Beyond Metabolism: Role of the Immune System in Hepatic Toxicity.

The liver is primarily thought of as a metabolic organ; however, the liver is also an important mediator of immunological functions. Key perspectives on this emerging topic were presented in a symposium at the 2018 annual meeting of the American College of Toxicology entitled "Beyond metabolism: Role of the immune system in hepatic toxicity." Viral hepatitis is an important disease of the liver for which insufficient preventive vaccines exist. Host immune responses inadequately clear these viruses and often potentiate immunological inflammation that damages the liver. In addition, the liver is a key innate immune organ against bacterial infection. Hepatocytes and immune cells cooperatively control systemic and local bacterial infections. Conversely, bacterial infection can activate multiple types of immune cells and pathways to cause hepatocyte damage and liver injury. Finally, the immune system and specifically cytokines and drugs can interact in idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. This rare disease can result in a disease spectrum that ranges from mild to acute liver failure. The immune system plays a role in this disease spectrum.

Acute Phase Responses to Novel, Investigational Vaccines in Toxicology Studies: The Relationship Between C-Reactive Protein and Other Acute Phase Proteins.

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of investigational vaccine candidates on acute-phase proteins (APPs) as determined in GLP toxicology studies. Sixty-four GLP toxicity studies, which were submitted to the Food and Drug Administration from 2008 to 2012 in support of proposed clinical investigations, were reviewed and entered into a database. These studies employed the intramuscular route of injection and were conducted using New Zealand White rabbits. A retrospective review of these GLP toxicity studies was conducted to evaluate the changes in plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, and albumin as APPs following the administration of various investigational vaccines. The incidence and intensity of responses associated with acute-phase responses both positive and negative were observed to increase in animals when treated with vaccines containing more potent immunological components such as novel adjuvants that activate Toll-like receptors in the investigational vaccine products. Changes in plasma levels of CRP were prominent among these responses and provided a basis to propose a classification scheme of H, M, L, and N responding groups. These changes in plasma proteins reflect an activation of the acute-phase response and indicate increasing levels of systemic inflammation, which potentially may be correlated with important clinical adverse events.

New era in drug interaction evaluation: US Food and Drug Administration update on CYP enzymes, transporters, and the guidance process.

Predicting clinically significant drug interactions during drug development is a challenge for the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies. Since the publication of the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) first in vitro and in vivo drug interaction guidance documents in 1997 and 1999, researchers and clinicians have gained a better understanding of drug interactions. This knowledge has enabled the FDA and the industry to progress and begin to overcome these challenges. The FDA has continued its efforts to evaluate methodologies to study drug interactions and communicate recommendations regarding the conduct of drug interaction studies, particularly for CYP-based and transporter-based drug interactions, to the pharmaceutical industry. A drug interaction Web site was established to document the FDA's current understanding of drug interactions (http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/drugInteractions/default.htm). This report provides an overview of the evolution of the drug interaction guidances, includes a synopsis of the steps taken by the FDA to revise the original drug interaction guidance documents, and summarizes and highlights updated sections in the current guidance document, Drug Interaction Studies-Study Design, Data Analysis, and Implications for Dosing and Labeling.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in the development of therapeutic proteins.

With an increasing number of therapeutic proteins moving into preclinical and clinical development, pharmacokinetic factors play an important role in the development of these macromolecules. It is also important that the pharmacokinetic evaluation of these compounds be done as accurately as possible. For macromolecules, evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters is often complicated by a number of factors. Bioanalytical methods are essential for any pharmacokinetic study, but for many therapeutic proteins the immunoassay and bioassay methodologies are often nonspecific and sometimes the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters becomes assay dependent. In vivo binding proteins, metabolites and antibody formation may also interfere with bioanalytical methodologies and thus may have significant impact on the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic proteins. There are also difficulties in identifying and quantifying metabolites as well as the binding of therapeutic proteins to endogenous proteins. Some macromolecules exhibit species specificity that complicates the preclinical pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of these compounds. Antibody formation is a particular problem in the preclinical evaluation of therapeutic proteins. Changes in structure or sequence of protein molecules (glycosylation or pegylation) may cause changes in the pharmacokinetics of these compounds. The size of therapeutic proteins may become a hindrance for absorption. Low absorption of intact molecules across biological membranes frequently occurs. Other factors that may affect the pharmacokinetics of a therapeutic protein are immunogenicity, presence of endogenous protein, time of drug administration, and rate and site of drug delivery. The relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutic proteins is complex and in most cases is unclear. In many cases the mechanism and site of action are unknown for these compounds.

Animal models to assess the toxicity, immunogenicity and effectiveness of candidate influenza vaccines.

INTRODUCTION: Every year, > 100 million doses of licensed influenza vaccine are administered worldwide, with relatively few serious adverse events reported. Initiatives to manufacture influenza vaccines on different platforms have come about to ensure timely production of strain-specific as well as universal vaccines. To prevent adverse events that may be associated with these new vaccines, it is important to evaluate the toxicity of new formulations in animal models. AREAS COVERED: This review outlines preclinical studies that evaluate safety, immunogenicity and effectiveness of novel products to support further development and clinical trials. This has been done through a review of the latest literature describing vaccines under development. EXPERT OPINION: The objective of preclinical safety tests is to demonstrate the absence of toxic contaminants and adventitious agents. Additional tests that characterize vaccine content more completely, or demonstrate the absence of exacerbated disease following virus challenge in vaccinated animals, may provide additional data to ensure the safety of new vaccine strategies.