Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 161 Suppl 3: 78-84, 2009 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19775361

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Skin cancers represent a major challenge within the ever growing group of long time surviving organ transplant recipients (OTR) world wide. Especially UV-induced non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) like invasive squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and actinic keratoses (AK), and basal cell carcinoma (BCC), outnumber every other form of cancer in organ transplant recipients. Despite encouraging reports of protective effects of broad-spectrum sunscreens in immunocompetent patients, evidence for the prevention of NMSC in immunocompromised patients is still missing. OBJECTIVES: To assess preventive effects of regular sun-screen use on AK, SCC and BCC in chronically immunocompromised organ transplant recipients. METHODS: Hundred and twenty matched (age, sex, skin type, graft, transplant duration, previous post-transplant skin malignancies) organ transplant recipients (40 heart, 40 kidney, 40 liver grafted) were recruited for this prospective, single-center study. Both groups received equally written and oral information on sun protection measures. Sixty patients were provided with a free broad spectrum study-sunscreen (SPF>50, high-UVA absorption) for daily application of 2 mg cm(-2) to the head, neck, forearms, and hands. RESULTS: All 120 patients completed the 24 months study. Within this 24 month study interval 42 of the 120 patients developed 82 new AK (-102 sunscreen group vs. +82 control; P<0.01), 8 new invasive SCC (0 vs. 8; P<0.01) and 11 BCC (2 vs. 9; ns). In spite of equal numbers of AK at baseline, a marked difference in favor of the intent-to-treat sunscreen group was recorded after 24 months (89 vs. 273; P<0.01, mean difference 3.07 [1.76-4.36]) and the lesion count was significantly lower as compared to the initial visit (89 vs. 191; P<0.01, mean difference 1.7 [0.68-2.72]). With an average of 5.6 applications per week throughout the 24 months the study sunscreen was generally well tolerated. Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels as marker for vitamin D status were decreased in all patients without adequate substitution and 25(OH)D was found to be lower in the sunscreen-group as compared to the control group (mean value 53 ng mL(-1) vs. 60 ng mL(-1)). INTERPRETATION: Regular use of sunscreens, as part of a consequent UV-protection strategy, may prevent the development of further AK and invasive SCC and, to a lesser degree, BCC in immune-compromised organ transplant recipients.


Assuntos
Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Ceratose Actínica/prevenção & controle , Transplante de Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Protetores Solares/administração & dosagem , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma Basocelular/prevenção & controle , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Ceratose Actínica/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Cutâneas/imunologia , Deficiência de Vitamina D/etiologia
2.
Am J Transplant ; 8(9): 1891-900, 2008 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18786232

RESUMO

Organ transplant recipients have a higher incidence of melanoma compared to the general population but the prognosis of this potentially fatal skin cancer in this group of patients has not yet been established. To address this, we undertook a multicenter retrospective analysis to assess outcome for 100 melanomas (91 posttransplant and 9 pretransplant) in 95 individuals. Data were collected in 14 specialist transplant dermatology clinics across Europe belonging to the Skin Care in Organ Transplant Patients, Europe (SCOPE) Network, and compared with age, sex, tumor thickness and ulceration status-matched controls from the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) melanoma database. Outcome for posttransplant melanoma was similar to that of the general population for T1 and T2 tumors (< or = 2 mm thickness); but was significantly worse for T3 and T4 tumors (> 2 mm thickness); all nine individuals with a pretransplant melanoma survived without disease recurrence following organ transplantation. These data have implications for both cutaneous surveillance in organ transplant recipients and management of transplant-associated melanoma.


Assuntos
Melanoma , Transplante de Órgãos , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Oculares/etiologia , Neoplasias Oculares/patologia , Neoplasias Oculares/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Melanoma/patologia , Melanoma/cirurgia , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Br J Dermatol ; 156 Suppl 3: 40-2, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17488405

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) represents a significant cause of morbidity in organ transplant patients; the relative risk of squamous cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis (AK) is 100 and 250 times higher, respectively, compared with immunocompetent patients. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 3% diclofenac gel on the clearance rates of multiple AKs in organ transplant recipients (OTRs). PATIENTS/METHODS: An open-label study was conducted in six patients (three kidney, one liver and two heart transplant patients) with histories of multiple NMSCs and extensive actinic keratoses (AKs). Patients were treated with diclofenac 3% gel, twice daily for 16 weeks. Complete and partial clearance rates of AKs were assessed after 16 weeks and biopsies were performed 4 weeks post-therapy on clinically typical AKs identified prior to the start of treatment. RESULTS: Three out of six patients showed complete clinical and histological clearance after 16 weeks of treatment with diclofenac 3% gel. Two further patients showed a marked (> or = 75% lesion reduction) improvement in their overall AK lesion count in the treatment area. One patient showed a 30% lesion reduction in the area treated. Local adverse events at the site of application were very mild and included mild erythema and marginal erosion. No systemic side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that diclofenac 3% gel may be useful in the treatment and control of multiple AK lesions in OTRs. Further studies are needed to investigate the efficacy and safety of this therapy for the local treatment of AK in greater numbers of immunosuppressed patients.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Diclofenaco/administração & dosagem , Ceratose/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante , Administração Tópica , Géis , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA