Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 49(4): 396-402, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25655805

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: The increased complexity of endovascular aortic repair necessitates longer procedural time and higher radiation exposure to the operator, particularly to exposed body parts. The aims were to measure directly exposure to radiation of the bodies and heads of the operating team during endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA), and to identify factors that may increase exposure. METHODS: This was a single-centre prospective study. Between October 2013 and July 2014, consecutive elective branched and fenestrated TAAA repairs performed in a hybrid operating room were studied. Electronic dosimeters were used to measure directly radiation exposure to the primary (PO) and assistant (AO) operator in three different areas (under-lead, over-lead, and head). Fluoroscopy and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) acquisition times, C-arm angulation, and PO/AO height were recorded. RESULTS: Seventeen cases were analysed (Crawford II-IV), with a median operating time of 280 minutes (interquartile range 200-330 minutes). Median age was 76 years (range 71-81 years); median body mass index was 28 kg/m(2) (25-32 kg/m(2)). Stent-grafts incorporated branches only, fenestrations only, or a mixture of branches and fenestrations. A total of 21 branches and 38 fenestrations were cannulated and stented. Head dose was significantly higher in the PO compared with the AO (median 54 µSv [range 24-130 µSv] vs. 15 µSv [range 7-43 µSv], respectively; p = .022), as was over-lead body dose (median 80 µSv [range 37-163 µSv] vs. 32 µSv [range 6-48 µSv], respectively; p = .003). Corresponding under-lead doses were similar between operators (median 4 µSv [range 1-17 µSv] vs. 1 µSv [range 1-3 µSv], respectively; p = .222). Primary operator height, DSA acquisition time in left anterior oblique (LAO) position, and degrees of LAO angulation were independent predictors of PO head dose (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The head is an unprotected area receiving a significant radiation dose during complex endovascular aortic repair. The deleterious effects of exposure to this area are not fully understood. Vascular interventionalists should be cognisant of head exposure increasing with C-arm angulation, and limit this manoeuvre.


Assuntos
Angiografia Digital , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Cabeça/efeitos da radiação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angiografia Digital/métodos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Estudos Prospectivos , Doses de Radiação , Radiografia Intervencionista/métodos , Medição de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA