Creating a personalized evaluation framework for patient-reported outcomes: an illustration using the EQ-5D visual analogue scale.

BACKGROUND: This paper outlines the creation of an intuitive, personalized evaluation framework for Patient-Reported Outcomes, using the EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) as an illustration. METHODS: A draft framework asked patients to divide and label the EQ-5D-VAS into different levels or categories of health. Comprehension of the framework and patient-defined health level labels, and how they map onto the EQ-5D-VAS, were tested through in-person, semi-structured interviews with individuals self-reporting cardiovascular disease. Interviews were conducted in three waves, with the framework revised between waves. RESULTS: Analyses included 14 participants. Eight participants (57.1%) felt that four levels of health were appropriate and there was general agreement on the labels; Poor, Fair, Good, and Excellent. There was substantial variability in where patients drew lines to indicate the level boundaries; Poor ranged between 0 and 50; Fair 10-75; Good 40-91; Excellent 60-100. In wave 3, all participants demonstrated appropriate comprehension of the framework. CONCLUSIONS: The framework was well understood. The wide range of margins and the extent of overlap between the levels provide strong evidence for the relevance of the personalized evaluation framework approach, and specifically a personalized EQ-5D-VAS evaluation framework, to better understand and interpret each individual's response to the item.

The effect of bupropion on nicotine craving and withdrawal.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Bupropion has demonstrated efficacy for smoking cessation. Given the importance of nicotine craving and withdrawal in the smoking cessation process, the current study examined the effects of bupropion on these parameters during smoking abstinence. METHODS: During a 2-day Baseline phase with ad lib smoking, 91 non-depressed smokers (who were not trying to quit permanently) were administered measures of nicotine craving, withdrawal symptoms, and timed measures of cognitive performance five times daily. Participants were then assigned randomly to a 14-day treatment regimen with bupropion 300 mg/day, bupropion 150 mg/day, or placebo. Thereafter, the above measures were re-administered during 3 days of abstinence on a closed research ward. RESULTS: Relative to placebo, 300 mg bupropion significantly reduced abstinence-associated increases in rated depression, difficulty concentrating, and irritability, and attenuated a decrease in positive affect. The results also suggested that bupropion might have a positive effect on performance measures during the withdrawal period. No effects were observed on craving, anxiety, restlessness, or hunger. The lack of findings on craving measures may be explained by a floor effect; except on the first day of abstinence, neither drug nor placebo groups showed much craving elevation during abstinence. CONCLUSIONS: Study results indicate that bupropion ameliorates some nicotine withdrawal symptoms.

Dynamic effects of self-efficacy on smoking lapse and relapse.

Self-efficacy (SE) is thought to be critical to success in smoking cessation both as an individual difference and as a dynamic process after a quit attempt. In this study, 214 smokers used palm-top computers to record day-to-day variations in SE during 4 weeks after quitting. SE remained at high and stable levels prior to a 1st lapse but decreased and became more variable thereafter. The authors used event history models with time-varying covariates to assess the effect of daily SE on lapse and relapse risk. Daily SE measures predicted an initial lapse on the subsequent day. However, this relationship was accounted for by stable baseline differences in SE (assessed by questionnaire), rather than by day-to-day dynamics in SE. Progression from 1st lapse to relapse was also examined. In this instance, daily SE predicted subsequent relapse risk, even when baseline SE and concurrent smoking were accounted for, suggesting the importance of SE dynamics for this stage of the relapse process.

Comparative efficacy of 24-hour and 16-hour transdermal nicotine patches for relief of morning craving.

AIMS: To compare a transdermal nicotine patch designed for 24-hour wear with one designed for 16-hour wear for relief of craving and withdrawal, particularly in the morning hours. DESIGN: Smokers were randomly assigned to use one of two common patch regimens: NicoDerm/NiQuitin (24-hour wear, 21 mg nicotine) or Nicotrol/Nicorette (16-hour wear, 15 mg). In a double-dummy design, participants wore two patches during the day, one active, one placebo and one patch while sleeping. SETTING: A smoking cessation research clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and forty-four smokers who suffered morning cravings. INTERVENTION: Two patch formulations approved and marketed for over-the-counter use in the US--NicoDerm CQ (labeled as 21 mg over 24 hours) and Nicotrol (labeled as 15 mg over 16 hours)--were each used according to its instructions. Smokers also received behavioral counseling. MEASUREMENTS: For a week of baseline and 2 weeks after quitting, smokers used palm-top computers to assess craving and withdrawal symptoms several times each day. FINDINGS: The 21 mg/24-hour patch yielded consistently better control of craving, not only during the morning hours, but throughout the day, and over the 2-week period of abstinence. Additionally, the 21 mg/24-hour patch yielded greater reductions in anxiety, irritability and restlessness. Smokers using the 21 mg/24-hour dosing regimen also experienced longer abstinence than those using the 15 mg/16-hour patch. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that 24-hour dosing with a 21 mg patch affords superior relief of craving and withdrawal during the first 2 weeks of abstinence, when symptoms are at their peak, and when relapse is most likely. They confirm the importance of dosing parameters in nicotine replacement products.

Does smoking abstinence self-efficacy vary across situations? Identifying context-specificity within the Relapse Situation Efficacy Questionnaire.

According to self-efficacy and relapse theories. abstinence self-efficacy (ASE) ratings should be context-specific: they should vary across situations. This variability may be important, as it could signal high-risk for relapse situations. In this study, confirmatory factor analysis was used to identify situational variability in a novel ASE assessment (Relapse Situation Efficacy Questionnaire. or RSEQ). Results supported a hierarchical structure, where both context-specific and unidimensional measures of ASE exist within the assessment. Context-specific factors included Negative Affect, Positive Affect, Restrictive Situations (to smoking). Idle Time, Social-Food Situations, Low Arousal, and Craving. Multiple context-specific factors and the aggregate factor predicted cessation outcome, even after controlling for concurrent smoking rate. However, the context rated with the least confidence proved to be the best outcome predictor, suggesting the existence of "Achilles' heel" situations. These data indicate the internal and predictive validity of the RSEQ.