Outcomes of Augmented Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups.

INTRODUCTION: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with acetabular bone defects is associated with a high risk of dislocation and aseptic loosening. No studies to date have examined the use of uncemented and augmented dual mobility cups (DMC) in patients with acetabular defects. We hypothesized that the use of augmented DMC under these conditions would reduce the dislocation rate and lead to satisfactory bone integration in the medium term despite acetabular bone defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This continuous multicenter study included all cases of augmented DMC performed between 2010 and 2017 in patients with acetabular bone loss (Paprosky 2A: 46%, 2B: 32%, 2C: 15% and 3A: 6%). The indications for implantation were revisions for cup aseptic loosening (AL) (n=45), femoral stem AL (n=3), bipolar AL (n=11), septic loosening (n=10), periprosthetic fracture (n=5), chronic dislocation (n=4), intraprosthetic dislocation (n=2), cup impingement (n=1), primary posttraumatic arthroplasty (n=8), and acetabular dysplasia (n=4). The clinical assessment consisted of the Harris hip score (HHS) and Merle d'Aubigné Postel score (MDP), along with preoperative and final follow-up radiographs. The primary endpoint was surgical revision for aseptic acetabular loosening or the occurrence of dislocation. RESULTS: Overall, 93 patients were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 5.3 ± 2.3 years [0, 10]. As of the last follow-up, the acetabular cup had been changed in five cases: 3 AL (3.2%) and 2 infections (2.1%). Thus the overall survivorship of the cup was 94.6% and the survivorship for AL was 96.8%. Three patients (3%) suffered a dislocation. At the last follow-up visit, the mean MDP and HHS scores were 14.75 and 72.15, respectively, which reflected significant improvements relative to the preoperative scores (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Use of an uncemented and augmented DMC in cases of acetabular bone defect leads to satisfactory medium-term results with low dislocation and loosening rates. We recommend its use in these cases.

Does inverse kinematic alignment coupled with robot-assisted TKA optimize patellofemoral clinical and radiological results?

INTRODUCTION: With a satisfaction rate of 80%, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery has seen significant improvements in recent decades. The 20% of poor results may be explained by the alignment technique used for implant placement, which can influence patellofemoral kinematics. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the use of inverse kinematic alignment makes it possible to obtain satisfactory clinical and radiological patellar scores in robotic TKA. HYPOTHESIS: The inverse kinematic alignment technique coupled with robotic surgery makes it possible to restore the native kinematics of the patella. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study including 100 TKAs with a primary TKA performed using the Stryker Mako™ robotic surgery system, and the inverse kinematic alignment technique. Patients who underwent patella resurfacing were excluded. Clinical and radiological scores were recorded preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: At one year, the specific patellar clinical scores were excellent with an average Kujala score of 85.69 and an average HSS Patellar score 88.15. The average patellar lateralization index was 0.15 and the average patellar tilt was 5.1°, showing no significant difference compared to preoperation (p=0.45 and p=0.18). The average external rotation of the femoral implant was 0.47±0.6° [-1.9; 2.1]. DISCUSSION: The patellofemoral clinical results were excellent. The use of the robotic arm coupled with this alignment technique makes it possible to obtain a controlled external rotation of the femoral implant as well as an optimized orientation of the tibial component, favoring good restitution of the alignment of the extensor apparatus. This study did not demonstrate any radiological correction of patellar tilt and lateralization. CONCLUSION: The combined use of robotic surgery with the inverse kinematic alignment technique seems effective on specific clinical results of the patellofemoral joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II; prospective cohort.