoxifen, most patients given fulvestrant in 2007 in France were previously exposed to AI.

'Parcours de Femme 2001': a French opinion survey on overall disease and everyday life management in 1870 women presenting with gynecological or breast cancer and their caregivers.

PURPOSE: The aim of the survey 'Parcours de Femmes 2001' was to evaluate the overall management and care of women with female cancers and to determine their needs. METHODS: Women with breast or gynecological cancer who had either received at least 3 months of treatment or had completed treatment <1 year before the study were enrolled in this cross-sectional, observational study. RESULTS: From February to November 2001, 2839 questionnaires were distributed; 1870 were returned (66% response rate), mainly by breast cancer patients (87%). While 92% of women reported having received information at diagnosis, 34% of relapsed patients complained of lack of information concerning their disease and treatment. Only 18% of patients were included in the treatment decision process and 66% of women obtained complementary information from the media, patients and care professionals. Fatigue was the most severe problem quoted (78% of cases) and was poorly managed by caregivers due to diagnostic and treatment difficulties. Problems relating to family and to affective and socio-professional life were poorly identified and remained largely unmanaged. CONCLUSIONS: Information given to female cancer patients must be improved in relapsed patients, particularly regarding the adverse effects of treatment. Psychosocial management requires a more holistic approach through new channels, together with the coordination of existing structures.