A randomized, controlled trial examining quarter-level somatic cell count and culture-based selective dry cow therapy against blanket dry cow therapy on early-lactation production outcomes.

The objective of this study was to determine quarters requiring antimicrobial treatment using either a benchtop somatic cell counter (S-SDCT) or culture with gram-positive selective media (C-SDCT) and compare outcomes in these cows to those receiving blanket dry cow therapy (BDCT) in a randomized, controlled trial. Two novel methods of identifying cows with intramammary infections followed by selective antimicrobial treatment were evaluated at a commercial dairy farm to determine their usefulness in decreasing antibiotic usage during the dry period without significant detrimental effects on milk quality and production. Cows (n = 840) were randomly allocated to one of 3 groups (BDCT, C-SDCT, S-SDCT) the day before dry-off and quarter-level milk samples (QLMS) were collected. The QLMS from cows in the S-SDCT group were evaluated using the cell counter and quarters were treated if somatic cell count (SCC) was ≥200,000 cells/mL, while QLMS from cows in the C-SDCT group were cultured and quarters were treated if the culture showed growth. All cows in the BDCT received antimicrobial therapy and all cows received an internal teat sealant regardless of treatment group. Outcomes measured were first and second DHIA test somatic cell count, milk production through 60 d in milk, cows leaving the farm, clinical mastitis, and bacteriologic new infections in a subset of quarters. Cows in both SDCT groups had fewer antimicrobial treatments than cows in the BDCT group as was expected, and cows in the C-SDCT group had fewer treatments than those in the S-SDCT group. Cows in both SDCT groups had higher linear score at the first DHIA test (BDCT: 1.8, S-SDCT: 2.2, C-SDCT: 2.2), however there were no other differences between groups regarding any other outcomes measured. While antimicrobial use was significantly reduced, farms should use caution in adopting the benchtop analyzer and the selective media described in this study as ways to identify infected cows for dry cow therapy as they may result in increased linear score early in lactation.

Plasma oxylipin profile of postpartum dairy cows categorized into different systemic inflammatory grades in the first week after parturition.

Oxygenated polyunsaturated fatty acids (oxylipins) are important mediators of inflammation ranging from pro- to anti-inflammatory actions. Research investigating differences in the oxylipin profile of dairy cows suffering from different degrees of systemic inflammation in the early postpartum period is lacking and can help advance knowledge on potential mechanisms leading to excessive inflammation. The objective of this preliminary study was to evaluate the plasma oxylipin profile of cows classified in 1 of 4 systemic inflammation categories based on plasma haptoglobin (Hp) concentrations assessed on days in milk (DIM) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7, in addition to the presence or absence of metritis within 10 DIM, and of cows without any clinical diseases within 21 DIM. Groups were classified as follows: (1) cows with a peak Hp concentration ≤3 DIM (EarlyHp) and diagnosed with metritis; (2) cows with a peak Hp concentration 3 < DIM ≤7 (LateHp) and diagnosed with metritis; (3) cows suffering from persistently elevated Hp concentrations assessed on DIM 4 and 7 while remaining apparently healthy during the first 21 DIM (PersistentHp); and (4) apparently healthy cows not suffering from persistently elevated Hp concentrations (LowHp). Six cows from each category were randomly selected from a plasma bank of a parent cohort study including 380 multiparous cows. Plasma samples on DIM 1 and 2, 3 and 4, and 5 and 7 were proportionally pooled to create 3 samples per cow for lipidomic analysis (i.e., pool 1 = DIM 1 and 2; pool 2 = DIM 3 and 4; pool 3: DIM 5 and 7). Statistical analyses were performed using SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.) and least squares means adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Tukey-Kramer test. Comparisons for EarlyHp and LateHp were only performed on pooled samples from DIM 1 and 2 (i.e., before metritis diagnosis). EarlyHp cows had decreased concentrations of 9(S)-HOTrE compared with LowHp cows of DIM 1-2 pooled samples. LateHp cows had decreased concentrations of 9(10)-DiHOME compared with LowHp cows. Next, we sought to investigate whether cows classified as PersistentHp had time-dependent differences in oxylipin profile versus LowHp cows. PersistentHp cows had decreased concentrations of 19(R)-HETE compared with LowHp cows in a time-dependent manner (only in pooled samples from DIM 5 and 7). Our results identified oxylipins of interest that warrant further investigation to elucidate their in vitro and in vivo functions in the postpartum inflammatory process of dairy cows.

Comparison of an image cytometry somatic cell count analyzer to a flow cytometry analyzer.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of a small footprint benchtop somatic cell counter based on image cytometry (LactiCyte HD; Page and Pedersen International Ltd., Hopkinton, MA) against a flow cytometer employed at a regional dairy herd improvement (DHI) laboratory. Milk samples collected during monthly DHI testing were split into 2 samples. One sample was evaluated using flow cytometry (Bentley SomaCount FCM; Bentley Instruments, Chaska, MN) at the regional DHI laboratory, whereas the other was evaluated using image cytometry at 2 different image levels (full number of images, 16 pictures per slide; half number of images, 8 pictures per slide). Mean bias of the image cytometer at 16 images was -15,500 cells/mL, whereas at 8 images the bias was 21,800 cells/mL. When considering only cell counts ≤400,000 cells per mL, the bias for both imaging resolutions was positive, meaning the image cytometer read higher than the flow cytometer. Both imaging resolutions (16 and 8) had a concordance correlation coefficient greater than 0.95. Considering ≥200,000 cells/mL to be indicative of subclinical mammary gland infection, the sensitivity and specificity of the image cytometer at 16 images were 92.0% and 91.7%, whereas the sensitivity and specificity of the analyzer at 8 images were 92.0% and 85.7%, respectively. Method precision (repeatability; coefficients of variation) were calculated at 3 different somatic cell counts (100,000, 200,000, and 400,000 cells/mL) where each sample was run repeatedly 12 times. When analyzed at the full number of images the coefficients of variation were 16.9%, 11.7%, and 10.9% for 100,000, 200,000, and 400,000 cells/mL, respectively. Analysis at half the number of images resulted in coefficients of variation of 18.9%, 24.8%, and 8.7% for 100,000, 200,000, and 400,000 cells/mL. We conclude that the image cytometer is an acceptable somatic cell count analyzer for on-farm use for applications such as screening cows for microbiological testing, and that precision is superior when the analysis is performed at the full number of images allowed by the instrument.