The Extraperitoneal Approach to Left-Sided Colorectal Rectal Resections: EXPERTS Procedure.

BACKGROUND: Current transperitoneal approaches to colorectal resections can be technically challenging, especially in obese patients. The head-down position can lead to rare but serious complications, e.g. compartment syndrome and brachial plexus injuries. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of a novel extraperitoneal approach in patients requiring anterior resection. METHODS: The extraperitoneal left-sided approach was performed in the supine position. A 5 cm LIF incision was created into which a Gelpoint port was inserted. The full video of the procedure is embedded in the QR code below. The procedure was performed by three surgeons with experience in minimally invasive surgery. Patients requiring left colonic resections were prospectively selected over a 2-year period. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were prospectively assessed between March 2020 and April 2022; 26 were males, with a median age of 67 (55-88) years. The average body mass index (BMI) was 30 (22-40). 38/41 cases were cancers and three were diverticular diseases; 31 cases had anterior resection and 11 had sigmoid colectomies. Peak airway pressures were significantly less (10 cmH20) in the supine position compared with the head-down position (p < 0.0001). Median time to identify the ureter and gonadal vessels was 23 (3-55) min, and median time to return of bowel function and length of stay was 2 (0-13) and 5 (IQR 3-7) days, respectively. No intraoperative complications or postoperative mortality occurred within 90 days of discharge. Three patients had anastomotic complications, and an R0 resection was achieved in all 38 cancer patients. The median lymph node count was 16. CONCLUSION: Extraperitoneal surgery for left colonic resections is safe and clinically feasible, and allows for early identification of important retroperitoneal structures.

The Extraperitoneal Approach to Left-Sided Colorectal Resections: A Human Cadaveric Study.

INTRODUCTION: Technical challenges during laparoscopic and robotic anterior resection include identification of key retroperitoneal structures and obtaining clear views of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) pedicle and total mesorectal excision (TME) plane. Steep head-down position improves surgical exposure but is associated with cerebral oedema, high intrapulmonary pressures, and rare neurological complications. In this article we describe the key steps of an anterior resection performed via the extra-peritoneal (XP) space in the supine position. METHODS: The technique of same-side lateral-to-medial XP dissection has been developed and refined in serial cadaveric workshops. A standard periumbilical port is inserted for initial laparoscopic exploration. Dissection is then performed in the left XP space via a 5 cm skin incision (later used as the extraction site) to allow for insertion of four (latterly three) working ports. The colon is mobilized along its lateral attachments, reflecting retroperitoneal structures down and away. The IMA pedicle is taken proximally, next to the duodenum. If required, TME dissection can be continued in the same plane. A short intraperitoneal phase is then required to complete the procedure. RESULTS: Eight cadavers were studied (seven males; median 78 y). Four operations were performed laparoscopically and four robotically. Excellent views of the key retroperitoneal structures were achieved early in the procedure. Anatomical identification was performed sequentially for left-sided structures-psoas tendon, gonadal vessel, ureter, common iliac artery, IMA, and duodenum before ligation of the IMA pedicle. High ligation of IMA on the aorta and splenic flexure mobilization were performed in all eight procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This novel study shows it is feasible to perform the key steps of an anterior resection using the XP space in the supine position. This will reduce the need for steep head-down positioning which may have meaningful clinical benefits. Prospective clinical studies are required to validate the technique within a patient population.