Predicting Accommodative Response Using Paraxial Schematic Eye Models.

PURPOSE: Previous ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) studies showed that accommodative optical response (AOR) can be predicted from accommodative biometric changes in a young and a pre-presbyopic population from linear relationships between accommodative optical and biometric changes, with a standard deviation of less than 0.55D. Here, paraxial schematic eyes (SE) were constructed from measured accommodative ocular biometry parameters to see if predictions are improved. METHODS: Measured ocular biometry (OCT, A-scan, and UBM) parameters from 24 young and 24 pre-presbyopic subjects were used to construct paraxial SEs for each individual subject (individual SEs) for three different lens equivalent refractive index methods. Refraction and AOR calculated from the individual SEs were compared with Grand Seiko (GS) autorefractor measured refraction and AOR. Refraction and AOR were also calculated from individual SEs constructed using the average population accommodative change in UBM measured parameters (average SEs). RESULTS: Schematic eye calculated and GS measured AOR were linearly related (young subjects: slope = 0.77, r = 0.86; pre-presbyopic subjects: slope = 0.64, r = 0.55). The mean difference in AOR (GS - individual SEs) for the young subjects was -0.27D and for the pre-presbyopic subjects was 0.33D. For individual SEs, the mean ± SD of the absolute differences in AOR between the GS and SEs was 0.50 ± 0.39D for the young subjects and 0.50 ± 0.37D for the pre-presbyopic subjects. For average SEs, the mean ± SD of the absolute differences in AOR between the GS and the SEs was 0.77 ± 0.88D for the young subjects and 0.51 ± 0.49D for the pre-presbyopic subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Individual paraxial SEs predict AOR, on average, with a standard deviation of 0.50D in young and pre-presbyopic subject populations. Although this prediction is only marginally better than from individual linear regressions, it does consider all the ocular biometric parameters.

Can ultrasound biomicroscopy be used to predict accommodation accurately?

PURPOSE: Clinical accommodation testing involves measuring either accommodative optical changes or accommodative biometric changes. Quantifying both optical and biometric changes during accommodation might be helpful in the design and evaluation of accommodation restoration concepts. This study aims to establish the accuracy of ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) in predicting the accommodative optical response (AOR) from biometric changes. METHODS: Static AOR from 0 to 6 diopters (D) stimuli in 1-D steps were measured with infrared photorefraction and a Grand Seiko autorefractor (WR-5100 K; Shigiya Machinery Works Ltd., Hiroshima, Japan) in 26 human subjects aged 21 to 36 years. Objective measurements of accommodative biometric changes to the same stimulus demands were measured from UBM (Vu-MAX; Sonomed Escalon, Lake Success, NY) images in the same group of subjects. AOR was predicted from biometry using linear regressions, 95% confidence intervals, and 95% prediction intervals. RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis showed 0.52 D greater AOR with photorefraction than with the Grand Seiko autorefractor. Per-diopter changes in accommodative biometry were: anterior chamber depth (ACD): -0.055 mm/D, lens thickness (LT): +0.076 mm/D, anterior lens radii of curvature (ALRC): -0.854 mm/D, posterior lens radii of curvature (PLRC): -0.222 mm/D, and anterior segment length (ASL): +0.030 mm/D. The standard deviation of AOR predicted from linear regressions for various biometry parameters were: ACD: 0.24 D, LT: 0.30 D, ALRC: 0.24 D, PLRC: 0.43 D, ASL: 0.50 D. CONCLUSIONS: UBM measured parameters can, on average, predict AOR with a standard deviation of 0.50 D or less using linear regression. UBM is a useful and accurate objective technique for measuring accommodation in young phakic eyes.

Distortion Correction of Visante Optical Coherence Tomography Cornea Images.

PURPOSE: Quantitative biometry measurements from uncorrected anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) images are inaccurate because of spatial and optical distortions. Prior reported distortion correction equations for the Visante AS-OCT were not reproducible. The goal was to calculate the distortions and provide equations to correct corneal parameters for the Visante AS-OCT to get a central corneal radius of curvature from young and older subjects. METHODS: Five contact lenses (CLs) of known front and back radii of curvature and central thickness were imaged using the Visante AS-OCT (Carl Zeiss, Dublin, CA). Contact lens surface coordinates from Visante images were identified and fitted with a circle using custom Matlab image analysis software. Spatial and optical distortions of the Visante image of the CL radii of curvature and thickness were calculated and corrected. Visante images were also captured from 24 younger (aged 21 to 36 years) and 30 older (aged 36 to 48 years) human subjects. Corneal radii of curvature and thickness measurements from these subjects were corrected, and intrasession and intersession repeatabilities of the corneal parameters were calculated. RESULTS: Root mean square error of radius and power of the CL surfaces after distortion correction were 0.02 mm and 0.18D for the front and 0.011 mm and 0.11D for the back, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient for intrasession and intersession repeatability for all the corneal parameters from the human subjects was greater than 0.88 in both age groups. CONCLUSIONS: A distortion correction algorithm was developed for the Visante AS-OCT and applied to extract human corneal radius of curvature measurements.

Pharmacologically and Edinger-Westphal stimulated accommodation in rhesus monkeys does not rely on changes in anterior chamber pressure.

This study was undertaken to understand the role of anterior chamber pressure (ACP) during pharmacological and Edinger-Westphal (EW) stimulated accommodation in anesthetized monkeys. Experiments were performed on one iridectomized eye each of 7 anesthetized adolescent rhesus monkeys. Accommodation was induced by EW stimulation (n = 2) and intravenous administration of 0.25-4.0 mg/kg pilocarpine (n = 6). Accommodative refractive and biometric changes were measured with continuous 60 Hz infrared photorefraction (n = 6) and 100 Hz A-scan ultrasound biometry (n = 1). An ocular perfusion system was used to measure and manipulate ACP. Pressure was recorded via a 27-gauge needle in the anterior chamber connected to a pressure transducer (n = 7). The needle was also connected to a fluid reservoir to allow ACP to be manipulated and clamped (n = 4) by raising or lowering the fluid reservoir. In all six pharmacologically stimulated monkeys ACP increased during accommodation, from 0.70 to 2.38 mmHg, four of which showed pressure decreases preceding the pressure increases. Two eyes also showed increases in ACP during EW-stimulated accommodation of 2.8 and 7.2 mmHg. ACP increased with increasing EW stimulus amplitudes (n = 2). Clamping or externally manipulating ACP had no effect on resting refraction or on EW and pharmacologically stimulated accommodation in four eyes. The results show that EW stimulated and pharmacologically stimulated accommodation do not rely on ACP in rhesus monkeys.

Comparison between carbachol iontophoresis and intravenous pilocarpine stimulated accommodation in anesthetized rhesus monkeys.

Rhesus monkeys are an animal model for human accommodation and presbyopia and consistent and repeatable methods are needed to stimulate and measure accommodation in anesthetized rhesus monkeys. Accommodation has typically been pharmacologically stimulated with topical pilocarpine or carbachol iontophoresis. Intravenous (i.v.) pilocarpine has recently been shown to produce more natural, rapid and reproducible accommodative responses compared to topical pilocarpine. Here, i.v. pilocarpine was compared to carbachol iontophoresis stimulated accommodation. Experiments were performed under anaesthesia on five previously iridectomized monkeys aged 10-16 years. In three monkeys, accommodation was stimulated with carbachol iontophoresis in five successive experiments and refraction measured with a Hartinger coincidence refractometer. In separate experiments, accommodation was stimulated using a 5 mg/kg bolus of i.v. pilocarpine given over 30 s followed by a continuous infusion of 20 mg/kg/hr for 5.5 min in three successive experiments with the same monkeys as well as in single experiments with two additional monkeys. Refraction was measured continuously using photorefraction with baseline and accommodated refraction also measured with the Hartinger. In subsequent i.v. pilocarpine experiments with each monkey, accommodative changes in lens equatorial diameter were measured in real-time with video-image analysis. Maximum accommodation of three monkeys with carbachol iontophoresis (five repeats) was (mean ± SD; range) 14.0 ± 3.5; 9.9-20.3 D and with i.v. pilocarpine stimulation (three repeats) was 11.1 ± 1.1; 9.9-13.0 D. The average of the standard deviations of maximum accommodation from each monkey was 0.8 ± 0.3 D from carbachol iontophoresis and 0.3 ± 0.2 from i.v. pilocarpine. The average latency to the start of the response after carbachol iontophoresis was 2.5 ± 3.9; 0.0-12.0 min with a time constant of 12.7 ± 9.5; 2.3-29.2 min. The average latency after i.v. pilocarpine was 0.31 ± 0.03; 0.25-0.34 min with a time constant of 0.19 ± 0.07; 0.11-0.31 s. During i.v. pilocarpine stimulated accommodation in five monkeys, lens diameters decreased by 0.54 ± 0.09; 0.42-0.64 mm with a rate of change of 0.052 ± 0.002; 0.050-0.055 mm/D. Accommodative responses with i.v. pilocarpine were more rapid, consistent and stable than those with carbachol iontophoresis. The accommodative decrease in lens diameter with i.v. pilocarpine as a function of age was consistent with previous results using constant topical pilocarpine. Intravenous pilocarpine stimulated accommodation is safe, more consistent and more rapid than carbachol iontophoresis and it requires no contact with or obstruction of the eye thus allowing continuous and uninterrupted refraction and ocular biometry measurements.

Long-term reproducibility of Edinger-Westphal stimulated accommodation in rhesus monkeys.

If longitudinal studies of accommodation or accommodation restoration procedures are undertaken in rhesus monkeys, the methods used to induce and measure accommodation must remain reproducible over the study period. Stimulation of the Edinger-Westphal (EW) nucleus in anesthetized rhesus monkeys is a valuable method to understand various aspects of accommodation. A prior study showed reproducibility of EW-stimulated accommodation over 14 months after chronic electrode implantation. However, reproducibility over a period longer than this has not been investigated and therefore remains unknown. To address this, accommodation stimulation experiments in four eyes of two rhesus monkeys (13.7 and 13.8 years old) were evaluated over a period of 68 months. Carbachol iontophoresis stimulated accommodation was first measured with a Hartinger coincidence refractometer (HCR) two weeks before electrode implantation to determine maximum accommodative amplitudes. EW stimulus-response curves were initially measured with the HCR one month after electrode implantation and then repeated at least six times for each eye in the following 60 months. At 64 months, carbachol iontophoresis induced accommodation was measured again. At 68 months, EW stimulus-response curves were measured with an HCR and photorefraction every week over four consecutive weeks to evaluate the short-term reproducibility over one month. In the four eyes studied, long-term EW-stimulated accommodation decreased by 7.00 D, 3.33 D, 4.63 D, and 2.03 D, whereas carbachol stimulated accommodation increased by 0.18 D-0.49 D over the same time period. The short-term reproducibility of maximum EW-stimulated accommodation (standard deviations) over a period of four weeks at 68 months after electrode implantation was 0.48 D, 0.79 D, 0.55 D and 0.39 D in the four eyes. Since the long-term decrease in EW-stimulated accommodation is not matched by similar decreases in carbachol iontophoresis stimulated accommodation, the decline in accommodation cannot be due to the progression of presbyopia but is likely to result from variability in EW electrode position. Therefore, EW-stimulated accommodation in anesthetized monkeys is not appropriate for long-term longitudinal studies of age-related loss of accommodation or accommodation restoration procedures.

Reproducibility of carbachol stimulated accommodation in rhesus monkeys.

Approaches are being explored to restore accommodation to the presbyopic eye. Some of these approaches can be tested in monkeys by stimulating accommodation in various ways including using carbachol iontophoresis. Knowledge of the repeatability of carbachol iontophoresis stimulated accommodation in the monkey phakic eye is necessary to understand the variability of this method of evaluating accommodation. Data from 9 to 10 separate carbachol iontophoresis experiments performed on phakic eyes from 8 monkeys were retrospectively analyzed. For each experiment, carbachol was applied iontophoretically to the eyes of anesthetized monkeys and refraction generally measured every two minutes until accommodation reached a plateau. Repeated experiments were performed in each monkey over periods ranging from 10 to 18 months. Maximum accommodation measured for each monkey ranged from 11.1 D to 18.3 D with standard deviations from 0.8 D to 2.1 D and differences in accommodative amplitude varying from 2.2 D to 7.5 D. Time to reach maximum accommodation ranged from 18 to 64 min in individual experiments. Averaged time-courses indicate that maximum accommodation is generally achieved between 10 and 20 min after carbachol administration. Although carbachol iontophoresis is considered a reliable method to stimulate maximum accommodation in anesthetized monkeys, the amplitude achieved typically varies by more than 2 D. Presbyopia treatments evaluated in this way in phakic monkeys would need to show an increase in accommodation of over 2 D to clearly demonstrate that the treatments work when being tested with carbachol iontophoresis stimulation.

Manipulation of intraocular pressure for studying the effects on accommodation.

A reliable experimental system in which IOP can be manipulated or a rapid IOP change can be induced while simultaneously and continuously measuring IOP and the ocular accommodative changes would be useful for understanding the physiological effect of intraocular pressure (IOP) on the accommodative mechanism. In this study, an IOP perfusion and recording system was developed and tested using 13 enucleated pig eyes. The vitreous chamber of the pig eyes was cannulated with a needle connected to two fluid reservoirs at different heights. One reservoir was set to achieve one of three baseline pressures of 5.5 mmHg, 13.0 mmHg and 20.5 mmHg. The other reservoir was moved to achieve pressures of 1.5 mmHg, 3.0 mmHg, 4.5 mmHg and 6.0 mmHg higher than the baseline pressure. The height differential between the reservoirs determined the amplitude of IOP changes. Rapid IOP changes were induced by switching the reservoirs with a solenoid pinch-valve. Two needles, one each attached to a pressure transducer were inserted into the anterior chamber and vitreous chamber respectively. Custom developed software was used to measure the anterior chamber pressure and vitreous chamber pressure at 80 Hz. A high-resolution continuous A-scan ultrasound biometer (CUB) was used to dynamically measure changes in ocular biometry including anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT) and vitreous chamber depth (VCD) while the vitreous chamber pressure was manipulated. The changes in ACD, LT and VCD were analyzed as a function of the pressure change. Perfusion-induced axial biometric changes were quantified by the slopes of linear regression relationships. Both anterior chamber pressure and vitreous chamber pressure changed relatively systematically with the induced vitreous chamber pressure changes (anterior chamber: y = 0.863x + 0.030, r(2) = 0.983; vitreous chamber: y = 0.883x + 0.009, r(2) = 0.981). At perfusion pressures of 5.5, 13.0 and 20.5 mmHg, the slopes for ACD were -5.72, -2.75 and -2.36 µm/mmHg, for LT were -3.31, -1.59 and -1.03 µm/mmHg and for VCD were 19.05, 8.63 and 5.18 µm/mmHg. The system was able to manipulate and monitor IOP while axial biometry changes were recorded. This system will allow the relationship between IOP and accommodation to be studied in non-human primate eyes.

Accuracy and resolution of in vitro imaging based porcine lens volumetric measurements.

There is considerable interest in determining lens volume in the living eye. Lens volume is of interest to understand accommodative changes in the lens and to size accommodative IOLs (A-IOLs) to fit the capsular bag. Some studies have suggested lens volume change during accommodation. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the only method available to determine lens volume in vivo. MRI is, by its nature, relatively low in temporal and spatial resolution. Therefore analysis often requires determining lens volume from single image slices with relatively low resolution on which only simple image analysis methods can be used and without repeated measures. In this study, 7 T MRI scans encompassing the full lens volume were performed on 19 enucleated pig eyes. The eyes were then dissected to isolate and photograph the lens in profile and the lens volumes were measured empirically using a fluid displacement method. Lens volumes were calculated from two- and three-dimensional (2D and 3D) MR and 2D photographic profile images of the isolated lenses using several different analysis methods. Image based and actual measured lens volumes were compared. The average image-based volume of all lenses varied from the average measured volume of all lenses by 0.6%-6.4% depending on the image analysis method. Image analysis methods that use gradient based edge detection showed higher precision with actual volumes (r(2): 0.957-0.990), while threshold based segmentation had poorer correlations (r(2): 0.759-0.828). The root-mean-square (RMS) difference between image analysis based volumes and fluid displacement measured volumes ranged from 8.51 µl to 25.79 µl. This provides an estimate of the error of previously published methods used to calculate lens volume. Immobilized, enucleated porcine eyes permit improved MR image resolution relative to living eyes and therefore improved image analysis methods to calculate lens volume. The results show that some of the accommodative changes in lens volume reported in the literature are likely below the resolution limits of imaging methods used. MRI, even with detailed image analysis methods used here, is unlikely to achieve the resolution required to accurately size an A-IOL to the capsular bag.

Topical and intravenous pilocarpine stimulated accommodation in anesthetized rhesus monkeys.

Many studies have used pilocarpine to stimulate accommodation in both humans and monkeys. However, the concentrations of pilocarpine used and the methods of administration vary. In this study, three different methods of pilocarpine administration are evaluated for their effectiveness in stimulating accommodation in rhesus monkeys. Experiments were performed in 17 iridectomized, anesthetized rhesus monkeys aged 4-16 years. Maximum accommodation was stimulated in all these monkeys with a 2% pilocarpine solution maintained on the cornea for at least 30 min in a specially designed perfusion lens. In subsequent topical pilocarpine experiments, baseline refraction was measured with a Hartinger coincidence refractometer and then while the monkeys were upright and facing forward, commercially available pilocarpine (2, 4, or 6%) was applied topically to the cornea as 2 or 4 drops in two applications or 6 drops in three applications over a five minute period with the eyelids closed between applications. Alternatively, while supine, 10-12 drops of pilocarpine were maintained on the cornea in a scleral cup for 5 min. Refraction measurements were begun 5 min after the second application of pilocarpine and continued for at least 30 min after initial administration until no further change in refraction occurred. In intravenous experiments, pilocarpine was given either as boluses ranging from 0.1mg/kg to 2mg/kg or boluses followed by a constant infusion at rates between 3.06 mg/kg/h and 11.6 mg/kg/h. Constant 2% pilocarpine solution on the eye in the perfusion lens produced 10.88+/-2.73 D (mean+/-SD) of accommodation. Topically applied pilocarpine produced 3.81 D+/-2.41, 5.49 D+/-4.08, and 5.55 D+/-3.27 using 2%, 4%, and 6% solutions respectively. When expressed as a percentage of the accommodative response amplitude obtained in the same monkey with constant 2% pilocarpine solution on the eye, the responses were 34.7% for 2% pilocarpine, 48.4% for 4% pilocarpine, and 44.6% for 6% pilocarpine. Topical 4% and 6% pilocarpine achieved similar, variable accommodative responses, but neither achieved maximum accommodation. IV boluses of pilocarpine achieved near maximal levels of accommodation at least ten times faster than topical methods. Doses effective for producing maximum accommodation ranged from 0.25mg/kg to 1.0mg/kg. IV pilocarpine boluses caused an anterior movement of the anterior lens surface, a posterior movement of the posterior lens surface, and a slight net anterior movement of the entire lens. Considerable variability in response amplitude occurred and maximum accommodative amplitude was rarely achieved with topical application of a variety of concentrations of commercially available pilocarpine. Intravenous infusion of pilocarpine was a rapid and reliable method of producing a nearly maximal accommodative response and maintaining accommodation when desired.

Autonomic drugs and the accommodative system in rhesus monkeys.

Accommodation and pupil constriction result from parasympathetic stimulation from the Edinger-Westphal (EW) nucleus of the midbrain resulting in release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junctions of the ciliary muscle and iris. Cholinergic and adrenergic drugs can be applied topically to evaluate the effects on the pupil and accommodative system without input from the EW nucleus. This study is directed at characterizing how topical low dose echothiophate, an anti-cholinesterase inhibitor (i.e., an indirect cholinergic agonist), epinephrine, an adrenergic agonist, and timolol maleate, a beta adrenergic antagonist, affect pupil diameter, resting refraction and accommodative amplitude and dynamics in rhesus monkeys. The effects of 0.015% echothiophate, 2% epinephrine, 0.5% timolol maleate and saline on pupil diameter and resting refraction were measured in one eye each of four normal rhesus monkeys for 60-90 min following topical instillation. Pupil diameter was measured with infrared videography and refraction was measured with a Hartinger coincidence refractometer. Effects on static and dynamic EW stimulated accommodation were studied in three iridectomized monkeys (ages 5, 6 and 12 years) with permanent indwelling stimulating electrodes in the EW nucleus. Dynamic accommodative responses were measured with infrared photorefraction for increasing current amplitudes before and during the course of action of the pharmacological agents. Echothiophate caused a significant decrease in pupil diameter of 3.07 +/- 0.65 mm (mean +/- SEM, p < 0.01), and a myopic shift in resting refraction of 1.30 +/- 0.39 D (p < 0.05) 90 min after instillation. Epinephrine caused a 2.76 +/- 0.38 mm (p < 0.01) increase in pupil diameter with no change in resting refraction 60 min after instillation. Timolol maleate resulted in no significant change in either pupil diameter or resting refraction 60 min after instillation. There was no significant change in maximum EW stimulated accommodative amplitude after any agent tested. The amplitude vs. peak velocity relationship for accommodation was significantly different after echothiophate and timolol maleate, and for disaccommodation after echothiophate, epinephrine and timolol maleate. In conclusion, when tested objectively in anesthetized monkeys, epinephrine and timolol maleate did not alter resting refraction or accommodative amplitude, but did have small, significant affects on accommodative dynamics. This suggests that there is an adrenergic component to the accommodative system. Low dose echothiophate had significant effects on pupil diameter and resting refraction, with only small effects on the dynamics of the accommodative response.

