Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Assunto principal
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hematol Oncol ; 40(4): 704-715, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35608183

RESUMO

The combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (EloRd) enhanced the clinical benefit over Rd with a manageable toxicity profile in the ELOQUENT-2 trial, leading to its approval in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The present study is a 3-year follow-up update of a previously published Italian real-life RRMM cohort of patients treated with EloRd. This revised analysis entered 319 RRMM patients accrued in 41 Italian centers. After a median follow-up of 36 months (range 6-55), 236 patients experienced disease progression or died. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 18.4 and 34 months, respectively. The updated multivariate analyses showed a significant reduction of PFS and OS benefit magnitude only in cases with International Staging System stage III. Major adverse events included grade 3/4 neutropenia (18.5%), anemia (15.4%), lymphocytopenia (12.5%), and thrombocytopenia (10.7%), while infection rates and pneumonia were 33.9% and 18.9%, respectively. No new safety signals with longer follow-up have been observed. Of 319 patients, 245 (76.7%) reached at least a partial remission. A significantly lower response rate was found in patients previously exposed to lenalidomide. In conclusion, our study confirms that EloRd is a safe and effective regimen for RRMM patients, maintaining benefits across multiple unfavorable subgroups.


Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Dexametasona/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lenalidomida/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Talidomida/efeitos adversos
2.
Haematologica ; 106(1): 291-294, 2021 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32107338
3.
J Clin Med ; 13(16)2024 Aug 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39201102

RESUMO

Background: Spinal cord lymphomas represent a minority of extranodal lymphomas and often pose diagnostic challenges by imitating primary spinal tumors or inflammatory/infective lesions. This paper presents a unique case of primary cauda equina lymphoma (PCEL) and conducts a comprehensive review to delineate the clinical and radiological characteristics of this rare entity. Case Report: A 74-year-old male presented with progressive paresthesia, motor weakness, and symptoms indicative of cauda equina syndrome. Neurological examination revealed paraparesis and sphincter dysfunction. Imaging studies initially suggested an intradural meningioma. However, surgical intervention revealed a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma infiltrating the cauda equina. Findings: A systematic review of the pertinent literature identified 18 primary cauda equina lymphoma cases. These cases exhibited diverse clinical presentations, treatments, and outcomes. The mean age at diagnosis was 61.25 years for women and 50 years for men, with an average follow-up of 16.2 months. Notably, 35% of patients were alive at 18 months, highlighting the challenging prognosis associated with PCEL. Discussion: Primary spinal cord lymphomas, especially within the cauda equina, remain rare and diagnostically complex due to their nonspecific clinical manifestations. The review highlights the need to consider spinal cord lymphoma in patients with neurological symptoms, even without a history of systemic lymphoma. Diagnostic Approaches: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as the primary diagnostic tool but lacks specificity. Histopathological examination remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis. The review underscores the importance of timely biopsy in suspected cases to facilitate accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Management and Prognosis: Current management involves biopsy and chemotherapy; however, optimal treatment strategies remain ambiguous due to the rarity of PCEL. Despite aggressive therapeutic interventions, prognosis remains poor, emphasizing the urgency for enhanced diagnostic and treatment modalities. Conclusions: Primary cauda equina lymphoma poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, necessitating a high index of suspicion in patients with atypical spinal cord symptoms. Collaborative efforts between neurosurgical, oncological, and infectious diseases teams are imperative for timely diagnosis and management. Advancements in diagnostic precision and therapeutic options are crucial for improving patient outcomes.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA