Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 407(16): 4757-66, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25893804

RESUMO

Some microorganisms have been shown to retain a chemical signature indicative of the medium used for culturing. However, the repeatability of medium-specific chemical signatures has not been demonstrated from samples of microorganisms produced in the same batch or in different batches by the same sporulation protocol. Here, the variation in Raman spectra of bacterial endospores repeatedly prepared by the same procedure is compared to the variation between Raman spectra of spores prepared using different media. Bacillus cereus T strain (BcT) samples were correctly classified according to the medium used to induce sporulation for 100 % of spores grown in a controlled manner by the same scientist using Raman spectroscopy and multivariate data analysis. The proof-of-concept results from BcT spores produced in 12 different sporulation media showed correct classification by medium for 98 % of samples (with 100 % classification accuracy for all but one sporulation medium in this data set). Spectral differences were discerned between spores that had been freshly prepared or freeze-dried and spores that had been frozen; however, the differences did not impact the classification of the sporulation medium. Latent variables reduced the classification accuracy of BcT sporulated in G medium by different scientists using different media lots and stored for different periods of time and requires further study.


Assuntos
Bacillus cereus/isolamento & purificação , Ciências Forenses , Análise Espectral Raman/métodos , Esporos Bacterianos/isolamento & purificação , Bacillus cereus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Meios de Cultura , Esporos Bacterianos/genética
2.
ERJ Open Res ; 10(4)2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39286057

RESUMO

Background: This study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study intended to establish the translatability of the RLS-0071 mechanisms of action from animal disease models to humans by inhibiting neutrophil-mediated inflammation at the tissue level and major inflammatory biomarkers. We hypothesised that RLS-0071 inhibits a temporary neutrophil-mediated inflammation in the lungs induced by inhalation of low-dose lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in healthy participants. Methods: Participants were randomised to one of three arms to receive inhaled LPS followed by three doses of either low-dose (10 mg·kg-1) or high-dose (120 mg·kg-1 loading dose followed by two doses of 40 mg·kg-1) RLS-0071 i.v. or placebo (saline) every 8 h. Biomarkers evaluating inflammatory responses, with absolute neutrophil counts in induced sputum as the primary end-point, were collected before and at 6 and 24 h after LPS challenge. Results: Active treatment with RLS-0071 showed a similar safety profile to participants receiving placebo. RLS-0071 significantly decreased the numbers of neutrophils in sputum at 6 h post LPS by approximately half (p=0.04). Neutrophil effectors myeloperoxidase, neutrophil elastase and interleukin-1ß in sputum were also significantly decreased at 6 h for RLS-0071 compared with placebo. Several biomarkers showed trends suggesting sustained decreases for RLS-0071 versus placebo at 24 h. Conclusion: This clinical trial demonstrated that RLS-0071 was safe and well tolerated and modulated neutrophil-mediated inflammation in humans after inhaled LPS challenge, consistent with results from prior animal model studies.

3.
Am J Case Rep ; 24: e939803, 2023 May 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37231631

RESUMO

BACKGROUND RLS-0071 is a dual-targeting peptide developed for the regulation of humoral and cellular inflammation via inhibition of neutrophil effectors, including myeloperoxidase and neutrophil extracellular trap formation (NETosis). The safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single and multiple doses of RLS-0071 were evaluated in a first-in-human clinical trial in healthy volunteers. Myeloperoxidase is the major peroxidase enzyme present in neutrophilic granules and contributes to cellular inflammation. Extracellular myeloperoxidase has been associated with chronic inflammation in a variety of diseases, including atherosclerosis. RLS-0071 has previously been shown to inhibit extracellular myeloperoxidase function both in vitro and in vivo in animal disease models. CASE REPORT Healthy subjects participating in the RLS-0071-101 study were screened for baseline myeloperoxidase level, leading to the identification of a 21-year-old woman with elevated baseline levels. After randomization, the subject received 9 intravenous infusions of 10 mg/kg RLS-0071. The subject tolerated the peptide infusions well with no adverse changes in vital signs, significantly abnormal clinical laboratory results, or severe adverse events. Analysis of this subject's myeloperoxidase plasma concentrations demonstrated that her myeloperoxidase levels decreased by 43% and myeloperoxidase activity levels decreased 49% after infusions of RLS-0071. The reduction in the patient's plasma myeloperoxidase levels demonstrated a partial return to baseline levels 24 hours after cessation of dosing. There were no other clinically meaningful safety observations for this subject. CONCLUSIONS This observation suggests RLS-0071 has the therapeutic potential to moderate plasma myeloperoxidase levels and activity and modulate diseases in which myeloperoxidase contributes to pathogenesis.


Assuntos
Inflamação , Peroxidase , Feminino , Animais , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Infusões Intravenosas
4.
Neurohospitalist ; 12(3): 467-475, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35755228

RESUMO

Background: We implemented a multi-disciplinary process improvement intervention at our Comprehensive Stroke Center with speech/language pathologists to expedite oral medication delivery in stroke patients. Following a failed nursing dysphagia screen, trained neurology physicians screened dysphagia further to approve use of oral medications. We analyzed the safety and efficacy of this intervention. Methods: We analyzed retrospectively collected data for hospital course, timing of first screen, first oral medication use, and complications (e.g., aspiration pneumonia) in consecutive ischemic stroke patients (9/2019-07/2021). Patients were included if they passed a dysphagia assessment by physicians (Ph), nurses (RN), or speech/language pathologists (SLP). Arrival-to-dysphagia screen and arrival-to-antithrombotic were assessed using restricted mean survival time (RMST). Results: Of the 789 included patients, 673 were passed by RN, 104 by SLP, and 12 by Ph. Compared to patients passed by SLP, those passed by Ph were younger and had less severe deficits (P < .01 for both). Patients were screened more quickly by Ph than RN or SLP (median 38 vs 182 vs 1330-min post-arrival, P = .0001; 299-min RMST difference vs RN [95%CI 22-575, P = .03]; 470-min RMST difference vs SLP [95%CI 175-765, P = .002]). This translated to faster oral antithrombotic use for Ph-passed patients (138-min RMST difference vs RN [95%CI 59-216]; 332-min RMST difference vs SLP [95%CI 253-411]). No patients passed by Ph experienced aspiration pneumonia (0%). Conclusions: We safely conducted a physician-driven dysphagia screening paradigm which led to faster oral antithrombotic delivery without signal of patient harm. Physician availability to complete dysphagia screens in acute stroke patients was a limitation.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA