Leucocyte filtration of salvaged blood during cardiac surgery: effect on red blood cell function in concentrated blood compared with diluted blood.

OBJECTIVE: Leucocyte filtration of salvaged blood has been suggested to prevent patients from receiving activated leucocytes during auto-transfusion in cardiac surgery. This study examines whether leucocyte filtration of salvaged blood affects the red blood cell (RBC) function and whether there is a difference between filtration of the concentrated and diluted blood on RBC function. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were randomly divided into a group receiving leucocyte filtration of concentrated blood (High-Hct, n=20) and another group receiving leucocyte filtration of the diluted blood (Low-Hct, n=20). During operation, all the salvaged blood, as well as the residual blood, from the heart-lung machine was filtered. In the High-Hct group, blood was concentrated with a cell saver prior to filtration, whereas in the Low-Hct group, blood was filtered without concentration. RBC function was represented by RBC aggregation and deformability measured by a laser-assisted optical rotational cell analyser and by the RBC 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) contents with conventional biochemical tests. RESULTS: Leucocyte filtration of diluted blood with a low haematocrit (14+/-4%) did not affect RBC function. However, when the concentrated blood with a high haematocrit (69+/-12%) was filtered, there was a reduction of ATP content in RBCs after passing through the filter (from 1.45+/-0.57 micromol g(-1) Hb to 0.92+/-0.75 micromol g(-1) Hb, p<0.05). For patients who received the concentrated blood, their in vivo RBC function did not differ from those who received diluted blood. CONCLUSIONS: Leucocyte filtration of the diluted salvaged blood during cardiac surgery does not affect RBC function, but it tends to deplete the ATP content of RBCs as the salvaged blood has been concentrated prior to filtration.

Influence of mechanical cell salvage on red blood cell aggregation, deformability, and 2,3-diphosphoglycerate in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical cell salvage is increasingly used during cardiac surgery. Although this procedure is considered safe, it is unknown whether it affects the red blood cell (RBC) function, especially the RBC aggregation, deformability, and the contents of 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG). This study examines the following: (1) whether the cell salvage procedure influences RBC function; and (2) whether retransfusion of the salvaged blood affects RBC function in patients. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were randomly allocated to a cell saver group (n = 20) or a control group (n = 20). In the cell saver group, the blood aspirated from the wound area and the residual blood from the heart-lung machine were processed with a continuous-flow cell saver before retransfusion. In the control group this blood was retransfused without processing. The RBC aggregation and deformability were measured with a laser-assisted optical rotational cell analyzer and 2,3,-DPG by conventional laboratory test. RESULTS: The cell saver procedure did not influence the RBC aggregation but significantly reduced the RBC deformability (p = 0.007) and the content of RBC 2,3-DPG (p = 0.032). However, in patients receiving the processed blood, their intraoperative and postoperative RBC aggregation, deformability, and 2,3-DPG content did not differ from those of the control patients. Both groups of patients had a postoperative drop of RBC function as a result of hemodilution. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanical cell salvage procedure reduces the RBC deformability and the cell 2,3-DPG content. Retransfusion of the processed blood by cell saver does not further compromise the RBC function in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Clinical efficacy and biocompatibility of three different leukocyte and fat removal filters during cardiac surgery.

Activated leukocytes and fat particles are associated with organ injury after a cardiac surgery. Filters are currently used to remove either leukocytes or fat particles. A novel approach with a filter that combines leukocyte and fat removal might be clinically useful. As it is not known which type of filter has a good and safe performance in both leukocyte and fat removal, we measured in this study the leukocyte and fat removal properties and the biocompatibility of three different filters. We used six Pall RS1 (Pall, Portsmouth, England) leukocyte removal filters, six Pall LipiGuard fat removal filters, and six Fresenius Biofil 02 (Fresenius, Emmer-Compascuum, The Netherlands) leukocyte removal filters and measured the passage times of 500 and 1000 mL of residual heart-lung machine blood. We determined the circulating leukocyte and platelet counts, and total hemoglobin, triglyceride, and free fatty acid concentration after the filters. In addition, we measured free hemoglobin, plasma elastase (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and complement C5-9 (Quidel, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.) to assess the biocompatibility of the filters. The circulating fat particles were calculated with an automated hematology analyzer. The passage time for the blood was shortest for the Biofil filter (P = 0.02, analysis of variance). The total leukocyte counts (P = 0.04) and fat particles (P = 0.02) were higher after the LipiGuard filter. This filter also had a higher increase in free hemoglobin concentration (P = 0.03). We conclude that the leukocyte removal filters were superior to the fat removal filter both in leukocyte and fat removal.