Mouse lens stiffness measurements.

Presbyopia is a gradual loss of accommodation with age. Various studies have shown that an age-related increase in lens stiffness may be one factor involved. Lens stiffness has previously been measured using lens spinning experiments, resistance to conical probe penetration and dynamic mechanical analysis. In the current study, two different techniques have been used to evaluate the stiffness of isolated mouse lenses. In the first method, compressive forces were applied to mouse lenses using microscope cover-slips to exert incremental forces on the lens. Lens images were captured for analysis of change in diameter. In the second method, a fully automated squeezer system with an actuator, electronic scale and a CCD camera was used to apply incremental compressive forces to the lenses. The actuator exerted forces comparable to those exerted by cover-slips. Force and actuator displacement data together with images of the lenses as they were compressed were captured. Images were analyzed for change in lens diameter on application of force and also with actuator displacement. Lenses from 19 young male mice (4-weeks old) and 28 male retired breeders (7-9 months old) were tested. Lenses were used immediately after sacrificing the mice and extracting the lenses. The lenses from the older male mice were stiffer compared to the lenses from the younger male mice. This was determined by comparing the average change in lens diameter at various force values used. The two methods provide a good indication of the stiffness properties of mouse lenses.

Static and dynamic accommodation measured using the WAM-5500 Autorefractor.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to compare static and dynamic accommodation measurements using the Grand Seiko WR-5500 (WAM) in young, phakic subjects. METHODS: Fifteen subjects, aged 20 to 28 years (23.8 ± 0.58 years; mean ± SD years) participated. Accommodation was stimulated with printed text presented at various distances. In static mode, three measurements were taken for each stimulus amplitude. In dynamic mode, 5-Hz recordings were started, and subjects alternately looked through a transparent near chart and focused on a letter chart at 6 m for 5 seconds and then focused on the near letter chart for 5 seconds for a total of 30 seconds. After smoothing the raw data, the highest three individual values recorded in each 5-s interval of focusing at near were averaged for each stimulus amplitude. Analysis of variance and Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare the static and dynamic measurements. A calibration was performed with +3.00 to -10.00 D trial lenses behind an infrared filter, in 1.00 D steps in 5 of the 15 subjects. RESULTS: Stimulus-response graphs from static and dynamic modes were not significantly different in the lower stimulus range (<5.00 D, p = 0.93), but differed significantly for the higher stimulus amplitudes (p = 0.0027). One of the 15 subjects showed a significant difference between the static and dynamic modes. Corresponding pupil diameter could be recorded along with the accommodation responses for the subjects, and pupil diameter decreased with increasing stimulus demand. Calibration curves for static and dynamic measurements were not significantly different from the 1:1 line or from each other (p = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Slight differences between the dynamically and statically recorded response amplitudes were identified. This is attributed to differences in the accommodative responses in this population and not to the instrument performance. Dynamic measurement of accommodation and pupil constriction potentially provides additional useful information on the accommodative response other than simply the response amplitude.

Saccadic lens instability increases with accommodative stimulus in presbyopes.

An SRI dual Purkinje image (dPi) eye tracker was used to measure lens wobble following saccades with increasing accommodative effort as an indirect measure of ciliary muscle function in presbyopes. Ten presbyopic subjects executed 32 four-degree saccades at 1-s intervals between targets arranged in a cross on illuminated cards at each of 9 viewing distances ranging from 0.5- to 8-D accommodative demands. Post-saccadic lens wobble artifacts were extracted by subtraction of P1 (H(1)/V(1)) position signals from P4 signals (Theta(H)/Theta(V)), both of which were sampled by the eye tracker at 100 Hz. A ray tracing eye model was also employed to model the fourth Purkinje image shifts for a range of lens translations and tilts. Combining all saccades from all subjects showed a significant positive relationship between lens wobble artifact amplitude and accommodative demand. Eye model simulations indicated that artifacts of the amplitude measured could arise from either lens tilts (in the range of 2-4 degrees) or lens translations (in the range of 0.1 to 0.2 mm). Saccadic lens wobble artifacts increase with accommodative effort in presbyopes, indicating preserved ciliary muscle function and greater relaxation of zonular tension with accommodative effort. Variation across subjects may reflect differences in accommodative effort, ciliary muscle function for a given effort, and/or in intraocular anatomy.